News
Councillor accused of conflict of interest over planning vote on rival venue
Ombudsman to investigate complaint after Milford Haven business blocked from regularising outdoor space
A FORMAL investigation is now under way into a senior Pembrokeshire councillor who cast the deciding vote to block a rival wedding and events venue from having its outdoor dining area approved.

Cllr Guy Woodham, Chair of Pembrokeshire County Council’s Planning Delegation Panel, has been referred to the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales following a complaint from Lee Bridges, the manager of Imperial Hall Limited, based on Hamilton Terrace in Milford Haven.
Bridges claims that Cllr Woodham breached the Members’ Code of Conduct by failing to declare relevant interests in two nearby venues — both of which operate in the same commercial space as the Imperial. These include:
- The Pill Social Centre, where Cllr Woodham is listed as Treasurer. The venue markets itself as a community hub offering weddings, parties, and live events.
- The Torch Theatre, where Cllr Woodham is Senior Manager – Business. The venue includes a licensed bar and offers private hire for functions and entertainment.
The complaint alleges that these roles constitute a personal and potentially prejudicial interest, which should have been declared prior to voting on planning application 24/0740/PA, submitted by Imperial Hall for retrospective permission to retain an upgraded outdoor dining space.
The vote on whether the application should proceed to the full Planning Committee was tied — and Cllr Woodham used his casting vote to prevent it from being heard by councillors. The application was later refused by officers on 4 June.

When asked whether Cllr Woodham had declared any interest in the matter, Pembrokeshire County Council confirmed:
“It is the responsibility of individual members to determine whether they have an interest that requires declaration under the Code of Conduct. In this case, no such declaration was made by Cllr Woodham.”
The Council added that where concerns about such matters arise, they are for the Ombudsman to consider independently.
Planning officers refused the application on the basis of the wall’s visual impact on the Grade II listed building, overlooking concerns, and the absence of a Green Infrastructure Statement.
But the decision has sparked outcry from the business community and local residents, who say the improved outdoor space is a positive visual and functional upgrade to what had previously been an overgrown area. The application was supported by Milford Haven Town Council, but never reached a public hearing.

A planning process clouded by confusion
The Herald has also learned that the process was further complicated when the Welsh Government initially objected to the development, mistakenly believing that the wall encroached on the A4076 trunk road pavement, which it owns and manages.
Lee Bridges said he was contacted directly and issued formal documents alleging that part of the development had been built on public land.
“I told the council I was nearly broke, as I was at that time” said Bridges. “We’d just come out of Covid, I’d spent everything improving the venue, and my solicitor was adamant we hadn’t encroached. I told them: ‘Take me to court if you think you’ve got a case.’”
In the end, the Welsh Government quietly dropped the issue, and it became clear that no paving slabs had been disturbed — and that the footway was now wider than before, once the overgrown hedge had been removed.
Bridges told The Herald that council officers had previously suggested that once the land ownership issue was resolved, planning permission should not be a problem. That assumption proved incorrect.
“We simply want to be treated fairly,” he added. “This decision has cost our business. We were told there would be no objections, and we’ve been left with the sense that there are different rules for different people.”

