News
Labour’s refusal to compensate WASPI women sparks outrage
THE UK LABOUR GOVERNMENT has ignited controversy by refusing to compensate the 3.8 million Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaigners affected by changes to the state pension age. The decision has drawn fierce criticism from opposition figures and campaigners, who accuse Labour of breaking election promises made to these women.
The WASPI women are campaigning because they believe they were unfairly impacted by changes to the state pension age, which were poorly communicated and left many born in the 1950s financially unprepared. The sudden shift from receiving pensions at 60 to later ages caused significant hardship, as many were unable to adjust their retirement plans in time. They argue the changes disproportionately affect them due to limited financial opportunities earlier in life, and the lack of transitional arrangements or compensation exacerbates the harm caused. WASPI women seek fair redress for the financial and emotional distress they have endured.
Andrew RT Davies, Senedd Member for South Wales Central and former Welsh Conservatives leader, condemned the decision. Speaking to The Herald, he said: “This decision shows what a bunch of shameless opportunists Labour are. Many of the Labour great and good, including Eluned Morgan, said their party would compensate WASPI women when they were trying to get votes, and now haven’t kept up their end of the bargain.
“People across Wales will see this decision and conclude that they cannot trust Labour again.”
The controversial decision
The announcement follows a long-standing campaign by WASPI women, who argue that the government failed to notify them adequately about changes to the state pension age. These changes left many women facing financial hardship.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) previously recommended compensation ranging from £1,000 to £2,950 per affected individual. However, the Labour Government has rejected providing financial redress, citing financial constraints.
Key points from the decision include:
- Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall described compensation as “unfair and poor value for taxpayers’ money.”
- Chancellor Rachel Reeves defended the move, claiming most women were aware of the pension age changes and suggesting the reforms had “significant awareness.”
- Ministers argued there was no evidence of “direct financial loss” and that compensation could cost up to £10.5 billion, which they deemed disproportionate.
- The government plans to introduce an action plan addressing issues raised in the Ombudsman’s report, aiming for clearer communication in future pension reforms.
Backlash from campaigners

The WASPI campaign group condemned the decision as “bizarre and totally unjustified.” A spokesperson said: “This is a devastating blow for the millions of women who have been waiting for justice. It raises serious questions about the government’s commitment to fairness and accountability.”
Liberal Democrat Welsh Affairs Spokesperson David Chadwick MP called the decision a “day of shame” for Labour.
“The new government has turned its back on millions of pension-age women who were wronged through no fault of their own. Ignoring the Ombudsman’s recommendations is disgraceful.
“For years, Liberal Democrats have pushed the government to fairly compensate WASPI women. Today’s heartless decision cannot be allowed to stand, and we will press ministers to give those affected the fair treatment they deserve.”
Political ramifications in Wales
In Wales, where Labour has traditionally held strong support, the decision has caused outrage among affected women.
“We trusted Labour to stand up for us,” said a WASPI campaigner in Cardiff. “They promised us compensation, and now they’re turning their backs. How can we ever trust them again?”
Andrew RT Davies warned of potential long-term political consequences. “Labour’s actions send a clear message to voters: when push comes to shove, they cannot be trusted to deliver on their promises,” he said.
Financial and social impact
The refusal to compensate exacerbates the financial struggles faced by many WASPI women. Campaigners argue the decision undermines their financial stability and fails to acknowledge the harm caused by the sudden changes.
“This isn’t just about money,” said another campaigner. “It’s about fairness. Many of us lost years of financial stability and retirement dreams. That’s not something you can sweep under the rug.”
Next steps for campaigners

Jim Scott, a prominent local campaigner, has voiced his outrage over what he describes as Labour’s “despicable betrayal” of the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) movement.
Posting on social media, Scott said: “I would say I’m ‘shocked and appalled’ by Labour’s despicable betrayal of the WASPI women. However, it comes as absolutely no surprise whatsoever from Starmer and Kendall.”
Scott expressed his sympathy for the many women and campaigners who have fought tirelessly for justice, particularly praising dedicated activists like Gilderdale Jackie, Moira Jenkins, and Olivia Atkinson, the latter of whom has sadly passed away.
He added: “We’ve worked with the Pembrokeshire WASPI Group and other campaigners over the years who must feel utterly let down by this disgusting decision. Labour politicians who previously supported the cause, such as Henry Tufnell MP, Marc Tierney, Joyce Watson, Eluned Morgan, Philippa Thompson, and Thomas Baden Tudor, must be feeling deeply ashamed.”
Scott called for solidarity among campaigners and urged Labour to reverse their decision, saying: “We hope this fight is not over and that Labour are forced to U-turn on their U-turn.”
Scott also shared photos highlighting the support WASPI received from Labour representatives over the years, reinforcing the sense of betrayal among campaigners.
The WASPI group vowed to continue fighting for justice, with plans for legal challenges and further demonstrations to keep the issue in the public eye.
As Labour faces backlash, particularly from older voters, the decision could have significant repercussions in the next general election, especially in battleground areas like Wales. The plight of WASPI women remains a stark reminder of the challenges facing today’s pension system.
News
Reform accused of ‘punishing voters’ with detention centre plan
Cross-party backlash as proposal to target Green-voting areas sparks outrage
REFORM UK has been accused of seeking to “punish voters” after unveiling a controversial plan to site migrant detention centres in areas that do not support the party.
The proposal forms part of the party’s pledge to deport “all illegal migrants” in Britain, which would require holding tens of thousands of people at a time in large-scale detention facilities.
