THE BBC’s Director-General, Tim Davie, has confirmed that discussions are under way regarding the potential recovery of £200,000 from disgraced former news presenter Huw Edwards. Despite the request, Edwards, from Carmarthenshire has yet to return the money. The BBC is seeking to claw back the salary Edwards continued to receive after being arrested last November on charges related to indecent images of children.

Speaking before the House of Lords communications and digital committee on Tuesday, Mr Davie stated: “We’ve made the formal request, and I can’t go into too much detail, but discussions are under way. The money should be returned, and we have made the request.”

When pressed by the committee’s chair, Baroness Stowell, on whether a deadline had been set for Edwards, Mr Davie confirmed no formal timeline had been imposed. “But we do expect to make progress and get an answer,” he added.

The BBC first made the request for repayment in August, following Edwards’ suspension in July 2023 and subsequent arrest in November on three counts of making indecent images of children. The corporation has indicated that legal avenues may be explored to recover the money, though Mr Davie acknowledged the difficulty of such an approach.

Edwards, once one of the BBC’s most prominent newsreaders, continued to draw his salary for five months after his arrest. He did not resign from his role at the BBC until April 2024, following his guilty plea to the charges.

In a letter to staff, BBC Chair Samir Shah condemned Edwards’ actions, stating that the former presenter had “behaved in bad faith” by continuing to accept his salary despite his criminal activities. “What Huw Edwards did damaged the reputation of the BBC,” Mr Shah remarked during the committee session. “It was a shock to find he was charged and had lived this double life. The person who betrayed the trust of the nation was Huw Edwards.”

The committee session also touched upon broader concerns regarding the BBC’s independence from government influence. Mr Shah expressed his belief that the government’s leverage over the corporation had damaged its global reputation in recent years. He argued that the BBC should aim to reduce this influence and instead focus its accountability on the public and licence fee payers.

“The BBC’s 14-strong board includes five non-executive directors appointed by the government. I’m not sure that’s the right balance, and I think we should think again about it,” said Mr Shah, reflecting on the influence exerted by government-appointed members.

Mr Shah’s comments come in the wake of previous controversies surrounding the BBC’s leadership. Richard Sharp, Mr Shah’s predecessor as chair, resigned in 2023 after a report criticised his failure to fully disclose his involvement in Boris Johnson’s personal financial dealings. Although Mr Sharp defended his actions, he ultimately stepped down to avoid being a distraction.

Additionally, former Downing Street head of communications, Sir Robbie Gibb, faced accusations of editorial interference after joining the BBC board in 2021.

Mr Shah also raised concerns about the BBC’s funding structure, particularly the impact of government-imposed duties. He highlighted the corporation’s responsibility for funding the World Service, which was transferred from the government to the BBC a decade ago. “We suddenly had to find £300m,” Mr Shah noted, adding that such financial burdens detract from the corporation’s ability to produce content.

“What matters most of all is the independence of the BBC,” he asserted. “We need to have a future funding model that ensures we are independent of that kind of action.”