Crime
John Cooper appeal file still under review, but CCRC says process ‘will take time’

THE CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION has confirmed that its review of John Cooper’s convictions remains ongoing, with no fixed timeline for a decision. The process, described as extensive due to the volume of evidence and the potential need for expert analysis, is expected to continue well into 2025, with an update likely in October.
Cooper, who is serving a life sentence for the murders of Richard and Helen Thomas in 1985 and Peter and Gwenda Dixon in 1989, applied to the CCRC last year for a review of his convictions. Unlike many applications, which are dismissed early, Cooper’s case has progressed further than most, with dedicated case workers assigned—suggesting it is being taken seriously.

A spokesperson for the CCRC told The Herald on Monday (Mar 10): “Reviews can often be extensive, particularly when there is a lot of evidence to analyse; if we need to consider new case law or instruct scientific experts. A more complicated review can take many months, or even years.”
Sources close to the matter indicate that Cooper’s application, which exceeds 1,000 pages, is well-researched and has met the threshold for further scrutiny. While the CCRC operates under strict resource constraints, it is understood that this case is receiving significant attention.
Despite the high-profile nature of Cooper’s original trial, particularly following the ITV drama The Pembrokeshire Murders, the CCRC review has received little media coverage so far.
Cooper has always maintained his innocence, though previous appeals have failed.
If the CCRC ultimately refers his case to the Court of Appeal, it would be a significant legal development.
When approached for comment, Dyfed-Powys Police told The Herald: “We will comply with our obligations in any judicial process, but consider it inappropriate to provide specific comments at this time.”

The CCRC plays a crucial role in determining whether there are any anomalies in Cooper’s conviction or sentencing. If any are identified, the case will be referred to the Court of Appeal.
Cooper’s case gained national attention partly due to its dramatization in the ITV series The Pembrokeshire Murders, which highlighted his appearance on the TV game show Bullseye—a crucial yet circumstantial piece of evidence in his conviction.
At his 2011 trial, Justice John Griffith Williams sentenced Cooper to life imprisonment, describing him as a “very dangerous man” whose conviction relied heavily on advances in forensic science.
As readers may recall, The Pembrokeshire Herald previously uncovered significant concerns about the handling of forensic evidence in Cooper’s case. An investigation by this newspaper revealed a series of procedural failings, including missing or incomplete exhibit logs, the mixing of different evidence samples, and a previously unreported flood in the storage area where forensic materials were kept.

Documents obtained by The Herald suggested that some forensic exhibits were not properly logged at key stages of the investigation, raising concerns about gaps in the chain of custody.
The absence of complete records makes it difficult to determine whether all items were handled and stored correctly, an issue that is particularly significant in cases where forensic evidence plays a central role in securing a conviction.
The mixing of evidence samples was another area of concern. It was found that items from different cases had been stored together, a practice that increases the risk of cross-contamination. The potential for DNA transfer between exhibits, particularly when stored in close proximity, is well-documented in forensic science. Any such contamination could have serious implications for the reliability of the evidence used to convict Cooper.
Perhaps most troubling was the discovery of a flooding incident in the forensic storage facility. The flood, which had not been disclosed in court or in any official reports at the time, raised concerns about whether water damage may have compromised key exhibits. The extent of any damage and whether steps were taken to mitigate the risk of evidence degradation remain unclear. The possibility that critical forensic materials were exposed to moisture, mould, or other contaminants could be a crucial issue for the CCRC to consider.
Despite these concerns, the forensic evidence presented by the Crown was substantial and was not challenged during Cooper’s unsuccessful 2012 appeal. However, advances in DNA testing and forensic methodologies since his trial may now allow for more sophisticated analysis of key exhibits. If the CCRC determines that new scientific techniques could yield different results, this may influence its decision on whether the case should be referred to the Court of Appeal.
Statistically, Cooper faces an uphill battle. Between April 1997 and February 2023, the CCRC received 29,845 applications but referred only 811 cases to an appeal court.
However, if his case does reach the appeal stage, historical data suggests a roughly 70 percent chance of a successful challenge.
Chloe Handling from the CCRC press office confirmed to The Pembrokeshire Herald previously: “I can confirm we have received two applications for John Cooper.”
“However, we won’t be able to comment any further while the review is underway.”
With no fixed timeline for completion, Cooper’s case remains under detailed review.
The Herald will continue to follow developments and provide updates as they emerge.
(Cover image: Athena Picture Agency)
Crime
Campaign gains momentum for Pembrokeshire man wrongly jailed for sex offences

