News
THE DEATH OF DEMOCRACY
THE EXTRAORDINARY meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council to decide if the Chief Executive, Bryn Parry Jones should be suspended has collapsed, amongst unprecedented scenes at County Hall last week.
On Friday, February 14, opposition Councillors were told by a top QC that they should withdraw from the meeting due to comments they had made in the press.
A stunned Cllr Bob Kilmister stood up and said “Can I just have a point of clarification please before other members go, I gave a response to the “Pembrokeshire Herald” and the question that they asked me was ‘Do you as an elected member support the growing calls for the chief executive to resign?’ Now I’m not aware that we have got that motion before us, I don’t believe that that is something that we can actually vote on as nobody is actually calling on him to resign.”
He added: “Now we have a notice of motion that is in that uses the word suspension. Suspension is a highly different thing to resignation. Resignation can only be done by the person concerned. I was asked my question about resignation and I said it in the chamber already that those people in that position should consider their position including that resignation.”
Cllr. Guy Woodham was next on his feet, saying: “I am one of the signatories on the notice of motion. When I gave the quote that appeared in the Pembrokeshire Herald, it said I believe it said the chief exec should be suspended pending an investigation. To me that doesn’t show pre-determination.”
Cllr. Reg Owens told the meeting: “Mr Chairman, are these names just the ones that came from the Pembrokeshire Herald? Because my name wasn’t read out and I gave my quote to the Western Telegraph. You have only been given the press cuttings from the Pembrokeshire Herald, You haven’t been given the press cutting from the Telegraph!”
Tim Kerr QC, the lawyer advising the Council on the ‘tax-dodge’ pension arrangements read out a list of Councillors who he felt could not participate in the meeting due to negative comments they had made about Bryn Parry Jones in the local press.
In light of this, most members of the opposition walked out of the council chamber and the one remaining signatory to the notice of motion that Bryn Parry-Jones be suspended, Cllr Phil Baker, withdrew the vote.Cllr. Phil Baker told the Herald after the meeting: “I knew something was afoot when the QC was allowed to remain after the Wales Audit Office report was discussed.”
He added: “I think that a lot of IPPG members as well as opposition Councillors are not happy about what has happened today. Very shabby indeed, it’s like the old East Germany.”
Pembrokeshire Alliance
The Pembrokeshire Alliance Group have made a statement about the meeting:
A spokesperson said: “This meeting was an insult to democracy. The people of Pembrokeshire deserve openness, transparency and good governance and this meeting was an example of what happens when these principles are quite deliberately not followed.”
The Pembrokeshire Alliance Group says it is now in discussions with other opposition groups and non-affiliated Councillors as to what should happen next.
AM wants Bryn stripped of returning officer powers
Welsh Labour AM Rebecca Evans has called for embattled chief executive of Pembrokeshire Council Bryn Parry-Jones to be stripped of his role as Returning Officer for Wales in the European elections this May until local Councillors are allowed to debate the issue properly and the police investigation has concluded.
Rebecca Evans AM, Assembly Member for Mid and West Wales said: “After the embarrassing spectacle that was Friday’s ‘extraordinary meeting’ of Pembrokeshire council, it is clear that the Pembrokeshire council leadership is content to allow the debate to descend into farce rather than grapple openly and in public with the serious issues presented by the Wales Audit Office reports.
“It would now be utterly preposterous for Bryn Parry Jones to preside over the European Ballot as Returning Officer while his pension payments are still under police investigation. The public must have complete confidence in the election process, and in all of the people involved. Until the police investigation is concluded, alternative arrangements must be made – and that means relieving Bryn Parry Jones of his Returning Officer role.”
Paul Miller, leader of the Labour group in Pembrokeshire said: “Sometimes, particularly around planning issues, pre-determination rules help ensure fairness but last week it was worrying to see those rules used to stifle debate and silence critics in a totally unjust and undemocratic way. Many opposition Councillors felt cornered having a QC tell them that they had to leave. Having sought legal advice, I know that no Labour councillors pre-determined the debate. Pre-determination is a matter for individuals not lawyers. Enlisting a barrister in a crude attempt to undermine our roles as Councillors and prevent us from seeking to represent the views of our constituents on this hugely important issue is nothing short of Orwellian.
