News
Haverfordwest: Developer ‘extremely disappointed’ as cinema plan collapses

The proposed site: Withdrawn this week
THE COMPANY behind the plans to build a brand new multiplex cinema and retail park in Haverfordwest, Conygar Haverfordwest Ltd, have said they are ‘extremely disappointed’ to have withdrawn the proposal.
The complex would have been built on the site which Sainsburys formerly planned to build on near Slade Lane.
The plans included a five-screen cinema, ten shops and a hotel with 60 beds.
In a letter to the council, the company said “Further to a recent email correspondence, we have been instructed by our client, Conygar Haverfordwest Ltd, to withdraw the above-referenced planning applications, and should be obliged if you would take this letter as a formal request to do so, on their behalf.”
Today (May 5) A Conygar spokesperson expanded further on the reasoning, saying: “We are extremely disappointed to have had to make the difficult decision to withdraw our planning applications for the Slade Lane site in Haverfordwest. The site currently benefits from detailed planning permission for a 95,000 square foot superstore and hence we have already invested £4 million on facilitating the infrastructure.
“In the aftermath of Sainsbury’s decision to abandon their plans for Haverfordwest, the applications we submitted last year sought to alter the development to include a 124,000 square foot retail park, a cinema and a hotel. We already have tenants for this alternative scheme, which would not only deliver employment and opportunity at the site, but also attract visitors and spending to the town centre and wider community. These tenants have space requirements which the town centre cannot provide. We are also confident that this initial injection of economic activity would act as a catalyst to bring forward the main residential development at Slade Lane.
“Over the last 10 years, Conygar has been a significant investor in Wales and South West Wales in particular. We have a number of substantial projects on Anglesey, a large-scale retail scheme in Llandudno Junction (which we are developing in conjunction with Conwy County Borough Council) and we are soon to complete a 106,000 square foot retail development in Cross Hands, Carmarthenshire. This latter scheme was another site that Sainsbury’s chose not to develop. However, in that instance, Carmarthenshire Council chose to encourage our investment in the site, on the basis of the jobs and other local benefits that would be created, and adopted a more pragmatic position in terms of the planning permissions that were needed to bring the scheme forward.
“In Pembrokeshire, apart from Slade Lane, we are progressing a major project in Fishguard, which will see a significant improvement to the existing Port and the creation of a new marina and a residential development, for which we are also presently seeking various permissions.
“Up until last year, we also had a £4.8 million investment in the Martello Quays project in Pembroke Dock. Sadly, however, we were forced to write this off, due to us not being able to reach agreement with Pembrokeshire County Council. It is most unfortunate that we have, again, been unable to find common ground with the Council on Slade Lane, where we believe that our plans would considerably benefit both the residents and the business community of Haverfordwest.
“Conygar has £46 million of cash and no debt. Our shareholders are keen for us to use our funds, not only to develop the investments we already have, but also to find new opportunities both in England and in Wales. We understand that there will be different opinions, locally, on the projects we promote, but it is logical that any institution will choose to invest where the local community welcomes its interest and involvement, without which it is difficult to make progress.
“The Slade Lane site is one of our key strategic ownerships and we remain committed to delivering a successful development to the economic benefit of the entire region.”

