PLANS for a One Planet Development scheme in rural Pembrokeshire which includes producing honey and walnuts, as well as raising guinea pigs for the applicants’ food, has been given the go-ahead.

In an application recommended for approval at the June 30 meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council’s planning committee, Dave and Mayu Phillips sought permission for a One Planet Development scheme at Walnut Grove, near Jeffreyston.

A supporting statement said Dave grew up locally; the couple keen to return to the area and continue the honey business established by Dave’s father Jim, which is based at Walnut Grove, and develop vegetable gardens and build a low impact dwelling on the site.

It added: “The land has been in the family for 20 years and is used as a base for Jim’s honey business with storage and a processing room in the sheds. There is also a kitchen on site for jarring up the honey. The site has over 50 walnut trees that were planted approximately 15-20 years ago as well as 20 active beehives in the apiary.”

It says, as well as the honey and walnuts, and fruits and vegetables, the site will also have a pair of breeding rabbits and three pairs of breeding guinea pigs will be kept to produce meat for the household, along with a a flock of 20 pigeons for eggs and meat.

An officer report for planners said: “The application seeks full permission for a One Planet Development (OPD), comprising a low-impact dwelling and integrated land-based activities.

“The dwelling would meet caravan standards and would be sited in the northern part of the site to the west of the access track. The wider scheme includes continuation and expansion of honey production, development of the walnut enterprise, horticulture, small-scale livestock, renewable energy provision, and a reed bed wastewater system.”

At the committee meeting, members were told that, by the fifth year of the One Planet Development, the projected income would be in the £13,450-£16,850 range.

Speaking at the meeting, Dave Phillips stressed the ethos of the One Planet Development scheme: “Humanity is living as if we have several more Planet Earths; once we’ve totally trashed this planet ‘move on to the next one,’ we can all play our part, living sustainably  and Pembrokeshire County Council can play its part.”

He said the honey had won prizes at the county show, with many shops and market stalls stocking it; the intention now to “add value” to what was already on site with products such as walnuts preserved in honey and walnut-infused apple cider vinegar, going on to say: “Walnuts with a glass of wine goes well.”

Committee chair Cllr Mark Carter said he was “quite intrigued” by the report mention of guinea pigs for meat, Mr Phillips stressing the ‘pigs were larger than the pet variety, and were similar to rabbits in terms of meat production.

Cllr Michael Williams raised the issue of a previous One Planet proposal for the site, refused back in 2023, and was told by officers that scheme was not considered robust enough.

Cllr Carter said he would support the scheme, adding: “To me this looks like a good chance of success, with an income from day one.”

Members unanimously backed conditional approval of the scheme.

PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL’S Deputy Leader has launched a major bid to halt controversial plans to close Stepaside School.

Cllr Paul Miller, who took over responsibility for education on May 15, has submitted a motion asking councillors to rescind two previous decisions which authorised officers to begin statutory consultation on closing Saundersfoot and Stepaside schools and replacing them with a single 3-11 primary school on the Saundersfoot site.

The proposal, backed by council in December 2025 and reaffirmed in March 2026, would have seen consultation begin in September.

But in a significant change of direction, Cllr Miller has now told members he no longer believes the proposal to discontinue Stepaside School is “the right one”.

In an email sent to all county councillors, he said he had reviewed the council’s school modernisation and reorganisation plans since taking on the education portfolio.

He said the authority’s work to date had focused mainly on surplus places, which he described as an “interesting estates and facilities metric” but one which “tells us very little about the educational experience of the children inside those buildings”.

Cllr Miller said he accepted that very small schools could become unviable, not only financially but educationally, because of pressures on leadership, staff capacity, mixed-age classes, peer groups and pupil wellbeing.

However, he said Stepaside was in a “materially different position” from schools with exceptionally low pupil numbers.

With around 100 pupils on roll, he said the school was “substantially larger than schools previously deemed unviable”.

He added that decisions affecting larger schools required a broader assessment of educational sustainability, leadership capacity, workforce resilience and pupil experience before closure could be justified.

Cllr Miller also raised the possibility of alternatives, including shared leadership arrangements or formal federation, which he said could strengthen the sustainability of both schools.

He further noted that the planned temporary full decant of Tenby VC School may use a significant proportion of existing surplus places at Saundersfoot School, potentially weakening the case for closing Stepaside as a response to surplus capacity in the Tenby cluster.

His motion asks council to rescind its decisions of December 12, 2025 and March 5, 2026 and to discontinue the proposed statutory consultation process relating to the closure of Saundersfoot and Stepaside schools.

He has asked for the motion to be dealt with at July’s full council meeting, describing it as the final ordinary meeting before the planned September consultation.

The move is likely to be welcomed by campaigners and parents who have opposed the closure of Stepaside School, but it also raises fresh questions about the future of the wider Saundersfoot proposal and the council’s school modernisation programme.

The Herald has previously reported strong local concern over the plans, with parents and residents arguing that Stepaside remains a viable village school and plays an important role in the community.

