A CALL to convert a former vineyard restaurant in rural Pembrokeshire to holiday lets as a form of small farm diversification has been refused.

In an application recommended for refusal at the March meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council’s planning committee, Barry Cadogan sought permission for a farm diversification and expansion of an existing holiday operation through the conversion of the former Cwm Deri vineyard production base and restaurant to three holiday lets at Oaklea, Martletwy.

It was recommended for refusal on the grounds the proposal “would introduce three new self-catering accommodation units within a countryside location which is not considered to be a proportionate amount of development to support a farm enterprise of limited scale”.

It had previously been recommended for refusal at the December planning committee but was deferred pending a site visit.

An officer report then said that, while the scheme was suggested as a form of farm diversification for the 36-acre farm, no detail had been provided in the form of a business case.

Speaking at that meeting, agent Andrew Vaughan-Harries of Hayston Developments & Planning Ltd, said the former Cwm Deri vineyard had been a very successful business, with a shop and a restaurant before it closed several years ago.

He said Mr Cadogan then bought the site, farming and running a small campsite of 20 spaces, but didn’t wish to run a café or a wine shop; arguing it would easily convert to holiday let use.

Speaking again at the March meeting, he said his applicant had now produced a business case, expecting the proposal would generate half the farm income, saying of the recommendation of refusal: “It almost seems like my client is punished for being a small farmer.”

He later added: “compared to a lot of farms in Pembrokeshire it is small; I think it’s very difficult to make a living out of 36 acres, he’s just a businessman trying to use a building.”

The business figure was debated, with estimations of the income ratio being closer to three-to-one in favour of the tourism side raised.

However, calls to go against officer recommendations and approve the scheme were moved by Cllr Brian Hall, who said the tourism operation was “the only thing that’s keeping him going at the moment,” adding: “I think we should give this applicant a chance; I think if we don’t do this a lot of these smallholdings are going to go out of business.”

Cllr Nick Neumann said the building not being used “doesn’t sit well with me,” warning: “I fear we are just making another building in our county redundant.”

Cllr Michael Williams, who had previously warned of the dangers about going against officer recommendations, saying it was time for a “reality check,” adding: “We have to determine this application as it is before us, not to look for ways round it; that’s the agent’s job.”

Committee chair Cllr Mark Carter, who had previously raised the three-to-one concern, said the business plan as received “doesn’t really stack up to show a form of farm diversification,” adding: “This new proposal with three units of holiday accommodation could well outstrip anything on the farming side by three-to-one.”

Cllr Hall’s call for approval was defeated by six votes to four, with the recommendation of refusal then taken, passing, also by six votes to four.

THE RETAIL workers’ union Usdaw has criticised opposition parties in the Senedd after Members representing the Conservatives, Reform UK and Plaid Cymru voted against granting legislative consent for the UK Government’s Crime and Policing Bill.

The legislation includes measures aimed at tackling anti-social behaviour and violent crime, including the introduction of Respect Orders, tougher penalties for low-value shoplifting and knife crime, and a specific offence covering assaults on retail workers.

Usdaw says it is now seeking clarification on whether the lack of Senedd consent means the measures will apply in Wales once the legislation is passed by the UK Parliament.

Joanne Thomas, general secretary of Usdaw, said: “It is difficult to understand why the main opposition parties in Wales would come together to oppose a new law to protect retail staff in the face of record incidents of shoplifting and very high levels of violence, threats and abuse against shop workers.

“We are now seeking clarification on whether the lack of Senedd consent will mean that these important measures will not apply in Wales when the legislation is passed in the UK Parliament.”

According to official crime statistics, police recorded 11,447 shoplifting offences in Wales in the year to March 2021. The latest figures show that number had risen to 23,009 by September last year.

Usdaw also highlighted findings from its survey of retail workers. Interim results from the union’s 2025 survey, based on 3,271 responses, found that in the previous 12 months 71 per cent of retail staff reported verbal abuse, 48 per cent said they had been threatened and nine per cent said they had been assaulted.

The union said that two-thirds of attacks on retail staff were triggered by incidents of theft or robbery.

Usdaw has campaigned for several years for stronger legal protections for shop workers through its “Freedom from Fear” campaign, which seeks measures to tackle violence, threats and abuse against retail staff.

The Crime and Policing Bill has already passed all stages in the House of Commons and is currently progressing through the House of Lords.

Opposition parties in the Senedd have argued that concerns over devolved powers and the legislative consent process influenced their decision not to support the motion.

The outcome has raised questions about how the legislation will apply in Wales once it completes its passage through the UK Parliament.

Labour claims opposition blocked protections for workers and tougher action on violence

PLAID CYMRU has come under criticism from Welsh Labour after voting against a motion supporting UK legislation aimed at strengthening protections for workers and tackling crime.

Members of the Senedd debated a Legislative Consent Motion relating to the UK Government’s Crime and Policing Bill on Tuesday (Mar 10). The bill includes measures intended to strengthen action against anti-social behaviour, knife crime, and violence against women and girls, as well as providing additional protections for retail and emergency workers.

Welsh Labour MSs voted in favour of the motion, while Plaid Cymru, the Conservatives, and Reform UK members opposed it.

The proposed legislation includes provisions to increase protections for shop workers and emergency staff from assault, strengthen powers to tackle anti-social behaviour and serious violence, address knife and drug-related crime, and improve safeguarding for children and vulnerable adults.

Welsh Labour politician Huw Irranca-Davies MS, who is standing as a candidate for Afan Ogwr Rhondda, criticised Plaid Cymru’s decision.

He said: “Plaid teamed up with the Tories and Reform to block this bill. They voted against stronger protections for retail workers, emergency workers, and vulnerable people in our communities.

“When there was a choice to vote to make Wales a safer place, Plaid and the other opposition voted against it. When there was a choice between backing tougher action on crime and creating a constitutional row, Plaid chose the row. Welsh Labour chose to back stronger protections and safer communities.”

He added that the vote showed what a Plaid-led government might prioritise.

“This shows exactly what a Plaid-led government would look like — putting political arguments ahead of practical action to keep people safe,” he said.

However, opposition parties have previously argued that votes against Legislative Consent Motions do not necessarily reflect opposition to the policy itself, but rather concerns about Westminster legislating in areas that overlap with devolved powers.

Plaid Cymru has often taken the position that Welsh laws affecting devolved matters should be made in the Senedd rather than by the UK Parliament.

The Crime and Policing Bill continues its passage through the UK Parliament.