News
Council ‘white elephant’ likely to be sold off
IT is ‘highly likely’ that Pembrokeshire County Council’s Cherry Grove building, which was bought for over £2,000,000 in 2011, will be declared surplus to requirements.
Questions have long been raised about the council’s purchase of the building and previous leaders defended their actions saying it would be beneficial and good value for money.
However, at a meeting of the Council on Thursday, December 14, it was revealed that the building is likely to be deemed surplus to requirements.
Cllr Viv Stoddart described Cherry Grove as a ‘white elephant’ and said that the council had been in denial about the building ever since they brought it in 2011.
Cllr Stoddart asked: “The demolition costs of Haverfordwest’s Cherry Grove have been quoted to be £400,000. This figure comes on top of the £3 million costs of acquiring and maintaining the building. Will the Council consider producing a detailed report as to how the Authority blundered into this situation?”
Cllr Kilmister replied: “The purchase of Cherry Grove took place in 2011, it was led by the former head of property acting on the instructions of the former chief executive.
“It is very likely that this building will be declared surplus to requirements and disposed of.
“I share Cllr Stoddart’s concern that a detailed report will not provide us with any benefit. I sincerely hope that we have already learned lessons from this corporate mistake.”
Cllr Stoddart added: “In 2011, when I challenged this purchase, the then leader John Davies said it would improve the authority’s efficiency and it had been brought at a very favourable price.
“The former leader, again when I challenged this purchase, Jamie Adams said ‘Cherry Grove represents good value for money and would be put to good use’.
“At a similar meeting I was chastised by Cllr Adams for quizzing whether this represented value for money and he chastised me saying perhaps I wanted to see the building fall into disrepair and it was important that it should not fall into disrepair.
“I call Cherry Grove the folly on the hill, I hear what you say, we are where we are. In the six years since this white elephant was brought, the previous administration had been in denial about it so would you agree with me that this scandalous waste of taxpayers’ money, if this had happened in the private sector, heads would roll?”
Cllr Kilmister said: “I agree with every word you have said in terms of that. This has been, in my view, a huge corporate error by this authority to purchase the building which is 30% empty at the present moment despite the amount that has been spent on it, it’s extremely unpopular with the people that work in it and it has high running costs. The sooner it comes off our books, the better it will be.
“I’m sure the people did it with good intention, but it is a complete and utter corporate folly, there is no need for that building which is why I have said it is almost certain it will be declared surplus.”
Cllr Jacob Williams also asked about the cost of the building and what its future would be.
Cllr Kilmister said: “The cost of purchasing and refurbishing Cherry Grove was £2,209,000. There are other costs in terms of running it since 2011.
“At a seminar there was significant support for releasing and disposing of Cherry Grove. It is highly likely that the building will be declared as surplus to requirements and disposed of. A Cabinet report to consider this option in the New Year.”
Cllr Jacob Williams said he was supportive of the demolition of the site and added that he felt that the County Hall wasn’t being used to its full capacity.
Cllr Kilmister finished by saying they have certainly never had ‘value for money’ out of Cherry Grove.
Crime
Lamphey parent fined over child’s school attendance record
A PARENT from the Lamphey area has been fined after failing to ensure their child attended school regularly, magistrates heard.
The case was dealt with in the defendant’s absence at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11) following proceedings brought by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that between Wednesday (April 30) and Friday (May 23), the parent failed to secure regular school attendance for their child, who was of compulsory school age at the time.
The offence was brought under section 444 of the Education Act 1996, which places a legal duty on parents to ensure their children attend school regularly.
The case was proved in absence, and magistrates imposed a fine of £220. The parent was also ordered to pay an £88 victim services surcharge and £100 in prosecution costs.
A collection order was made, with the total balance of £408 to be paid by Thursday (Jan 9).
Magistrates imposed reporting restrictions under section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. These prohibit the publication of any information that could identify the child involved, including names, addresses, schools, workplaces or images. The restrictions remain in force until the child reaches the age of eighteen.
