A CALL for a 60-foot-long shed and stables at the proposed home of a gypsy traveller family near a Pembrokeshire village has been refused by planners.

In an application to Pembrokeshire County Council, Ryan Surname Boswell & Family, through agent Hayston Developments & Planning Ltd, sought provision for an access road and replacement of temporary stables and storage containers with a multi-purpose shed and stables at Greenwells, Cosheston Bridge, Cosheston.

The application initially sought a 24.3 by 9.1 metre building, which has now been reduced to 18.3m by nine.

A supporting statement said that land to the north “is subject to a current planning application for the provision of two traveller family pitches with improvements to access and ecological enhancements with other land in our client’s ownership being un-affected”.

It added: “Mr Boswell and his family are of traveller origin and intend to make this site their family home. They own various domestic equipment, children / family articles, mowers / tools and farming equipment that require secure storage. The shed will also be used to house horses/ponies that are currently stabled in the temporary wooden stable block currently on skids on the land in question.”

It concluded: “The scale, design and use of materials (and colours) of the proposed shed is comparable to many new such sheds throughout Pembrokeshire. There will be no significant negative impacts on the level of amenity enjoyed by any neighbours or those travelling along the minor county road to Cosheston from any aspects of the proposed development.”

Local community council Cosheston had raised concerns including the “excessive” size of the proposed building, feeling “this is on the large side of what is required for a couple of ponies”.

It added: “Our concern is that the applicant intends to run his building/property maintenance business from the property. If the council grants the application, restrictions should made on the property’s use. i.e. restricted to agricultural use only.

“We have no objection to the construction of a small stable block, similar in size to the existing one on site.”

Objections were also received from two members of the public, raising concerns including the scale, environmental concerns, and a potential conflict with the ongoing application.

An officer report recommending refusal said the scheme was part-retrospective due to the prior formation of an access track within the field.

It added: “Despite amendments to the application as originally submitted by the reduction in building footprint and scale, the proposal remains a substantial and visually intrusive structure in the open countryside. An essential countryside need has not been justified nor evidence provided of an agricultural or equine enterprise warranting a building of this size or permanence.”

The application was refused on the grounds it “is not typical of a structure intended solely for the storage of paraphernalia associated with grazing land or for equine use and no information has been provided within the application to demonstrate the functional need for a building of this scale”.

It added: “The nature, siting and scale of the building would not be compatible with the capacity and rural character of the site, and together with the access track results in an unjustified and visually intrusive form of development in the open countryside, which does not represent sustainable development.”

PLANS for three solar-powered parking meters at National Trust south Pembrokeshire beauty spots have been given the go-ahead by the national park.

In an application to Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, the National Trust, through agent Mott Macdonald Ltd, sought permission for replacement solar-powered parking meters, along with associated infrastructure including an Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) camera, at Broad Haven, Stackpole Quay, and Bosherston Lily Ponds carparks.

An officer recommending approval said it was intended to install a Solar Strada S5 Terminal parking meter at Broad Haven Carpark, an Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) camera and Solar Strada S5 Terminal at Stackpole Quay carpark, and a Solar Strada S5 Terminal parking meter at Bosherston Lily Ponds.

It added: “As there was a previous level of visual intrusion caused by the existing infrastructure, the proposed parking fee terminals are considered unlikely to exacerbate the existing level of visual impact caused by the existing pay and display terminals.

“The proposed installation of the solar parking fee terminals at Broadhaven, Stackpole Quay and Bosherston Lily Pond carpark and the ANPR camera at Stackpole Quay carpark are considered to be well designed in terms of scale, siting, visual amenity and biodiversity.”

The application for the three units was conditionally approved by park planners.

A HAVERFORDWEST teaching assistant became the quiet centrepiece of Welsh Labour’s manifesto launch — and, in doing so, revealed a party focused less on momentum than on damage limitation in towns like ours.

Eluned Morgan’s manifesto launch speech was meant to speak to the whole of Wales. But tucked inside it was a telling local calculation.

