Crime
Hope for John Cooper as DNA clears man jailed in 1987
Breakthrough in UK’s longest miscarriage of justice highlights power of new forensic science
A MAN jailed for a brutal murder 38 years ago has today walked free from court after the Court of Appeal quashed his conviction—offering renewed hope to others claiming wrongful imprisonment, including Pembrokeshire’s most notorious inmate, John Cooper.

Peter Sullivan, now 68, was convicted in 1987 of the rape and murder of 21-year-old barmaid Diane Sindall, who was attacked while walking home from work in Birkenhead. Despite maintaining his innocence throughout, Sullivan spent nearly four decades behind bars—until new forensic testing revealed DNA from an unknown man on preserved crime scene samples.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) referred the case back to the Court of Appeal last year, and today (May 13), judges ruled that the fresh evidence completely undermined the original conviction.
Sullivan’s case is now believed to be the longest-known miscarriage of justice involving a living prisoner in British legal history.
The ruling highlights the growing role that advances in DNA science are playing in overturning unsafe convictions. It also raises serious questions about other historic cases—including that of John Cooper, who is currently serving a whole-life sentence for the 1985 murders of Richard and Helen Thomas in Scoveston Park and the 1989 killings of Gwenda and Peter Dixon near Little Haven.
Cooper’s 2011 conviction relied heavily on DNA and forensic evidence—particularly fibres and trace DNA allegedly linking him to the crime scenes years after the murders occurred. Advances in forensic science were hailed at the time for cracking the cold cases, but serious questions have since been raised about the handling and interpretation of that evidence. Critics argue that crucial items were poorly stored, contaminated, or even cross-referenced between unrelated cases, with incomplete exhibit logs and inconsistencies in how samples were managed. There are also concerns that some forensic results were presented to the jury with greater certainty than the underlying science could justify, potentially prejudicing the verdict.
Cooper’s legal team submitted a detailed appeal dossier to the CCRC in 2023.
The case is now under formal review.
Concerns raised include missing or contaminated forensic samples, questionable police procedures, and the alleged mixing of evidence from unrelated cases.
One of the team supporting cooper in his fight to get his name cleared said: “If there was nothing in it, the case would have been rejected already.”
He added that the Peter Sullivan ruling shows how persistent investigation and modern science can uncover serious flaws in past prosecutions.
While Cooper remains behind bars, the momentum from today’s decision may shift public and legal focus back to the unresolved questions surrounding his case.
Crime
Farming company fined £19,000 for damaging protected wildlife site
A CARDIGAN farming company has been ordered to pay almost £20,000 after recklessly damaging a Site of Special Scientific Interest.
Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd, run by David Glyn Jenkins and William Lloyd Jenkins, of Ty Hen, Verwig, admitted damaging the Llwyn Ysgaw, Caeau Crug Bychan and Ty Gwyn SSSI through the unauthorised use of manure, slurry, fertilisers and lime.
The offences took place between June 21 and July 31, 2024.
The court heard that Natural Resources Wales had repeatedly warned the company about how the protected land should be managed.
Aled Watkins, prosecuting for NRW, said an agreement made in 2004 made clear that the landowners needed written consent before carrying out certain activities on the site, including the use of slurry, herbicides, pesticides, fertiliser or lime.
He said: “A significant amount of guidance, advice and warnings has been directed to the company over a substantial period of time, as there have been problems before.”
The court was told advice had been given in 2017, with further discussions in 2021. Further problems were identified in 2024, leading to advice letters and then a formal warning in June that year.
Mr Watkins said: “Even after the letters were sent, no consent request was made.
“The common sense conclusion was that, where the original agreement was clear and advice had been given years prior, this was a deliberate act by the landowners of spreading slurry on the SSSI.”
Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd pleaded guilty to intentionally or recklessly destroying or damaging flora on the protected site, contrary to the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
The company also admitted permitting the use of manure, slurry, silage liquor, fertiliser or lime without written consent from NRW, knowing it was likely to damage rare flora and fauna as well as geological and physiographical features.
Defending, solicitor Harry Dickens said the company had not deliberately set out to damage the land.
“This is more akin to the business damaging the land rather than setting out within their practices to do that damage,” he said.
He added that various contractors were used at the farm and were not always aware of the regulations.
“The defendants did not go out intentionally to harm the flora and fauna,” he said.
