News
Pensioner cleared of sexual assault
A 78-YEAR-OLD man was found not guilty at Haverfordwest Magistrates Court on Wednesday of last week after being accused of sexual assault.
John Joseph Colfer, of Haven Court, Monkton, had been charged with sexual assault on a woman from Monkton on two separate occasions. The first was cuddling and kissing her on May 23, and the second was grabbing her while she was in a phone box on May 25.
The Herald cannot name the woman for legal reasons. Three 999 calls were played from the two incidents. During the calls, the alleged victim refused to give her name a number of times and mumbled considerably over the phone. She was very unclear about the reason she was calling and said: “I went to use his landline. I was on my own. I was being stupid” and later “I know you won’t do **** all about it because you don’t do **** all around here”. In the last call, we hear her say “I just want him to leave me alone” and “I hate him” while crying.
She claimed that she had gone to Colfer’s home address to use his telephone. She then gave her version of events: “I went to use his phone and he asked me to sit down. He sat next to me and put his arms around me and started kissing me. I didn’t want him to. I used to live next door to him. I went to get up to leave and he said ‘You only leave when I tell you to’. I was scared. After he went to do something with the dogs, I just got up and walked out of his front door”.
She then spoke about the second incident: “I was in the phone box and I didn’t know he was there until he put his arms around me and said we’ve got to finish what we started and called me a slut. I said I didn’t start nothing and he went home”.
Defence solicitor, Kate Smith said: “You have indicated that you have known Mr Colfer for a long time and brought your children up next door to him. I understand that you no longer have a relationship with your daughters. I imagine that much be very stressing and upsetting for you?”
The alleged victim confirmed this. Miss Smith continued: “I understand you attended at his address. He was the last link to your daughters, so is the reason you attended the house not to use the telephone, but to inquire about your daughters and you got upset?”
She denied this fact and said: “We were talking earlier and he said I’m welcome any time”.
Miss Smith asked the victim why she went to the house. She said: “I was invited. He said I could come over and chill out. I knew he had a landline and I wanted to use it”.
Miss Smith then said: “You’re lying, aren’t you? Mr Colfer doesn’t have a landline and you’re lying about the conversation. Your statement says ‘I went over to Shaun’s phone to call the police. I’d been having problems with kids. He said if I ever have any problems I can use the phone’. What I’m suggesting is you’re giving a different account in the court than you did to the officer. Why didn’t you tell the police what you told us?”
The alleged victim said: “After what happened I was really upset”.
Miss Smith replied: “How do you say that affected you? Did it affect your memory?”
She told the court: “I’ve got depression and health problems and I don’t need to sit here getting a mouthful from you”.
Miss Smith then asked the victim: “Can I suggest you’re giving an inconsistent account on what happened? Mr Colfer did not have a conversation with you”.
She replied: “He did because I was with my ex-partner. He went to Nottingham a couple of weeks ago”.
Miss Smith asked again: “You went to discuss your children” and was cut off by the alleged victim, who shouted “No, I don’t want nothing to do with my children”.
Miss Smith told her that she knew it was difficult for her. Her response was: “You know something, you’re doing my bloody head in! He told me he didn’t have a phone, I went to get up but I couldn’t and said you leave when I tell you to. Now can we leave it?”
Miss Smith said: “I’m afraid I can’t. Did you tell him why you were there or did you just go in?” After not receiving an answer, she continued: “I understood you came into the property, he told you he didn’t have a phone and then you sat down. You haven’t said why you’re there, and he didn’t ask?”
The victim denied this and Miss Smith continued: “Why didn’t you leave the house after he told you he didn’t have a phone?”. She replied saying: “I couldn’t get up”.
Miss Smith asked: “Why didn’t you inform the police about the conversation about the landline? The defendant told you he didn’t have one, why is it a matter you have failed to mention? My problem is, you’re telling the court one thing and your statement says another. Can you explain why you failed to mention the conversation about the landline?”
The alleged victim had no answer.
