A DRUG dealer has been jailed after admitting to supplying cocaine, pregabalin, and diazepam.

Phillip Greenfield, 46, of Queen Street, Pembroke Dock, appeared before Swansea Crown Court charged with multiple drug offences.

The court heard that Greenfield was concerned in the supply of cocaine between February 26 and March 26 last year. He also faced two charges of possession with intent to supply Class C drugs—diazepam and pregabalin—on March 25.

Greenfield was further charged with possessing criminal property, namely £1,250 in cash, on the same date. He had previously admitted possession of cannabis at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on December 17.

At a hearing in January, Greenfield pleaded guilty to all four offences. His defence stated that he had no previous convictions for drug dealing.

He was sentenced to three years in prison.

Greenfield will return to court on June 23 for a Proceeds of Crime Act hearing, where an application has been made to recover any profits from his offending.

THE SENTENCING of three men for an antisemitic kidnapping in Carmarthenshire has reignited concerns about the rise of hate crimes in the UK. The attack, which saw an Israeli music producer lured to a remote location under false pretenses before being assaulted and detained, has been widely condemned. The case raises significant questions about the intersections of racial hatred, criminal opportunism, and law enforcement’s ability to curb such incidents before they escalate.

What sets this case apart is not just the brutality of the attack but the underlying motivations. As revealed in court, the perpetrators—Mohammad Comrie, 22, Faiz Shah, 22, and Elijah Ogunnubi-Sime, 20—were driven by a mix of financial gain and racial hatred. Using a fictitious music production company, they tricked the victim into traveling to Wales before launching their assault.

The court found that all three men had specifically targeted the victim due to his Jewish identity, making this a case of both opportunistic crime and hate-driven violence. The victim later described his experience as his “personal October 7th,” referencing the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, underscoring the deep psychological impact of the ordeal.

A growing trend of antisemitism

The case is not an isolated event but part of a wider pattern of increasing antisemitic incidents. Between October 2023 and September 2024, the Community Security Trust (CST) recorded 5,583 antisemitic incidents in the UK—a 204% rise from the previous year. This surge has heightened concerns about the safety of Jewish individuals across the country.

Experts have pointed to a combination of factors fueling this rise. Geopolitical tensions, the spread of extremist ideologies through social media, and a broader trend of rising hate crimes across Europe have all contributed to the problem. The rise of online radicalization has played a significant role in fostering antisemitic sentiments, creating an environment where individuals feel emboldened to act on their prejudices.

Legal fallout and sentencing

On March 14, 2025, Swansea Crown Court sentenced Comrie, Shah, and Ogunnubi-Sime to eight years and one month each. Their guilty pleas on the first day of trial indicated a case so clear-cut that mounting a defense proved impossible. The sentencing, while providing a sense of justice, has left many questioning whether such punishments serve as an effective deterrent.

Hate crime laws in the UK have evolved over the years, but many campaigners argue they still do not go far enough. Calls for harsher penalties for racially motivated crimes have grown louder, with some urging for mandatory minimum sentences for hate-related offenses. Others believe that law enforcement needs greater resources to tackle hate crime networks before they escalate into violent incidents.

The role of law enforcement and community response

Dyfed-Powys Police acted swiftly in apprehending the suspects, aided by a police helicopter and ground units. However, the incident raises broader concerns about law enforcement’s role in preventing hate crimes before they happen. Investigations into the trio’s online activity could shed light on whether they were influenced by extremist content or whether they had connections to wider hate groups.

The CST has since provided security advice and psychological support to the victim, but the community remains on edge. The response from Jewish organizations has been one of renewed vigilance, with many calling for increased security measures at synagogues, schools, and cultural centers.

Mark Gardner, CST Chief Executive, summed up the gravity of the case: “The combination of criminality and anti-Jewish hatred could easily have resulted in a far worse, perhaps even fatal, outcome.”

The psychological and societal impact

Hate crimes do not just affect individual victims—they send shockwaves through entire communities. This incident has left the Jewish community in the UK feeling increasingly vulnerable.