Pembrokeshire County Council has consistently said school reorganisation must take account of pupil numbers, surplus places, Welsh Government guidance, building condition, long-term sustainability and the need to provide high-quality education.

If accepted onto the agenda, Cllr Miller’s motion could force councillors to revisit one of the most sensitive education decisions currently facing the authority.

South Pembrokeshire MP Henry Tufnell welcomed the development, describing it as “absolutely fantastic news” and “a massive victory for our community”.

He said the council had listened following serious concerns raised by local parents, residents and community representatives.

Mr Tufnell added: “When a community stands together, raises its voice, and refuses to be ignored, this is exactly what can be achieved.”

He also thanked those who attended meetings, backed the campaign and spoke up for the future of local children.

ANDREW RT DAVIES has accused the new Plaid Cymru Welsh Government of backtracking on a pledge to hold a Wales-specific Covid inquiry.

The Conservative Senedd member for the Vale of Glamorgan and Bridgend challenged ministers in the Senedd this week, asking whether the Government’s proposed examination of Wales’s pandemic response would be a full public inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005.

Such an inquiry would have statutory powers, including the ability to compel witnesses and evidence.

Mr Davies said Plaid had repeatedly called for a Wales-specific inquiry while in opposition, but claimed ministers were now using the language of a “review” instead.

Speaking in the Senedd, he asked Trefnydd and Culture Minister Heledd Fychan to clarify whether the process would be an inquiry under the 2005 Act.

He said: “In his statement last week, he referred constantly to the Covid review rather than the Covid inquiry that the Government promised when they were in opposition.

“It was quite clear that, when you were in opposition, you were voting for an inquiry.

“Can we have clarity, please, via a statement, to understand the Government preparations in putting this together and that it will be an inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005?”

Ms Fychan did not directly confirm whether the process would be statutory, but said Plaid would stand by its manifesto commitment and continue working with families affected by the pandemic.

She told the Senedd: “I will refer the Member to the Plaid Cymru manifesto, where it was clear, and the commitment that was made in working with Covid bereaved families, in terms of what we would commit to.

“Certainly there will be an update when that work does progress.

“He will also know that we stood shoulder-to-shoulder and have been calling for lessons to be learned. And that’s what needs to happen here: lessons should be learned, so that preparations are better for the future.”

Responding afterwards, Mr Davies said the answer suggested Plaid was watering down its previous position.

He said: “Plaid Cymru’s first weeks in power have been marred by broken promises.

“Their failure to commit to a Covid inquiry with full statutory powers suggests they’re backtracking on this too.

“The cynical way in which many politicians fail to keep their pledges is the reason public trust in politics has collapsed.”

The dispute matters because there is a significant difference between a statutory public inquiry and a non-statutory review.

A statutory inquiry can compel documents and witnesses. A review may be quicker and cheaper, but its powers depend on the terms set by ministers.

Plaid’s position has developed over time. While in opposition, the party was among the strongest voices calling for Wales-specific scrutiny of the pandemic response. In November 2025, following the publication of the UK Covid Inquiry’s report into core decision-making, Heledd Fychan said a Plaid Government would conduct a dedicated “gap inquiry” to examine Welsh Government decisions.

However, Plaid’s 2026 manifesto promised to “establish a review of Wales’s Covid response, its legacies and lessons for the future within the first year of the next Senedd term, with a targeted focus on Wales-specific matters and questions not covered by the UK-wide inquiry.”

That wording is likely to be central to the political row now developing in Cardiff Bay.

The UK Covid Inquiry has already considered aspects of Wales’s pandemic response. Module 2B focused on core political and administrative decision-making in Wales, including decisions taken by the First Minister and Welsh Ministers between early 2020 and the lifting of remaining restrictions.

The inquiry has also published reports on resilience and preparedness, decision-making, healthcare systems, and vaccines and therapeutics. Further reports are expected on procurement, social care, test and trace, children and young people, economic support, and the wider impact of the pandemic.

For many families in Pembrokeshire and across Wales, the issue remains deeply personal rather than political.

Pandemic decisions affected care home visits, hospital appointments, school closures, business support, funeral arrangements, access to GPs and the rules governing daily life. In rural areas such as west Wales, the impact was felt by older residents, tourism businesses, farming families, pupils, carers, NHS staff and people who lost loved ones in difficult and often isolated circumstances.

Covid Bereaved Families for Justice Cymru has continued to call for a Wales-specific statutory public inquiry. The group has argued that Wales does not need simply to repeat the UK-wide inquiry, but does need a short, focused and economical process capable of answering questions specific to Wales.

The Welsh Government says it remains committed to learning lessons from the pandemic and has pointed to its manifesto commitment to a targeted review.

The key question now is whether that review will have the legal force demanded by opposition politicians and bereaved families, or whether ministers will opt for a narrower process intended to report more quickly.

The Herald has asked the Welsh Government whether the planned Covid review will be established under the Inquiries Act 2005, whether it will have powers to compel evidence and witnesses, when its terms of reference will be published, and how bereaved families in Wales will be involved.