“On two occasions in your statement you asked to use the telephone. Why didn’t you include his response that he didn’t have a phone?”
This question was asked twice. The alleged victim failed to give an answer.
Miss Smith read her 999 call: “I went in to use his phone. He kissed me all over and said I’m the Monkton slut’. Why didn’t you tell 999 what happened?”
She replied: “I know what happened”.
Miss Smith said: “You have given different accounts. There is nothing in your statement about him calling you the Monkton slut. It’s inconsistent and isn’t in your statement because it didn’t happen. The defendant’s case is you came to speak about your children”.
The alleged victim screamed: “Leave my children out of this!”
Miss Smith continued saying: “He put his hands over your shoulder to comfort you,” and was cut off by the alleged victim shouting “He was putting his hand all over me”.
Miss Smith replied: “Was he? You’ve never said that before. You’ve previously said ‘he had his arms around me’. Where did he actually have his hands?”
Her reply was: “You’re female, you should know”.
There was a pause before Miss Smith continued: “’He had his arms around me and I couldn’t move’. Where on your body did he have his hands? This defendant has been charged with extremely serious offences and I need to establish exactly what happened. Had you been drinking May 23?”
The alleged victim denied this. Miss Smith asked: “Why were you refusing to give your name?”
Her reply was: “Because the coppers know me”.
Miss Smith said: “In the incident on May 25 you were on the phone and you had just put the receiver down, and you state ‘he was right behind me. He put his arms around my waist and said we’ve got to finish what we started’. You made no mention about the comments he made over the phone. Upon being asked by Miss Smith if she claims to have told Mr Colfer to ‘sod off’ with reference to the alleged incident on May 25, she said: “Yes. Any more language? Because I’ve got plenty” and later said “I am having enough of you!”
Prosecuting, David Weale read out Mr Colfer’s statement: “She came to my house about her children, and she was crying a lot saying she is not allowed to see her children. I put my arms around her and gave her a kiss on the lips and her cheek. It lit her up a bit. It put a smile back on her face. When a woman’s in distress you give them a cuddle, in a way she gave me permission. I couldn’t help her with her problem. She did not ask to use the landline, and she left around 10 or 15 minutes after the kiss. “I didn’t call her a slut. I saw her to the door and waved goodbye. I’m 78 years of age, I lost that long ago. In the second incident I didn’t see her that day. I got off the bus around 5pm and I walked past the phone box on the way home, and I did not see anyone.”
Miss Smith pointed out in her final submission that it is concerning that there were no other eye witnesses to back up her account of what happened May 25 and that her evidence falls short.
Magistrates found Mr Colfer not guilty, and told the court: “We do not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that a sexual assault took place on either occasion”.’
News
Ben Lake backs tougher protections for rural heating oil customers
CMA calls for new regulatory regime after households faced cancelled orders and sharp price increases
BEN LAKE MP has welcomed proposals for stronger protections for households that rely on heating oil, following a major investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority.
The Ceredigion Preseli MP said people living in rural and off-grid communities should receive protections comparable to those available to customers connected to the mains gas and electricity networks.
Around 1.5 million UK households depend on heating oil. Customers currently lack several protections available elsewhere in the energy market, including consistent support for vulnerable people and access to independent dispute resolution when complaints cannot be settled directly with suppliers.
The CMA launched its investigation after conflict in the Middle East disrupted supplies and caused heating oil prices to rise sharply earlier this year.
Its final report found that the market remained generally competitive and that suppliers had not profited materially from the crisis. Most of the increase was attributed to higher wholesale costs.
However, the regulator concluded that customers remained particularly exposed during periods of disruption, with uncertainty over prices, deliveries and the support available when problems arose.
In Wales, the average retail price rose from 64p per litre in February to 106p in March, an increase of 42p. Across the UK, prices peaked at 123p per litre in April, 92% above February’s average.
The CMA has recommended a proportionate regulatory regime requiring heating oil suppliers to register and meet minimum standards.
