News
£500 fine a small price to pay for the truth, says Editor
THE EDITOR of The Pembrokeshire Herald has been fined for naming a youth in a court report.
At Llanelli Magistrates’ Court today (Oct 6), Thomas Sinclair, age 37, was fined £500 and ordered to pay £85 prosecution costs for an article which published the name of a fishing boat captain who crashed his vessel in 2015.
The article breached the Children and Young Persons Act 1933.
The case had been adjourned from September, when the CPS were asked to re-consider if the case should continue in light of representations from Sinclair’s lawyer that Milford Haven Port Authority, who had prosecuted the captain had made a similar breach of the law.
They had named the youth’s place of work, also a breach of the same Act of Parliament.
The judge told Sinclair that his approach had been cavalier and that this was a serious matter.
Speaking after the case, Sinclair of Hamilton Terrace, Milford Haven said: “I have been fined £500 today for naming the captain of a fishing vessel who crashed it after falling asleep at the wheel.
“Although the publication of the defendants’s name was made in error, it remains my view that it was in the public interest that he should have been named.
“Further, the youth who was named, had no objection to being named.
“That captain was just under the age of eighteen, and therefore legally should not have been named in the report in The Pembrokeshire Herald. However, no harm was done. As highlighted in today’s case the captain was already known to all.
“I fully respect that reporting restrictions are in place to protect the vulnerable; but this is not one of those cases.
“The decision the CPS made to bring the case to court genuinely baffled me.
“I was happy that my barrister was able to highlight that before the Pembrokeshire Herald was launched, that court reporting in west Wales was on the wane.
“The Herald has forced our competitors to employ more journalists, to report on more cases, and to show the public that justice is being done.
Mr Sinclair concluded: “We have to, as a newspaper push the boundaries on what can be reported, a free and fair press is the cornerstone of democracy.”
“£500 is a small price to pay for the truth.”
Community
Hooking customers with a healthy seafood message
SEAFOOD restaurants and takeaways have an exciting opportunity to attract and engage customers by highlighting the numerous health benefits of their dishes.
That’s the message from three multi-award-winning businesses recognised for their innovative approaches to promoting the health aspects fish and shellfish.
As the New Year sparks a focus on healthier living, Towngate Fisheries in Yorkshire, Fish City in Belfast and Something Else Fishy in Dorset are leading the way in highlighting seafood as a nutritious choice. They hope to inspire others in hospitality to weave health-focused messaging into their customer engagement.
The businesses’ efforts are part of Seafish’s new Seafood for Life initiative, which champions the benefits of fish and shellfish while celebrating industry best practice. Profiles of the three businesses are featured in the health section of the Seafood for Life web hub, alongside a blog by registered dietician Juliet Kellow outlining 10 healthy reasons to eat more seafood in 2025. There is an accompanying downloadable factsheet.
Businesses are invited to use these resources to help inform their own approaches to promoting seafood’s health benefits.
Explaining his rationale for promoting the healthy eating aspects of fish in his fish and chip shop, Towngate Fisheries owner Mark Drummond said: “One out of 10 customers might be interested in health, but if you can get to that extra 10% of customers, that can mean the difference between a business breaking even or making a good profit.”
John Lavery, owner of Fish City restaurant in Belfast said: “Fish is a healthy, natural protein, often with little or no processing. Government guidelines recommend a minimum of two portions per week, so I believe, from a promotional point of view, this provides an opportunity we should focus on.”
Nicki Else runs Something Else Fishy in Dorset. She explained: “For us, it’s about showcasing the wide range of benefits of seafood and fitting a health message into that. I would encourage other businesses to do something like this because it builds loyalty from your customers – they trust you because you are knowledgeable.”
Seafish Chief Executive Marcus Coleman said: “The aim of Seafood for Life is to showcase the benefits of seafood and the good work of the UK industry that produces it. We want to help businesses have informed conversations with their customers that encourage them to eat more fish and shellfish.
“As we begin 2025, we know many people are thinking about ways to be a bit healthier, so we’ve kicked off the year with a focus on the nutritional benefits of seafood. We’re highlighting great examples of businesses which are already successfully promoting the health aspects of their dishes and offering resources for the industry which we hope will inspire and inform their own activities.”
Pictured above: John Davery from Fish City
Farming
Farming Connect roadshow to advise farmers on succession planning
AS WELSH farming families consider the implications of the UK government’s plan to limit 100% agricultural and business relief for inheritance tax (IHT) to the first £1m of value, Farming Connect is launching a roadshow of events across Wales to help businesses consider different options for protecting their assets including succession planning.
The Autumn Budget on 30 October included significant proposed changes to IHT rules and these will impact many farm businesses.
Demand for the advice available through Farming Connect is anticipated to be high as a result therefore it is holding 10 events where experts in farm IHT issues and succession planning will provide important guidance on the planned measures and advise on how farmers can mitigate the effects of the change.
They will include Dr Nerys Llewelyn Jones, of Agri Advisor, who says the changes further emphasise the importance of timely and effective succession planning.
For example, the seven-year rule still applies which means someone could transfer an asset at least seven years before their death, without having to pay IHT on that asset. These are referred to as Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)
“The changes could lead to more transfers between generations before death but reservation of benefits rules apply and therefore this must be considered carefully,’’ says Dr Llewelyn Jones.