Crime
Haverfordwest couple fined over child’s school attendance
A COUPLE from the Haverfordwest school area have been fined after failing to ensure their child attended school regularly, a magistrates’ court has heard.
The pair were dealt with at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11) in separate but linked cases brought by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that over a period in May, the couple failed to secure regular attendance at school for their child, who was of compulsory school age at the time.
Both cases were brought under section 444 of the Education Act 1996, which places a legal duty on parents to ensure their children attend school regularly.
One parent admitted the offence, with the guilty plea taken into account during sentencing. They were fined £40 and ordered to pay a £16 victim services surcharge and £128 in prosecution costs.
The second parent did not attend court and the case was proved in absence. Magistrates imposed a £60 fine, along with a £24 victim services surcharge and £100 in costs.
Collection orders were made in both cases, with payments set at £24 per month starting in January.
Magistrates imposed strict reporting restrictions under section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. These prohibit the publication of any information that could identify the child involved, including names, addresses, schools, workplaces or images.
The restrictions remain in place until the child reaches the age of eighteen.
Crime
Trefin dog case ends in forfeiture order after protection notice breach
Village protest followed months of complaints about barking
A WOMAN from north Pembrokeshire has been fined £1,000 and ordered to forfeit four dogs after repeatedly breaching a Community Protection Notice issued following complaints and protests in her village.

Julia Goodgame, aged fifty-eight, of Bryn Y Derwydd, Trefin, appeared before Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11), where she admitted failing to comply with the terms of a notice served by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that on Friday (June 20) Goodgame failed to secure control of her dogs just three days after a Community Protection Notice was issued on Tuesday (June 17). The notice was served under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
The case followed months of complaints from residents in Trefin relating to dog noise and control. Earlier this year, the dispute escalated into a public protest in the village, with a number of residents gathering to raise concerns about constant barking and its impact on daily life.
Goodgame had previously denied breaching the notice when she first appeared before magistrates in September. At that hearing, the council alleged multiple breaches across June and July and said enforcement action had been taken only after informal measures failed. A trial was later listed for Monday (Nov 10), with several witnesses expected to give evidence.

However, at the November hearing, Goodgame changed her plea from not guilty to guilty to one offence, with the remaining allegations not proceeded with.
As part of Wednesday’s sentence, magistrates ordered the immediate forfeiture and seizure of four Border Collie dogs, which Goodgame told the court were the only dogs in her possession.
Authorised officers from Pembrokeshire County Council are permitted to seize the dogs, with custody transferred to the council or an approved animal welfare organisation to ensure their humane handling and care. The court granted the council powers to rehome the dogs through reputable animal welfare organisations, or to destroy them if deemed necessary.
Goodgame was also ordered to pay the reasonable costs of seizure, transport, detention and any veterinary treatment required, along with additional enforcement costs.
A Criminal Behaviour Order was imposed until further order of the court. The order prohibits Goodgame from allowing her dogs to create unreasonable noise, leaving dogs outdoors while she is absent from the property, or allowing dog faeces to accumulate at the address. Any waste stored on the premises must be kept in secured bins away from boundary fences.
In addition to the £1,000 fine, she was ordered to pay a £400 victim services surcharge and £1,200 in prosecution costs. A collection order was made, allowing deductions to be taken directly from benefits if necessary.
The forfeiture order was made under section 50 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
-
Crime5 days agoPhillips found guilty of raping baby in “worst case” judge has ever dealt with
-
Crime4 days agoKilgetty scaffolder sentenced after driving with cocaine and in system
-
Crime4 days agoHousing site director sentenced after failing to provide breath sample following crash
-
Crime4 days agoMotorist banned for three years after driving with cannabis in system
-
Education3 days agoTeaching assistant struck off after asking pupil for photos of her body
-
News6 days agoJury retires tomorrow in harrowing Baby C rape trial
-
Crime4 days agoMilford Haven pensioner denies exposure charges
-
Crime17 hours agoMan spared jail after baseball bat incident in Milford Haven