Under the Members’ Code of Conduct for Wales, councillors must declare any interests where they are an officer, committee member, or trustee of a body that could be affected by a council decision. If the interest is deemed prejudicial, they are expected to withdraw from the meeting and not participate in the vote.
The Ombudsman will now investigate whether Cllr Woodham’s involvement — given his roles at the Pill Social Centre and Torch Theatre — constituted a failure to comply with the Code.
When contacted by The Pembrokeshire Herald, Cllr Woodham said he was unable to provide a statement while the matter is under investigation by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales.
The applicant, Lee Bridges and Guy Woodham are both community councillors, sitting on Milford Haven Town Council.
Crime
Man accused of Milford Haven burglary and GBH remanded to Crown Court
A MILFORD HAVEN man has appeared in court charged with burglary and inflicting grievous bodily harm, following an incident at a flat in the town earlier this week.
Charged after alleged attack inside Victoria Road flat
Stephen Collier, aged thirty-eight, of Vaynor Road, Milford Haven, appeared before Llanelli Magistrates’ Court today (Friday, Dec 5). Collier is accused of entering a property known as Nos Da Flat, 2 Victoria Road, on December 3 and, while inside, inflicting grievous bodily harm on a man named John Hilton.
The court was told the alleged burglary and assault was carried out jointly with another man, Denis Chmelevski.
The charge is brought under section 9(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968, which covers burglary where violence is inflicted on a person inside the property.
No plea entered
Collier, represented by defence solicitor Chris White, did not enter a plea during the hearing. Prosecutor Simone Walsh applied for the defendant to be remanded in custody, citing the serious nature of the offence, the risk of further offending, and concerns that he could interfere with witnesses.
Magistrates Mr I Howells, Mr V Brickley and Mrs H Meade agreed, refusing bail and ordering that Collier be kept in custody before trial.
Case sent to Swansea Crown Court
The case was sent to Swansea Crown Court under Section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Collier will next appear on January 5, 2026 at 9:00am for a Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing.
A custody time limit has been set for June 5, 2026.
Chmelevski is expected to face proceedings separately.
News
Woman dies after collision in Tumble as police renew appeal for witnesses
POLICE are appealing for information after a woman died following a collision in Tumble on Tuesday (Dec 2).
Officers were called to Heol y Neuadd at around 5:35pm after a collision involving a maroon Skoda and a pedestrian. The female pedestrian was taken to hospital but sadly died from her injuries.
Dyfed-Powys Police has launched a renewed appeal for witnesses, including anyone who may have dash-cam, CCTV footage, or any information that could help the investigation.
Investigators are urging anyone who was in the area at the time or who may have captured the vehicle or the pedestrian on camera shortly before the collision to get in touch. (Phone: 101 Quote reference: DP-20251202-259.)
News
Greyhound Bill faces fresh scrutiny as second committee raises “serious concerns”
THE PROHIBITION of Greyhound Racing (Wales) Bill has been heavily criticised for a second time in 24 hours after the Senedd’s Legislation, Justice and Constitution (LJC) Committee published a highly critical Stage 1 report yesterday.
The cross-party committee said the Welsh Government’s handling of the legislation had “in several respects, fallen short of the standard of good legislative practice that we would normally expect”.
Key concerns highlighted by the LJC Committee include:
- Introducing the Bill before all relevant impact assessments (including a full Regulatory Impact Assessment and Children’s Rights Impact Assessment) had been completed – a step it described as “poor legislative practice, particularly … where the Bill may impact on human rights”.
- Failure to publish a statement confirming the Bill’s compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The committee has recommended that Rural Affairs Minister Huw Irranca-Davies issue such a statement before the Stage 1 vote on 16 December.
- Inadequate public consultation, with the 2023 animal-licensing consultation deemed “not an appropriate substitute” for targeted engagement on the specific proposal to ban the sport.
The report follows Tuesday’s equally critical findings from the Culture, Communications, Welsh Language, Sport and International Relations Committee, which questioned the robustness of the evidence base and the accelerated legislative timetable.
Industry reaction Mark Bird, chief executive of the Greyhound Board of Great Britain (GBGB), described the two reports as leaving the Bill “in tatters”.
“Two consecutive cross-party Senedd committees have now condemned the Welsh Government’s failures in due diligence, consultation and human rights considerations and evidence gathering,” he said. “The case for a ban has been comprehensively undermined. The responsible path forward is stronger regulation of the single remaining track at Ystrad Mynach, not prohibition.”
Response from supporters of the Bill Luke Fletcher MS (Labour, South Wales West), who introduced the Member-proposed Bill, said he welcomed thorough scrutiny and remained confident the legislation could be improved at later stages.
“I have always said this Bill is about ending an outdated practice that causes unnecessary suffering to thousands of greyhounds every year,” Mr Fletcher said. “The committees have raised legitimate procedural points, and I look forward to working with the Welsh Government and colleagues across the Senedd to address those concerns while keeping the core aim of the Bill intact.”
A Welsh Government spokesperson said: “The Minister has noted the committees’ reports and will respond formally in due course. The government supports the principle of the Bill and believes a ban on greyhound racing is justified on animal welfare grounds. Work is ongoing to finalise the outstanding impact assessments and to ensure full compatibility with the ECHR.”
The Bill is scheduled for a Stage 1 debate and vote in plenary on Tuesday 16 December. Even if it passes that hurdle, it would still require significant amendment at Stages 2 and 3 to satisfy the committees’ recommendations.
-
Crime3 days agoDefendant denies using Sudocrem-covered finger to assault two-month-old baby
-
Crime2 days agoPembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation
-
News2 days agoBaby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box
-
Crime15 hours agoProsecution delivers powerful closing speech in Christopher Phillips trial
-
Crime3 days agoLifeboat crew member forced to stand down after being assaulted at Milford pub
-
Crime4 days agoDefendant denies causing injuries to two-month-old baby
-
Crime2 days agoMother admits “terrible idea” to let new partner change her baby’s nappies alone
-
Crime4 days agoPembrokeshire haven master admits endangering life after speedboat collision