“The public deserve reassurance that this matter is being dealt with properly. I will not lie down and be silenced by the puppet administration running Pembrokeshire, and will continue to fight to ensure the full council are able to debate this.”
Angela Burns urges Bryn to step aside
AM Angela Burns has called for Pembrokeshire council’s chief executive to step aside.
She said: “I would say that he should stand aside. I’m perfectly happy for the status quo to be restored, providing the police investigation comes up saying that everything is as it should be.”
Mrs Burns said: “I would like to see an independent investigation being undertaken because I feel that the councillors involved here have acted with the most extraordinary behaviour.”
Plaid Cymru speaks out
Pembrokeshire Plaid Cymru leader Cllr Michael Williams has called on the Welsh Government to intervene in the running of Pembrokeshire County Council.
Cllr Williams told The Herald: “The recent events are yet more evidence of the gross incompetence of the Independent Group which presently masquerades as the controlling group of the Council. We say “masquerade” as it is patently obvious that the authority is run by a small cabal of out of control senior officers orchestrated by the Chief Executive, who are bringing the Council into disrepute.”
He added: “After their appalling performance in the Council meeting on Friday, is it any wonder that PCC is the laughing stock of Wales? Pembrokeshire tax payers deserve better. We deserve honesty and integrity, and they have consistently failed to deliver.”
“This Council staggers from crisis to crisis, from travel claims which were years late from the Leader to the misuse of Council computers by Councillor Rob Lewis to produce Independent group election literature. This together with failures to properly safeguard our children, a failed social care provision and recently dubious grant dealings in Pembroke Dock render them unfit.
“It was amazing to see on Friday their efforts to extricate themselves from their self-inflicted problems. Legal advice of forty five pages, which we, as elected Members, were not allowed to see, and the costs of at least one Q C, with another expert flown in from Edinburgh. This, plus the mysterious brown envelope left on the passenger seat of the Council vehicle which transported the Q C with information enclosed selectively identifying those Members who had stated that the CEO should go. “The rulers of North Korea would be proud.
“Mr Parry-Jones should step aside immediately, and take his poodle, Jamie Adams with him. The Welsh Government should immediately install Commissioners to take over the running of PCC” he concluded.
QC advice was ‘not the whole story’,says Herald
The Pembrokeshire Herald took independent legal advice before publishing comments made by County Councillors this month, in the days leading up to the vote over the suspension of chief executive of Pembrokeshire council, Bryn Parry Jones.
During the extraordinary meeting of Full Council, members were told to withdraw by a barrister appointed by senior officers and leaders of the authority.
Mr Tim Kerr QC told members that some of them had ‘crossed the line’ by showing predetermination over whether the chief executive should be suspended. Mr Kerr told members that this predetermination was demonstrated by comments made in the newspaper article.
Mr Kerr had been given photocopies of selected press cuttings from The Pembrokeshire Herald’s February 7 edition by the monitoring officer, Mr Laurence Harding. He told the meeting that the newspaper article had been ‘brought to his attention’ but refused to say by who. However, Deputy Leader, Cllr Rob Lewis told members that he also had copies of the same documents. He did not, however, admit to giving them to Mr Laurence Harding.
Pembrokeshire Herald editor Thomas Sinclair said: “There is legislation regarding the issue of predetermination that was not brought up at the meeting. Section 25(2) of the Localism Act 2011 provides that ‘a decision-maker is not to be taken to have had, or to have appeared to have had, a closed mind when making the decision just because the decision-maker had previously done anything that directly or indirectly indicated what view the decision-maker took’.”
Mr Sinclair added: “This legislation clearly applies to all County Councils in Wales & England, but a very restrictive interpretation of it was given to Councillors at Friday’s meeting.”
He concluded: “In the newspaper’s view if Lawrence Harding was acting in the best interests of all the members of the council, he would have advised members of any issue with what they had said before the meeting.”
News
Prince William faces diplomatic tightrope on first Saudi Arabia visit
Energy, trade and human rights concerns collide as UK deploys monarchy’s ‘soft power’
PRINCE WILLIAM will step into one of the most politically sensitive overseas trips of his public life this week as he travels to Saudi Arabia at the request of the UK Government.
Unlike recent royal visits to Estonia, Poland or South Africa, this tour carries significant diplomatic weight, placing the Prince of Wales at the centre of a complex balancing act between strengthening economic ties and confronting a deeply controversial human rights record.
