Crime
Banned for driving Defender when more than twice over drink-drive limit

A PEMBROKESHIRE caught driving his Land Rover Defender when he was over twice the legal drink-drive limit claimed he had consumed just one pint of Stella earlier that morning.
Guy Owen, 58, of The Stables, Enfield Road, Broad Haven, was stopped by officers at around midday on December 15 as he was driving his Defender along the Dale Road near Haverfordwest.
“The officers were carrying out a routine stop check on his grey Land Rover Defender, but there was a clear smell of alcohol emanating from inside the vehicle,” Crown Prosecutor Sian Vaughan told a District Judge sitting at Haverfordwest magistrates earlier this week.
“The defendant was asked if he’d drunk anything and he said he’d had one pint of Stella.”
A roadside breath test carried out by officers proved positive and Owen was conveyed to the police station where he was asked to provide further breath tests . These gave a lowest reading of 89 mcg of alcohol; the prescribed legal limit is 35.
Owen pleaded guilty to a charge of drink-driving. He was legally represented in court by Mr David Williams.
“My client has taken significant steps after recognising that he has issues with alcohol,” he said. “He now wants to address those issues.
“ As a result of this offence, his work has come to an end and his family has become separated.”
District Judge Mark Layton questioned Guy Owen about the car he was driving at the time of the offence. Owen stated that the Defender was under the ownership of Land Rover and will subsequently be returned to the company following his drink-drive conviction.
Owen was disqualified from driving for a total of 22 months. He was fined £400 and ordered to pay £85 court costs and a £160 surcharge.
Crime
John Cooper appeal file still under review, but CCRC says process ‘will take time’

THE CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION has confirmed that its review of John Cooper’s convictions remains ongoing, with no fixed timeline for a decision. The process, described as extensive due to the volume of evidence and the potential need for expert analysis, is expected to continue well into 2025, with an update likely in October.
Cooper, who is serving a life sentence for the murders of Richard and Helen Thomas in 1985 and Peter and Gwenda Dixon in 1989, applied to the CCRC last year for a review of his convictions. Unlike many applications, which are dismissed early, Cooper’s case has progressed further than most, with dedicated case workers assigned—suggesting it is being taken seriously.

A spokesperson for the CCRC told The Herald on Monday (Mar 10): “Reviews can often be extensive, particularly when there is a lot of evidence to analyse; if we need to consider new case law or instruct scientific experts. A more complicated review can take many months, or even years.”
Sources close to the matter indicate that Cooper’s application, which exceeds 1,000 pages, is well-researched and has met the threshold for further scrutiny. While the CCRC operates under strict resource constraints, it is understood that this case is receiving significant attention.
Despite the high-profile nature of Cooper’s original trial, particularly following the ITV drama The Pembrokeshire Murders, the CCRC review has received little media coverage so far.
Cooper has always maintained his innocence, though previous appeals have failed.
If the CCRC ultimately refers his case to the Court of Appeal, it would be a significant legal development.
When approached for comment, Dyfed-Powys Police told The Herald: “We will comply with our obligations in any judicial process, but consider it inappropriate to provide specific comments at this time.”

The CCRC plays a crucial role in determining whether there are any anomalies in Cooper’s conviction or sentencing. If any are identified, the case will be referred to the Court of Appeal.
Cooper’s case gained national attention partly due to its dramatization in the ITV series The Pembrokeshire Murders, which highlighted his appearance on the TV game show Bullseye—a crucial yet circumstantial piece of evidence in his conviction.
At his 2011 trial, Justice John Griffith Williams sentenced Cooper to life imprisonment, describing him as a “very dangerous man” whose conviction relied heavily on advances in forensic science.
As readers may recall, The Pembrokeshire Herald previously uncovered significant concerns about the handling of forensic evidence in Cooper’s case. An investigation by this newspaper revealed a series of procedural failings, including missing or incomplete exhibit logs, the mixing of different evidence samples, and a previously unreported flood in the storage area where forensic materials were kept.

