News
Badger’s Easter message
HELLO, READERS. Badger begins this week by acknowledging a grave error In last week’s column. In that article. Badger described the IPPG Cabinet as “a gang of time-serving nincompoops.” He apologises: Shelley wrote Ozymandias, not Keats. You know how it is. readers: distracted by the sheer commonplace idiocy of Jamie Adams saying that -change is never popular- (think winning the lottery. bucko!) Badger got his nineteenth century poets confused. Readers of Badger’s past columns will recall that he has. occasionally, expressed views which might lead his readers to suggest that while he appreciates and understands that others are possessed of religious faith. Badger is rather more sceptical. Badger is sceptical about many things: UFO’s. ghosts, the Loch Ness Monster, and conspiracy theories of any stripe.
Simply because some things are on the periphery of understanding does not mean that they cannot or could not be explained. With the caveat that Ken Rowlands clearly defies explanation. Every year. in December. national newspapers of a certain type produce acres of newsprint bewailing the loss of the spirit of Christmas. At some point in such an article painted wooden soldiers. nutcrackers. tangerines and the words “traditional Christmas fayre” appear with startling regularity. Along with an exhortation to say “Hurrah for the Black Shirts!” Easter is different. For an event that should be a celebration. there’s an awful lot of moping around and glumness. One expects on or around religious festivals a given number of (necessarily) pious pronouncements by Church leaders. a reaching for meaning and relevance.
But readers , are you ready for the zillionth showing of The Robe. Quo Vadis. The Greatest Story Ever Told, or Ben Hur as TV networks try to strike the right note of constipated cinemascope solemnity/ When he attended secondary school. Badger remembers one fervently devout teacher espousing the opinion that the television series Jesus of Nazareth, starring Robert Powell. was a blasphemous trivialisation of the message of the Gospels. Even then, Badger remembers thinking that this was a pretty rum position: now. Badger thinks it ignores – providing one believes in an all-knowing and all-powerful God – the likelihood that such a deity would be as much behind the making of television programmes and popular entertainments as he would be behind the oscillations of the stars in the heavens and the existence of the beasts of the field.
And that. for Badger, sitting in his sett and occasionally scratching his head, is at the heart of Badger’s Easter message. If you are inclined to believe in a deity. your faith does not exist in a vacuum. The world changes: faith – does not necessarily change but the context in which one exercises it does. A god – or gods. whatever one believes – did not create an unchanging world. The world might be “without end” but it is not pickled. Change, if one is inclined to believe Jamie Adams (please see above. then take two of the 80mg tablets and go for a lie down), is never popular. Badger could not agree less. Change for the better, whether personal or collective is always popular. It isonly with some people that some change is unpopular. For example the National Health Service is a jewel in the crown of public welfare provision. When it was first proposed it was as unpopular with the BMA as free thought is the County Council’s Cabinet.
The medical profession attended the NilS’s inception in the same way as – according to the Christian bible – Pharisees and Sadducees regarded the person of Jesus. Or as the !PPG greets scrutiny. Badger believes that change is the motor that drives us all forward: a necessary part of living; an essential pan of our growth as human beings. Badger notes that if you are a Christian. your faith is rooted in a radical change in Judaism that your belief tells you took place two millennia ago. While religious faith might he “the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen”, scripture is itself endlessly changeable. Politics – both worldly and ecclesiastical – as much as faith were behind the collation of the New Testament in the third and fourth centuries and the finalization of the Old Testament around the same time.
The same considerations underpinned the creed at the heart of the Christian faith. As Badger has noted before: words, even ones supposedly divinely inspired. are slippery and elusive. In such a way, doctrine and dogma change while faith can remain constant. Direction of travel remains the same. even when the highway code changes. And so it is with marriage. There’s been an awful lot of hullabaloo about same sex marriage in the sort of papers that buy into Christianity periodically and selectively. At the same time there has been an outpouring of outrage by those who regard the idea of changing the institution of marriage as a sign of the approaching end of times. Badger’s readers might know that before 1753 there was no statutory law underpinning marriage. The absence of banns or a licence – or even the fact that the marriage was not celebrated in a church – did not render the marriage void.