Sources close to the Palace say William “didn’t flinch” when asked to go, viewing such duties as part of his responsibility as heir to the throne.
But Saudi Arabia presents challenges unlike almost anywhere else on the royal calendar.
A country in transition
The visit will focus on energy transition and young people, two areas the kingdom is promoting heavily as it attempts to diversify its oil-dependent economy.
In recent years Saudi Arabia has staged major sporting and cultural events, including Formula One races, international film festivals and high-profile entertainment shows. The country will also host the men’s football World Cup in 2034.
Officials argue this signals modernisation and openness.
Critics say it is “sportswashing” — using global events to distract from repression.
Human rights organisations including Amnesty International continue to raise concerns over restrictions on free speech, criminalisation of same-sex relationships and harsh penalties for dissent.
While reforms have allowed women to drive and increased participation in public life, significant legal and social limits remain.
Meeting a controversial leader
Central to the trip will be talks with Mohammed bin Salman, widely known as MBS, the kingdom’s de facto ruler.
The crown prince is credited with pushing economic reforms but remains internationally divisive.
A US intelligence report concluded he approved the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul — an allegation he denies and Saudi Arabia rejects.
Whether William raises such issues privately is unlikely to be disclosed. Kensington Palace does not comment on confidential conversations.
However, the prince will be briefed extensively by the Foreign Office and the British Embassy before any meetings.
Soft power diplomacy
Government insiders describe William as a key diplomatic asset.
One source said the monarchy acts as a “secret weapon”, able to open doors politicians sometimes cannot.
This form of so-called soft power has long been part of the Royal Family’s overseas role — building relationships first, leaving governments to handle the harder negotiations.
Dr Neil Quilliam of Chatham House says Saudi leaders value high-level recognition from Britain.
“Deploying Prince William sends a signal that the UK takes the relationship seriously,” he said.
Energy cooperation and investment are expected to dominate talks, particularly as Britain seeks new partners during the global shift away from fossil fuels.
Echoes of the past
The visit also reflects longstanding links between the two royal families.
King Charles III has travelled to Saudi Arabia numerous times over the decades and is said to maintain warm relations with senior figures there.
William is now expected to assume a more prominent global role as he prepares for future kingship.
A delicate balancing act
For many observers, images of handshakes between William and MBS will be uncomfortable.
Yet world leaders continue to engage with Riyadh, citing its strategic and economic importance.
The prince’s task is unlikely to involve grand statements. Instead, it will be quiet diplomacy — maintaining dialogue while representing British values.
It is a careful, sometimes uneasy role.
But it is one the monarchy has long performed: building bridges in places where politics alone struggles to tread.
Community
Ice rink campaign launched for Pembrokeshire
Survey underway as resident explores sites and funding for year-round skating facility
PLANS to bring a permanent ice skating rink to Pembrokeshire are gathering momentum after a local resident began talks with council officers and launched a public survey to test demand.

Jemma Davies, from Newgale, says the county is missing out on a major leisure attraction that could benefit families, schools and visitors while creating new jobs.
At present, the nearest full-time rink for Pembrokeshire residents is in Cardiff — a round trip of several hours — making regular skating sessions difficult for many families.
She believes a local facility could change that.
“I think it would give people something completely different to do here,” she said. “It’s exercise, it’s social, and it’s something children could take up after school instead of having to travel out of the county.”
Early talks with council
Jemma has already met officers from Pembrokeshire County Council’s sport and recreation department to discuss whether the idea could be viable.
She is also hoping to approach Sport Wales to explore possible funding streams and support.
To measure interest, she has set up an online questionnaire asking residents whether they would use an ice rink and how far they would be willing to travel.
She said early responses have been positive, with families, young people and skating enthusiasts backing the idea.
Reusing empty buildings
Rather than constructing a new arena, Jemma is investigating whether vacant premises could be converted, reducing costs.
Potential options include a former retail unit in Haverfordwest or a large hangar-style building near existing leisure attractions.
She said: “If we can reuse a building that’s already there, it keeps the costs down and brings life back into empty spaces at the same time.”
As part of her research, she plans to visit Vindico Arena to better understand the practicalities of running a rink.
