News
Stephen Crabb: ‘I will vote to deliver Brexit tonight’
STEPHEN CRABB MP, member of parliament for Preseli Pembrokeshire, has written an open letter to his constituents explaining his position over Brexit and explaining his intentions in supporting Theresa May in the Brexit vote tonight (Jan 15).
On his Facebook page, the MP posted: “I have received thousands of emails and letters from constituents in recent weeks outlining their views on Brexit. I am taking the time to read through every piece of correspondence because I believe it is important to hear all views from the constituency at this serious moment.
“It will not be possible to reply to all emails ahead of the vote tomorrow but I will respond as soon as I can.
“Attached is an open letter to all my constituents about the Brexit vote tonight.
“It is highly likely that the deal will be defeated later, but I believe that this deal or something very much like it will eventually have to be passed in order for us to move forward. Please take the time to read over the letter to hear my views on the process so far and what is yet to come.”
The full letter below:
Dear Constituents,
Firstly, many thanks to everyone who has contacted me about Brexit over the last few weeks and months.
I have received more than two thousand emails and letters from constituents. No other issue, including the proposed downgrading of Withybush Hospital, has generated anything like as much correspondence – and opinion has been split right down the middle. Many constituents are now arguing for a second referendum and for Brexit to be stopped, whilst on the other side many are arguing for the Brexit vote to be respected and implemented.
Tonight the House of Commons will vote on the draft EU Withdrawal Agreement. It will be the most significant vote for over forty years.
In 2016 the country voted 52% to leave the EU and 48% to remain. In Preseli Pembrokeshire, that majority was even clearer with 55% of voters wanting to leave. On the night of the referendum result I promised to give my all to ensuring that the outcome of that vote is delivered.
It would be an enormous breach of trust with voters for the referendum result to be ignored or overturned. So at every stage of the process since June 2016 I have voted consistently to implement Brexit and to allow the UK Government flexibility in the way it conducts the negotiations. I have voted against every attempt to block or water-down the referendum result, or to try and shackle the hands of the Prime Minister.
As we approach the end of the negotiation process, there is now a deal on the table. It is important to be clear about what this deal is and what it is not. This deal does not set out in detail our new long-term relationship with the EU once we leave; this is purely about the terms on which we exit at the end of March this year.
Under this Agreement, the UK ceases to be a member of the EU at the end of March but it provides for a transition period which will give clarity on trade rules for businesses while the details of the new long-term relationship are negotiated and agreed.
I will vote for the deal because I believe it is the surest and most responsible way of delivering Brexit. A lot of the criticism I have heard about the deal is ill-informed and, in some cases, blatantly untrue.
This deal ensures:
- Free movement of people will end
- We are free to sign trade deals with other countries
- A free trade area for goods with the EU
- No more vast contributions to the EU budget
- Flexibility on services and digital
- We leave the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy
- The European Court of Justice won’t have jurisdiction over the UK
- Continued security cooperation
- Direct effect of EU law in the UK will end
- No hard border in Northern Ireland, or a border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK
On the issue of the so-called ‘Irish backstop’, I think that taking a careful approach to the sensitivities around the Irish border and protecting the gains of the peace process is the responsible thing to do. Polls show that a majority of people in Northern Ireland actually support the Irish backstop regardless of what the DUP may say.
If this Brexit deal is blocked tonight, it is very unclear what will happen next. Different groups of MPs have their own ideas on the way forward. There is a growing number of MPs calling for a second referendum to stop Brexit; there is a group of MPs arguing for a Norway style deal which would be an even softer Brexit; some are arguing for the Brexit day to be postponed to allow more time to negotiate the current deal. All of these scenarios make Brexit less likely.
Even though it is not my preferred outcome, I have consistently voted to allow the Government to spend money preparing for a No Deal outcome as I believe we should be prepared for all eventualities. However, as we saw in the votes last week, there is a majority of MPs in Parliament who will do everything in their power to try to prevent No Deal.
How we leave the EU really does matter to the lives of people who work in key sectors in Pembrokeshire, such as the ports, oil refining and agriculture. I have taken the time to discuss the different Brexit scenarios with all of the leading employers in Pembrokeshire and I honestly believe that the deal on the table is the best way forward given the very serious and specific concerns that have been raised with me by the people who create jobs for my constituents.
The deal is not perfect but no one seems to have a serious Plan B that can command a majority in the Commons. Britain needs a way forward from the current divisions and arguments that are poisoning our national politics.
Nobody knows what will happen next but I genuinely believe that the Brexit deal on the table is the only way to deliver on the referendum result with any kind of certainty.
Tonight I will vote to deliver Brexit.
Rt Hon Stephen Crabb MP
Crime
Hakin man’s appeal delayed again as Crown Court seeks guidance on insurance law
A HAKIN man’s long-running legal battle over road traffic convictions has been delayed again after a judge granted the Crown Prosecution Service more time to review the latest legal guidance on motor insurance law.
Seventy-six-year-old Niall Taylor, of Haven Drive, appeared at Swansea Crown Court on Tuesday (Jan 13) for a mention hearing in his appeal against conviction.
Taylor is challenging findings that he drove without a valid licence and without insurance.
The case has already followed an unusual procedural route. Taylor initially pleaded not guilty before changing his plea part-way through the original magistrates’ court trial. That later raised questions over whether the plea had been “equivocal”, prompting the court to reopen proceedings under Section 142 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980.
A full rehearing was ordered, during which Taylor again entered not guilty pleas. Following a trial of the facts, magistrates found him guilty and sentenced him on Wednesday (Dec 3).
He has since lodged an appeal.
