FIVE emerging acts have been shortlisted for this year’s Green Man Rising final, with the winner set to open the Mountain Stage at the sold-out Welsh festival.

The final will take place at Clwb Ifor Bach in Cardiff on Tuesday, June 2, hosted by BBC 6 Music’s Huw Stephens.

Now in its seventeenth year, the competition gives new artists from across the UK the chance to perform at Green Man, Wales’ largest music, arts and science festival.

This year’s finalists are Brighton school friends Glasshouse Red Spider Mite, Leeds dance-punk duo Kiosk, Heist or Hit signees The Slow Country, Tall Child — the project of London-based Nigerian/Indian musician Zha Gandhi — and bilingual English-Welsh band Cyn Cwsg.

Organisers said a record number of entries were received for the 2026 competition. The shortlist was chosen by an industry panel featuring representatives from Clash, DIY, NME, Dazed, Wonderland, The Quietus, So Young and BBC Radio Wales.

The winning act will secure the opening slot on Green Man’s Mountain Stage later this summer, along with a week of studio time at Prah Recordings and a physical vinyl release with Dinked Edition.

The runners-up will also appear on the Green Man Rising Stage, which has previously hosted acts including The Last Dinner Party, English Teacher, Westside Cowboy, Silver Gore, Adult DVD and Keo.

Each shortlisted artist will also receive a professional recording at the festival to help showcase their music to labels, agents and promoters.

Green Man managing director and owner Fiona Stewart said: “Launching talent is at the heart of Green Man and our incredible five finalists were chosen from a record breaking number of acts.

“When Rising was launched 18 years ago we could never have imagined how many artists have been supported in their early careers. Our industry panel will choose which band will open the Mountain Stage at Green Man 2026.”

Free tickets for the Green Man Rising final are available via Dice. Those attending will also be entered into a raffle to win two tickets to the sold-out Green Man 2026.

A LANDMARK court case in London could have major consequences for protesters across Wales after campaigners claimed four activists convicted of criminal damage may be sentenced as terrorists.

The case centres on the so-called Filton24, a group linked to Palestine Action, following damage caused at Elbit Systems’ site at Filton, near Bristol — just across the Severn from South Wales.

Although the case was heard at Woolwich Crown Court, its implications stretch far beyond England. Lawyers, campaigners and civil liberties groups say the sentencing could affect anyone in Wales involved in direct action protests, including demonstrations over Palestine, climate change, arms manufacturing, animal rights, or major infrastructure projects.

Four activists were convicted of criminal damage earlier this month after a retrial linked to damage at the Israeli-owned defence company’s Bristol-area facility. Two others were acquitted. The prosecution case concerned an incident in August 2024 in which equipment was damaged during a protest at the site.

Campaign group Defend Our Juries now says reporting restrictions have been lifted, allowing it to report that the court is considering whether the offences had a “terrorist connection” for sentencing purposes.

That does not mean the defendants were convicted of terrorism offences. Instead, the issue concerns sentencing law, under which an ordinary offence can be treated more seriously if the court finds a terrorist connection.

Campaigners say this would be the first time direct action protesters convicted of criminal damage are sentenced in this way.

The case is likely to be watched closely in Wales, where pro-Palestine protests have taken place regularly in Cardiff, Swansea, Aberystwyth, Bangor and other towns since the outbreak of the war in Gaza.

It also has relevance to Welsh campaigners involved in environmental and anti-arms trade activism, particularly because the Filton site sits close to the Wales-England border and within the wider Severn region.

Civil liberties campaigners fear the case could create a chilling effect, with protesters in Wales potentially facing far more serious sentencing consequences for direct action that causes property damage.

The issue is especially sensitive because the defendants were not convicted by a jury of terrorism offences. Defend Our Juries claims the jury was not told that a terrorist connection could later be argued at sentencing.

The group said: “The public will be astonished to learn that in the British justice system a protester can now be convicted of criminal damage for disrupting an arms factory, and then be sentenced as ‘terrorists’ without having been convicted of terror charges.”

Legal row

The case has also drawn attention because of a separate legal dispute involving defence barrister Rajiv Menon KC.

The Court of Appeal has reportedly ruled in Mr Menon’s favour after contempt proceedings were brought over comments made during a previous trial concerning the role of juries and their ability to acquit according to conscience.

Campaigners argue that restrictions placed on the defence prevented jurors from hearing key arguments about motivation, conscience, and the defendants’ beliefs about the use of weapons manufactured by Elbit Systems.

The court, however, will ultimately decide what material is legally admissible and what sentencing framework applies.

Broader implications

For Wales, the central question is whether a sentencing approach developed for terrorism-related offending could now be used in cases involving political protest and criminal damage.

If so, campaigners say activists could face longer prison sentences, stricter licence conditions, and the stigma of being treated as terrorist-linked offenders despite not being convicted of terrorism.

Supporters of tougher action argue that serious damage to defence sites, especially where violence or injury is involved, cannot be treated as ordinary protest.

The sentencing hearing is expected to take place on June 12.

Whatever the outcome, the case is likely to become a major test of how British courts draw the line between protest, criminal damage, and terrorism-related sentencing — with consequences that could be felt by campaigners across Wales.

THE COMMEMORATION, held on Tuesday (May 12), marked the anniversary of the wartime attack, with members of the community gathering beside a newly installed plaque.

The plaque remembers those who lost their lives when the Pier Hotel suffered a direct hit during an air raid on Pembroke Dock.

A blessing was given by Rev Alex Grace, and the names of those who died were remembered by those in attendance.

The plaque was supplied by the Pembroke Dock Bicentenary Committee and installed as a permanent reminder of the town’s wartime sacrifice.

Pembroke Dock Town Council said it had been “an honour” to be part of the service.

The event brought together civic representatives, clergy, residents and members of the local community, with flowers laid in memory of those killed.

The new plaque reads: “This plaque commemorates those who died when the Pier Hotel suffered a direct hit during a Luftwaffe bombing raid on Pembroke Dock.”

Caption: Remembered: The service in Pembroke Dock marked the anniversary of the bombing of the Pier Hotel, with a new plaque supplied by the Bicentenary Committee.