Concept of the new cinema: At the existing Wilko site
A second cinema proposal has also been submitted by Fairacre, who own the Wilko shop and the Riverside Quay Shopping Centre.
Their development, which would see the existing Wilko store on Old Bridge partly demolished, would house five cinema screens and four restaurants, as well as an outdoor seating area.
There would be a loss in parking spaces, dropping to 106 down from its current 153.
Crime
Lamphey parent fined over child’s school attendance record
A PARENT from the Lamphey area has been fined after failing to ensure their child attended school regularly, magistrates heard.
The case was dealt with in the defendant’s absence at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11) following proceedings brought by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that between Wednesday (April 30) and Friday (May 23), the parent failed to secure regular school attendance for their child, who was of compulsory school age at the time.
The offence was brought under section 444 of the Education Act 1996, which places a legal duty on parents to ensure their children attend school regularly.
The case was proved in absence, and magistrates imposed a fine of £220. The parent was also ordered to pay an £88 victim services surcharge and £100 in prosecution costs.
A collection order was made, with the total balance of £408 to be paid by Thursday (Jan 9).
Magistrates imposed reporting restrictions under section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. These prohibit the publication of any information that could identify the child involved, including names, addresses, schools, workplaces or images. The restrictions remain in force until the child reaches the age of eighteen.
Crime
Haverfordwest couple fined over child’s school attendance
A COUPLE from the Haverfordwest school area have been fined after failing to ensure their child attended school regularly, a magistrates’ court has heard.
The pair were dealt with at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11) in separate but linked cases brought by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that over a period in May, the couple failed to secure regular attendance at school for their child, who was of compulsory school age at the time.
Both cases were brought under section 444 of the Education Act 1996, which places a legal duty on parents to ensure their children attend school regularly.
One parent admitted the offence, with the guilty plea taken into account during sentencing. They were fined £40 and ordered to pay a £16 victim services surcharge and £128 in prosecution costs.
The second parent did not attend court and the case was proved in absence. Magistrates imposed a £60 fine, along with a £24 victim services surcharge and £100 in costs.
Collection orders were made in both cases, with payments set at £24 per month starting in January.
Magistrates imposed strict reporting restrictions under section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. These prohibit the publication of any information that could identify the child involved, including names, addresses, schools, workplaces or images.
The restrictions remain in place until the child reaches the age of eighteen.
Crime
Trefin dog case ends in forfeiture order after protection notice breach
Village protest followed months of complaints about barking
A WOMAN from north Pembrokeshire has been fined £1,000 and ordered to forfeit four dogs after repeatedly breaching a Community Protection Notice issued following complaints and protests in her village.

Julia Goodgame, aged fifty-eight, of Bryn Y Derwydd, Trefin, appeared before Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11), where she admitted failing to comply with the terms of a notice served by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that on Friday (June 20) Goodgame failed to secure control of her dogs just three days after a Community Protection Notice was issued on Tuesday (June 17). The notice was served under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
The case followed months of complaints from residents in Trefin relating to dog noise and control. Earlier this year, the dispute escalated into a public protest in the village, with a number of residents gathering to raise concerns about constant barking and its impact on daily life.
Goodgame had previously denied breaching the notice when she first appeared before magistrates in September. At that hearing, the council alleged multiple breaches across June and July and said enforcement action had been taken only after informal measures failed. A trial was later listed for Monday (Nov 10), with several witnesses expected to give evidence.

However, at the November hearing, Goodgame changed her plea from not guilty to guilty to one offence, with the remaining allegations not proceeded with.
As part of Wednesday’s sentence, magistrates ordered the immediate forfeiture and seizure of four Border Collie dogs, which Goodgame told the court were the only dogs in her possession.
Authorised officers from Pembrokeshire County Council are permitted to seize the dogs, with custody transferred to the council or an approved animal welfare organisation to ensure their humane handling and care. The court granted the council powers to rehome the dogs through reputable animal welfare organisations, or to destroy them if deemed necessary.
Goodgame was also ordered to pay the reasonable costs of seizure, transport, detention and any veterinary treatment required, along with additional enforcement costs.
A Criminal Behaviour Order was imposed until further order of the court. The order prohibits Goodgame from allowing her dogs to create unreasonable noise, leaving dogs outdoors while she is absent from the property, or allowing dog faeces to accumulate at the address. Any waste stored on the premises must be kept in secured bins away from boundary fences.
In addition to the £1,000 fine, she was ordered to pay a £400 victim services surcharge and £1,200 in prosecution costs. A collection order was made, allowing deductions to be taken directly from benefits if necessary.
The forfeiture order was made under section 50 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
-
Crime5 days agoPhillips found guilty of raping baby in “worst case” judge has ever dealt with
-
Crime4 days agoKilgetty scaffolder sentenced after driving with cocaine and in system
-
Crime4 days agoHousing site director sentenced after failing to provide breath sample following crash
-
Crime4 days agoMotorist banned for three years after driving with cannabis in system
-
Education3 days agoTeaching assistant struck off after asking pupil for photos of her body
-
News6 days agoJury retires tomorrow in harrowing Baby C rape trial
-
Crime4 days agoMilford Haven pensioner denies exposure charges
-
Crime17 hours agoMan spared jail after baseball bat incident in Milford Haven








