News
1950s women’s group questions ‘new evidence’ claims and £180k DWP payment
Welsh campaigners demand clarity from ministers as WASPI legal costs deal faces scrutiny
CAMPAIGNERS representing women born in the 1950s have written to the UK Government demanding urgent clarification over what ministers are calling “new evidence” on state pension age changes – and why the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) agreed to pay £180,000 towards legal costs when a High Court cap had been set at £90,000.
In a strongly worded email sent on Monday (Dec 15), Jackie Gilderdale and Kay Clarke, writing on behalf of 1950s Women of Wales, 50s Women United and Pension Partners for Justice, asked Pensions Minister Torsten Bell and Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden to explain the Government’s position ahead of a planned meeting with MPs in January.
They warn that, if ministers do not provide a “full and substantive” response, they will file Freedom of Information requests and escalate the issue to the National Audit Office (NAO) and the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee.
FIRST, THE ‘NEW EVIDENCE’
The Welsh-based group say they are “seeking urgent clarity” about repeated references in Westminster to “new evidence” relating to the way changes to women’s state pension age were communicated.
They argue that key material being talked about publicly is not new at all, but was uncovered years ago during the early stages of the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign.
In their letter, Jackie and Kay say the omission of state pension age rises for women from automatic pension forecasts “as early as 2003” was documented by the original WASPI co-founders, widely used in campaigning work and held by law firm Bindmans “for almost a decade”.
“It CANNOT credibly be described as new,” they write.
The email asks the ministers to spell out:
- What evidence is being described as “new”;
- When that evidence first came into the possession of Government, MPs and legal representatives; and
- Why “long established, documented evidence is now being presented in this manner”.
They also point to the fact that some material was once published on the WASPI website but later removed by the current WASPI leadership, led by Angela Madden, saying the reason “has never been explained”.
COSTS CAP AND £180,000 PAYMENT
The second major concern raised in the correspondence is the size of the DWP’s contribution to WASPI’s legal costs after the recent judicial review was halted.
The campaigners highlight that a costs capping order in the High Court proceedings limited the department’s liability to £90,000, yet the DWP has since confirmed it will pay £180,000 towards WASPI’s costs.
“This raises significant concerns regarding value for money, propriety and regularity, which fall within the scrutiny remit of the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee,” the letter states.
“It is unclear on what basis this excess payment was authorised, who approved it, or how it complied with principles of public financial management and ministerial accountability.”
Jackie and Kay say that unless ministers set out a clear justification for the payment, they will “proceed with a formal Freedom of Information request and refer the matter to the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee for full investigation”.
They also argue that, in a climate of tight public finances, any decision to go beyond a court-imposed cap should be fully explained to Parliament and the public.

CALL FOR INCLUSIVE MEDIATION
Underpinning the exchange is a long-running demand by 1950s Women of Wales and allied groups for formal mediation between the Government and all major campaign organisations representing women affected by pension age changes.
They point to recent changes to the Civil Procedure Rules and to case law encouraging courts and public bodies to make greater use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including mediation.
“As Pensions Minister, Mr Bell has a duty to engage constructively in mediation with leaders of all 1950s women groups,” they write, adding that these groups “possess further evidence requiring scrutiny”.
“To decline or ignore such engagement would risk breaching ministerial duties; fail to meet legal expectations and be manifestly unjust to the women impacted.”
The letter asks for written confirmation that the Minister will now engage in mediation “in line with the Civil Procedure Rules and 2024 ADR requirements”.
SECRECY ROW OVER DECEMBER HEARING
The latest intervention also revisits controversy around the handling of a court hearing on 3 December, linked to the WASPI judicial review.
In earlier emails copied into the thread, Jackie and Kay describe the arrangements for public access to that hearing as an “extraordinary scandal”, claiming the DWP and WASPI agreed to conditions which “effectively repudiated the principle of open justice” by limiting or charging for access.
They say it took an intervention by a High Court judge shortly before the hearing to restore open access, after which both parties withdrew their applications and the case did not proceed.
The campaigners argue that this sequence “raises profound questions” and are calling for greater transparency about why the case collapsed and what, if anything, was being “concealed”.
Those comments are allegations by the campaign group; there is no suggestion that any party has accepted that characterisation of events.

