News
Legal action threatened over ‘councillor’s’ status
THE COUNCIL’S Legal Department has failed to respond to two pre-action letters sent by solicitors acting on behalf of the local authority’s Labour Group as thedilemma over the future of David Boswell’s membership of the Council has taken yet another turn.
The Herald understands that the Council’s Legal Department now fears that if the Pembroke St Mary North ward was declared vacant, Mr Boswell might have a legal action against the local authority.
That potenital threat is two-fold: firstly, in relation to any change of position on the advice from Monitoring Officer Claire Jones he has relied upon; and, secondly, in respect of the potential prejudice formally removing him might cause to his scheduled trial at Swansea Crown Court.
Had Mr Boswell’s trial taken place as scheduled neither of the above issues could possibly have arisen.
Suspicion is growing among some council members that Council officers were counting on the trial being over to avoid embarrassment over the advice given to Mr Boswell by the officer upon whose advice they are entitled to rely upon as the last word.
However, the legal pressure has grown upon the authority. A letter before potential proceedings has been sent by a firm of solicitors acting for the Association of Labour Councillors.
With their initial letter unanswered, a second letter has now been sent from those solicitors which takes the Council to task both for their failure to respond to a letter marked ‘URGENT’, but also for statements made by the Monitoring Officer to the press and alleged comments made to councillors.
The Herald can confirm that despite receiving both letters, the Council has failed even to acknowledge their receipt at the time we went to press.
To quote the ALC Solicitor letter to the council: “We strongly disagree with your interpretation of this legislation and urge you to declare the vacancy as soon as possible. We do not consider that it is accurate or reasonable to describe a members’ seminar as a meeting of the local authority.”
The Council’s position turns on whether or not seminars for members are council meetings.
If they were Council meetings, the Council’s Legal Department would have been able to provide minutes of those meetings.
Council meetings, at law, are subject to rules in relation to publishing the agenda, setting out the the timetable, clear rules in regards to voting, and minute taking.
None of those apply to a seminar.
And the Council’s Legal Department refused to provide any of the information that define a Council meeting to this newspaper, claiming that it wanted to explain the legal situation to members first.
What that has to do with providing information that – if it exists – would prove the Monitoring Officer’s contention that seminars are meetings is unclear.
The Solicitors’ letter sent to the authority, sets out that position with a stinging rebuke to the Legal Department’s stated position, saying: ‘If it does not sound like a council meeting and it does not act like a council meeting, then it is more than likely not a council meeting’.
And ‘more likely than not’ is the key legal test. Not beyond a reasonable doubt, as in criminal proceedings.
Of course, the Council’s position would be stronger if it did not publish information likely to be of assistance to other potential parties to litigation.
At a meeting in 2011, a key Council committee considered a range of governance issues including member attendance at meetings.
The committee endorsed the position that members’ attendance should be published.
It even set out what meetings would be covered.
‘That the recording period cover each municipal year, and the record apply to attendances at formal Council body meetings (Council; Cabinet; Committees and Sub-Committees)’.
More fundamentally, it ‘suggested that training events/seminars be included in the attendance record’.
The distinction between what the Council then resolved were meetings on the one hand and members’ seminars and training on the other is crystal clear. If seminars were ‘meetings’ under the law, attendance would be recorded as a matter of course.
That is not the whole list of what is in the law covering council meetings. That also includes meetings which councillors attend as representatives of the authority.
However a list of what constitutes a council meeting cannot just be added to as and when a local authority finds convenient. A strong legal position would be that just because a statutory list of ‘meetings’ is not comprehensive (which is a fair reflection of the legal department’s position on the Local Government Act) that does not mean meetings which do not meet the criteria for council meetings can then be called council meetings.
The ridiculousness of the situation is best illustrated by the fact that on Wednesday (Feb 28), Mr Boswell attended a members’ seminar of an authority of which he is quite possibly no longer a member, while no press or public were admitted to the ‘council meeting’, no minutes were kept, and no agenda was published.
Why the Council’s legal department has been so reticent about replying to an urgent solicitors’ letter is a mystery, although no suggestion is made that it is either because council officers are hoping to ‘run down the clock’ in order to forestall taking any action at all or because they are paralysed by indecision.
In an email sent to all county councillors marked ‘CONFIDENTIAL’ in large red letters the Monitoriing Officer forcefully reminds members not to say anything that might jeopardise Mr Boswell’s trial. The Council’s monitoring officer appears also to suggest the Council has advice from ‘Leading Counsel’ (usually a QC) to support its position.