Proposed protections would cover the way prices are quoted, how cancellations are handled and access to independent dispute resolution. Suppliers could also be required to explain available payment plans and minimum purchase quantities more clearly.
A register of vulnerable customers has also been proposed, alongside a review of minimum-order rules to determine whether households should be allowed to buy smaller quantities.
Heating oil is generally purchased in bulk, leaving households facing bills of £500 or more at a time. The CMA said allowing smaller orders could make the fuel more accessible to customers experiencing financial difficulties.
Ben Lake old The Herald: “I welcome the Competition and Markets Authority’s call for a new regulatory regime for heating oil suppliers, together with action to compensate households affected by last-minute order cancellations earlier this year.
“Requiring suppliers to meet minimum standards, clearly explain payment plans and minimum purchases, and maintain a register of vulnerable households would help protect off-grid customers during sudden price increases or periods of crisis.
“These recommendations are welcome, but I will also be pressing for similar protections to be introduced for households that rely on LPG.”
The CMA estimates that around 1,700 customers may have had orders cancelled in circumstances that breached their contracts.
Although those customers received refunds, some were forced to place replacement orders at much higher prices, potentially leaving them between £150 and £350 worse off. Others were unable to obtain replacement fuel.
Several suppliers have agreed to compensate affected customers. Those who paid more for a replacement delivery are expected to receive the difference, while customers who did not purchase replacement oil should have their original orders honoured at the agreed price.
The CMA said some suppliers had not yet agreed to provide compensation and warned that it was preparing possible court enforcement action.
Mr Lake said the regulator’s findings reflected concerns raised by constituents across Ceredigion Preseli.
He said: “The conclusions of the CMA’s report will not surprise residents of Ceredigion Preseli.
“Many saw the price of their regular fuel deliveries changing at very short notice during the Middle East fuel crisis. I am also aware of cases where customers were not told the final price until the delivery lorry had arrived at their property.
“Ceredigion Preseli has one of the highest proportions of households in Great Britain that are not connected to the mains gas network. The crisis therefore had a disproportionate effect on the amount many residents were forced to pay to heat their homes.”
Mr Lake welcomed the commitment to compensate affected households but said further information was needed about how eligible customers would receive payments.
He added: “I welcome the announcement that compensation will be paid, but the eligibility and process remain unclear.
“I have asked for further details about how customers can make sure they receive the money they are owed. I am determined that constituents in Ceredigion Preseli should receive every penny of compensation to which they are entitled.”
The CMA will now work with the UK and devolved governments, regulators and the heating oil industry to consider how its recommendations should be implemented.
Business
Resilience is becoming one of the UK’s greatest competitive advantages
Phil Jones, founder of Defence Security Resilience Cymru, says Welsh businesses of every size could have a role to play in strengthening the UK’s defence and security capabilities
THE CONVERSATION around defence has changed.
For many years, defence was viewed largely through the lens of military capability. It was considered primarily a matter for government, the armed forces and a relatively small group of specialist suppliers.
That view no longer reflects the challenges facing the UK.
Cyber attacks, geopolitical instability, disrupted supply chains, energy security, disinformation and climate-related emergencies are increasingly interconnected. Each demonstrates how national resilience depends not only on military strength, but also on the strength, adaptability and security of the wider economy.
The organisations helping to build that resilience are no longer confined to what might traditionally be described as the defence sector.
Across Wales and the wider UK, manufacturers are developing advanced engineering solutions, cyber security businesses are protecting critical infrastructure and technology companies are applying artificial intelligence to complex operational challenges.
Universities are producing world-leading research, while small and medium-sized businesses are developing specialist products and services capable of responding rapidly to new threats and requirements.
These organisations are increasingly becoming part of the UK’s national resilience story.
The UK Government’s direction of travel places growing emphasis on innovation, sovereign capability and secure supply chains alongside conventional military assets. The focus is shifting from simply purchasing equipment towards strengthening the wider industrial network that supports national defence and security.
That presents a significant opportunity, not only for established defence contractors, but also for businesses that may never previously have considered themselves part of the sector.
