News
Nobody happy with 12.5% Council Tax compromise
THE QUESTION was who would blink first.
Would councillors vote down the budget and Council Tax proposals, plunging the Council into turmoil, or would there be a last-minute deal?
A deal, there wasn’t.
But, faced with the possibility of Independent Group councillors and Conservatives banding together to block the budget, the Cabinet did offer a compromise.
That compromise – a 12.5% Council Tax rise this year – finally passed after a debate that involved more officer input than any previous budget.
The Monitoring Officer and Head of Legal, Rhian Young, faced with allegations that officers had engaged in “strongarm” tactics intended to intimidate well-known nervous nellies David Bryan, Michael Williams, and Mike Stoddart, carefully explained—three times—that she and the Council’s Director of Resources had been asked by several councillors what would happen if the Council did not set a budget. To inform all councillors and avoid confusion, they emailed their response to all of Pembrokeshire’s county councillors.
The CEO, Will Bramble, clearly exasperated by being asked the same question three different ways by three different councillors, deferred to Ms Young to reply on matters of procedure.
The Director of Resources, Jon Haswell, carefully explained his reservations about a 12.5% Council Tax rise.
Too many councillors were stuck on transmit and too few on receive.

So Mr Haswell had to repeat them. Twice.
During a break in proceedings caused by an equipment malfunction, the disembodied voice of a couple of councillors could be heard.
One, easily identifiable as Cllr Mike Williams, lamented that the connection indicator was “just going round and round”. He paused and added: “Like this morning, really.”
And that’s what it was like.
In truth, Cllr Williams’s observation about the proceedings was not his best contribution to the meeting.
After Cllr Alec Cormack moved the main budget motion, the Council’s Deputy Leader, Paul Miller, moved to suspend standing orders to place an amended budget before the Council.
After lunatic procedural shenanigans, Councillors eventually voted to let Cllr Miller lay his amendments and speak to them.

12.5% – more out of reserves, a different approach to the leisure budget, a restructure of back-office functions – and the proposed Council Tax rise fell from 16.31% to 12.5%.
Cllr Jamie Adams did his best to respond, but the killer blow came from Mike Williams.
The Tenby North councillor wondered if Cllr Adams opposed a 12.5% increase and the amended budget fell, would he then support a 16.31% rise as that was the only other proposal on the table?
There was no snappy comeback to that one.
Cllr Williams had shot Cllr Adams’s fox.
Cllr Adams wriggled and tried to get Jon Haswell to come to his aid. Unimpressed as the Director of
Resources was by a 12.5% Council Tax rise, he wouldn’t do Cllr Adams’s job for him.
Through gritted teeth, Jon Haswell said he was satisfied the 12.5% rise met the Council’s obligation to set a balanced budget for the coming financial year.
He added, however, that next year’s budget would be trickier than forecast.
Conservative Group Leader Di Clements expressed her reservations about the last-minute changes to the budget.
Her principal concern was that the figures used to justify a 12.5% rise had to be taken on trust, as they had not been scrutinised.
She also observed, with frustration, that waiting until the last minute to pull a budgetary rabbit out of a hat was not good for building consensus.
It all looked to be drifting to a vote when, with a speech written and not wanting to waste his opportunity to get his deathless oratory into the record, Cllr Jamie Adams moved to give more time for speakers to address the amendment.
Cllr Adams’s speech wasn’t about the amendment.
First, taking the good points he made, local government funding is a mess. Wales has far too many councillors. The local government system is deficient. How councils get grants and what they are allowed to spend them on is wrong.
So far, so good. Nothing to disagree with there.
However, Cllr Adams then decided that with a speech written for a debate that wouldn’t happen, he had to score some political points.
Cllr Adams complained that the administration hadn’t been bolder with Council Tax increases in the past to avoid the present crisis.
Cllr Adams did not acknowledge that he and the IPG had opposed and engaged in guerilla warfare against the Council Tax rises that would have avoided the present crisis.
The Cabinet, Jamie Adams declared, was too focused on the jam and not the bread and butter issues.
Councillor Adams failed to mention the number of white elephants he’d left littering the capital budget.
Cllr Adams said the current administration had been in place for seven years, so banging on about the previous one’s addiction to the “Lowest Council Tax in Wales” was jolly unfair. Put a pin in that thought.
