Connect with us
Advertisement
Advertisement

international news

Starmer rocked by Mandelson row as Epstein links spark police probe

Published

on

PM admits he knew of Mandelson’s post-conviction friendship with Jeffrey Epstein as questions mount over vetting and national security

IT took three attempts for Kemi Badenoch to get a straight answer, but when the Prime Minister finally responded, what remained of his authority appeared to drain away.

At Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday (Feb 4), the Conservative leader targeted the vetting process behind Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK’s ambassador to Washington. The line of attack was widely anticipated. Equally predictable were Keir Starmer’s attempts to deflect.

Eventually, however, disclosure proved unavoidable. The Prime Minister confirmed that when he appointed Mandelson, he already knew that the former Cabinet minister had maintained a friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for child sex offences.

A packed House of Commons audibly gasped.

Whatever political cover Downing Street hoped to create by suggesting Mandelson had repeatedly misled questioners about the relationship quickly evaporated. The reality was stark. Those responsible for the appointment knew that Mandelson’s association with Epstein had continued after conviction, imprisonment and release — and still judged him suitable for Britain’s most sensitive diplomatic post.

That decision now raises profound questions about the Prime Minister’s judgment and the advice he received from senior officials and security services.

As MP after MP rose to speak, common themes emerged. Conservative members described the appointment as reckless. Labour backbenchers said it demonstrated a callous disregard for Epstein’s victims. Others questioned whether proper security warnings had been heeded at all.

When Mandelson was later removed from the Washington role, the Government claimed the decision followed “new revelations” about his association with Epstein. That explanation was left in tatters by the Prime Minister’s admission that the relationship was already known.

Yet the Epstein connection may not be the most politically damaging element of the affair.

During the 2008 financial crisis, taxpayers rescued Britain’s banking system after years of reckless risk-taking. Public anger led ministers to propose a 50% tax on bankers’ bonuses. Papers from the so-called Epstein files suggest that while serving as Business Secretary in Gordon Brown’s Cabinet, Mandelson briefed Epstein on confidential discussions about that tax.

One email indicates he even advised that a senior US banker should “slightly threaten” then-Chancellor Alistair Darling over the proposal.

Labour MP Emily Thornberry was among those who branded the conduct “treachery”.

Further disclosures suggest Mandelson also shared market-sensitive information about the 2010 General Election, including the progress of coalition negotiations and advance notice that Brown would step down. Even if intended as political gossip, such information could have delivered a significant trading advantage to well-placed investors.

Whether profits were made is beside the point. The mere possibility that privileged Cabinet intelligence reached a convicted sex offender is politically toxic.

Now the Metropolitan Police Service has launched an investigation into whether any criminal offences were committed, placing the Prime Minister in an increasingly awkward position. Detectives have warned against the release of potentially relevant documents, complicating calls for full transparency.

Although the Intelligence and Security Committee will review the material, public confidence may already be too badly shaken.

Mandelson’s long and controversial career in public life appears finished. The unresolved question is whether his downfall will drag the Prime Minister down with him.

With Labour sliding in the polls, internally divided, facing elections in Scotland and Wales and a looming by-election in Manchester, the political crunch may not be far away.

 

international news

Can Starmer keep Britain out of a wider war?

Published

on

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer is walking an increasingly delicate diplomatic tightrope as tensions in the Middle East threaten to spill into a broader international conflict.

Speaking at a press conference on Monday (Mar 16), Starmer repeatedly declined to be drawn into speculation about military escalation, stressing that any potential effort to reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz would not be a NATO operation but rather “an alliance of partners”.

The narrow waterway between Iran and Oman is one of the most important shipping routes in the world, with around a fifth of global oil supplies passing through it.

Recent tensions in the region have raised fears that disruption there could trigger a major international crisis.

But Starmer’s message was clear: Britain will support efforts to keep trade routes open while avoiding being pulled into a full-scale conflict.

When asked directly about comments made by former US President Donald Trump suggesting NATO allies should help reopen the strait, Starmer refused to engage in the escalating rhetoric.

Instead, he emphasised diplomacy and cooperation.

“It’s not straightforward,” the Prime Minister said, adding that discussions with international partners were ongoing.

Observers noted that Starmer also avoided responding to speculation about potential military commitments, a move widely interpreted as an attempt to prevent Britain being boxed into a position before negotiations with allies are complete.

