News
Controversy over Cleddau cash
A DISPUTE about tolls on the Cleddau Bridge has delayed the council’s accounts being signed off by its external auditors.
Councillors have been kept in the dark about the argument and the fact the council has had to seek external legal advice on the issue.
It is alleged that the council has been funnelling between £1.5m and £2m per annum into the council’s revenue services account and not accurately accounting for either the income it receives or the deficit it claims the vital transport link has accumulated over time.
The Pembrokeshire Herald can confirm that the council has been in dispute with the Wales Audit Office (WAO) about the way it accounts for revenue from tolls on the Cleddau Bridge.
The spat turns on the interpretation of part of an Act of Parliament from 1987, The Dyfed Act, which sets out how the Council is supposed to deal with the revenue from bridge tolls it collects. The dispute is also about how the council’s own figures show a large accumulated deficit for operating the bridge, which is more a work of accounting fiction than a true reflection of its financial position.
The Herald has spoken to a person close to the dispute who has told us that one way the council has used the revenue from tolls is to subsidise its Council Tax figures, using the money gathered in tolls to drive down Council Tax bills so that Pembrokeshire has apparently lower Council Tax than other councils.
The Herald further understands that the accumulated deficit shown in the council’s accounts is an issue which is under discussion between the council and the WAO. The picture is obscured by the fact that while the bridge was commissioned in the 1960’s under one local government settlement, there have been two subsequent re-alignments of the local government landscape. Those reorganisations have contributed to the confusion about how to draw up the profit and loss schedule for the bridge, how much it has received in tolls, whether a profit has accrued and, in the event it has, what the council and its predecessors have done with the money.
Our source told us that it’s fair to say the situation is a mess and one partly created by the 1987 Act’s unclear drafting.
With local government re-organisation a hot topic at the moment, the effect of any merger will be that the council will need to both strike a more realistic position in respect of the Bridge’s financial status.
At the same time, in the event of merger with neighbouring authorities the effect of the backdoor subsidy given to Pembrokeshire’s Council Tax will unwind as a sudden and significant rise in Council Tax for the county.
Significantly, members of the council appear to have been kept in the dark about the situation and the potential impact it will have on the council’s financial position going forward.
The Herald understands that the council has sought external legal advice on how to sort out the dispute, which both it and the WAO are keen to resolve.
The Herald asked for a comment from the council about the position of its accounts. A spokesperson told us: “We anticipate the matter will be resolved at the next meeting of the Corporate Governance Committee which will be held before the end of the financial year.”
The WAO said: “We had a formal objection in regard to the accounting for the Cleddau Bridge. This delayed the accounts opinion. That has recently been resolved with the Council and we are awaiting an updated set of accounts, so we can check and certify them in March.”
Health
Resident doctors in Wales vote to accept new contract
RESIDENT doctors across Wales have voted to accept a new contract, with 83% of those who took part in a referendum backing the agreement, according to BMA Cymru Wales.
The contract includes a four per cent additional investment in the resident doctor workforce and introduces a range of reforms aimed at improving training conditions, wellbeing and long-term workforce sustainability within NHS Wales. The BMA says the deal also supports progress towards pay restoration, which remains a central issue for doctors.
Key changes include new safeguards to limit the most fatiguing working patterns, measures intended to address medical unemployment and career progression concerns, and reforms to study budgets and study leave to improve access to training opportunities.
Negotiations between the BMA’s Welsh Resident Doctors Committee, NHS Wales Employers and the Welsh Government concluded earlier this year. Following a consultation period, a referendum of resident doctors and final-year medical students in Wales was held, resulting in a clear majority in favour of the proposals.
Welsh Resident Doctors Committee chair Dr Oba Babs Osibodu said the agreement marked a significant step forward for doctors working in Wales.
He said: “We’re proud to have negotiated this contract, which offers our colleagues and the future generation of doctors safer terms of service, fairer pay, and better prospects so that they can grow and develop their careers in Wales.
“This contract will help to retain the doctors already in training, and also attract more doctors to work in Wales, where they can offer their expertise and benefit patients.”
Dr Osibodu added that the BMA remains committed to achieving full pay restoration and acknowledged that challenges remain for some doctors.
“Whilst this contract sets the foundations for a brighter future for resident doctors in Wales, we recognise that there are still doctors who are struggling to develop their careers and secure permanent work,” he said. “We need to work with the Welsh Government and NHS employers to address training bottlenecks and underemployment.”
The Welsh Government has previously said it recognises the pressures facing resident doctors and the importance of improving recruitment and retention across NHS Wales, while also highlighting the need to balance pay agreements with wider NHS funding pressures and patient demand.
The new contract is expected to be phased in from August 2026. It will initially apply to doctors in foundation programmes, those in specialty training with unbanded rotas, and new starters, before being rolled out to all resident doctors across Wales.
Crime
Swansea man jailed for online child sex offence dies in prison
A SWANSEA man who was jailed earlier this year for attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child has died while in custody.
Gareth Davies, aged 59, of the Maritime Quarter, was serving an 18-month prison sentence after being convicted in May of sending sexually explicit messages to what he believed was a 14-year-old girl. The account was in fact a decoy used as part of an online safeguarding operation.
The court heard that Davies began communicating with the decoy between November and December 2024 and persistently pursued the individual, later attempting to arrange a face-to-face meeting. He was arrested after being confronted by the decoy operators.
Davies had pleaded not guilty but was convicted following a trial. At the time of sentencing, police described the messages as extremely concerning and said his imprisonment was necessary to protect children.