Cllr Adams then mentioned he’d examined the figures behind the Children’s Social Care budget and accused Cllr Paul Miller of sleeping on the job for not paying attention to it. Put a pin in that thought.
Finally, Cllr Adams said the Cabinet had only cobbled together a compromise because it knew it would otherwise lose the vote and its remaining time in office was short.
Step forward, Cllr Tessa Hodgson.
She began gently. Cllr Adams, she reminded him, had been the only person in the room to mention the previous administration and the lowest council tax in Wales. Nobody had mentioned his administration.
She said the Cabinet, of which she is a member, is focused on the here and now.
She then reminded Cllr Adams of how the Cabinet works. Cllr Miller does not have the Social Care portfolio; Cllr Hodgson does.
Highlighting the IPG’s old boys’ nature, she suggested that instead of addressing his remarks at Paul Miller, he should address them to her. The implicit criticism of Cllr Adams for directing flak at the Deputy Leader because he is a member of the Labour Party was clear.
Cllr Hodgson not only defended the Council’s handling of the Social Care budget but also pointed out that unplanned and unanticipated cost increases in service delivery were, by their very nature, not something anyone could anticipate. The cost of delivering services had shot up, the demand increased, and the Council had to provide them.
There was no alternative budget on the table.
It was the sort of firm smackdown needed to draw a line under a fractious debate that spent more time speaking about what members said they felt about setting the budget than any real engagement with the budget itself.
When Cllr Miller’s amendment to the budget passed by 32-26, the Council had managed to dodge a bullet.
Having been marched up to the top of the hill by the IPG twice in the last year, the Conservatives will feel deflated.
They’ll be invited to hitch their wagon to the IPG again in May as the Independent Group tries to form another administration.
Who and what they’ll be able to rally behind is anyone’s guess.
international news
Data watchdog probes Musk’s AI firms over deepfake fears
Investigation launched into Grok chatbot after reports of explicit images created using people’s likeness without consent
THE UK’s data protection regulator has opened formal investigations into X and artificial intelligence company xAI amid growing concerns that their chatbot Grok may have been used to create sexualised “deepfake” images without people’s knowledge.
The action has been taken by the Information Commissioner’s Office, which enforces Britain’s data protection laws, following complaints that the AI tool could generate intimate or explicit images using real individuals’ faces or personal data.
Such images, often referred to as deepfakes, are digitally altered or AI-generated pictures that make it appear someone has posed for photographs or videos they never took.
Regulators fear the technology could be exploited for harassment, blackmail or abuse.
The probe follows a separate investigation by Ofcom, which began examining the platform earlier this year over wider online safety concerns.
Mounting pressure
Both investigations come amid mounting scrutiny of services linked to tech billionaire Elon Musk, whose companies have rapidly expanded the use of generative AI tools capable of producing realistic text and images in seconds.
While such tools are marketed for creative and commercial use, campaigners say safeguards have not kept pace with the risks.
Privacy experts warn that if AI systems are trained on, or can access, personal images or data without clear consent, they may breach UK data protection law.
The ICO said it is now examining how Grok was built, what data may have been used in its development, and whether sufficient protections were put in place to stop misuse.
William Malcolm, the watchdog’s executive director for regulatory risk and innovation, said reports surrounding the chatbot were “deeply troubling”.
He said losing control of personal information in this way could cause “immediate and significant harm”, particularly where children or vulnerable people are targeted.
Safeguards questioned
Investigators will look at whether the companies properly assessed risks, limited the use of personal data and introduced effective barriers to prevent the creation of explicit or abusive content.
Under UK law, organisations found to have mishandled personal data can face enforcement action, including large fines or orders to change how their systems operate.
The ICO confirmed it is working closely with Ofcom and overseas regulators as concerns about AI-generated content increasingly cross international borders.
In response to criticism, X has said it has introduced additional moderation tools and technical measures aimed at preventing the creation of harmful or non-consensual images.
However, regulators say they will continue to examine whether those steps go far enough.
The ICO said it would take action if it finds that legal obligations have not been met.
Crime
Man caught in hotel sting after trying to meet girl, 13
Laugharne defendant confronted by paedophile hunters at St Clears Travelodge before suspended jail term at Swansea Crown Court
A LAUGHARNE man who turned up at a Carmarthenshire hotel believing he was meeting a thirteen-year-old girl instead found himself confronted by paedophile hunters and later sentenced at Swansea Crown Court.
