Politics
Sacked Welsh Government minister Hannah Blythyn gives her side of story
A MINISTER sacked by Wales’ First Minister amid claims she leaked information to the press has broken her silence, telling the Senedd her side of the story.
Hannah Blythyn, the Labour MS who has represented Delyn since 2016, reiterated her vehement denial of the allegations made by Vaughan Gething.
She was accused of leaking messages between ministers which revealed the First Minister deleted Covid-era texts to swerve freedom of information legislation.
Ms Blythyn has been on leave and her personal statement was the first time she has spoken in the chamber, or Siambr, since her sacking in May.
Describing it as a privilege to serve in government – “particularly under Mark Drakeford” – she said: “This is not a statement that is easy for me to make, nor one that I take lightly.
“Indeed, there were times in the not-too-distant past when I’m not sure I would or could stand and speak in this Siambr again.
“I do so today because I know my removal from government has been a focus of discussion in this place while I have not been here.
“I also feel a responsibility to those closest to me and my many constituents who have demonstrated great patience, understanding and confidence in me….
“I know I can look all my colleagues who sit on these benches in the eye and say I have never leaked or briefed the media about any of you.
“In fact, I can say to everyone in this Siambr.
“Whilst I will not share the detail, I will wish to share that I have formally raised concerns about the process by which I was removed from government.”
Ms Blythyn said she was not being shown any alleged evidence before being sacked, made aware she was under investigation nor advised she had broken the ministerial code.
She told the Senedd: “I absolutely recognise and respect that it is within the gift of any First Minister to appoint and remove members of their government.
“I understand the nature of politics, I completely accept that. I raise concerns not out of self-interest but because I fundamentally believe in devolution and public service.”
In closing, she said: “In spite of the challenges and difficulties – perhaps because of them – I feel a renewed sense of commitment to the politics of public service and a real determination to continue to contribute to devolved democracy, my community and our country.”
She added: “I have very real concerns that lessons have not been learned from the past.
“Proper process not only needs to be in place and followed to ensure the dignity and respect of individuals but also to uphold the integrity of the civil service and the office of First Minister.
“I want to take a moment to reflect on something that is very personal and somewhat difficult for me but I feel it’s important to say for the sake of how we do politics.
“I know there has been speculation about my circumstances and whether I have been well enough to work.
“This has ranged from tantamount to misinformation and what can be put down to misunderstanding.”
Ms Blythyn told the chamber the past few months have taken a toll on her mental health as she called for a kinder politics.
She said: “It should not be surprising that what happened has been hugely detrimental to me on a personal level and led to acute anxiety and stress.
“I have never been signed off work before …. there was a point when the thought of putting my camera on to vote and seeing you all literally took my breath away.
“I share this now not in search of sympathy, I don’t want people’s sympathy, but because my recent experience has brought home to me that while we all ‘talk the talk’ on mental health, there is still more to do to improve our understanding and the impact that it has on individuals and their ability to do things we would ordinarily take for granted.
“Sadly, I think sometimes we get so caught up in the politics that we don’t always think about the person.”
Immediately following her sacking, Ms Blythyn wrote on social media: “I am deeply shocked and saddened by what has happened.
“I am clear and have been clear that I did not, nor have I ever leaked anything.
“Integrity is all in politics and I retain mine.”
In a statement at the time, the First Minister said: “It is of vital importance we are able to maintain confidence among government colleagues, so we work as one to focus on improving the lives of the people in Wales.”
Mr Gething kept the door open for his Labour colleague to return to government in future, praising her work on fire services and Wales’ LGBTQ+ action plan.
Martin Shipton, associate editor of Nation Cymru, penned an article in early May, accusing the First Minister of misleading the UK Covid inquiry by not admitting to deleting records.
In a ministerial group chat in August 2020, Mr Gething, the then-health minister, wrote in the leaked iMessage: “I’m deleting the messages in this group.
“They can be captured in an FoI [freedom of information] and I think we are all in the right place on the choice being made.