Documents obtained by The Herald suggested that some forensic exhibits were not properly logged at key stages of the investigation, raising concerns about gaps in the chain of custody.
The absence of complete records makes it difficult to determine whether all items were handled and stored correctly, an issue that is particularly significant in cases where forensic evidence plays a central role in securing a conviction.
The mixing of evidence samples was another area of concern. It was found that items from different cases had been stored together, a practice that increases the risk of cross-contamination. The potential for DNA transfer between exhibits, particularly when stored in close proximity, is well-documented in forensic science. Any such contamination could have serious implications for the reliability of the evidence used to convict Cooper.
Perhaps most troubling was the discovery of a flooding incident in the forensic storage facility. The flood, which had not been disclosed in court or in any official reports at the time, raised concerns about whether water damage may have compromised key exhibits. The extent of any damage and whether steps were taken to mitigate the risk of evidence degradation remain unclear. The possibility that critical forensic materials were exposed to moisture, mould, or other contaminants could be a crucial issue for the CCRC to consider.
Despite these concerns, the forensic evidence presented by the Crown was substantial and was not challenged during Cooper’s unsuccessful 2012 appeal. However, advances in DNA testing and forensic methodologies since his trial may now allow for more sophisticated analysis of key exhibits. If the CCRC determines that new scientific techniques could yield different results, this may influence its decision on whether the case should be referred to the Court of Appeal.
Statistically, Cooper faces an uphill battle. Between April 1997 and February 2023, the CCRC received 29,845 applications but referred only 811 cases to an appeal court.
However, if his case does reach the appeal stage, historical data suggests a roughly 70 percent chance of a successful challenge.
Chloe Handling from the CCRC press office confirmed to The Pembrokeshire Herald previously: “I can confirm we have received two applications for John Cooper.”
“However, we won’t be able to comment any further while the review is underway.”
With no fixed timeline for completion, Cooper’s case remains under detailed review.
The Herald will continue to follow developments and provide updates as they emerge.
(Cover image: Athena Picture Agency)
Crime
Haverfordwest businessman admits fraudulent Covid loan applications

A PEMBROKESHIRE company director has pleaded guilty to fraud charges related to multiple applications for government-backed business loans during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Zahid Afzal, 37, of Albert Street, Haverfordwest, admitted to three counts of fraud by false representation at Swansea Crown Court. The charges relate to claims made under the Bounce Back Loan scheme, a financial support initiative introduced to assist small and medium-sized businesses struggling during the pandemic.
The court heard that Afzal submitted misleading applications to three different banks in 2020, falsely stating financial details and loan eligibility. On May 12, 2020, he applied to Lloyds Bank PLC, claiming that Phone Bits Ltd had not applied for any other Bounce Back Loan. He later made a similar application to Starling Bank Ltd on July 23, 2020, stating that Phones Onn Ltd had an annual turnover of £200,000 and that the funds would be used solely for business purposes. A third application, containing comparable claims, was made to Metro Bank PLC on November 22, 2020.
Companies House records list Afzal as a director of both Phone Bits Ltd and Phones Onn Ltd.
Judge Geraint Walters adjourned sentencing to allow for the preparation of a pre-sentence report. Afzal was granted unconditional bail and is scheduled to return to court on April 1 for sentencing.
Crime
Milford Haven man jailed for six years after hiding cocaine in police car

A MILFORD HAVEN man has been jailed for six years after attempting to hide nearly 50 grams of cocaine under the seat of a police car after he was arrested.
Shaun Clawson, age 39, had been travelling as a passenger in a Seat Leon car on February 1, when officers stopped the vehicle on the A40 near St Clears.
Clawson was found with a phone, a cling film wrap and spoon containing traces of white powder in the footwell where he had been sitting.
After being arrested, police in-car camera footage showed Clawson removing a cling-film wrap from the back of his trousers and dropping it on the floor of the car while being conveyed to custody.
The wrap contained an approximate 48.5g of crack cocaine worth an estimated £4,850.
Clawson pleaded guilty to possession with intent to supply cocaine at Swansea Crown Court on Wednesday, March 5, 2025. He was sentenced to six years imprisonment.
Three other suspects were also arrested at the scene for possession with intent to supply a class A drug and have been bailed pending further enquiries.
Detective Sergeant Vinny Barrett, of Dyfed-Powys Police, said: “This sentence should serve as a warning to anybody considering engaging in the supply of illegal drugs that Dyfed-Powys Police will not tolerate the supply of class A drugs into our communities. We will seek to relentlessly target those who engage in the supply of illegal substances.”
To report anything suspicious or concerns about the selling and taking of drugs in the community contact Dyfed-Powys Police either online at: https://bit.ly/DPPContactOnline, by emailing [email protected], or by calling 101.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or speech impaired text the non-emergency number on 07811 311 908101.
Alternatively, contact the independent charity Crimestoppers anonymously by calling 0800 555111, or visiting crimestoppers-uk.org.
To seek advice and support, visit https://barod.cymru/where-to-get-help/west-wales-services/ddas-dyfed-drug-and-alcohol-service/
-
Crime7 days ago
Woman accused of £85,000 fraud while acting as power of attorney
-
Crime7 days ago
Milford Haven teenager accused of Valentine’s Day sex offences
-
Crime7 days ago
Notorious paedophile cult leader Colin Batley may be freed this week
-
Crime7 days ago
Domestic violence order issued after argument over Tesco opening time
-
Top News7 days ago
Pembrokeshire women hit half way mark in gruelling 3,200 mile Atlantic row
-
Crime7 days ago
Pembrokeshire man with ‘horrific’ criminal record banned from driving
-
Comment7 days ago
Council’s historic budget decision: A step forward or political manoeuvre?
-
Business7 days ago
Welsh investors weigh up alternatives as property market evolves