It has now been confirmed that Davies died at HMP Parc on Wednesday (Nov 27) while serving his sentence.
The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman has launched an independent investigation into the death, which is standard procedure in all cases where someone dies in custody. No cause of death has been released at this stage.
A coroner will determine the circumstances in due course.
Farming
Welsh Conservatives warn climate plans could mean fewer livestock on Welsh farms
THE WELSH CONSERVATIVES have challenged the Welsh Government over climate change policies they say could lead to reductions in livestock numbers across Wales, raising concerns about the future of Welsh farming.
The row follows the Welsh Government’s decision, alongside Plaid Cymru and the Welsh Liberal Democrats, to support the UK Climate Change Committee’s Fourth Carbon Budget, which sets out the pathway towards Net Zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
The Carbon Budget, produced by the independent Climate Change Committee (CCC), states that meeting Net Zero targets will require a reduction in agricultural emissions, including changes to land use and, in some scenarios, a reduction in livestock numbers.
During questioning in the Senedd, the Welsh Conservatives pressed the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Rural Affairs on whether the Welsh Government supports reducing livestock numbers as part of its climate strategy.
Speaking after the exchange, Welsh Conservative Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Samuel Kurtz MS, said the Welsh Government could not distance itself from the implications of the policy it had backed.
Mr Kurtz said: “By voting in favour of these climate change regulations, Labour, Plaid Cymru and the Liberal Democrats have signed up to the UK Climate Change Committee’s call to cut livestock numbers in Wales, and they cannot dodge that reality.
“The Deputy First Minister’s smoke-and-mirrors answers only confirm what farmers already fear: that Labour, along with their budget bedfellows in Plaid and the Lib Dems, are prepared to sacrifice Welsh agriculture in pursuit of climate targets.”
He added that the issue came at a time of growing pressure on the farming sector, pointing to uncertainty over the proposed Sustainable Farming Scheme, the ongoing failure to eradicate bovine TB, nitrogen pollution regulations under the Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs), and proposed changes to inheritance tax rules affecting family farms.
The Welsh Government has repeatedly said it does not have a target to forcibly reduce livestock numbers and has argued that future emissions reductions will come through a combination of improved farming practices, environmental land management, and changes in land use agreed with farmers.
Ministers have also said the Sustainable Farming Scheme, which is due to replace the Basic Payment Scheme, is intended to reward farmers for food production alongside environmental outcomes, rather than remove land from agriculture.
The UK Climate Change Committee, which advises governments across the UK, has stressed that its pathways are based on modelling rather than fixed quotas, and that devolved governments have flexibility in how targets are met.
However, farming unions and rural groups in Wales have warned that policies focused on emissions reduction risk undermining the viability of livestock farming, particularly in upland and marginal areas where alternatives to grazing are limited.
The debate highlights the growing tension between climate targets and food production in Wales, with livestock farming remaining a central part of the rural economy and Welsh cultural identity.
As discussions continue over the final shape of the Sustainable Farming Scheme and Wales’ long-term climate plans, pressure is mounting on the Welsh Government to reassure farmers that climate policy will not come at the expense of the sector’s survival.
-
Crime1 day agoMilford Haven man jailed after drunken attack on partner and police officers
-
News4 days agoDyfed-Powys Police launch major investigation after triple fatal crash
-
Crime1 day agoTeenager charged following rape allegation at Saundersfoot nightclub
-
Crime2 days agoMan charged with months of coercive control and assaults
-
Crime3 days agoMan sent to Crown Court over historic indecent assault allegations
-
Crime5 days agoMan spared jail after baseball bat incident in Milford Haven
-
Crime3 days agoMilford Haven man admits multiple offences after A477 incident
-
Crime2 days agoWoman ‘terrified in own home’ after ex breaches court order










Louis Riel
March 4, 2015 at 4:24 pm
\”I need to seek external advice\” said the Head Of Legal Services when asked if she took her tea with sugar.
Tomos
March 5, 2015 at 9:37 am
So the one “excuse” to pay BPJ a fortune – lowest taxes in Wales – was down to us having to pay to cross the bridge i.e we were paying is now shot to pieces as well.
Now we’re in a position to ask – Why on earth was BPJ ever taken on, why was he not sacked, why was he protected – You have no reasons, no justifications – we need to learn from IPiGs mistakes otherwise we are eestined to make the same mistakes again and again
ieuan
March 8, 2015 at 1:47 pm
As head of Legal services she should know here job, it’s what she’s paid for!
I smell a cover up
John Hudson
March 24, 2015 at 8:03 am
Given that the Leader is on record at the last Council meeting as saying that the Council’s Accounting methodology for the Bridge has not changed:-
why The Auditor required The Council to seek Legal advice to substantiate the accounting entries in respect of the Bridge, an unusual step.
Why the Statutory Trading account for the Cleddau Bridge
was amended from the Draft 2013/14 Accounts figures by the exclusion of an amount in respect of a “notional” annual deficit, changing an annual net loss of £4.3m to a profit of £1.1m.
If, as the Leader would like us to believe, that Council is as usual, infallible, why it is taking so long to issue the report so that the Council’s Corporate Governance Committee can meet in order approve the Council’s 2013/14 Accounts and The Auditor can sign off the Accounts.
Why surplus toll income, over and above that required to meet annual Bridge operational expenses is applied to reduce the Council’s budget requirement and hence Council Tax.
Prior to the Auditor’s refusal to sign off the Accounts in respect of the Bridge, The Council had completed an in depth scrutiny and review of the financial prospects for the Bridge which concluded the exercise had covered all issues to do with the Bridge and all was well.