Ms Blythyn, a trade unionist from Connah’s Quay, supported Mr Gething’s opponent Jeremy Miles in the Labour leadership race after Mark Drakeford stood down.
The left-winger, who has been tipped as a potential future Welsh Labour leader, served as deputy minister for housing, local government and the environment under the former First Minister.
Crime
Welsh Lib Dems urge ministers to rethink rates relief for struggling pubs and cafés
Calls grow for Welsh Government to match support offered to English venues
THE WELSH LIBERAL DEMOCRATS have urged the Welsh Government to review its business rates policy, warning that scaling back support for pubs and hospitality risks further closures across towns and villages.
Party leader Jane Dodds, who represents Mid and West Wales in the Senedd Cymru, said ministers should act quickly to protect local venues after additional support for pubs and music venues was announced for England by the UK Government.
The measures announced by the Chancellor do not automatically apply in Wales, leaving uncertainty over whether similar help will be introduced here.
Hospitality businesses across Pembrokeshire and Carmarthenshire have already reported rising energy bills, higher wage costs and reduced footfall since the pandemic. From April, current business rates relief is expected to be reduced, a move the Liberal Democrats say could place Welsh firms at a disadvantage compared with competitors over the border.
Dodds said that pubs, cafés and restaurants form “the heart of our communities” and warned that withdrawing relief now would be “a serious mistake”.
She told the Senedd that support “cannot stop at pubs alone” and should extend to the wider hospitality sector, including restaurants and family venues that rely heavily on seasonal trade and tourism.
“When questioned, the First Minister said she needed to examine the details of the English package before committing to anything similar for Wales,” Dodds said. “Without urgent action, we risk losing viable, well-loved businesses that communities simply cannot afford to lose.”
The party is also calling for UK-wide action, including a temporary reduction in VAT for hospitality and tourism, funded by a windfall tax on large banks.
However, Welsh Government sources have previously argued that decisions on rates relief must be balanced against pressures on public finances, with ministers required to prioritise health, education and other frontline services within a fixed budget. They have said any additional support would need to be affordable and targeted.
Industry bodies have echoed concerns about the challenges facing the sector. Trade groups say many independent pubs and cafés continue to operate on tight margins, particularly in rural areas where they serve as community hubs as well as businesses.
Local operators say clarity is now key, with decisions on staffing, stock and opening hours often planned months in advance.
With the next financial year approaching, hospitality owners will be watching closely to see whether Wales mirrors England’s support – or leaves businesses to absorb the extra costs alone.
international news
Mandelson quits Labour over Epstein controversy
Former cabinet minister says stepping down is ‘in best interests of the party’ as questions raised over historic payments
LORD MANDLESON has resigned his membership of the Labour Party, saying he does not want to cause “further embarrassment” following renewed controversy over his past links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The former cabinet minister and one-time UK ambassador to the United States confirmed his decision in a letter to Labour’s general secretary after fresh documents released by the US Department of Justice appeared to reference him in connection with Epstein’s finances.
The files suggest that three payments of $25,000 — totalling $75,000, about £55,000 at today’s exchange rates — were allegedly made to Peter Mandelson in 2003 and 2004.
Lord Mandelson said he had “no record or recollection” of the transactions and believes the allegations may be false, but intends to investigate the matter himself.
In his resignation letter, he wrote that he felt “regretful and sorry” to be linked again to what he described as the “understandable furore” surrounding Epstein.
He added that stepping down from party membership was the responsible course of action while he reviewed the claims.
“I do not wish to cause further embarrassment to the Labour Party,” he said. “I have dedicated my life to the values and success of the party and believe I am acting in its best interests.”
Ambassador role ended
Lord Mandelson had been appointed the UK’s ambassador to Washington by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in December 2024.
However, he was removed from the post last year after earlier revelations about his past friendship and contact with Epstein, including emails showing communication after the financier’s 2008 conviction.
The latest release of files has also included photographs said to show Lord Mandelson alongside an unidentified woman. He said he could not place the location or circumstances of the images.
There is no suggestion that appearing in the documents or photographs indicates criminal wrongdoing.