When the Welsh Labour leader told delegates about a teaching assistant in Haverfordwest who had “never voted in her life” but would now back Labour because of a pay rise, it was no throwaway line.

In political terms, it was no throwaway line. Morgan was invoking a voter from the very constituency battleground where Labour needs reassurance to cut through.

After years in power, Welsh Labour knows it cannot simply rely on habit, loyalty or anti-Tory feeling to carry it over the line. It needs to reconnect with lower-paid working people in towns like Haverfordwest — voters who may still support parts of Labour’s record, but are increasingly doubtful that life in Wales is getting better.

That is why Morgan’s speech mattered.

Far from sounding like a leader marching confidently towards victory, she sounded like someone trying to hold together a delicate coalition of public sector workers, traditional Labour supporters and anxious voters tempted by change, but wary of the alternatives.

The tone was revealing from the outset.

This was not a speech built on triumph. It was built on caution.

Morgan spoke of pressure on families, pressure on public services and pressure on her own party. She acknowledged that many voters feel something “isn’t quite right” and said people want “a little more certainty” and “a little less dread”.

That is not the language of a party taking victory for granted. It is the language of a party that knows it must steady nervous voters before polling day.

In that sense, the Haverfordwest example was politically shrewd.

Teaching assistants and school support staff are not just another part of the workforce. They are exactly the sort of voters Labour needs to keep onside — public-facing, often modestly paid, rooted in their communities and living the everyday pressures politicians talk about so freely.

By highlighting a Haverfordwest worker who had never voted before, Morgan was trying to tell a wider story: that Welsh Labour can still reach the ordinary voter who feels overlooked, underpaid and unconvinced by politics in general.

But there was another message buried in the anecdote.

Labour is plainly worried about disengagement.

A voter who has “never voted in her life” is useful in a speech not just because she is newly supportive, but because she represents a wider problem for all parties — the sense that many people have drifted away from politics altogether.

Morgan knows frustration with government in Cardiff Bay is real, especially after long-running complaints over NHS access, stretched public services, transport and the cost of living. Her answer was not to offer excitement, but reassurance.

That came through again and again.

She promised there would be no rise in income tax. She attacked “easy promises” and “slogans”. She said she would not “gamble” with people’s lives. She framed the election not as a call for upheaval, but as a choice between seriousness and protest.

In plain terms, Labour is trying to turn this election into a referendum on risk.

That is often what governing parties do when they sense frustration in the electorate, but hope voters remain more cautious about the opposition.

It also helps explain why west Wales featured so prominently in the speech.

Morgan promised a new hospital for west Wales as part of a wider NHS building programme. She also pledged that patients would be able to access a primary healthcare professional within 48 hours if they had a problem that could not wait.

Those lines will have landed strongly in Pembrokeshire, where concern over health services has become one of the most potent and emotional issues in local politics.

But they also expose Labour’s weakness.

After decades as the dominant force in Welsh politics, Labour is still having to promise basic improvements in areas where public frustration is already deepest. Voters may welcome those pledges, but many will also ask why, after all this time, they are still being asked to wait.

That is the central tension in Morgan’s speech.

She wants to campaign as both the agent of improvement and the guardian of stability. She is asking people to believe Labour can fix problems that have grown on Labour’s watch, while also arguing that nobody else can be trusted to take over.

It is not an impossible argument. But it is a difficult one.

For readers in Pembrokeshire, perhaps the most revealing thing about the speech is not just what it promised, but what it exposed.

It exposed a Welsh Labour leadership that knows west Wales matters.

It exposed a party that sees lower-paid workers and public service staff as central to its survival.

And it exposed a leader who understands that this election is not being fought on favourable ground.

The repeated slogan was “fairness you can feel”.

But the speech itself suggested something more hard-headed than hopeful.

Welsh Labour is no longer campaigning like a movement expecting gratitude. It is campaigning like a government asking voters, however frustrated they may be, not to take a chance on anything else.