WASPI GOVERNANCE QUESTIONS
Alongside criticism of Government, the Welsh group is also calling for scrutiny of WASPI’s own governance.
In previous correspondence, they raised concerns about:
- apparent discrepancies between public statements about resignations and the directors still listed on Companies House;
- the group’s internal accountability; and
- whether WASPI’s leadership structure reflects those it claims to represent.
They argue that, by WASPI’s own figures, the organisation represents a relatively small proportion of the estimated 3.8 million women affected by state pension age changes, and say ministers should not treat it as the sole voice of the cohort.
“Government cannot be expected to engage with a company whose own governance raises such substantial questions,” one email says, while stressing that all groups – including WASPI – should be involved in any settlement process.
“WOMEN DESERVE HONESTY”
The latest message concludes by saying that women born in the 1950s “deserve honesty, transparency and accountability”.
“Anything less further undermines trust in the political process and perpetuates an injustice that has already endured for far too long, and cost a vast number of lives,” Jackie and Kay write.
They tell the ministers that, if their questions are ignored, they will ensure the full group of All-Party Parliamentary Group members, cross-party MPs and the wider public “are fully informed”.
The Herald has approached Torsten Bell MP, Pat McFadden MP and Bindmans for comment.
In an emailed response to The Herald’s questions on Monday, a DWP spokesperson said: “Last month we committed to retake the decision and as set out, we will do so within 3 months.
“This should not be taken as an indication that Government will necessarily decide that it should award financial compensation.”
A spokesperson for Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) said: “Just days before WASPI’s judicial review was set to take place, the Government backed down and agreed to reconsider all the evidence in the case by the end of February, and to pay WASPI £180,000 in legal costs – an increase on the costs cap.
“Prior to the expected hearing date, WASPI secured an agreement for the case to be screened online, in the public interest. However, the case was not in the end heard given the out-of-court settlement.
“WASPI continues to fight for fair and fast compensation for 1950s women and we enjoy the clear backing of the Parliamentary Ombudsman who concluded compensation was due following a thorough six year inquiry.”
Community
New parking rules spark concern at Dew Street site
Residents question phone-only payments, rising permit costs and future of former library building
RESIDENTS in Haverfordwest’s upper town say new parking rules behind the former County Library on Dew Street risk excluding older and less tech-savvy drivers, as concerns grow over both rising permit prices and the uncertain future of the prominent community building.
The car park is owned by Ateb Group, which allowed free public use over Christmas. However, signs installed this week state that drivers must pay either by phone or online.
Campaigners say both options effectively require a smartphone or internet access, leaving some motorists without a practical way to pay.
Mike Daffern, acting secretary of the Dew Street Campaign, told The Herald: “Realistically these are the same method. Both depend on a phone. For many older people, or anyone without mobile data, that simply isn’t accessible.
“Government guidance says there should be more than one way to pay. Most car parks still offer cash or card. We feel this discriminates against some of the very people who rely most on town centre parking.”

Permit prices questioned
Residents also say they were previously informed that Ateb intended to mirror the charging structure used by Pembrokeshire County Council.
They expected this would reduce the cost of residential permits. Instead, several have reported being quoted figures more than four times higher than equivalent council permits, alongside what they describe as a 30 per cent rise on last year.
One nearby resident, who did not wish to be named, said: “We were told it would be in line with the council. When the price came through it was nowhere near. For some households it just isn’t affordable.”
The Herald has approached Ateb for clarification on its pricing structure and the choice of payment systems.
Building left in limbo

Beyond parking, frustration is mounting about the long-term future of the former library itself.
Planning permission to refurbish the site was granted in 2023, but residents say little visible progress has been made. There is speculation the housing association may instead base operations in Milford Haven following the closure of Meyler House.
Campaigners argue that if the building is no longer required for offices, alternative community uses should be explored rather than allowing further deterioration.
A petition signed by ninety-five locals has been submitted to Cadw requesting the structure be considered for listing.
The request is backed by Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales and The Twentieth Century Society, both of which recognise its architectural significance as an example of late 20th-century civic design. The building also features in Simon Phipps’ book Brutal Wales / Cymru Friwtalaidd, which celebrates modernist architecture across Wales.
Mr Daffern said: “It’s part of Haverfordwest’s story. Even people who don’t love the look of it accept it’s an important public building. Leaving it empty helps no one.”