Then Parliament regularised and regulated marriage by statute. Statutes are drawn up and passed – however one regards George Osborne – by humans. And it is by humans they are changed. Human-made law governs the worldly actions of all of us. We render to Caesar what is Caesar’s. Badger remembers reading that somewhere. Since 1753. it is the law of the land that has governed marriage. And now the law has changed. It has
changed because the: ad has changed and so has society. Put it this way, if the English language had not mutated and evolved we would have no way of describing how we live. We would be like the French: fighting a losing battle against the modern world of le weekend, e-mail. le parking and le budget. And readers, nobody – surely, nobody! – wants to be like the French.
News
Prince William faces diplomatic tightrope on first Saudi Arabia visit
Energy, trade and human rights concerns collide as UK deploys monarchy’s ‘soft power’
PRINCE WILLIAM will step into one of the most politically sensitive overseas trips of his public life this week as he travels to Saudi Arabia at the request of the UK Government.
Unlike recent royal visits to Estonia, Poland or South Africa, this tour carries significant diplomatic weight, placing the Prince of Wales at the centre of a complex balancing act between strengthening economic ties and confronting a deeply controversial human rights record.
Sources close to the Palace say William “didn’t flinch” when asked to go, viewing such duties as part of his responsibility as heir to the throne.
But Saudi Arabia presents challenges unlike almost anywhere else on the royal calendar.
A country in transition
The visit will focus on energy transition and young people, two areas the kingdom is promoting heavily as it attempts to diversify its oil-dependent economy.
In recent years Saudi Arabia has staged major sporting and cultural events, including Formula One races, international film festivals and high-profile entertainment shows. The country will also host the men’s football World Cup in 2034.
Officials argue this signals modernisation and openness.
Critics say it is “sportswashing” — using global events to distract from repression.
Human rights organisations including Amnesty International continue to raise concerns over restrictions on free speech, criminalisation of same-sex relationships and harsh penalties for dissent.
While reforms have allowed women to drive and increased participation in public life, significant legal and social limits remain.
Meeting a controversial leader
Central to the trip will be talks with Mohammed bin Salman, widely known as MBS, the kingdom’s de facto ruler.
The crown prince is credited with pushing economic reforms but remains internationally divisive.
A US intelligence report concluded he approved the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul — an allegation he denies and Saudi Arabia rejects.
Whether William raises such issues privately is unlikely to be disclosed. Kensington Palace does not comment on confidential conversations.
However, the prince will be briefed extensively by the Foreign Office and the British Embassy before any meetings.
Soft power diplomacy
Government insiders describe William as a key diplomatic asset.
One source said the monarchy acts as a “secret weapon”, able to open doors politicians sometimes cannot.
This form of so-called soft power has long been part of the Royal Family’s overseas role — building relationships first, leaving governments to handle the harder negotiations.
Dr Neil Quilliam of Chatham House says Saudi leaders value high-level recognition from Britain.
“Deploying Prince William sends a signal that the UK takes the relationship seriously,” he said.
Energy cooperation and investment are expected to dominate talks, particularly as Britain seeks new partners during the global shift away from fossil fuels.
Echoes of the past
The visit also reflects longstanding links between the two royal families.
King Charles III has travelled to Saudi Arabia numerous times over the decades and is said to maintain warm relations with senior figures there.
William is now expected to assume a more prominent global role as he prepares for future kingship.
A delicate balancing act
For many observers, images of handshakes between William and MBS will be uncomfortable.
Yet world leaders continue to engage with Riyadh, citing its strategic and economic importance.
The prince’s task is unlikely to involve grand statements. Instead, it will be quiet diplomacy — maintaining dialogue while representing British values.
It is a careful, sometimes uneasy role.
But it is one the monarchy has long performed: building bridges in places where politics alone struggles to tread.
Community
Ice rink campaign launched for Pembrokeshire
Survey underway as resident explores sites and funding for year-round skating facility
PLANS to bring a permanent ice skating rink to Pembrokeshire are gathering momentum after a local resident began talks with council officers and launched a public survey to test demand.

Jemma Davies, from Newgale, says the county is missing out on a major leisure attraction that could benefit families, schools and visitors while creating new jobs.