More than just skating
Beyond public sessions, she believes a rink could host school trips, birthday parties, events and competitions, while encouraging young people to take up winter sports.
“Pembrokeshire has produced plenty of sporting talent over the years,” she said. “There’s no reason we couldn’t develop figure skaters or ice hockey players here too.”
Residents who want to share their views can complete the online survey.
Cover image:
Jemma Davies: Hopes to bring a permanent ice rink to Pembrokeshire (Pic: Supplied).
Cymraeg
Moonpig’s Welsh fail still on sale as mistranslated St David’s Day card sparks laughs
A GREETING card meant to celebrate St David’s Day has become an accidental comedy hit after shoppers spotted its Welsh message makes absolutely no sense – and, even better, it is still on sale.
The card, sold by online retailer Moonpig, reads: “Hapus Dewi Sant Dydd.”
Unfortunately for the designers, that translates back into something closer to “Happy David Saint Day” or “Day Saint David Happy” rather than the correct Welsh phrase, “Dydd Dewi Sant Hapus.”
In other words, the words are right – just in completely the wrong order.
The mistake was first highlighted by Nation.Cymru, prompting plenty of amusement online, with some joking it looked like the result of a lazy copy-and-paste from an automatic translator.
The Herald decided to check for itself.
And yes – as of today – the card is still live and available to buy on Moonpig’s website.
Customers can personalise it and add it to their basket just like any other design, with no sign the message has been corrected.
One reader joked: “It’s like they put the words in a hat and picked them out at random.”
Another described it as “peak AI Welsh”.
For Welsh speakers, the error is immediately obvious. Welsh sentence structure differs from English, so simply translating each word individually rarely works. It’s the linguistic equivalent of writing “Birthday happy you” on a cake.
There was also online chatter that the dragon artwork may be facing the wrong direction – though by that point, the language had already stolen the show.
With St David’s Day cards meant to celebrate Welsh culture, the gaffe feels particularly ironic.
Still, if you fancy a collector’s item or a bit of office wall décor, you might want to be quick. Once someone at Moonpig finally runs it past an actual Welsh person, this one could quietly disappear.
Photo caption: The mistranslated St David’s Day card still available for sale on the Moonpig website (Pic: Moonpig).
-
Crime4 days agoSex offender jailed after living off grid in Pembrokeshire and refusing to register
-
Health3 days agoHealth board targets rise in steroid and gym drug use across west Wales
-
News6 days agoPrincess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
-
Crime3 days agoTeacher injured and teenager arrested for attempted murder at Milford Haven School
-
Crime5 days agoHakin man’s appeal delayed again as Crown Court seeks guidance on insurance law
-
Crime6 days agoArrest made after Carmarthen park stabbing investigation
-
Crime5 days agoJohnston man remanded in custody over knife and assault charges
-
Crime6 days agoMan guilty of threatening to kill Herald editor












Teifion
February 28, 2014 at 7:59 am
So let’s get this right, a London QC paid for by the Pembs. tax payer basically stops councilors who have expressed an opinion NOT favourable to Bryn Jones are told they cannot vote BUT those who support him through thick and thin and have told the press they will continue to do so and as I understand get special allowances from the Council ARE allowed to vote – No wonder the place is called the Kremlin on the Cleddau.
I can only hope the more decent and honest members of the IPPG have been disgusted by actions and acts conducted in their name will revolt against Mr Adams when the vote comes
rath_riviera
March 1, 2014 at 11:39 am
Seems there is a lack of understanding in Council between the technicality of the law and the spirit of the law. If speaking to the press provides rationale for stating pre-determination, then any pre-meeting conversation could be construed the same so that IPGG meetings would be an equivalent technical problem? The payment of a QC under these circumstances appears a questionable use of public funds: as a tax-payer, how am I gaining by paying for certain individuals being able to de-rail a Council meeting by show-boating a QC? Did full council have notice a QC would be present (and why)? It is reasonably foreseeable that the outcome would be a publically funded Council meeting being de-railed so that a vote the whole County wants cannot take place. Why not have him pop out of a cake? Whatever the technicalities, perception of foul-play is undermining integrity and trust. On top of the apparent shambles with pension funds, educational degradation, and current investigations into property, are we obtaining value for our money? Who sanctioned the QC payment? When was the last time the accounts were independently audited?