William John Williams, fifty-nine, had been communicating online with what he thought was a schoolgirl. The profile was in fact a decoy set up by a vigilante group.
When he arrived at the Travelodge St Clears for a pre-arranged meeting, members of the group were waiting and contacted police, handing over screenshots of his messages.
Prosecutor Matt Murphy told the court that Williams first made contact with the fake Facebook profile in October 2021. The supposed age of thirteen was made clear from the outset.
Despite this, the defendant sent repeated sexual messages, spoke about masturbating, requested photographs and told the “girl” on several occasions that his penis was erect. He also sent topless photographs of himself.
The court heard Williams urged the account holder to delete the messages, acknowledging he knew he should not be sending them because of her age.
Second fake profile
Members of the group later created another false account, posing as a businesswoman from Swansea, and arranged a date with Williams at the hotel in St Clears. They then liaised with another group to attend the rendezvous.
When Williams arrived, he was challenged and police were called.
During interview he answered “no comment”. In a later interview in February 2023, he claimed he did not believe the child was real and said he thought he was exposing scammers.
The court rejected that explanation.
Williams, of Orchard Park, Laugharne, pleaded guilty to attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child. He had no previous convictions.
Defence barrister Ian Ibrahim said more than four years had passed since the offending and highlighted delays of more than two years between arrest and court proceedings. He said the defendant, formerly employed in hospitality and construction, was now in poor health and had lost his good character.
Internet ‘unsafe for children’
Sentencing, Judge Catherine Richards told Williams it was the actions of “grown men like you” that made the internet feel unsafe for children and caused parents and carers real concern.
After credit for his guilty plea, Williams was sentenced to twelve months’ imprisonment, suspended for twelve months, and ordered to complete a rehabilitation programme.
He was also placed on the sex offenders register for ten years and made subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order for the same period.
News
Princess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
Catherine the Princess of Wales visited Melin Tregwynt, a historic family-owned woollen mill, today, highlighting the enduring traditions and skills of the British textile industry.
Nestled in a secluded, wooded valley near Castlemorris, close to Haverfordwest, Melin Tregwynt has been in continuous operation since at least 1841. The mill, which employs over 40 local people, produces blankets, throws, scarves, cushions and clothing, blending traditional patterns with vibrant colours and contemporary design. Its products are admired globally, from Tenby to Tokyo.
During her visit, the Princess met Melin Tregwynt’s director, Louise Clarke, to learn how the mill preserves traditional craft skills. The company draws on generations of expertise among its staff to mentor young apprentices, ensuring the survival of this historic craft.
Her Royal Highness also spent time with weavers at the loom, observing the intricate process of Welsh double cloth weaving for which Melin Tregwynt is renowned. This traditional technique produces thick, reversible blankets with inverted patterns on each side. The Princess followed the journey of a blanket from initial design to the finished product, seeing the weaving loom in action and meeting the teams responsible for cutting, sewing and finishing the textiles.
The Princess, a long-standing advocate of the British textile industry, has personal connections to the trade: her paternal ancestors were owners of the Leeds-based woollen manufacturer and merchant William Lupton & Co. This visit continues a series of engagements celebrating British textiles, including a tartan-weaving studio in Stirling, Scotland, in January, and visits in 2025 to manufacturers in Carmarthenshire, Suffolk, Kent, and County Tyrone.
After her visit to Melin Tregwynt, the princess went on to visit Huit Denim in Cardigan.

MORE TO FOLLOW INCLUDING OFFICIAL PICTURES
-
Health5 days agoConsultation reveals lack of public trust in health board
-
News6 days agoCaldey still unsafe, survivors warn — despite Abbey’s reform claims
-
Community6 days agoPembrokeshire students speak at national Holocaust Memorial Day event
-
News1 hour agoPrincess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
-
News6 days agoKurtz raises Gumfreston flooding in the Senedd as petition deadline nears
-
Crime7 days agoMan denies murdering brother as jury hears of ‘ferocious attack’ at Morriston flat
-
Entertainment7 days agoRapunzel brings festive magic to Torch Theatre
-
Crime4 days agoPembroke man accused of child sex offences sent to Swansea Crown Court








