News
Jail for Eddie’s toilet attack
AFTER being found guilty of two assaults the day previously, Charlotte Whelton appeared before Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday (Jan 19) for sentencing.
Ellie Morgan, prosecuting, told the court that a 17-year-old girl and her sister were in the toilets of Eddie’s Nightclub with their friends on September 12 when they were assaulted by 27-yearold Whelton from Leven Close in Hook.
On the night, Whelton had barged into the complainant’s friend in the toilets and the 17-year-old victim said, “Please don’t push, say excuse me.”
“The defendant took umbrage with this and grabbed the young girl by the throat and pushed her into the wall,” said Ms Morgan.
The older sister tried to get Whelton off the young complainant, but the defendant did not let go of her younger sister’s throat.
The defendant beat off the older victim, who was shouting “Stop, let her go, she’s got asthma” repeatedly, leaving her arms covered in bruises.
Whelton also grabbed at the older victims hair, pulling her forward, but she stayed on her feet.
The younger complainant was described as going purple and red in the face by the older sister and their friends.
When Whelton finally let go of the younger girl’s throat, she slid down the wall.
One of the friends said that the complainant’s eyes rolled into the back of her head. She had lost consciousness.
The victim came around to see bouncers, the police and paramedics, while the defendant was pursued by bouncers.
At her trial on Monday (Jan 18), Whelton denied assaulting both of the girls, but she was found guilty by Magistrates.
Julie Norman of the probation service suggested that Magistrates should sentence Whelton to a high level community order.
She said that Whelton troubles the court very little and explained that the defendant maintains her not guilty plea and denies causing any injury.
Ms Norman told the court that Whelton lives alone as a single parent to two young children.
Mark Layton, defending Whelton, said that he believed that his client should be issued a suspended sentence instead of a community order due to the seriousness of the crime, commenting that it crosses the custody threshold.
“My client is clearly disappointed to be found guilty, but she accepts the courts findings and bears no animosity towards the complainants. We will not be appealing,” said Mr Layton.
Magistrates said that they were looking upon the offence very seriously and sentenced Whelton to an immediate 12 weeks in prison.
She will have to pay £620 in prosecution costs and an £80 victim surcharge. The younger complainant was awarded compensation of £150 and the older victim was awarded £50.
Mr Layton told the court that he and his client would be appealing the sentence and asked for bail pending the appeal.
He said that he was appealing the case due to the rights of Whelton’s children and commented that sending a single mother to prison should be a “last resort.”
Magistrates granted unconditional bail pending Mr Layton’s appeal.
Business
Builder wins court case against his solicitor — but still hasn’t seen a penny years later
Retired builder won over £130k from Milford Haven form Price and Kelway in 2022 for negligence, but is still waiting to be paid due to ongoing divorce
A NOW-RETIRED Pembrokeshire builder who won a six-figure professional negligence case against his former solicitors says he has still not received any of the money — almost four years after the court ruled decisively in his favour.
David Norman Barrett secured judgment in 2022 after a judge found that failures by the law firm Price & Kelway had caused him to lose the opportunity to pursue a potentially valuable claim against HSBC and HSBC Life.
The court ordered that damages, interest and costs totalling £130,820 be paid. Permission to appeal was refused.
Yet Mr Barrett says the legal victory has brought him no closure — because he has yet to see a single pound.

A clear win on paper
The negligence case arose from a failed property development at Ludchurch, near Narberth, where Mr Barrett borrowed money from HSBC in 2007 to purchase land and build two houses.
He later alleged that the bank departed from an agreed funding model, draining development funds prematurely and leaving the project financially unviable. He also claimed that associated life insurance policies were mis-sold.
After years of dispute with the bank — including an unresolved complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service — Mr Barrett instructed Price & Kelway.
He did this after hearing a radio advert for the solicitor’s firm on Radio Pembrokeshire. On November 7, 2012 Mr Barrett had a meeting with Mr Gareth Lewis, a partner in the firm.
“After that date and paying the a large amount in legal fees, progress was slow”, Mr Barrett said.
He added: “I gave Mr Lewis lots of paperwork, but work was not done in a timely fashion”
Proceedings against HSBC were eventually issued too late and struck out as time-barred, court documents show.
In 2022, the court found that the solicitors had failed to properly advise on limitation deadlines and that this negligence caused Mr Barrett a “loss of chance” to pursue or settle his claims.
Damages were assessed at £42,000, with statutory interest and costs bringing the total award to £130,820.
Money paid — but not released
Documents seen by The Herald show that following the conclusion of the case, a portion of the judgment money — £34,405.49 after fees and disbursements — was paid into the client account of Mr Barrett’s own solicitors, Red Kite Law LLP.
However, correspondence confirms that the funds have not been released due to an ongoing divorce between Mr Barrett and his wife, Dianne Carol Barrett, who was also named as a joint claimant in the negligence proceedings.
Red Kite Law has stated in writing that it cannot distribute the money without agreement from both parties, or a court order determining entitlement. The firm has also made clear that it cannot hold client money indefinitely and may ultimately be required to pay the funds back into court if the dispute remains unresolved.
‘This was business money’
Mr Barrett strongly disputes that the judgment award forms part of the matrimonial assets.
He told The Herald that the negligence case related entirely to his work as a self-employed builder and property developer, and that the damages awarded were compensation for business losses.
“This money didn’t arise from our marriage,” he said.
