Crime
Second victim takes the stand in day two of Nathan John’s trial
THE TRIAL of Nathan John, charged with the sexual assault of two 16-year-old girls in separate incidents in Milford Haven and Haverfordwest, continued today at Swansea Crown Court.
The Milford Haven victim’s stepfather provided a harrowing account of how he first learned of the alleged rape. In the early hours of the morning, he received a photograph from a relative, showing his stepdaughter at a local pub. Shortly after, she returned home, distraught and in tears, saying, “I have been raped.” He described her appearance, noting that her clothes were soaked and covered in mud, which he later handed over to the police for forensic investigation.
The victim’s mother also gave emotional testimony, recalling how she had gone to bed after exchanging texts with her daughter, only to find her later that night standing in the living room, visibly upset and shaking. “She said, ‘I have been raped,’” the mother recounted tearfully. She immediately called the police, and the victim’s muddy clothing was seized as evidence.
Police Officer Wilson, who arrested Nathan John, testified about the events of the night in Haverfordwest. Wilson found John asleep in bed and, after waking him, placed him under arrest.
The court heard that John was swabbed for DNA.
Next, the Haverfordwest victim took the stand. In her evidence the victim bravely explained that she and John, who appeared intoxicated, had been walking together when he suddenly became violent. She pulled away and then he grabbed her neck.
Before the attack started, the victim recounted how John threatened her, saying, “If anyone harms you, I will kill them,” before showing her a knife.
She described how John then dragged her to a secluded area, where he pulled down her trousers and raped her. Despite her desperate screams for help, no one came to her aid. The victim said she had trusted John, who was part of the same group of friends.
A witness, who is a close friend of the Haverfordwest victim, gave a moving account of the moments following the attack. She described how the victim had banged on her door late at night, frantic and in tears, and told her that Nathan John had raped her.
John was arrested near Haverfordwest train station later that night, and officers testified that he was verbally aggressive, slurring his words, and smelled of alcohol. At one point during his transportation to the police station, he allegedly attempted to headbutt a police officer. Body camera footage also captured him shouting, “I never would disrespect my mother,” while threatening to harm both the police and the victim.
In addition to the witness’s testimony, the court saw body camera footage from the police showing John’s aggressive behaviour during his arrest. He reportedly shouted at the officers, “I’m going to kill you,” and made threats towards the victim and the police officers’ families.
The trial continues.
Crime
Job loss threat for convicted Pembrokeshire drug-driver
A ROUTINE police check has resulted in a drug-driving conviction for Haverfordwest resident Nima Hajiaghaee after he was found with Delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol in his system.
This week Haverfordwest magistrates were told that Hajiaghaee, 36, was stopped at around 10.30 am on January 19 as he drove his Peugeot van along Dredgemans Hill heading towards Johnston A roadside breath test proved positive for cannabis while further samples gave a reading of 5.3, the legal limit being 2.
Hajiaghaee pleaded guilty to the charge and chose to legally represent himself before District Judge Mark Layton.
Addressing the judge, the defendant accepted full responsibility for his actions but stressed that a mandatory driving ban is likely to have a considerable impact on his employment with a specialist installation company.
“My job involves improving living conditions for elderly and vulnerable people and means I regularly have to travel across the UK,” he said. “This is extremely specialist work and depends on my ability to drive.
“I’m now worried about the spiraling financial consequences as a result of a disqualification.
“I’ve reflected seriously on the incident and realise the importance of road safety. It’s had a significant impact on me and I can assure the court I will not find myself in this situation again.”
Hajiaghaee, of Cleddau Avenue, Haverfordwest, was disqualified from driving for 12 months. He was fined £600 and ordered to pay a £240 court surcharge and £85 costs.
Crime
Milford motorist disqualified for drug-driving
A Milford motorist has lost his licence after being caught driving with cannabis in his system.
Cyril Davies, 45, was stopped by officers at approximately 12.45pm on January 6, when they saw his Volkswagen Tiguan being driven along Milford Road in Steynton.