Advice from a barrister, even a leading one, is usually dependent on the content and quality of the instructions sent to one. There is a world of difference between a barrister being asked to advise a client and a barrister being asked to advise how a client might wriggle off a hook of their own making.
There is also a faint suggestion that legal advice obtained by the Council for the benefit of the authority might not be shared with all members. The way in which the email is set out makes it difficult to determine whether the Monitoring Officer would propose releasing advice on a limited basis. In addition, when quoting the Code of Conduct, Ms Jones states that members of a political party should consider whether or not they should declare ‘either a personal or prejudicial interest when speaking and voting’ on business of the authority.
That section of the email appears to be a remarkable attempt to prevent any debate by councillors of the cleft stick the council’s own officers have placed the authority in.
With dire warnings about ‘predetermination’ and ‘recent media stories’, Claire Jones seems to confuse discussing the potential that she might have got it wrong with expressing a view on whether or not Mr Boswell is guilty of the allegations – and that is all that they are – he faces.
The latter, it goes without saying is – quite properly strictly forbidden – the former is not the same thing at all.
Ms Jones’ email warns councillors of the dangers of expressing views as to whether or not she is wrong before an occasion upon which elected members can express a view. However, Ms Jones will know that pre-sentiment is not pre-determination, that councillors are permitted to make their minds up for themselves, and that the purpose of the rules about pre-determination and potential bias, as made clear by guidance given by the Public Services Ombudsman, is not to stifle either political or public discussion of contentious issues.
In addition, seeking advice on whether the Monitoring Officer is herself right or wrong is not predetermination by any means.
Entertainment
Paws-ibly dog-free show comes to Torch Theatre
ACCLAIMED theatre-maker Sam Freeman is bringing We’re Not Getting A Dog to the Torch Theatre in Milford Haven this February — a new, comic, roughly 72-minute solo show packed with domestic observation and a quietly rueful bite.
Told through passive-aggressive letters, early-morning jet-washing and the small rituals we cling to in an effort to make a house feel like a home, the production casts a wry eye on what it means to live close to other people — neighbours we see every day, yet barely know.
“It’s really hard to describe the show,” Freeman said. “I guess it’s best to imagine a really gorgeous Radio 4 late-night comedy, but performed live — it’s heart-warming and like being wrapped in a warm hug. It’s a show to warm the soul.”

The performance weaves multiple storylines together: a couple sprinting through rain to catch a bus, a man staring at a blank laptop screen in despair, and a woman opening an envelope to reveal a photograph. Each moment builds towards a bigger picture, drawing the audience into a narrative where not everything is as straightforward as it first appears.
“It’s a real joy to perform because you let this story unfold,” Freeman added. “You see these moments where people laugh, occasionally cry, but also join the dots and discover that not everything is as simple as it first may seem.”
Read from a little black book, the show has been described as a hidden gem — a quietly powerful and comic examination of home, connection and distance.
And for anyone wondering about the dog on the poster, Freeman has an answer.
“Everyone wants to know about the dog on the poster… It’s my border terrier Poppy — absolute psychopath,” he said. “Whether she makes it into the show… well… you’ll have to see it to find out.”
We’re Not Getting A Dog will be performed at the Torch Theatre on Saturday, 14 February at 7.30pm. Tickets are £8. For more information, visit the Torch Theatre website or contact the Box Office on (01646) 695267.
Health
Hywel Dda board to consider refreshed health strategy to 2040
New plan promises more care closer to home, ‘Digital First’ services, and stronger focus on prevention
HYWEL DDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD will consider a refreshed version of its long-term health and care strategy at a public board meeting on Thursday (Jan 29).
The proposed strategy, titled A Healthier Mid and West Wales – Healthier lives, well lived, sets out the Health Board’s priorities up to 2040 and updates ambitions first published in 2018.
Health chiefs say the refreshed plan does not change Hywel Dda’s core aim of helping people live healthier lives for longer, with a stronger emphasis on preventing ill-health and supporting people to stay well. Instead, it updates the strategy to reflect changing needs across the region, alongside wider pressures on health and care services including rising demand and the lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The strategy sets out how clinical developments, new digital tools and community facilities could provide more opportunities to offer help earlier and closer to home, while outlining how services may need to adapt in the years ahead.