“It arose from my business. I was a sole trader. The claim was about my development project and professional advice I received as a builder.
“It wasn’t family savings or joint income. It was compensation for business losses.”
Mr Barrett says the stress and financial pressure of the prolonged litigation played a significant role in the breakdown of his marriage.
Years of financial strain
Earlier cost breakdowns from the case show that Mr Barrett personally paid more than £16,000 over several years to fund the negligence action, alongside significant unpaid disbursements incurred as the case progressed.
He says the litigation drained his finances long before judgment was handed down and left him struggling even after he technically “won”.
Now reliant on his pension and benefits, he says the continued freezing of the remaining funds has left him in financial limbo.
A legal deadlock
Where competing claims exist over money held in a solicitor’s client account, firms can find themselves acting as stakeholders.
Under professional rules, solicitors may retain funds until entitlement is resolved by agreement or court order, to avoid the risk of releasing money to the wrong party.
Red Kite Law has stated that it cannot advise either Mr Barrett or his wife on the dispute due to a conflict of interest, and has suggested options including a restricted joint account or transfer to a neutral third party — proposals which, to date, have not resolved the deadlock.
Personal cost
Beyond the legal arguments, Mr Barrett says the personal toll has been severe.
“The case broke us,” he said.
“And even after winning, I’m still fighting — this time just to get what the court already awarded.”
No allegation of wrongdoing
The Herald stresses that no finding of wrongdoing has been made against Red Kite Law LLP.
The firm has not been accused of acting unlawfully, and the dispute centres on how the judgment award should be classified and distributed in light of ongoing matrimonial proceedings.
The case raises wider questions about whether winning in court always delivers justice — and how long successful litigants can be left waiting for payment when personal and legal systems collide.
The Herald contacted Price and Kelway for comment at their main email address, but at the time of publication had received no response.
Farming
Forgotten meats tipped as future ‘superfood’ comeback
SO-CALLED “forgotten meats” such as liver, heart and kidneys could soon find their way back onto dinner plates, with scientists suggesting they may offer a cheap, sustainable and highly nutritious alternative to modern ultra-processed foods.
Offal was once a staple of everyday diets across the UK, particularly in working-class households, but has steadily fallen out of favour in recent decades despite being rich in iron, protein and essential vitamins.
Now researchers at Aberystwyth University are working with Hybu Cig Cymru (HCC) to understand why demand has dropped and whether these cuts could be repositioned as affordable “superfoods”.
Scientists say that when nutrient-dense parts of the animal go uneaten, valuable food is effectively wasted.
Dr Siân Mackintosh, from the university’s Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), said these meats could play an important role in healthier and more sustainable diets.
“Where they are not being used, these nutrient-dense ‘forgotten meats’ represent a significant loss of nutrients from our food chain,” she said. “Incorporating them as part of a balanced diet could support human health while also reducing food waste and improving environmental outcomes.”
Taste tests win over public
To test public attitudes, HCC staff have been running tasting sessions at major agricultural events including the Royal Welsh Show and the Winter Fair in Llanelwedd.
Visitors sampled dishes made with Welsh lamb’s liver, including stroganoff, traditional faggots and pâté. Organisers say many people were surprised by the flavour and keen to learn how to cook them at home.
Dr Eleri Thomas, Future Policy and Project Development Executive at HCC, said interest was stronger than expected.
“We believe there is significant potential for these forgotten meats to be incorporated back into our diets,” she said. “Consumers liked the flavour and wanted recipes and cooking tips, as well as understanding the nutritional value.”
She added that making better use of undervalued cuts could improve sustainability across the meat supply chain while creating new marketing opportunities for Welsh producers.
Part of wider sustainability project
The work forms part of the SMART Nutrient Cymru project, funded through the Welsh Government’s innovation support scheme.
Project lead Dr Christina Marley said the aim is to capture nutrients currently being lost across the agri-food system.
Alongside the collaboration with HCC, the team has also partnered with Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water on land management to protect rivers, and with British Wool to explore new uses for fleece by-products.
IBERS itself is one of eight UK research institutes strategically supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, providing national expertise in grassland and plant breeding science.
Researchers say that with food prices rising and pressure growing to reduce waste, traditional nose-to-tail eating could offer both economic and environmental benefits.
Image: Welsh lamb faggots (Pic: HCC)
Crime
Man fined after obstructing police in Haverfordwest
A HAVERFORDWEST man has been fined after admitting obstructing police officers during an incident in the town centre.
John Smith, aged twenty-seven, of Castle Street, Haverfordwest, pleaded guilty at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court to wilfully obstructing a constable in the execution of their duty.
The offence took place on Tuesday (Feb 3).
Magistrates fined him £160 and ordered him to pay £85 costs and a £64 victim services surcharge.
-
Crime2 days agoSex offender jailed after living off grid in Pembrokeshire and refusing to register
-
Health1 day agoHealth board targets rise in steroid and gym drug use across west Wales
-
News3 days agoPrincess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
-
Crime1 day agoTeacher injured and teenager arrested for attempted murder at Milford Haven School
-
Health5 days agoDoctor struck off after sexual misconduct findings at Withybush Hospital
-
Crime3 days agoHakin man’s appeal delayed again as Crown Court seeks guidance on insurance law
-
News5 days agoHerald journalists to feature in true-crime documentary on local lockdown murder
-
Education6 days agoIndustry insight helps marine cadets chart career course









