A £4,000 metal Christmas tree in Cardigan has sparked heated debate among residents, with opinions ranging from admiration to outrage over the cost and design.

The tree is described as a “modern festive centrepiece,” intended to enhance the town’s holiday charm. At night, its illuminated frame has been praised as a striking addition to Cardigan’s streetscape. However, critics argue the daytime view reveals a less appealing “builders’ yard aesthetic.”

On social media, opinions are sharply divided. Some residents, like Francesca Loveday, appreciated the tree, saying it had attracted children and added to the festive atmosphere. “The whole town looks lovely at night with the lights and lanterns,” commented Wendy Yates.

However, others criticized the expenditure, especially during tough economic times. “It’s basically scaffolding poles with lights draped over it,” remarked Michelle Hughes, adding that it’s an “absolute eyesore” during the day.

Value for money questioned

Several residents expressed concern about the cost. “£4,000 for this? It’s outrageous!” said one local. Others suggested alternative ways the money could have been spent, such as funding community projects or supporting vulnerable groups.

Councillor Mal Evans defended the decision, stating that the tree aligns with efforts to modernize the town’s decorations and draw more visitors during the festive season. “Shops and businesses have worked hard to bring a fabulous Christmas display to the town,” he said. “This tree is part of that vision.”

In addition to debates over aesthetics and cost, safety concerns have been raised. Resident Anthony Probert warned of potential hazards, describing the tree as a “health and safety nightmare” due to its exposed electric components and climbable frame.

Mixed reviews on festive efforts

Despite the controversy surrounding the tree, many agree that Cardigan’s overall Christmas display is impressive. The decorated shopfronts, lanterns, and lights have been widely praised, even by those who dislike the tree.

Cardigan Town Council said it’s part of cost-cutting measures which will help save the authority £1,000 a year as the structure can be reused.

The local town council has also argued that cutting and transporting a tree every year doesn’t meet its goals to reduce its carbon footprint.

A spokesperson for the council said: “The annual Christmas budget is set in January and varies between £5,000 and £10,000 every year. We are currently just over £6,000 for all of the decorations in town this year. “It covers everything from hiring telehandlers to replacing lights as well as purchasing the lights and frame for our new tree installation. We have invested in this product, which can be easily stored and reused, because it will save us the cost of a live tree every year, an estimated annual saving of £1,000.

“There is also a pressure on councils to consider reducing their carbon footprint and to promote biodiversity and we agreed as a council that cutting and transporting a live tree every year did not support our aim to meet these guidelines.”