Pressure is being put on the Government to compensate a Pembrokeshire man who spent five years in prison for sex crimes he did not commit.
Brian Buckle was wrongfully convicted in 2017 of 16 counts of rape and sexual assault. A Court of Appeal quashed his conviction and at his retrial, a jury found him not guilty on all charges after just one hour’s deliberation.
But despite his exoneration, Brian Buckle has been denied financial compensation by the Ministry of Justice, claiming his case fails to prove ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ that he did not commit the offences.
Now Brian’s family, with the support of his barrister Stephen Vullo KC, is calling for a fair compensation scheme to be implemented for his wrongful convictions. A petition launched by his wife, Elaine, is calling for a parliamentary reform, and the petition has already been signed by over 38,000 people.
“My family sacrificed everything to clear my name,” said Brian Buckle.
“ My father-in-law sold his house to fund my legal fight and the emotional and financial toll has been devastating. My wife’s inheritance is gone, and the money spent on legal fees can never be recovered.
“I lost a well-paying job I’d held for 16 years, I missed my daughter’s 18th and 21st birthdays and I missed irreplaceable moments with my family.
“Now I’m living with PTSD, and even though I’m a free man, the trauma of those five years will never fully leave me.
“I don’t want millions – I just want recognition of the injustice I suffered and the chance to rebuild my life.”
The total amount spent by Brian Buckle’s family to clear his name stands at £500,000 This is equal to the total amount of compensation that Brian was able to apply for. A letter from the Ministry of Justice arrived almost a year after he first submitted his application and the assessor, who had never spoken to Brian or his legal team, concluded he wasn’t eligible for a pay-out because there was insufficient proof that he had hadn’t carried out the offences.
“What do I need to do to prove that I’m an innocent person?” says Brian. “I’ve lost five years of my life, my job, my pension. People are absolutely gobsmacked when you tell them I’ve been refused compensation.”
In a previous BBC statement, The Ministry of Justice said it acknowledges the ‘grave impact of miscarriages of justice’ and is ‘committed to supporting individuals in rebuilding their lives’.
For hundreds of years it has been accepted that someone is presumed innocent until a court of law finds them guilty, however, following a small but significant law change in 2014, if a victim of a miscarriage of justice in England and Wales wants to receive compensation, they must not only be cleared, but also demonstrate they are innocent. But according to Stephen Vullo KC, this reverses the burden of proof and says this is ‘an almost impossibly high hurdle over which very few people can jump’.
Mr Vullo believes the legislation change was designed so that money would not be paid out. “It’s not by accident, it’s by design,” he says.
Government figures show that around 93% of compensation applications have been rejected by the Ministry of Justice since 2016.
Brian, who lives in Fishguard, is being politically supported by his MP Ben Lake, who said he was ‘appalled’ after hearing about his case.
“Sadly, miscarriages of justice happen,” he said. “They always have and they always will.
“But when we have a situation where an individual has been incarcerated for whatever reason for incorrect evidence or incorrect judgements, we should ensure that they are compensated for that.”
Mr Lake said that any law change should be made retrospectively, enabling the Buckle family to benefit.
Meanwhile Brian Buckle continues his battle to pick up the pieces following his wrongful term in prison.
“I will take what happened to me to the grave,” he said. “Money is not going to change how I am mentally, but it’s the principle of the justice system admitting that they got it wrong.”
Brian Buckle’s petition can be signed on this link
Crime
Man charged under 200-year-old law for Job Centre incident