Temporary arrangement
Public use of the car park may only ever be short-term. The 3.5-acre site, including the former library, was sold by the council for £250,000 in 2022.
A consultation held in early 2024 on potential redevelopment proposals drew criticism, with some residents describing suggested housing plans as “cut-price” and out of keeping with the conservation area surrounding the historic upper town.
No formal planning application has yet been submitted.
Residents say clearer communication is needed on both the future of the land and day-to-day parking arrangements.
Mr Daffern added: “People understand the site will change one day. But while it’s open, it should be fair and accessible. All we’re asking for is common sense and proper engagement with the community.”
international news
Mandelson quits Labour over Epstein controversy
Former cabinet minister says stepping down is ‘in best interests of the party’ as questions raised over historic payments
LORD MANDLESON has resigned his membership of the Labour Party, saying he does not want to cause “further embarrassment” following renewed controversy over his past links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The former cabinet minister and one-time UK ambassador to the United States confirmed his decision in a letter to Labour’s general secretary after fresh documents released by the US Department of Justice appeared to reference him in connection with Epstein’s finances.
The files suggest that three payments of $25,000 — totalling $75,000, about £55,000 at today’s exchange rates — were allegedly made to Peter Mandelson in 2003 and 2004.
Lord Mandelson said he had “no record or recollection” of the transactions and believes the allegations may be false, but intends to investigate the matter himself.
In his resignation letter, he wrote that he felt “regretful and sorry” to be linked again to what he described as the “understandable furore” surrounding Epstein.
He added that stepping down from party membership was the responsible course of action while he reviewed the claims.
“I do not wish to cause further embarrassment to the Labour Party,” he said. “I have dedicated my life to the values and success of the party and believe I am acting in its best interests.”
Ambassador role ended
Lord Mandelson had been appointed the UK’s ambassador to Washington by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in December 2024.
However, he was removed from the post last year after earlier revelations about his past friendship and contact with Epstein, including emails showing communication after the financier’s 2008 conviction.
The latest release of files has also included photographs said to show Lord Mandelson alongside an unidentified woman. He said he could not place the location or circumstances of the images.
There is no suggestion that appearing in the documents or photographs indicates criminal wrongdoing.
‘Deep regret’
Earlier this weekend, Lord Mandelson reiterated his regret for ever having known Epstein and apologised “unequivocally” to the women and girls who suffered abuse.
“I want to repeat my apology to the women and girls whose voices should have been heard long before now,” he said.
Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, but investigations into his network of associates continue to generate political fallout on both sides of the Atlantic.
Labour has not yet issued a detailed statement beyond confirming it had received Lord Mandelson’s resignation.

Health
Doctor struck off after sexual misconduct findings at Withybush Hospital
Hospital medic erased from register for second time after tribunal finds abuse of trust and repeated inappropriate behaviour
A DOCTOR who worked at Withybush Hospital has been struck off the medical register after a tribunal found he sexually harassed junior colleagues and abused his position of trust.
Dr Velmurugan Kuppuswamy was erased from the register by a panel convened by the General Medical Council following findings that he made inappropriate sexual comments, engaged in unwanted physical contact, and displayed what was described as a pattern of sexually motivated behaviour towards more junior members of staff.
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service heard the misconduct occurred over several weeks between August and September 2021 while he was working at the Haverfordwest hospital.
The panel concluded he made inappropriate remarks to female colleagues at a social event and touched staff without their consent. His conduct was described as repeated, targeted, and exploitative of the power imbalance between senior and junior medics.
Catherine Moxon, chairing the tribunal, said the behaviour represented a clear abuse of his professional position and a serious failure to maintain appropriate boundaries.
The tribunal found his actions undermined colleagues’ dignity and confidence and risked damaging public trust in the medical profession.
Although Dr Kuppuswamy denied the allegations and pointed to his clinical competence, the panel ruled the misconduct was serious, persistent, and not easily remediable. Erasure, it said, was necessary to protect the public and maintain confidence in doctors.
His name has now been removed from the medical register with immediate effect.
Troubled history
This is not the first time Dr Kuppuswamy’s fitness to practise has been called into question.
Tribunal records show he was previously struck off in 2012 after being found dishonest during an application and interview for a postgraduate cardiology training post at an NHS deanery in England.
The earlier hearing found he falsely claimed to have submitted a Doctor of Medicine thesis, said he was a member of the Royal College of Physicians, and stated he had passed a practical clinical skills assessment.
He initially admitted the deception before retracting parts of his account. The tribunal concluded he had maintained dishonest accounts and wrongly accused another witness of misleading evidence.
He was erased from the register and returned to India, where he later worked at a cardiac hospital.
Return and fresh concerns
In 2020, he successfully applied to be restored to the UK register despite opposition from the GMC, which raised concerns about the timing of his remorse and the lack of independent evidence about his overseas work. The regulator also noted he had not undertaken ethics training.
At the time, a tribunal accepted his assurances that he had changed, describing his evidence as “compelling, heartfelt and genuine,” and concluded that a well-informed member of the public would not be concerned about his return.
Shortly after being reinstated, he began working shifts at Withybush Hospital, part of Hywel Dda University Health Board.
Within months, the fresh allegations that have now led to his second erasure emerged.
The health board has not publicly commented on the outcome of the hearing.
-
Health4 days agoConsultation reveals lack of public trust in health board
-
News5 days agoCaldey still unsafe, survivors warn — despite Abbey’s reform claims
-
Community5 days agoPembrokeshire students speak at national Holocaust Memorial Day event
-
News7 days agoWales warned against single police force as Lib Dems cite Scotland ‘lesson’
-
Crime7 days agoMilford Haven man appears in court charged with burglary and GBH
-
Business7 days agoDuke of Edinburgh Inn in Newgale on the market for £325,000
-
Local Government7 days agoTribunal over former Neyland councillor’s conduct adjourned
-
News5 days agoKurtz raises Gumfreston flooding in the Senedd as petition deadline nears