CPS given 28 days
During Tuesday’s hearing, His Honour Judge Walters granted counsel for the Crown Prosecution Service 28 days to review Wilkinson’s Road Traffic Offences (32nd Edition), the leading legal reference text used by courts and practitioners in road traffic cases.
The judge indicated that the legal position surrounding insurance cover may still require closer examination.
Addressing the court, Judge Walters said: “The court still might want to reconsider the sentence even if the insurance company is right. It does look as if different insurance companies do things in different ways.”
He added: “It is not in fact void, but it is voidable.”
Ongoing dispute
Taylor maintains that although there were administrative issues with his driving licence, a valid insurance policy was in force at the time and that, under retained European motor insurance law, third-party cover cannot simply be voided.
He argues that the matter amounts to a technical breach rather than deliberate offending.
Next hearing
The appeal is now scheduled to return to Swansea Crown Court on March 27, when further legal argument is expected.
Business
Pub rate relief welcomed but closures still feared
CAMRA warns one-year discount is only a sticking plaster as many Welsh locals face rising bills
A BUSINESS rates discount for Welsh pubs has been welcomed as a step in the right direction — but campaigners warn it will not be enough to stop more locals from shutting their doors.
The Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) says the Welsh Government’s decision to offer a 15 per cent reduction on business rates bills for the coming year will provide short-term breathing space for struggling publicans.
However, it believes the move fails to tackle deeper problems in the rating system that continue to pile pressure on community pubs across Wales, including in Pembrokeshire and Carmarthenshire.
Chris Charters, Director of CAMRA Wales, said: “Today’s announcement from the Finance Secretary that pubs will get 15% discount on their business rates bills is a welcome step.
“However, many pubs still face big hikes in their bills due to the rates revaluation which could still lead to more of our locals in Wales being forced to close for good.
“15% off for a year is only the start of supporting pubs with business rates. It won’t fix the unfair business rates system our pubs are being crushed by.”
He added: “Welsh publicans need a permanent solution, or doors will continue to close and communities will be shut away from these essential social hubs that help tackle loneliness and isolation.”
Mounting pressure on locals
Under plans announced by the Welsh Government, pubs will receive a temporary discount on their rates bills for the next financial year.
But CAMRA argues that many premises are simultaneously facing sharp increases following the latest revaluation, which recalculates rateable values based on property size and trading potential.
For some smaller, rural venues, especially those already operating on tight margins, the increases could wipe out the benefit of the relief entirely.
Publicans say they are also contending with rising energy costs, higher wages, supplier price hikes and changing customer habits since the pandemic.
In west Wales, several long-standing village pubs have either reduced their opening hours or put their businesses on the market in the past year, with landlords warning that overheads are becoming unsustainable.
Community role
Campaigners stress that the issue goes beyond beer sales.
Pubs are often described as the last remaining social spaces in small communities — hosting charity events, sports teams, live music and local groups.
In parts of rural Pembrokeshire, a pub can be the only public meeting place left after the loss of shops, banks and post offices.
CAMRA says supermarkets and online retailers enjoy structural advantages that traditional pubs cannot match, making it harder for locals to compete on price.
The organisation is now calling on ministers to introduce a permanently lower business rates multiplier for pubs, rather than relying on short-term discounts.
Long-term reform call
CAMRA wants whoever forms the next Welsh administration to commit to fundamental reform of the rating system, arguing that pubs should be recognised as community assets rather than treated like large commercial premises.
Without change, it warns, the number of closures is likely to accelerate.
Charters said: “This is about protecting the future of our locals. Once a pub shuts, it rarely reopens. We can’t afford to lose any more.”
For many communities across west Wales, the fear is simple: temporary relief may buy time — but it may not be enough to save the local.
Local Government
Council tax rise options to be debated by Cabinet
Leader signals support for lower increase as schools set for £4.7m boost
PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL’S Cabinet will next week consider how much residents will be asked to pay in Council Tax as part of the authority’s 2026–27 budget setting process.
Members of Pembrokeshire County Council will meet on Monday (Feb 9) to examine two proposed options: a 4.6 per cent increase, equivalent to £1.46 per week for a Band D property, or a 7.5 per cent rise, equal to £2.38 per week.
Council leader Jon Harvey said the authority aimed to keep any rise as low as possible while protecting frontline services.
“In setting this year’s budget it’s our intention to ask the least possible from tax paying residents while still providing the vital services they rely upon,” he said.
He added that he expects Cabinet to favour the lower increase when it makes its recommendation to full council.
Mr Harvey said the lower option would still allow the authority to safeguard services and provide “significantly more money” for schools, with an additional £4.7 million earmarked for education.
He also highlighted the need for further investment in highways, building maintenance and street cleaning teams.
“We know these services are important to residents and so we intend to prioritise them,” he said.
The leader said the financial pressures created by the pandemic, rising costs and increasing demand for social care had led to unavoidable tax increases in recent years.
However, he added: “Going forward, I am very aware we cannot keep asking residents to pay significantly more and it is our intention to get back to Council Tax increases that are broadly in line with inflation.”
The Cabinet meeting starts at 10:00am and will be broadcast live via the council’s usual webcast platform.
-
Health5 days agoConsultation reveals lack of public trust in health board
-
News6 days agoCaldey still unsafe, survivors warn — despite Abbey’s reform claims
-
Community6 days agoPembrokeshire students speak at national Holocaust Memorial Day event
-
News5 hours agoPrincess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
-
News6 days agoKurtz raises Gumfreston flooding in the Senedd as petition deadline nears
-
Community5 days agoCampaign to ‘save’ River Cleddau hits over 2,200 signatures
-
Education6 days ago‘Vulnerable teen’ questioned by police at Milford Haven School
-
Crime4 days agoPembroke man accused of child sex offences sent to Swansea Crown Court