At present, the nearest full-time rink for Pembrokeshire residents is in Cardiff — a round trip of several hours — making regular skating sessions difficult for many families.
She believes a local facility could change that.
“I think it would give people something completely different to do here,” she said. “It’s exercise, it’s social, and it’s something children could take up after school instead of having to travel out of the county.”
Early talks with council
Jemma has already met officers from Pembrokeshire County Council’s sport and recreation department to discuss whether the idea could be viable.
She is also hoping to approach Sport Wales to explore possible funding streams and support.
To measure interest, she has set up an online questionnaire asking residents whether they would use an ice rink and how far they would be willing to travel.
She said early responses have been positive, with families, young people and skating enthusiasts backing the idea.
Reusing empty buildings
Rather than constructing a new arena, Jemma is investigating whether vacant premises could be converted, reducing costs.
Potential options include a former retail unit in Haverfordwest or a large hangar-style building near existing leisure attractions.
She said: “If we can reuse a building that’s already there, it keeps the costs down and brings life back into empty spaces at the same time.”
As part of her research, she plans to visit Vindico Arena to better understand the practicalities of running a rink.
More than just skating
Beyond public sessions, she believes a rink could host school trips, birthday parties, events and competitions, while encouraging young people to take up winter sports.
“Pembrokeshire has produced plenty of sporting talent over the years,” she said. “There’s no reason we couldn’t develop figure skaters or ice hockey players here too.”
Residents who want to share their views can complete the online survey.
Cover image:
Jemma Davies: Hopes to bring a permanent ice rink to Pembrokeshire (Pic: Supplied).
Cymraeg
Moonpig’s Welsh fail still on sale as mistranslated St David’s Day card sparks laughs
A GREETING card meant to celebrate St David’s Day has become an accidental comedy hit after shoppers spotted its Welsh message makes absolutely no sense – and, even better, it is still on sale.
The card, sold by online retailer Moonpig, reads: “Hapus Dewi Sant Dydd.”
Unfortunately for the designers, that translates back into something closer to “Happy David Saint Day” or “Day Saint David Happy” rather than the correct Welsh phrase, “Dydd Dewi Sant Hapus.”
In other words, the words are right – just in completely the wrong order.
The mistake was first highlighted by Nation.Cymru, prompting plenty of amusement online, with some joking it looked like the result of a lazy copy-and-paste from an automatic translator.
The Herald decided to check for itself.
And yes – as of today – the card is still live and available to buy on Moonpig’s website.
Customers can personalise it and add it to their basket just like any other design, with no sign the message has been corrected.
One reader joked: “It’s like they put the words in a hat and picked them out at random.”
Another described it as “peak AI Welsh”.
For Welsh speakers, the error is immediately obvious. Welsh sentence structure differs from English, so simply translating each word individually rarely works. It’s the linguistic equivalent of writing “Birthday happy you” on a cake.
There was also online chatter that the dragon artwork may be facing the wrong direction – though by that point, the language had already stolen the show.
With St David’s Day cards meant to celebrate Welsh culture, the gaffe feels particularly ironic.
Still, if you fancy a collector’s item or a bit of office wall décor, you might want to be quick. Once someone at Moonpig finally runs it past an actual Welsh person, this one could quietly disappear.
Photo caption: The mistranslated St David’s Day card still available for sale on the Moonpig website (Pic: Moonpig).
-
Health3 days agoHealth board targets rise in steroid and gym drug use across west Wales
-
Crime4 days agoSex offender jailed after living off grid in Pembrokeshire and refusing to register
-
News5 days agoPrincess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
-
Crime3 days agoTeacher injured and teenager arrested for attempted murder at Milford Haven School
-
Crime5 days agoHakin man’s appeal delayed again as Crown Court seeks guidance on insurance law
-
Crime6 days agoArrest made after Carmarthen park stabbing investigation
-
Crime4 days agoJohnston man remanded in custody over knife and assault charges
-
Crime6 days agoMan guilty of threatening to kill Herald editor










https://owlbadges.com
December 29, 2025 at 10:24 pm
Your expertise on this subject shines through in this post.