Psychologists have long studied the effects of hate crimes on victims, noting that targeted attacks based on race or religion often lead to more profound and lasting trauma than random acts of violence. Victims of hate crimes frequently report heightened levels of anxiety, difficulty trusting others, and a lasting sense of insecurity. The fear that such an attack could happen again compounds the trauma, making recovery even more difficult.

Beyond the Jewish community, cases like this can have a corrosive effect on social cohesion. Hate crimes fuel division, create fear, and weaken the bonds that hold communities together. Experts warn that unless action is taken to address the root causes of antisemitic hate crimes, they will continue to rise.

The bigger picture

This case underscores the evolving nature of antisemitic threats—no longer limited to verbal abuse or vandalism but now involving calculated acts of violence. It serves as a stark warning that tackling hate crime requires more than just police intervention; it demands a societal shift in attitudes, stronger legal deterrents, and increased vigilance from both authorities and the public.

Ultimately, preventing hate crimes requires a multi-faceted approach. Education campaigns aimed at combating antisemitism, stronger enforcement against online hate speech, and greater community outreach efforts are all essential steps. The UK has long prided itself on being a multicultural and inclusive society, but incidents like this show that there is still much work to be done.

PLANS to shift the supervision of sex offenders and domestic abusers in England and Wales to less-qualified probation staff have raised alarm among experts, with warnings that public safety could be at risk.

Under the proposals, set to be implemented in June, behaviour programmes for offenders will be delivered by “band 3” staff—who are not fully qualified probation officers—rather than “band 4” officers with extensive experience handling serious cases, including those involving rapists and paedophiles, and violent partners.

The move is part of wider changes in the probation system, which will also see the number of low- and medium-risk offenders required to complete twice-weekly rehabilitation courses reduced. Instead, probation officers will be expected to manage these offenders using “toolkits” in weekly meetings, rather than putting them through structured rehabilitation courses.

Some intervention programmes for sex offenders, including Horizon, Kaizen, and iHorizon, will also be scrapped in favour of a new single scheme called Building Choices.

Martin Jones, the chief inspector of probation, has urged the government to closely monitor the new programmes to ensure they are effective and do not compromise public safety.

“HM Prison and Probation Service needs to be certain that these programmes are delivering the intended results,” Jones said. “There is a real risk of wasting public money on schemes that fail to reduce reoffending.”

Concerns have been growing among probation officers, who have been voicing their unease for months. Some believe the changes will not lighten their workload, as intended, but instead add to it. Others fear that shifting responsibility to less-experienced staff could lead to poor outcomes.

Whitehall sources have echoed these concerns, warning that the new approach could damage the probation service’s reputation and effectiveness.

A probation officer, speaking anonymously, said: “There are serious worries about these changes. Peer challenge in group settings is a key part of rehabilitation—when offenders deny their crimes, others in the group call them out. This dynamic is much harder to achieve in one-on-one meetings.”

The overhaul comes amid broader pressures on the probation system. Last month, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced that rehabilitation courses for 13,000 convicted criminals would be scrapped due to what she described as “impossible” workloads faced by probation officers.

Mahmood defended the changes, stating: “We must prioritise resources for the most serious offenders. Those who pose a higher risk will still receive the courses they need, and breaches of licence conditions will continue to be met with prison recalls.”

She also outlined plans to recruit 1,300 new probation officers by March 2026, alongside an additional 1,000 staff by this March, and introduce new technology to reduce administrative burdens on officers.

Jones acknowledged the need for reforms, admitting that probation officers were struggling with heavy caseloads, but stressed that cutting structured rehabilitation for lower-risk offenders should be carefully reviewed to avoid unintended consequences.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “Our priority is keeping the public safe, which is why probation officers will continue to focus on the highest-risk offenders. Only staff who are fully trained will be allowed to deliver accredited rehabilitation programmes, and this will not change under the new proposals.”