Politics
New building safety law could make flats unsellable, lenders warn
PROPOSED building safety laws risk “suppressing the appetite” of mortgage lenders to offer loans on flats, making properties effectively unsellable to most buyers, a committee has heard.
John Marr, from UK Finance – which represents the banking industry – expressed concerns about unintended consequences of the Welsh Government’s building safety bill.
The bill, which aims to create clear lines of legal responsibility for managing safety risks, would create three categories of building with different restrictions for each:
- category one: highest risk, at least 18 metres or seven storeys
- category two: medium risk, 11m to 18m or five or six storeys
- category three: lower risk, less than 11m and fewer than five storeys
Warning the bill could curb the appetite of mortgage lenders, Mr Marr said: “This could be so, particularly if the proposed obligations/duties in relation to category three buildings mean no flat owner is willing to take on these responsibilities.
“This could result in a lack of management/maintenance for such buildings.”
Mr Marr added that additional legal and cost burdens could “accelerate further flight” from the private-rented sector in Wales, limiting the available supply of homes.
Under the bill – which was brought forward to ensure the 2017 Grenfell Tower tragedy, in which 72 people died, can never happen again – flat owners could become the legally responsible “accountable person” for a building’s safety.
UK Finance warned owners may lack the “skills, resources or willingness” to take on such a role, resulting in critical safety works being delayed or neglected.
In written evidence to the Senedd’s housing committee, which is scrutinising the bill, Mr Marr wrote: “If a repossession takes place, lenders would not expect then to be responsible for funding outstanding repairs potentially, to the further financial detriment of the former owner.
“Lenders would also need to understand the affordability consequences of obligations on borrowers… some of which might fall to individuals rather than collectively.
“The overall effect of the proposals particularly for category three buildings could impact lender appetite to lend on such properties.”
Mr Marr said the broad definition of “accountable person” raises concerns about exposing lenders to duties and liabilities despite their limited operational control over the property.
Concerns about the bill’s real-world impact were echoed by councils and fire services, which warned of demands on an “already overstretched” workforce.
The Welsh Local Government Association (WLGA), the national voice of Wales’ 22 councils, described plans to designate councils as building safety authorities as unrealistic.
While supportive of the bill’s overarching aims, the WLGA pointed to funding pressures, workforce capacity challenges and limited technical expertise.
The umbrella organisation told Senedd Members: “Local authorities will struggle to fulfil these new responsibilities effectively, potentially undermining the bill’s objectives.”
Warning of implementation failure, the WLGA said financial estimates that accompanied the bill significantly underestimate the costs and demands on councils.
Fire services similarly warned of the financial impact – cautioning that without funding, the new legal duties will force them to divert resources away from existing safety work.
In its written evidence, the WLGA said: “Introducing new responsibilities without adequate funding is short-sighted, especially given the financial pressures facing local authorities.
“With England pursuing full cost recovery, it is questionable why Wales would opt for a less robust or cheaper model – particularly given the high stakes involved in building safety.”
In its evidence, an all-Wales housing expert panel depicted plans for 22 building safety authorities as unworkable – particularly in light of a “massive skills gap” – advocating a regional model based on the three fire service areas.
The Senedd’s housing committee will take oral evidence on the bill from representatives of councils, fire and rescue services, and UK Finance during its meeting on October 1.
News
Recounts concern raised over new Senedd voting system
Political sources warn tiny vote differences could decide final seats under Wales’ new proportional voting system, with fears of inconsistent recount decisions across the country
QUESTIONS have been raised over how recounts will be handled in Wales’ first Senedd election using the new six-member proportional voting system, amid fears that tiny vote differences could decide the final seat in some constituencies.
Under the new arrangements, Wales has been divided into larger multi-member constituencies, with six Senedd Members elected in each area using the D’Hondt system of proportional representation.
Political sources have expressed concern that the current Electoral Commission guidance may not adequately address situations where the allocation of the sixth and final seat could hinge on very small differences in party vote totals.
One political source, who asked not to be named, said the issue was not about the competence or integrity of Returning Officers, but about the lack of detailed public guidance surrounding recount decisions under the new system.
They said: “In some constituencies, the final seat may come down to a very narrow margin once the D’Hondt calculations are applied, even if no party’s overall vote total appears especially close in traditional terms.
“The concern is that there appears to be no clear guidance about how close the contest for the final seat needs to be before a recount is granted.”
The source warned that without clearer guidance there could be inconsistencies across Wales, with recounts potentially being allowed in one constituency but refused in another despite similar margins.
Electoral Commission guidance currently states that Returning Officers must be satisfied vote totals are accurate before producing a provisional result and that candidates and agents are entitled to request recounts.
However, the guidance also makes clear that Returning Officers may refuse recount requests if they consider them “unreasonable”.
The Electoral Commission said the existing rules already provide a framework for openness and transparency during the counting process, with candidates and agents allowed to inspect ballot bundles and challenge provisional results before declarations are made.
The guidance also confirms that more than one recount can take place if Returning Officers believe further recount requests are justified.
But critics argue that Wales is entering untested territory with the new electoral system, where relatively small shifts in vote totals could alter the final seat allocation after D’Hondt calculations are completed.
The Senedd election is the first to use the new system, which replaces the previous arrangement of constituency and regional members with fully proportional six-member constituencies across Wales.
This story was first reported by Nation.Cymru, you can read their report here.