One of the greatest misconceptions is that defence opportunities are relevant only to companies manufacturing military equipment.
Modern defence and national resilience rely on expertise across software, engineering, data, communications, logistics, energy, construction, professional services and advanced manufacturing.
For many SMEs, the question is no longer whether they can contribute, but how they can navigate what may appear to be a highly complex landscape.
That concern is understandable.
Procurement routes may be unfamiliar, supply chains can be complicated and businesses often struggle to identify where their expertise fits or which organisations they need to approach.
The answer is rarely found by organisations working in isolation.
Businesses that succeed are often those that collaborate, build relationships across industry, academia and government, understand future capability requirements and invest in skills and innovation before opportunities develop into contracts.
National resilience follows the same principle.
No single organisation can build it alone. It depends on partnerships, trusted relationships and a willingness to share knowledge across sectors that have not always worked closely together.
For Wales, this represents an opportunity as well as a challenge.
The country has recognised strengths in advanced manufacturing, cyber security, compound semiconductors, engineering, digital technology and innovation. The task now is to connect that capability with opportunities in the defence, security and resilience sectors.
Welsh businesses must be given opportunities to meet, collaborate and learn from one another if they are to play a greater role in strengthening the UK’s resilience.
The future will belong to organisations that are prepared to build partnerships as readily as they build products.
That conversation is already under way, and businesses of every size should have the opportunity to take part.
Writing for The Herald, Phil Jones is the founder of Defence Security Resilience Cymru and chief executive of Business in Focus. Defence Security Resilience Cymru will take place at ICC Wales, Newport, on September 3 and 4, bringing together representatives from business, government, academia and industry.
News
Stephen Kinnock begins work as new Secretary of State for Wales
Aberafan Maesteg MP promises to champion Welsh interests and work closely with governments and institutions across Wales
STEPHEN KINNOCK has begun work as Secretary of State for Wales after being appointed to Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s new Cabinet.
The Aberafan Maesteg MP was appointed Welsh Secretary on Monday, July 20, having previously served as a Minister of State at the Department of Health and Social Care.
Mr Kinnock said he would provide a strong voice for Wales within the UK Government and promised an open and collaborative approach to the role.
He said he would work with the Welsh Government, local authorities and institutions across the country to support economic growth and deliver improved outcomes for Welsh communities.
Mr Kinnock said: “It is the privilege of my life to be appointed Welsh Secretary, and to serve the people of Wales as part of Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s new Cabinet.
“Wales succeeds when we all pull in the same direction, and I will work across all levels of government to deliver the best possible outcomes for our communities as a dynamic and confident country in a dynamic and strong United Kingdom.
“As Welsh Secretary, I will ensure that the Wales Office continues to champion Wales within the UK Government and that the needs of the Welsh people are prioritised.
“This is about building a strong Wales within a strong United Kingdom, where everyone has the opportunity to reach their full potential, with good growth in every Welsh postcode and communities that are in control and supported by government at every level.
“I am truly honoured to be taking on this role at such a pivotal time for Wales and for the UK, and I am clear that there is no limit to what we can achieve by working together.”
Mr Kinnock is now expected to begin a programme of meetings and visits as he develops the UK Government’s agenda for Wales and represents Welsh interests in Westminster and across Whitehall.
-
Community7 hours agoHuge water main burst sends geyser over Fishguard town centre
-
Health2 hours agoWelsh A&E performance hits record low as parties clash over NHS pressures
-
Crime4 hours agoMan in custody accused of intentionally strangling woman in Haverfordwest
-
Crime1 day agoSteynton man fined after breaching dog mess and anti-social behaviour notice
-
Community1 day agoNew creative team transforms the Maes ahead of Eisteddfod y Garreg Las
-
Health1 day agoWelsh NHS executive pay revealed as patients face lengthy waits
-
News1 day agoLandmark rural law could reshape public services across west Wales
-
Business1 day agoPure West Parlour opens in the heart of Haverfordwest