A MILFORD HAVEN man is due to appear in court on Tuesday (Apr 15) charged under a rarely used and centuries-old law after allegedly being found on the premises of Haverfordwest Job Centre “for an unlawful purpose”.
Christian Teeley, aged 21, of Gelliswick Road, Hakin, faces a charge of being found in or upon enclosed premises, contrary to Section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824.
The incident took place on September 18, 2024, when Teeley was allegedly discovered inside the Job Centre building in Haverfordwest for the purpose of causing criminal damage.
The charge — a so-called “vagrancy offence” — carries a maximum penalty of three months in prison and/or a Level 3 fine.
The Vagrancy Act, which was introduced in 1824 to deal with soldiers returning from the Napoleonic Wars, has faced widespread criticism in recent years for criminalising homelessness and poverty. Despite being repealed in Scotland and Northern Ireland, it remains in force in England and Wales.
Homelessness charity Crisis says more than 1,000 days have passed since the UK Government first pledged to scrap the law — but it still remains on the books. The charity has warned that people are still being prosecuted for simply being in a public place, with penalties of up to £1,000.
The Herald understands that the case could attract national attention from campaigners who are calling for the Act’s final repeal.
Crime
Man found with abuse images of children as young as three

A PEMBROKE DOCK man has avoided an immediate prison sentence after police discovered indecent images of children on his mobile phone.
Andrew Davies, aged 36, was arrested after officers attended his home on Brewery Street on November 16, 2022. The court heard he handed over his phone and PIN without hesitation. An initial check revealed child sexual abuse material, leading to his arrest.
A full forensic analysis uncovered a total of 67 indecent images of children, including nine in Category A – the most serious level – along with 14 Category B and 44 Category C images. Some of the images dated back to 2019.
Sian Cutter, prosecuting at Swansea Crown Court, said a further 32 “borderline” images were also found. The material featured children as young as three being restrained and abused.
Davies admitted three counts of making indecent images of children when he appeared before Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court. He had no previous convictions.
Appearing for the defendant, Ryan Bowen said: “Mr Davies is under no illusion about the gravity of these offences, which clearly cross the custody threshold. He has taken full responsibility and has not sought to deflect blame.”
The court was told there had been a significant delay in bringing the case to court, and that Davies had not re-offended since the original arrest.
Sentencing, Judge Catherine Richards said: “Viewing child sexual abuse material causes real harm to real children. It adds to their pain and suffering. A particularly serious feature of this case is the very young age of some of the victims.”
She acknowledged the delay in proceedings and accepted there was a realistic prospect of rehabilitation. Davies, she said, had already faced significant personal consequences as a result of his actions.
Davies was sentenced to eight months in prison, suspended for two years. He must complete 200 hours of unpaid work and attend 25 rehabilitation activity days.
He will also be on the sex offenders register for 10 years. A further hearing is set to take place on April 11 to consider the imposition of a sexual harm prevention order.
-
Crime6 days ago
Milford man banned from roads after driving with drugs in system
-
Crime4 days ago
Newcastle Emlyn man admits to attempted murder of baby
-
Crime5 days ago
Broad Haven man admits stalking and bail breaches, denies criminal damage
-
Education5 days ago
Teaching assistant forced to act after child left in locked toilet cubicle for hours
-
News3 days ago
A40 closed after serious crash near Wolfscastle
-
Crime6 days ago
Milford man denies GBH assault on ex-partner’s 70-year-old grandfather
-
Health12 hours ago
Pembrokeshire ‘Pink Puffins’ race the Cleddau thanks to local vet’s vision
-
News6 days ago
Motorcyclist airlifted with serious injuries after A40 roundabout crash