Hywel Dda said the draft refresh has been shaped by engagement with communities, staff and partners across Carmarthenshire, Ceredigion and Pembrokeshire. The engagement took place in two phases between July and November 2025 and involved almost 3,000 people.
Residents were asked what matters most to them in living a healthier life, as well as being invited to share views on priorities for health and care. The Health Board said feedback was used to develop four key themes which underpin the refreshed strategy: thriving teams, healthier communities, great care and positive futures.
During the engagement, people consistently raised concerns about the distance they have to travel to access healthcare. The Health Board said the refreshed strategy aims to deliver more care closer to where people live, with greater support in communities and at home.
The plan also outlines an expanded role for digital services, including easier access to advice, appointment booking and test results. The Health Board said it intends to create a ‘Digital First’ service designed to connect homes, communities and hospitals.
The refreshed strategy also builds on work started in 2018 on a Social Model for Health and Wellbeing, which aims to shift services away from mainly reacting to illness and towards preventing ill-health earlier, with prevention described as a central priority for improving health and reducing long-term demand.
Hywel Dda Chief Executive Professor Phil Kloer said: “Our communities have been clear about what matters most to them. People want fair access to care, strong local services, and support to stay well in their daily lives.
“This proposed strategy refresh is about listening to that feedback and setting a clear direction for how we work together over the next 15 years. Our strategy focuses on health and keeping people well, not just treating illness.
“It is also guided by our values of belonging, growth and working together. These values continue to emphasise the importance of putting people first, improving our services, and supporting each other to deliver the best care possible.
“We will continue to work with our communities and the individuals who play a vital role in shaping our social model for health and wellbeing.”
Lee Davies, Hywel Dda’s Executive Director of Strategy and Planning, said delivering the refreshed plan would require “a more radical approach” to how care is provided.
He said: “The principles of our 2018 strategy remain the same, but the world around us has changed. This refresh ensures our vision, goals and priorities reflect today’s challenges and opportunities.
“We will continue to move towards prevention, wellbeing and primary and community care, supported by digital solutions where appropriate. Most importantly, it shows how what people told us is being reflected in our plans.”
The Health Board said that if the refreshed strategy is approved, it will be finalised and published in multiple accessible formats. Work with communities, staff and partners would continue as delivery plans are developed, and the strategy would be regularly reviewed to reflect changes and developments in health needs across the region.
Health
Withybush staff fear crèche fee rise will price parents out
50% jump from March as Health Board says charges must increase to maintain “high-quality care”
WITHYBUSH HOSPITAL staff with young children have raised concerns over a steep rise in crèche fees which they say could leave some parents questioning whether it is worth staying in work.
Hywel Dda University Health Board has confirmed the hourly rate at the Withybush Crèche will increase from £4.50 per hour to £6.50 per hour from March 2026.
Parents told The Herald the increase will hit families with children under three particularly hard, as they do not qualify for the same level of childcare support available to older children.
One parent of a two-year-old said the change could add around £450 a month for parents using the service five days a week, warning that once childcare is taken into account, their partner — who works in an administrative role at the hospital — would effectively be “working for £20 a day”.
In a statement, Andrew Carruthers, Chief Operating Officer at Hywel Dda University Health Board said: “From March 2026, we will need to increase the hourly rate for our childcare fees at Withybush Crèche from £4.50 per hour to £6.50 per hour, which is broadly in line with other local service providers. Our fees have remained the same for several years, but to continue to provide the high-quality care children attending our crèche deserve, we now need to make this adjustment.
“This decision has not been taken lightly and follows a rigorous review into how we could offer best value for money for parents using the service.
“We have sent letters to parents explaining the changes and are inviting parents who have any questions or would like to talk this through to get in touch with us.”
-
News6 days agoWhitland Post Office to reopen under new management in March
-
News2 days agoMilford Haven man expelled from Russia amid spy allegations
-
News4 days agoCampaigners threaten judicial review over state pension redress talks
-
Local Government6 days agoCouncillor suspended for four years after tribunal finds code breaches
-
Crime6 days agoChristopher Phillips jailed for life for “grotesque” sexual violence against baby
-
Community6 days agoA generous character remembered after death of scaffolding boss Jozef Polak
-
Local Government2 days agoFinal budget published with £1.2bn uplift for Wales
-
Community3 days agoJenkins & Davies investigating alleged racist remarks after video circulates online