Relations with Washington

Starmer was also pressed by journalists about his relationship with Donald Trump, who has been increasingly critical of some NATO allies.

Asked to rate their relationship on a scale of one to ten, the Prime Minister said simply that it was “a good relationship”.

“We’re strong allies and have been for decades,” he said, adding that his responsibility was always to act “in the best interests of Britain”.

Despite the diplomatic language, the exchange underlined the growing pressure facing the UK government as global tensions rise.

The United States has been urging partners to support efforts to secure key shipping routes, while some European leaders remain cautious about the risks of escalation.

Energy and economic stakes

The stakes are not purely military.

Any disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could have immediate consequences for global energy markets, pushing up fuel costs and inflation.

That prospect is already weighing heavily on governments across Europe.

At the same press conference, Starmer announced new financial support for households struggling with rising heating costs and outlined plans to strengthen regulation of the heating oil market.

The move was widely seen as preparation for potential energy price shocks linked to instability in the Middle East.

A careful balancing act

For Starmer, the challenge now is balancing Britain’s commitments to international allies with a public that remains wary of overseas military entanglements after conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

So far, the Prime Minister appears determined to keep the UK involved diplomatically while resisting pressure to escalate militarily.

Whether that position can hold if tensions in the region worsen remains the key question facing Downing Street.

For now, Starmer’s strategy is clear: support allies, protect global trade routes — but avoid sliding into a wider war.

 

Continue Reading

international news

UK considers military options as pressure grows to secure Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

Ministers confirm talks with allies after Donald Trump calls on Britain to help protect vital oil shipping route

THE UK GOVERNMENT is examining “all options” to help secure the Strait of Hormuz as tensions in the Middle East threaten one of the world’s most important oil routes.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said Britain is already in discussions with allies, including the United States, about how to restore safe navigation through the narrow shipping corridor, through which around one fifth of the world’s oil supply passes.

Speaking on BBC One’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Miliband said reopening the strait was a global priority but stressed the government favours de-escalation rather than military confrontation.

“It is very important that we get the Strait of Hormuz reopened,” he said. “We are in talks with allies about how to secure that key shipping route. Any options to help the Strait reopen are being looked at.”

Ed Miliband: Reopening the strait is a global priority

The comments come after US President Donald Trump called on several major powers — including the UK, France, Japan, South Korea and China — to send warships to the region to ensure the vital oil corridor can no longer be threatened by Iran.

The escalating conflict between the US, Israel and Iran has already led to attacks on shipping in the Gulf, raising fears that Tehran could attempt to block or severely disrupt the strait.

Political divisions in Westminster

The prospect of British military involvement has exposed sharp political divisions in Westminster.

Shadow energy secretary Claire Coutinho said the UK should explore deploying ships or surveillance drones to the region if doing so would protect Britain’s national interests.

She argued that keeping international shipping lanes open and protecting military assets abroad was vital for global stability and the UK economy.

However, Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey warned Britain should not automatically follow Washington into another conflict.

He said the quickest way to stabilise oil markets and secure the route was through diplomatic de-escalation rather than military intervention.

Davey also criticised President Trump’s approach to the crisis, warning the UK should not be “at the beck and call” of an American president.

Global oil supply at risk

The Strait of Hormuz is widely regarded as one of the most strategically important shipping routes in the world.

Bounded by Iran to the north and Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south, the narrow channel connects the oil-rich Gulf region to the Arabian Sea and global markets.

Around 3,000 vessels pass through the strait every month, carrying an estimated 20 million barrels of oil per day.

Any prolonged disruption could send global oil prices soaring and drive up fuel and energy costs in countries including the UK.

Government sources have warned the economic impact of the Middle East conflict could be “huge”, with ministers already examining measures to shield households and businesses from potential spikes in energy prices.

The developments are being closely watched in Pembrokeshire, home to the South Hook and Dragon LNG terminals at Milford Haven. Tankers carrying Qatari liquefied natural gas frequently pass through the Strait of Hormuz before reaching the UK, meaning any disruption in the Gulf could have implications for energy supplies and prices in Wales.

For now, the government insists diplomacy remains the preferred path — but with tensions rising and pressure from Washington increasing, Britain may soon face difficult choices about how far it is willing to go to secure the world’s most critical oil chokepoint.