‘Deep regret’
Earlier this weekend, Lord Mandelson reiterated his regret for ever having known Epstein and apologised “unequivocally” to the women and girls who suffered abuse.
“I want to repeat my apology to the women and girls whose voices should have been heard long before now,” he said.
Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, but investigations into his network of associates continue to generate political fallout on both sides of the Atlantic.
Labour has not yet issued a detailed statement beyond confirming it had received Lord Mandelson’s resignation.

News
Policing powers stay with Westminster as devolution debate reignites in Wales
THE UK GOVERNMENT has ruled out handing control of policing and criminal justice to Wales, triggering fresh political debate over whether the Senedd should ever take responsibility for law and order.
South Wales Central Conservative MS Andrew RT Davies said ministers were “right” to block further devolution, warning that separating Welsh forces from England would weaken efforts to tackle organised and cross-border crime.
His comments follow an exchange in the House of Commons, where Liz Saville-Roberts pressed the Home Secretary on transferring powers to Cardiff Bay. The Government confirmed it does not believe policing and criminal justice should be devolved.

“Must reflect the reality on the ground”
Mr Davies said proposals from Plaid Cymru and other devolution campaigners ignore how crime and communities operate in practice.
“The Senedd must not be put in charge of policing,” he said.
“Senedd ministers have an appalling track record on law and order. As senior police officers say, reforms must reflect the reality that many Welsh communities look east towards England far more than they do to other parts of Wales.”
Senior officers have echoed that concern.
Amanda Blackman, Chief Constable of North Wales Police, recently said her force area is “very much connected from a criminality perspective” to Merseyside and Cheshire.
“Our population move, if you like, is more east to west, west to east than it is north to south,” she said, pointing to the daily flow of commuters, shoppers and offenders across the border.
Long-running constitutional argument
Wales currently has four territorial forces – Dyfed-Powys, South Wales, Gwent and North Wales – but funding, legislation, prisons and the courts all remain under Westminster control.
Supporters of devolution argue this creates a “jagged” system, where services like health, housing and education are run by the Senedd but justice is not.
Plaid Cymru has repeatedly called for Wales to follow Scotland and Northern Ireland, both of which run their own justice systems.
They say decisions made in Cardiff could better reflect Welsh priorities, invest more in prevention, and link policing with mental health, youth services and social care.
A Plaid source said: “Communities in Wales should not have to rely on London to decide how their streets are policed. Justice should sit alongside the other services that deal with the causes of crime.”
Cost and complexity concerns
But critics warn that splitting away from England could come at a high price.
Establishing a separate legal and prison system would mean new administrative structures, courts oversight, inspection bodies and funding arrangements.
There are also practical questions around serious organised crime, counter-terrorism and specialist units that currently operate across England and Wales.
Former policing leaders have previously cautioned that criminals do not respect borders, and intelligence-sharing could become more complicated if systems diverge.
For rural areas such as Mid and West Wales, including Pembrokeshire, officers often work closely with English counterparts on drugs, county lines and cross-border burglary gangs.
Little appetite for change – for now
With the current Government making clear it has no plans to devolve the powers, the issue appears unlikely to change in the short term.
However, with constitutional reform regularly debated ahead of future elections, policing remains a live political question.
For now, responsibility for law and order stays firmly with Westminster – but the argument over who should control Wales’ justice system looks set to continue.
-
Health5 days agoConsultation reveals lack of public trust in health board
-
News6 days agoCaldey still unsafe, survivors warn — despite Abbey’s reform claims
-
Community5 days agoPembrokeshire students speak at national Holocaust Memorial Day event
-
News6 days agoKurtz raises Gumfreston flooding in the Senedd as petition deadline nears
-
Entertainment7 days agoRapunzel brings festive magic to Torch Theatre
-
Crime7 days agoMan denies murdering brother as jury hears of ‘ferocious attack’ at Morriston flat
-
Community7 days agoStorm Chandra: Morning impacts across Pembrokeshire
-
Education6 days ago‘Vulnerable teen’ questioned by police at Milford Haven School