A roadside drugs wipe proved positive while further tests carried out at the police station showed the defendant had 4.4 mcg of Delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol in his system, the legal limit being 2.
This week Haverfordwest Magistrates Court was told that Davies, of Coombs Drive, Milford Haven, has no previous convictions. He chose to be legally unrepresented in court. After pleading guilty to the drink-driving charge, he was fined £400 and ordered to pay a £160 court surcharge and £85 costs. He was disqualified from driving for 12 months.
Crime
Farming company fined £19,000 for damaging protected wildlife site
A CARDIGAN farming company has been ordered to pay almost £20,000 after recklessly damaging a Site of Special Scientific Interest.
Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd, run by David Glyn Jenkins and William Lloyd Jenkins, of Ty Hen, Verwig, admitted damaging the Llwyn Ysgaw, Caeau Crug Bychan and Ty Gwyn SSSI through the unauthorised use of manure, slurry, fertilisers and lime.
The offences took place between June 21 and July 31, 2024.
The court heard that Natural Resources Wales had repeatedly warned the company about how the protected land should be managed.
Aled Watkins, prosecuting for NRW, said an agreement made in 2004 made clear that the landowners needed written consent before carrying out certain activities on the site, including the use of slurry, herbicides, pesticides, fertiliser or lime.
He said: “A significant amount of guidance, advice and warnings has been directed to the company over a substantial period of time, as there have been problems before.”
The court was told advice had been given in 2017, with further discussions in 2021. Further problems were identified in 2024, leading to advice letters and then a formal warning in June that year.
Mr Watkins said: “Even after the letters were sent, no consent request was made.
“The common sense conclusion was that, where the original agreement was clear and advice had been given years prior, this was a deliberate act by the landowners of spreading slurry on the SSSI.”
Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd pleaded guilty to intentionally or recklessly destroying or damaging flora on the protected site, contrary to the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
The company also admitted permitting the use of manure, slurry, silage liquor, fertiliser or lime without written consent from NRW, knowing it was likely to damage rare flora and fauna as well as geological and physiographical features.
Defending, solicitor Harry Dickens said the company had not deliberately set out to damage the land.
“This is more akin to the business damaging the land rather than setting out within their practices to do that damage,” he said.
He added that various contractors were used at the farm and were not always aware of the regulations.
“The defendants did not go out intentionally to harm the flora and fauna,” he said.
“Yes, they had foresight of the warnings and the previous agreement, but this is more akin to wilful blindness rather than going out intending to damage the land. It was not a flagrant disregard.
“The defendants were not loutish in their usage of the land, they are not vandals, they have not been silent and neither have they stonewalled NRW.”
Mr Dickens said the farmers accepted the need to restore the land and were keen to work productively with the authorities.
District Judge Mark Layton said Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd had breached NRW requirements.
“They spread fertilisers, herbicides and slurry on the land which was a breach,” he said.
“This was clearly a deliberate act of culpability and a complete disregard after already being given advice and warnings.”
The court heard the company’s most recent financial turnover was just over £1.6m. It was described by the defence as a micro-business.
Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd was ordered to pay £19,940.66, made up of a £9,000 fine, £8,940.66 costs to NRW and a £2,000 surcharge.
A restoration order was also made requiring work to improve the quality of the damaged SSSI land.
-
News19 hours agoBaby in critical condition after Fishguard emergency
-
Community6 days agoDogs removed after welfare concerns at Milford Haven property
-
Crime7 days agoPembrokeshire hairdresser avoids prison after pub assault
-
Crime7 days agoPembrokeshire man charged with making hundreds of indecent images of children
-
Business7 days agoHandcrafted garden furniture built to last across Pembrokeshire
-
Charity7 days agoRow erupts at Spitfire museum after Reform poster displayed at charity premises
-
Community7 days agoCancer patients targeted with parking fines outside Haverfordwest support centre
-
Community2 days agoTenby phone signal crisis goes national as businesses warn of summer disruption








