News
Two hundred at County Hall Bryn protest

Two hundred people attended a protest at County Hall
A PROTEST by local union members at Pembrokeshire County Council has been held at County Hall, Haverfordwest. The unions say they are protesting at leadership under Mr Parry-Jones, the chief executive.
The unions are also calling for the council CEO to be suspended while Gloucester police investigate his pension arrangements.
Unison branch secretary Vic Dennis told The Herald: “We organised a ballot very quickly, as a result of the reopening of the police investigation, and within a week we got over a 50% return on the ballot, during a peak holiday period, and 98% of those that returned said they had no confidence in the chief officer of this council.”
He added: “We want the county council to deal with what’s happening at the top fairly and equitably, the same as all our members who come to work every day, We expect fairness. We’re not looking for special treatment.”
Around two hundred people took part in the protest. A number of councillors were present including, Cllrs Paul Miller, Jonathan Nutting, Reg Owens, Rhys Sinnet, Alison Lee, Gwilym Price, Tony Wilcox and Stephen Joseph.
Asked why he was out supporting the protest, Cllr Tony Wilcox said: “I’m out here with a few hundred people because it’s time for a change. It seems hard to believe that a guy, who is in complete control of everything, can be responsible for nothing at all when it goes wrong.”
He added: “The very least he should do is stand down voluntarily until such as time as the enquiry has run its course. The Carmarthen chief executive did stand down but ours never did and he’s not going to now, he’s just completely immune and out of touch with everything. This is Pembrokeshire sadly; it’s not a nice place to be. We’re losing staff left right and centre for all sorts of reasons”.
Cllr Gwilym Price told The Herald: “I feel very strongly that Bryn Parry-Jones should have been listening to the people a long time ago and listening to us councillors that he has the moral duty to stand aside whilst he’s being investigated and that he should pay back the money.
“At a time of austerity when our people, our workers, who work very hard, had to lose money, anything up to £5000, it’s a bit obscene for him to collect all that money and have a huge amount of money to defend his position which we fought was really untenable.
“Most of all, this is my opportunity to say what I really feel about the people who are supporting him, these are elected members, I’m an elected member and I hope that I’m honest enough to represent my constituents, but as long as we have the IPG group who are like nodding donkeys, who will support the Bryn Parry-Jones’ of this world, then he is sitting pretty.
“He’s got a little cocoon around him, he tells them what to say and they say it and they vote that way and I find that disgusting. I have as much disgust for those for keeping him there as I do for the man who is taking this money”.
WATCH THE VIDEO:
Crime
Man accused of Milford Haven burglary and GBH remanded to Crown Court
A MILFORD HAVEN man has appeared in court charged with burglary and inflicting grievous bodily harm, following an incident at a flat in the town earlier this week.
Charged after alleged attack inside Victoria Road flat
Stephen Collier, aged thirty-eight, of Vaynor Road, Milford Haven, appeared before Llanelli Magistrates’ Court today (Friday, Dec 5). Collier is accused of entering a property known as Nos Da Flat, 2 Victoria Road, on December 3 and, while inside, inflicting grievous bodily harm on a man named John Hilton.
The court was told the alleged burglary and assault was carried out jointly with another man, Denis Chmelevski.
The charge is brought under section 9(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968, which covers burglary where violence is inflicted on a person inside the property.
No plea entered
Collier, represented by defence solicitor Chris White, did not enter a plea during the hearing. Prosecutor Simone Walsh applied for the defendant to be remanded in custody, citing the serious nature of the offence, the risk of further offending, and concerns that he could interfere with witnesses.
Magistrates Mr I Howells, Mr V Brickley and Mrs H Meade agreed, refusing bail and ordering that Collier be kept in custody before trial.
Case sent to Swansea Crown Court
The case was sent to Swansea Crown Court under Section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Collier will next appear on January 5, 2026 at 9:00am for a Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing.
A custody time limit has been set for June 5, 2026.
Chmelevski is expected to face proceedings separately.
News
Woman dies after collision in Tumble as police renew appeal for witnesses
POLICE are appealing for information after a woman died following a collision in Tumble on Tuesday (Dec 2).
Officers were called to Heol y Neuadd at around 5:35pm after a collision involving a maroon Skoda and a pedestrian. The female pedestrian was taken to hospital but sadly died from her injuries.
Dyfed-Powys Police has launched a renewed appeal for witnesses, including anyone who may have dash-cam, CCTV footage, or any information that could help the investigation.
