A TENBY woman has been fined after magistrates found she permitted an uninsured driver to use a car in Pembroke Dock.

Christy May Brown, aged 38, of Bush Terrace, Jameston, Tenby, was not present when her case was dealt with at Llanelli Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Jul 8).

The court heard that on November 1, 2025, Brown permitted Robert Christopher to use a Vauxhall Astra, registration KW08 KRD, on Ferry Lane, Pembroke Dock, when there was no insurance in force covering third-party risks.

The offence was proved in her absence.

Brown was fined £120 and ordered to pay a £48 victim services surcharge and £120 costs. Her driving record was endorsed with six penalty points.

Magistrates also dealt with a second matter, relating to Brown permitting Christopher to drive the same vehicle otherwise than in accordance with a driving licence. The court heard that he was a provisional licence holder, driving unaccompanied by a qualified passenger, and that no L-plates were displayed on the vehicle.

That offence was also proved in absence, but no separate penalty was imposed.

The court made a collection order and Brown was ordered to pay the £288 balance at £24 per month from August 5.

The case had earlier been reopened under section 142 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, with a sentence imposed on May 20, 2026 set aside and a previous licence endorsement removed.

Family-run cattle farm diversifies into rural tourism with support from £150,000 Development Bank loan

A FAMILY-run cattle farm in Carmarthenshire has opened its gates to visitors for the first time after launching a new holiday cottage business offering guests a hands-on taste of rural life.

Carnau Mawr Holiday Cottages, based at Brynawelon, has created two high-quality three-bedroom holiday lets alongside its existing beef farming operation.

The project was supported by a £150,000 loan from the Development Bank of Wales through the Wales Flexible Investment Fund.

Owned by Robert and Emily Currell, the farm now combines traditional livestock production with a growing rural tourism venture. The cottages give visitors the chance to stay on a working farm and learn more about day-to-day agricultural life.

The investment was led by David Knight, Investment Executive at the Development Bank of Wales.

Robert and Emily said: “Diversifying into holiday accommodation has been an enjoyable experience for us. It has given us a way to bring in additional income alongside the farm, while making full use of the land we already have.

“Neither of us had a background in hospitality before this, but we have found that we really enjoy welcoming people here.

“One of the most rewarding aspects has been giving visitors a chance to see how a working farm operates. For many children especially, it is their first real insight into farming, and that educational side has been incredibly positive.

“The Development Bank of Wales was excellent to work with. The team were approachable, supportive and made the whole process feel very personal. It really felt like dealing with people who understood what we were trying to achieve.”

The investment comes amid growing demand for high-quality rural accommodation in west Wales, while also highlighting how farming businesses are looking at new ways to diversify and strengthen their long-term future.

Nakeja Howell, Portfolio Executive at the Development Bank of Wales, said: “Carnau Mawr is a strong example of how farms across Wales are adapting and evolving.

“By diversifying into tourism, Robert and Emily have created a business that not only strengthens their own income but also contributes to the wider rural economy.

“Projects like this highlight the value of flexible finance that works alongside the realities of running a farm. By taking a relationship-led approach, we aim to provide funding that is practical, accessible and tailored to individual businesses.

“We are pleased to support Carnau Mawr as they establish their holiday accommodation offering and open up their farm to visitors, creating new opportunities for both the business and the local area.”

The £150,000 loan came from the Wales Flexible Investment Fund, which is financed by Welsh Government.

The £500m fund supports Welsh businesses with terms of up to 15 years. Loans, mezzanine finance and equity investments are available from £25,000 to £10m.

High Court dismisses claims by Duke of Sussex, Sir Elton John, Baroness Lawrence and others, with huge legal costs now looming

PRINCE HARRY Sir Elton John, Baroness Lawrence and four other public figures have lost a major High Court privacy battle against the publisher of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and MailOnline.

In a 436-page judgment handed down on Tuesday (July 7), Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed all claims brought against Associated Newspapers Limited.

The case was brought by Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon, Elizabeth Hurley, Sir Elton John, David Furnish, Sir Simon Hughes, Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, and Sadie Frost Law.

They alleged that Associated Newspapers had obtained private or confidential information through unlawful methods, including phone hacking, listening to calls, deception, and the use of private investigators.

The claimants said information gathered in this way was used to help prepare articles published in the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and MailOnline over a period stretching from the late 1990s to 2015.

Associated Newspapers denied the allegations.

After a lengthy trial earlier this year, the judge found that the claimants had not proved their case.

He said the court had to examine the evidence article by article, rather than deciding the case on broad allegations about tabloid culture or historic wrongdoing elsewhere in the newspaper industry.

The judgment examined dozens of stories and incidents, including articles about Prince Harry’s private life, Elizabeth Hurley’s family life, Sir Elton John and David Furnish, Sadie Frost Law, and Baroness Lawrence’s long campaign following the racist murder of her son Stephen Lawrence.

Mr Justice Nicklin said that while the use of private investigators could raise serious questions, it did not automatically prove unlawful information gathering.

He also accepted that some information could have come from public sources, previous reporting, ordinary journalistic contacts, publicists or confidential sources.

A central plank of the claimants’ case was an allegation that senior Associated figures had misled the Leveson Inquiry. The claimants described this as the “Leveson Lies”.

The judge rejected that allegation.

He found that the claimants had not proved that Paul Dacre, Elizabeth Hartley or Stephen Wright gave evidence to Leveson which they knew to be untrue.

The judge said Associated’s response to Leveson was not necessarily beyond criticism, but that was different from proving deliberate falsehoods.

He was also critical of the way the allegation had been pursued, saying that claims of such seriousness must be clearly tied to specific statements and properly put to witnesses.

The ruling is a major victory for Associated Newspapers and a significant setback for the Duke of Sussex, who has brought a series of legal actions against sections of the British press.

The financial consequences could also be substantial.

Associated Newspapers is expected to seek to recover its costs. Some reports have put the overall legal bill at more than £50m, although the final recoverable figure will be a matter for the court and may be lower.

A previous costs judgment showed that the claimants had taken out After The Event insurance, commonly known as ATE insurance. That type of policy is designed to protect a claimant against having to pay the other side’s legal costs if they lose.

The court was told the claimants had individual ATE policies of £2.35m each, giving total cover of £14.1m.

However, the final costs position has not yet been decided. A further hearing has been fixed for July 29 and 30, when the parties are expected to deal with the consequences of the judgment, including any dispute over costs.

For readers in Wales, the case is important because it goes to the heart of media law, privacy and the limits of evidence in claims against powerful publishers.

The judgment does not say that unlawful tabloid practices never happened. Instead, it says that these claimants failed to prove these claims against this publisher on the evidence before the court.

Mr Justice Nicklin concluded: “Each of the Claimants’ claims is dismissed.”

Associated Newspapers welcomed the ruling. The claimants are reported to be considering their next steps.