In a statement, Reform said the centres would not be located in constituencies where it holds parliamentary seats or controls local councils. Instead, it would prioritise areas represented by the Green Party of England and Wales.
The party said: “If you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you. If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will.”
Reform argued the approach was an “exercise in democratic consent”, claiming communities that back stricter immigration policies should not bear the burden of enforcement measures.
Political storm
The announcement triggered swift condemnation from across the political spectrum.
Mothin Ali said the policy was “abhorrent” and accused Reform of making inflammatory statements to distract from its wider agenda.
Labour chair Anna Turley described the proposal as “grotesque”, warning it undermined fundamental democratic principles by targeting communities based on how they vote.
Senior figures within the Conservative Party also voiced concern. Leader Kemi Badenoch shared criticism from former minister Simon Clarke, who warned the policy could amount to an abuse of power.
Clarke said deliberately siting facilities in areas based on voting patterns would likely face legal challenge and could be struck down in court, potentially costing taxpayers millions.
Legal and practical doubts
Critics have also raised questions over whether the plan could be implemented in practice.
Large detention centres would require suitable locations, infrastructure, and planning approval, as well as compliance with domestic law and international obligations.
Legal experts have suggested that targeting specific areas for political reasons could be open to challenge, particularly if it is seen as discriminatory or lacking a rational planning basis.
Reform’s defence
Reform has defended the proposal, insisting it is about fairness and accountability.
The party argues that voters who support stricter immigration controls should not be forced to host detention facilities, while those backing more liberal approaches should accept the consequences of their stance.
The policy was also framed as a direct challenge to Zack Polanski, with Reform suggesting Green politicians should “embrace” the idea.
Election backdrop
The row comes just days before local elections, with critics accusing Reform of deliberately provoking controversy to dominate the political agenda.
While the policy may appeal to the party’s core supporters, opponents say it risks alienating mainstream voters by appearing divisive and vindictive.
News
Land Rover swallowed by tide at popular Welsh beach
A LAND ROVER Discovery has been lost to the sea at Abersoch after becoming stranded on the resort’s Main Beach.
The vehicle, worth tens of thousands of pounds, was spotted by early morning dog walkers on the sand at the Gwynedd coastal village before being completely covered by the incoming tide at around 10:00am.
Stranded on sand
Images circulating on social media showed the 4×4 marooned on the beach, with some locals initially questioning whether the pictures were genuine.
However, witnesses later confirmed the incident, with one RIB owner reporting: “People are paddleboarding over its roof!”
It is believed the vehicle may have become stuck while being used to recover a boat trailer or jet ski.
‘Not the first’
Locals said the incident was a familiar sight at the popular seaside resort, where vehicles have previously become trapped by soft sand and fast-moving tides.
One man wrote: “Not the first and it won’t be the last.”
Another joked: “The tide comes in. Who knew?”
Others described it as the start of the “silly season”, when coastal mishaps increase as visitor numbers rise.
Expensive mistake
New Land Rover Discovery models can cost around £80,000, while Discovery Sport models start from about £55,000.
Commenters suggested the vehicle’s off-road reputation may have given the driver false confidence.
One wrote: “It probably gave him a sense of security that it can go anywhere — we all know it can’t.”
Recovery expected
As the tide began to recede, boat owners reported the outline of the vehicle starting to reappear beneath the water.
Recovery was expected to require a beach tractor, but seawater damage means the Land Rover is likely to be written off.
One local said: “Very sad to see that something went wrong. You see many cars go into the sea to retrieve boat trailers, and you know that car will be rotten very soon afterwards.
“There’s a reason why old tractors are used.”
Despite the flood of “can’t park there” jokes and “Chelsea tractor” comments online, many said they felt sorry for the owner, who now faces what one person called a “very expensive weekend.”
Community
Cllr marks 10th blood donation and urges others to give blood
A PEMBROKESHIRE councillor has urged more people to become blood donors after receiving his 10-unit donation badge from the Welsh Blood Service.
Cllr Thomas Tudor said he was pleased to receive the recognition and encouraged anyone who is able to donate to come forward.
He said: “If you can give blood, please do so.”
The Welsh Blood Service says hospitals in Wales need around 350 blood donations every day to support patients in need.
A single donation can help up to three patients, as blood can be separated into different components and used in different ways to help people recover.
The service is calling for donors from all backgrounds, including first-time donors and those who have given blood before, to help maintain supplies for hospitals across Wales.
Giving blood is described as quick, simple and safe, and remains one of the most important ways members of the public can help save lives.
Anyone wishing to find out more can contact the Welsh Blood Service on 0800 252 266, Monday to Friday from 8:00am to 7:00pm, or Saturday from 9:00am to 1:00pm. They can also email [email protected].
Caption:
Cllr Thomas Tudor giving blood after receiving his 10-unit donation badge from the Welsh Blood Service.
-
Local Government6 days agoFishguard children’s home application is a ‘legal test’, not planning merits decision
-
Community4 days agoDogs removed after welfare concerns at Milford Haven property
-
Crime6 days agoDrink-driver hit bicycle and failed to stop
-
Crime5 days agoPembrokeshire hairdresser avoids prison after pub assault
-
Crime5 days agoPembrokeshire man charged with making hundreds of indecent images of children
-
Business5 days agoHandcrafted garden furniture built to last across Pembrokeshire
-
Charity5 days agoRow erupts at Spitfire museum after Reform poster displayed at charity premises
-
Community5 days agoCancer patients targeted with parking fines outside Haverfordwest support centre