“If these rules are broken, for example if the gift donor is still benefiting in some way from the estate, for example living in the farmhouse, it may be referred to as a “failed PET” and will then become subject to IHT.’’
She anticipates heavier scrutiny on valuations and a greater need to have assets valued.
Until now, farmers will have been advised to essentially “keep farming” for as long as possible to qualify for Agricultural Property Relief (APR).
“This will apply possibly to assets that they are seeking APR and Business Property Relief (BPR) on, including those assets within the £1m cap’’ says Dr Llewelyn Jones.
However, there will be changes to the legal advice previously given as a result of the Budget and she strongly advises farmers to seek professional advice and put a plan in place.
“For some, small changes will enable them to maximise the new IHT regime and the reliefs available but for others significant planning and consideration will be required with some difficult decisions to be made,’’ says Dr Llewelyn Jones.
Solicitors, accountants and land agents will be on hand to answer questions.
A comprehensive package of support is available through Farming Connect including facilitated family succession meetings; a succession review to assess the tax position and subsidised business and legal advice. For more information contact your local Development Officer, or call the Service Centre.
The schedule of events is as follows:
20/01/25 – Ivy Bush Royal Hotel, Carmarthen SA31 1LG
21/01/25 – Monmouthshire Livestock Centre, Raglan, NP15 2B
22/01/25 – County Showground, Withybush, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, SA62 4BW
27/01/25 – The Barn, Moody Cow, Bargoed Farm, Llwyncelyn, Aberaeron, SA46 0HL
28/01/25 – Maesteg Golf Club, Maesteg, CF34 9PR
03/02/25 – Coleg Cambria – Llysfasi, Llysfasi, Ruthin LL15 2LB
03/02/25 – Celtic Royal Hotel, Caernarfon, LL55 1AY
05/02/25 – The Elephant & Castle Hotel, Newtown, SY16 2BQ
10/02/25 – Hafod a Hendre, Royal Welsh Showground, Builth Wells, LD2 3SY
11/02/25 – Rhyd-y-main Hall, Dolgellau, Gwynedd, LL40 2AS
For further details visit https://businesswales.gov.wales/farmingconnect/whats-on
News
Welsh Government’s childcare scheme criticised for ‘failing those who need it most’
THE WELSH GOVERNMENT’S childcare scheme has been criticised by a local politician failing to help vulnerable parents.
Speaking in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mid and West Wales MS Jane Dodds accused the Welsh Government of “missing the mark” on childcare costs and claimed that their current offer “disadvantages our most vulnerable.”
According to statistics from the Bevan Foundation, around 190,000 children in Wales are currently living in relative income poverty. And more than half of those children live in a family where there is at least one child between the ages of 0 and four years-old.
Another report from Oxfam Cymru revealed that 92% of parents felt as though they could not afford to pay for childcare fees.
The Welsh Liberal Democrats have now called on the Welsh Government to commit towards a universal childcare system for families across Wales.
The party claims that by helping to lower childcare costs, more parents will be able to return back to work to help better provide for their children.
Commenting on the need for affordable and accessible childcare services, Mid and West Wales MS Jane Dodds said that “It should be obvious that by cutting down on childcare costs, we can move towards eradicating child poverty.”
Across Wales thousands of parents are being forced to decide between paying extortionate childcare fees or leaving work to look after their children themselves. And regardless of what decision they make, these parents and their families are still left financially worse off.
The Welsh Government’s current childcare scheme misses the mark completely, instead of relieving pressures on parents, they are closing the door on them.
Current eligibility rules mean that our most vulnerable are left disadvantages, while those who do qualify are often unable to access support due to a lack of availability.
Pumping more money into a childcare offer that doesn’t work isn’t the answer and it’s time the Welsh Government realised this.
What we need is a universal healthcare system that works for every family here in Wales, a system that ensures that every parent is able to access affordable childcare services when and where needed.”
-
Crime6 days ago
Woman who used stolen bank cards having new baby taken into care
-
News2 days ago
Six-month old baby girl confirmed dead after being hit by car in Pembrokeshire car park
-
News24 hours ago
Man charged after tragic death of six-month-old baby in Tenby car park
-
Crime5 days ago
Grief stricken woman assaulted police officer after drinking binge
-
News5 days ago
Milford sex offender’s child abuse images ‘most disturbing imaginable’
-
Top News2 days ago
Fresh snow and ice warning issued for Pembrokeshire
-
Charity3 days ago
Tributes paid to former Tenby RNLI crew member Stuart Fecci
-
News2 days ago
Award-winning Welsh fashion designer stands down for health reasons
Name Supplied
October 6, 2016 at 8:10 pm
This really is quite horrendous – media law is media law and, in relation to youths in court, it is there for a reason. The reasons listed for breaching reporting restrictions are non reasons and are no defence. It is an appalling example to set to younger journalists.
Pembrokeshire Knight
October 6, 2016 at 8:14 pm
The law is the law, its not acceptable to break it because you think its stupid or irrelevant. Herald has lost some respect IMO.
Charlie Mapp
October 6, 2016 at 10:32 pm
Typical self righteous “journalist”
Ben
October 6, 2016 at 10:46 pm
Um. Confused. Thought he originally quivered in his defence he didn’t realise he was reporting the name in contravention of law. And now after the event it turns out our heroic “journalist” was wilfully forcing back the boundaries of law to bring his people the truth.
Plonker.