 

Continue Reading

international news

Trump urges UK to send warships as Iran tightens grip on global oil route

Published

on

STRAIT OF HORMUZ CRISIS

US President Donald Trump has urged the United Kingdom to send warships to the Middle East to help secure the Strait of Hormuz as Iran’s retaliation in the ongoing conflict continues to disrupt one of the world’s most critical oil routes.

The call comes as shipping through the narrow waterway has effectively ground to a halt following missile, drone and mine attacks linked to the escalating war. Analysts say tanker traffic through the strait has fallen sharply since the fighting began.

Located between Iran and Oman, the Strait of Hormuz is the most important oil chokepoint on the planet. Normally around 20 million barrels of oil per day – roughly one fifth of global supply – pass through the route.

Since the war began in late February, numerous vessels have reportedly been damaged or forced to turn back, while many more have anchored outside the Gulf waiting for the situation to stabilise.

In practical terms, analysts say Iran has been able to use geography to exert enormous leverage over global energy markets.

“Iran cannot permanently close the Strait of Hormuz, but it doesn’t have to,” one maritime security expert said. “If tankers refuse to sail because of the risk of mines, drones or missiles, the effect is almost the same.”

President Trump said Western allies must act together to protect the shipping lanes.

“The UK should be sending warships to help secure the Strait of Hormuz,” he said, calling for an international effort to keep the route open.

The appeal places pressure on the British government to decide whether it will increase its naval presence in the region as tensions escalate.

Britain already maintains naval forces in the Middle East as part of maritime security operations aimed at protecting international trade.

However, the scale of the current disruption has raised fears of a major global energy shock.

Oil prices have surged as markets react to the sudden loss of shipments from the Gulf, with analysts warning that prolonged disruption could trigger wider economic consequences.

The conflict has also exposed the strategic advantage Iran holds through its position along the Strait of Hormuz.

Even without a formal blockade, threats from missiles, naval mines and fast-attack craft have been enough to deter much of the commercial traffic.

For now, Tehran appears able to exert pressure on the global economy simply by making the waterway too dangerous for ships to use.

That reality is now forcing governments around the world to consider military options to reopen the route – a move that could risk drawing more countries into an already widening conflict.

With energy markets rattled and tanker traffic stalled, the struggle for control of one of the world’s most vital maritime passages is rapidly becoming a defining front in the war.

 

Continue Reading

Education15 hours ago

New facilities open at Portfield School as redevelopment reaches key milestone

THE FIRST phase of a major redevelopment programme at Portfield School in Haverfordwest has been completed, marking a significant step...

News16 hours ago

£377m spent saving blast furnaces months after Port Talbot closure

Government intervention keeps UK’s last primary steelmaking furnaces running THE UK GOVERNMENT spent £377 million to prevent the closure of...

Sport1 day ago

France crowned Six Nations champions after extraordinary final-day drama

Ramos penalty in Paris seals title as Ireland fall just short and Wales end losing run FRANCE were crowned 2026...

News2 days ago

Fishguard linked to allegations in Many Tears Animal Rescue investigation

Claims about puppies arriving through Pembrokeshire port emerge as licensing probe continues FISHGUARD has been named in allegations linked to...

Local Government3 days ago

Investigation confirmed after inspectors visit Many Tears Animal Rescue

Licensing authority declines to comment as police confirm attendance at Carmarthenshire rescue centre AN INVESTIGATION is underway following a visit...

Business4 days ago

Work set to begin on £50m hydrogen plant in Milford Haven

A MAJOR new hydrogen production facility worth around £50 million is expected to begin construction in Milford Haven later this...

Education5 days ago

Manorbier school closure approved while insurance claim still unresolved

Council confirms negotiations with insurer ongoing following 2022 fire PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL has confirmed that negotiations with its insurer over...

Crime5 days ago

‘Knife attack’ at Spittal property leaves man in hospital

POLICE have arrested a woman following what is being described as a ‘knife attack’ at a property in Spittal on...

Community6 days ago

Pembrokeshire to receive its first banking hub in Pembroke Dock

LINK, the UK’s Cash Access and ATM network, has today announced local people and businesses in Pembroke Dock will benefit from a new banking...

Health7 days ago

Future of Withybush Hospital petition sparks urgent call for Senedd debate

CALLS have been made for an urgent debate in the Senedd over the future of services at Withybush Hospital as...

Popular This Week