News
BT wiring error led to innocent trio being wrongly accused of child abuse
Three innocent people had their lives turned upside down after being falsely accused of downloading child abuse images – all because of a broadband wiring error by a BT engineer, a tribunal has heard.
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) was told that a mistake made years earlier inside a street cabinet caused internet activity from the real offender to be wrongly linked to an address occupied by two men and a woman. The error led Dyfed-Powys Police to launch a child abuse investigation against the trio in 2016, resulting in their homes being searched twice and their electronic devices seized.
The consequences were devastating. One of the men was placed on restricted duties at work after his employer was informed of an ongoing child protection investigation. Another had a job offer withdrawn. The woman involved was told by social services that she could not live alone with her children until the investigation cleared her name.
The tribunal heard that the accusations were “highly distressing” and had “serious consequences” for all three, who have since been granted anonymity. The location of the incident was described only as being within Dyfed-Powys Police’s “area of operation in Wales,” covering Carmarthenshire, Ceredigion, Pembrokeshire, and Powys.
BT told the tribunal that the issue stemmed from “crossed wires” – a rare technical fault that led to the real offender’s IP address being “misattributed” to one of the claimants, the registered tenant of the property. The error, the tribunal found, was not something the police could reasonably have foreseen.
Despite the distress caused, the IPT ruled that Dyfed-Powys Police had acted lawfully and appropriately throughout the investigation. The tribunal found no evidence of police misconduct, concluding instead that the error lay with the technical fault.
A spokesperson for Dyfed-Powys Police said: “We recognise the upset and hurt suffered by the claimants in this case, and commend them for the dignity, integrity, and full co-operation shown throughout.
We welcome the judgement which recognises that the errors discovered were no fault of the police, and all investigatory actions carried out by our officers were lawful, proportionate, and necessary.
Despite the difficult circumstances, we are satisfied that the party responsible for this error has been brought to justice.”
The tribunal heard that the true offender lived in “very close proximity” to the innocent trio’s home. Following their identification and arrest, a search of their devices uncovered indecent images of children, and they were later convicted of related offences.
Although the tribunal acknowledged the severe impact on the wrongly accused individuals, it ruled there were no grounds for compensation, as the police had acted within the law and responded appropriately once the mistake was uncovered.
BT described the wiring mix-up as an “exceptionally rare occurrence”. The telecommunications company has been contacted for further comment.
Crime
Crymych parent denies failing to comply with school attendance order
A CRYMYCH parent has denied failing to comply with a school attendance order, a court has heard.
The defendant appeared before Haverfordwest magistrates charged under the Education Act 1996.
The court heard that the defendant is accused of failing, as a parent, to ensure that a child attended school in accordance with the requirements of a School Attendance Order.
It is alleged that after being served with the order, the defendant did not comply within the required 15-day period.
A plea of not guilty was entered.
Magistrates adjourned the case for a case management hearing, which is scheduled to take place at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday, May 14.
A reporting restriction remains in force.
Crime
Cockle fisherman fined £3,450 for multiple breaches at protected site
A GOODWICK man has been ordered to pay £3,450 after breaching fishing regulations at a protected cockle fishery.
Richard William Edwards, 45, of Goodwick, appeared before Haverfordwest magistrates charged with a series of offences at the Burry Inlet cockle fishery.
The court heard that Edwards had fished for cockles without a valid permit and breached conditions imposed under fisheries management rules. He was also found to have used an unauthorised vehicle in the fishery area, contrary to restrictions in place to protect the site.
Magistrates were told the offences took place on September 9, 2025, within the Burry Inlet Cockle Fishery, a designated and regulated area subject to strict controls.
Edwards was fined £1,000 and ordered to pay a victim services surcharge of £800, along with costs of £650, bringing the total to £3,450. A collection order was made.
The case was brought under fisheries legislation including the Cockle Fisheries Management and Permitting (Specified Area) (Wales) Order 2024.
The court heard that Edwards had been in breach of a prohibition imposed by the permitting system and had failed to comply with the terms of his permit.
The offences are part of ongoing enforcement efforts to protect the sustainability of cockle stocks and ensure compliance within the fishery.
Crime
Hakin woman handed five-year behaviour order over household waste
A HAKIN woman has been made subject to a five-year Criminal Behaviour Order after repeated problems involving household waste outside her home.
Marie James, 47, of John Lewis Street, Hakin, appeared before Haverfordwest magistrates after being convicted of offences linked to accumulated rubbish at her address.
The court heard that James had failed to remove all refuse and household waste from 36 John Lewis Street, Hakin, in Milford Haven.
Magistrates imposed a Criminal Behaviour Order which will remain in force for five years.
Under the terms of the order, James must not engage in conduct causing alarm or distress to others within the perimeter of her address in Hakin. She is also prohibited from keeping, storing or accumulating household waste at the property.
The order further prevents her from keeping or storing household waste at an associated address in Milford Haven.
No order for costs was made due to limited means.
James was represented in court by Steve Wrobe
-
News6 days agoBarley Saturday brings bumper crowds to Cardigan
-
Local Government3 days agoFishguard children’s home application is a ‘legal test’, not planning merits decision
-
Crime7 days agoHakin resident fined £1,330 over repeated noise and intimidation breaches
-
Community21 hours agoDogs removed after welfare concerns at Milford Haven property
-
Crime7 days agoMan who assaulted woman remanded after failing to attend court
-
Sport6 days agoGoodwick United lift Senior Cup after 3-1 win over Monkton Swifts
-
Sport5 days agoNarberth seconds start season in new sponsored kit
-
News4 days agoSPECIAL FEATURE: Did Chernobyl affect children in Wales?