Investigators are urging anyone who was in the area at the time or who may have captured the vehicle or the pedestrian on camera shortly before the collision to get in touch. (Phone: 101 Quote reference: DP-20251202-259.)
News
Greyhound Bill faces fresh scrutiny as second committee raises “serious concerns”
THE PROHIBITION of Greyhound Racing (Wales) Bill has been heavily criticised for a second time in 24 hours after the Senedd’s Legislation, Justice and Constitution (LJC) Committee published a highly critical Stage 1 report yesterday.
The cross-party committee said the Welsh Government’s handling of the legislation had “in several respects, fallen short of the standard of good legislative practice that we would normally expect”.
Key concerns highlighted by the LJC Committee include:
- Introducing the Bill before all relevant impact assessments (including a full Regulatory Impact Assessment and Children’s Rights Impact Assessment) had been completed – a step it described as “poor legislative practice, particularly … where the Bill may impact on human rights”.
- Failure to publish a statement confirming the Bill’s compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The committee has recommended that Rural Affairs Minister Huw Irranca-Davies issue such a statement before the Stage 1 vote on 16 December.
- Inadequate public consultation, with the 2023 animal-licensing consultation deemed “not an appropriate substitute” for targeted engagement on the specific proposal to ban the sport.
The report follows Tuesday’s equally critical findings from the Culture, Communications, Welsh Language, Sport and International Relations Committee, which questioned the robustness of the evidence base and the accelerated legislative timetable.
Industry reaction Mark Bird, chief executive of the Greyhound Board of Great Britain (GBGB), described the two reports as leaving the Bill “in tatters”.
“Two consecutive cross-party Senedd committees have now condemned the Welsh Government’s failures in due diligence, consultation and human rights considerations and evidence gathering,” he said. “The case for a ban has been comprehensively undermined. The responsible path forward is stronger regulation of the single remaining track at Ystrad Mynach, not prohibition.”
Response from supporters of the Bill Luke Fletcher MS (Labour, South Wales West), who introduced the Member-proposed Bill, said he welcomed thorough scrutiny and remained confident the legislation could be improved at later stages.
“I have always said this Bill is about ending an outdated practice that causes unnecessary suffering to thousands of greyhounds every year,” Mr Fletcher said. “The committees have raised legitimate procedural points, and I look forward to working with the Welsh Government and colleagues across the Senedd to address those concerns while keeping the core aim of the Bill intact.”
A Welsh Government spokesperson said: “The Minister has noted the committees’ reports and will respond formally in due course. The government supports the principle of the Bill and believes a ban on greyhound racing is justified on animal welfare grounds. Work is ongoing to finalise the outstanding impact assessments and to ensure full compatibility with the ECHR.”
The Bill is scheduled for a Stage 1 debate and vote in plenary on Tuesday 16 December. Even if it passes that hurdle, it would still require significant amendment at Stages 2 and 3 to satisfy the committees’ recommendations.
-
Crime3 days agoDefendant denies using Sudocrem-covered finger to assault two-month-old baby
-
News2 days agoBaby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box
-
Crime2 days agoPembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation
-
Crime7 days agoMan denies causing baby’s injuries as police interviews read to jury
-
Crime3 days agoLifeboat crew member forced to stand down after being assaulted at Milford pub
-
Crime3 days agoDefendant denies causing injuries to two-month-old baby
-
Crime3 days agoPembrokeshire haven master admits endangering life after speedboat collision
-
Crime1 day agoMother admits “terrible idea” to let new partner change her baby’s nappies alone







Jonathan nutting
August 8, 2014 at 4:09 pm
Actually I was there too. I wanted to stand with the ordinary workers who feel let down. If we have rules and expectations then they should be equally applie to all 🙁
Frank
August 8, 2014 at 9:30 pm
This man is tainted by his own arrogant disregard for the people who pay his wages. Remember, he is a public servant, like every single one of the people working in County Hall, and as such, they are all equal.(Even though the “lesser mortals” can apparently be reprimanded for giving him the courtesy of a cheery “good morning”!) They are all there for us, not the other way round. Why is he still there?
Tomos
August 9, 2014 at 5:50 pm
I wrote to PCCs HR Dept asking them whether they had a standard operating procedure for when a member of staff is being investigated by Police for an alleged illegal action committed whislt acting as a PCC employee.
The reply I was given that each case is looked at independently . so NO standard procedure.
Would any PCC employees like to confirm or deny that?
Maybe I should ask again but this time under the Freedom of Information Act?