Business
Pembrokeshire Lydstep Beach Village development refused
A CALL for an extra sign advertising a Pembrokeshire holiday park, adding to exiting unauthorised ones, which planners say would create “visual clutter and intrusion” and a distraction to drivers, has been refused.
In an application to Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, permission was sought, through Lakeside Signs Limited, for an additional sign advertising Haven’s Lydstep Beach Village, near Tenby, the sign proposed for North Lodge where the holiday park joins the main road.
Pembrokeshire County Council’s highways authority raised no concerns regarding the specific location of the sign, but said “there remains a broader concern regarding the cumulative impact of signage along this section of highway,” adding: “The increasing proliferation of signs in this location has the potential to create a visually cluttered environment, which may distract drivers and, in turn, give rise to road safety implications.”
A Park officer report recommending refusal said: “Currently, there are eight flagpoles, one A-frame banner type sign, one pole mounted panel sign, and a further panel sign, located behind the stone wall on the western side of the park’s entrance. None of these advertisements have the benefit of advertisement consent.”
It added: “The increasing number of signs in this location has the potential to create a distraction to drivers, which may result in road safety implications. In addition, the proliferation of signage would create clutter that would result in visual intrusion in this countryside location affecting amenity. As such, the recommendation is to refuse.”
It went on to say: “Whilst it is not deemed that the proposed advertisement would result in harm being caused to the specific special qualities of this area, there are concerns that the display of this advertisement would, along with the remainder of the advertisements, which are unauthorised, result in a proliferation of advertisements, which in turn would cause visual clutter and intrusion.
“This is especially problematic in a countryside location where development is strictly controlled. Should the existing signage be consolidated and rationalised, the Authority may support the proposed sign, however, currently, any additional signage would not be deemed appropriate.”
The application was refused on the grounds that it would, along with the exiting signage, “result in visual clutter and intrusion which would detract from the visual amenity of this countryside location, and would result in potential distraction to drivers, which in turn would rise to road safety implications”.
Community
Game of Thrones Jerome Flynn call to stop DARC space radar
GAM OF THRONES star Jerome Flynn has called for the controversial DARC ‘space radar’ scheme at Pembrokeshire’s Cawdor Barracks to be halted.
In an application recently submitted to Pembrokeshire county Council following a public consultation, the Ministry of Defence wants to install 27 radar antenna and a long list of associated works at Cawdor Barracks, Brawdy for a worldwide network of sensors called the Deep Space Advanced Radar Concept (DARC) to track active satellites and other objects which would utilise three sites worldwide, part of the AUKUS trilateral security partnership, in the USA, the UK and Australia “enabling 360-degree coverage of the sky at all times of day and under any weather conditions”.
In late 2023, Cawdor Barracks was identified as the preferred UK site by the-then UK Defence Secretary, Grant Shapps.
A supporting statement says of the DARC scheme: “This capability is critical to protect and defend the services provided by satellites, ensuring continuity and resilience against collisions or debris-related incidents.
“Without DARC, the UK faces a significant risk of losing access to these vital services, which would have severe consequences for national security, economic stability, and public safety.”
It says the scheme would create 90 full time equivalent construction jobs, and, when operational, will result in the creation of 60 full time equivalent jobs including operation, maintenance and security staff.
St Davids City Council members recently unanimously opposed the pre-application consultation proposals, and public objectors have raised concerns with protests recently taking place outside the barracks and County Hall, Haverfordwest, and Labour Senedd candidate Eluned Morgan has called for the scheme to be put on hold while Donald Trump is President of the USA.
Pembrokeshire-based Jerome Flynn, who was first famous for his roles in Soldier Soldier, Robson & Jerome and more recently Game Of Thrones has entered the fray surrounding the controversial DARC Radar via a social media video.

In the video Flynn describes voting in the upcoming Senedd election as; “probably the most crucial vote we’ve made in 25 years”, saying that whoever gets into the Senedd will have the power to block DARC Radar, referring to the project as “the most unspeakably abominable planning application led by the US military, backed by Donald Trump to place 27 radar dishes right on the edge of our beloved coastal national park”.
Campaigners against the scheme, PARC Against DARC said: “Whichever party or parties form the next Senedd administration following Thursday’s election will have at their disposal a mechanism known as ‘Calling in’ the planning application.”
Any ‘calling in’ could mean the final decision on the DARC scheme is made by Welsh Government.
Campaigners have previously warned that if built, DARC radar would make Pembrokeshire a first priority military target and would give Trump and the US the capability to dominate space from Wales.
“With a Chinese government-aligned source calling DARC a ‘significant escalation’, the US in yet another illegal war this time in Iran, and DARC confirmed by the US as the ground radar part of a weapons system designed to target space assets, there’s little sign DARC would be for anything else but fuelling decades of US aggression that Wales should have no part of.
“This time they’re trying to use our peninsula to weaponise space, as if Earth isn’t already weaponised enough.”
The DARC application will be considered by county planners at a later date.
-
News2 days agoBaby in critical condition after Fishguard emergency
-
News1 day agoFormer housing officer admits drink-driving in Pembrokeshire retail park
-
Crime1 day agoJob loss threat for convicted Pembrokeshire drug-driver
-
Crime1 day agoMilford motorist disqualified for drug-driving
-
Crime1 day agoPolice tip-off leads to driving ban for Milford motorist
-
Crime1 day agoDelivery driver caught twice over legal drink-drive limit
-
Community1 day agoSixth-former firefighter balances schoolwork with saving lives
-
Crime3 hours agoRacial abuse suspect barricaded himself inside Johnston lodge