“Yes, they had foresight of the warnings and the previous agreement, but this is more akin to wilful blindness rather than going out intending to damage the land. It was not a flagrant disregard.
“The defendants were not loutish in their usage of the land, they are not vandals, they have not been silent and neither have they stonewalled NRW.”
Mr Dickens said the farmers accepted the need to restore the land and were keen to work productively with the authorities.
District Judge Mark Layton said Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd had breached NRW requirements.
“They spread fertilisers, herbicides and slurry on the land which was a breach,” he said.
“This was clearly a deliberate act of culpability and a complete disregard after already being given advice and warnings.”
The court heard the company’s most recent financial turnover was just over £1.6m. It was described by the defence as a micro-business.
Jenkins Ty Hen Ltd was ordered to pay £19,940.66, made up of a £9,000 fine, £8,940.66 costs to NRW and a £2,000 surcharge.
A restoration order was also made requiring work to improve the quality of the damaged SSSI land.
Crime
Trial of men accused of murdering Ian Watkins delayed
THE TRIAL of two prison inmates accused of murdering former Lostprophets singer Ian Watkins has been delayed by a day.
Watkins, who was serving a 29-year sentence for child sexual offences, died following an alleged attack at HMP Wakefield last October.
Rashid Gedel, 25, who has been referred to in court as Rico Gedel, and Samuel Dodsworth, 43, were due to stand trial at Leeds Crown Court on Tuesday (May 5).
The case is now expected to begin on Wednesday (May 6).
Watkins was jailed in December 2013 for 29 years, with a further six years on licence, after admitting a series of child sex offences, including the attempted rape of a baby.
He was arrested after police executed a drugs warrant at his home in Pontypridd on September 21, 2012. Officers seized computers, mobile phones and storage devices, which later revealed evidence of his offending.
Watkins had previously been taken to hospital after being attacked in prison in 2023.
In 2019, he was jailed for an additional ten months after being found guilty of possessing a mobile phone while in prison.
Crime
70-year-old denies assault and restraining order breach
A PENSIONER from Pembroke Dock has denied breaching a restraining order and assaulting another man.
Henry Howlett, 70, of Market Street, appeared before Swansea Crown Court today (Friday, May 1), charged with breaching a restraining order and common assault.
The charges relate to an alleged incident on November 9 last year.
Howlett has previously appeared before magistrates in connection with a separate alleged incident involving a neighbour.
Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court previously heard that a dispute arose on July 17 after neighbour Steven Bromhall was washing his car outside his home in Market Street.
Prosecutor Nia James told the court that, as a taxi arrived to collect Howlett, the driver opened the window while passing and Mr Bromhall inadvertently sprayed the taxi driver with water from a hosepipe.
“The taxi driver started remonstrating, and the defendant then began waving his walking stick in the air, towards Mr Bromhall,” she said.
The court heard Mr Bromhall sustained an injury to his back, although it remained unclear whether he had been struck by Howlett’s stick.
Howlett pleaded not guilty to common assault in relation to that incident and was released on unconditional bail. A trial date was set at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court.
At Swansea Crown Court today, His Honour Judge P H Thomas KC asked Howlett whether he was legally represented.
“I can’t find anyone decent, I’m still searching, my lord,” Howlett replied.
When the court attempted to take his pleas, Howlett repeatedly interrupted in an effort to give an explanation, prompting the judge to tell him: “Be quiet, Mr Howlett.”
Howlett then pleaded not guilty to the charges, telling the court: “Definitely not guilty.”
As he left the courtroom, Howlett said: “I will get the truth out and I hope you all hang your heads in shame… this is all fixed.”
A trial date was set for January 14, 2027.
-
News12 hours agoBaby in critical condition after Fishguard emergency
-
Community5 days agoDogs removed after welfare concerns at Milford Haven property
-
Crime7 days agoPembrokeshire hairdresser avoids prison after pub assault
-
Crime7 days agoPembrokeshire man charged with making hundreds of indecent images of children
-
Business6 days agoHandcrafted garden furniture built to last across Pembrokeshire
-
Charity6 days agoRow erupts at Spitfire museum after Reform poster displayed at charity premises
-
Community6 days agoCancer patients targeted with parking fines outside Haverfordwest support centre
-
Community1 day agoTenby phone signal crisis goes national as businesses warn of summer disruption









