THE UK GOVERNMENT has ruled out handing control of policing and criminal justice to Wales, triggering fresh political debate over whether the Senedd should ever take responsibility for law and order.

South Wales Central Conservative MS Andrew RT Davies said ministers were “right” to block further devolution, warning that separating Welsh forces from England would weaken efforts to tackle organised and cross-border crime.

His comments follow an exchange in the House of Commons, where Liz Saville-Roberts pressed the Home Secretary on transferring powers to Cardiff Bay. The Government confirmed it does not believe policing and criminal justice should be devolved.

“Must reflect the reality on the ground”

Mr Davies said proposals from Plaid Cymru and other devolution campaigners ignore how crime and communities operate in practice.

“The Senedd must not be put in charge of policing,” he said.

“Senedd ministers have an appalling track record on law and order. As senior police officers say, reforms must reflect the reality that many Welsh communities look east towards England far more than they do to other parts of Wales.”

Senior officers have echoed that concern.

Amanda Blackman, Chief Constable of North Wales Police, recently said her force area is “very much connected from a criminality perspective” to Merseyside and Cheshire.

“Our population move, if you like, is more east to west, west to east than it is north to south,” she said, pointing to the daily flow of commuters, shoppers and offenders across the border.

Long-running constitutional argument

Wales currently has four territorial forces – Dyfed-Powys, South Wales, Gwent and North Wales – but funding, legislation, prisons and the courts all remain under Westminster control.

Supporters of devolution argue this creates a “jagged” system, where services like health, housing and education are run by the Senedd but justice is not.

Plaid Cymru has repeatedly called for Wales to follow Scotland and Northern Ireland, both of which run their own justice systems.

They say decisions made in Cardiff could better reflect Welsh priorities, invest more in prevention, and link policing with mental health, youth services and social care.

A Plaid source said: “Communities in Wales should not have to rely on London to decide how their streets are policed. Justice should sit alongside the other services that deal with the causes of crime.”

Cost and complexity concerns

But critics warn that splitting away from England could come at a high price.

Establishing a separate legal and prison system would mean new administrative structures, courts oversight, inspection bodies and funding arrangements.

There are also practical questions around serious organised crime, counter-terrorism and specialist units that currently operate across England and Wales.

Former policing leaders have previously cautioned that criminals do not respect borders, and intelligence-sharing could become more complicated if systems diverge.

For rural areas such as Mid and West Wales, including Pembrokeshire, officers often work closely with English counterparts on drugs, county lines and cross-border burglary gangs.

Little appetite for change – for now

With the current Government making clear it has no plans to devolve the powers, the issue appears unlikely to change in the short term.

However, with constitutional reform regularly debated ahead of future elections, policing remains a live political question.

For now, responsibility for law and order stays firmly with Westminster – but the argument over who should control Wales’ justice system looks set to continue.

Visit comes as campaigning steps up ahead of the Senedd elections on May 7

PEMBROKESHIRE Conservative Members of the Senedd were among those meeting Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch in Cardiff Bay on Friday, as political parties increase campaigning ahead of the Senedd elections.

Samuel Kurtz MS, Welsh Conservatives Group Chair, welcomed Ms Badenoch alongside Darren Millar MS and Conservative colleagues during her visit to the Senedd. Discussions focused on the party’s priorities for Wales, the economy, and the future of the United Kingdom.

With fewer than 100 days to go until polling day on May 7, the Welsh Conservatives said the visit formed part of their preparations for the election, with a focus on their “Fix Wales” campaign message.

Mr Kurtz, who is standing as a Conservative candidate for the new Ceredigion and Pembrokeshire constituency, was joined by fellow candidates Paul Davies MS, Claire George and Brian Murphy.

Following the Cardiff Bay visit, Mr Kurtz returned to Pembrokeshire to hold a public advice surgery at Lamphey Hall, where residents raised local issues and concerns despite heavy rain.

The Senedd election will take place on May 7.

Campaigners say government decision ‘irrational and unlawful’ as ministers defend position

WOMEN born in the 1950s are threatening a Judicial Review after the UK Government refused to introduce a compensation scheme for those affected by changes to the State Pension age.

Campaign groups representing thousands of women across Wales say the decision by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions is “legally flawed and procedurally unsafe”, arguing that ministers have relied on incomplete evidence while ignoring long-standing claims of maladministration and discrimination.

But the UK Government maintains that, while mistakes were made in communication, there is insufficient evidence that most women suffered direct financial loss as a result.

The row centres on the long-running dispute over changes to the State Pension age, which saw the retirement age for women rise from sixty to sixty-six, bringing it into line with men. Many women say they were given little or no notice, leaving them unable to plan financially.

Ombudsman findings

In 2024, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) concluded that the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was guilty of maladministration in how it communicated the changes.

The Ombudsman recommended compensation, suggesting payments could range from £1,000 to nearly £3,000 depending on impact.

However, in December, Paymaster General Pat McFadden MP said the Government would not implement a blanket compensation scheme, arguing that evidence did not show widespread financial injustice directly caused by the communication failures.

Campaigners say that stance is wrong in law.

‘Not new evidence’

Groups including 1950s Women of Wales & Beyond, 50s Women United, and Pension Partners for Justice claim ministers relied on what they described as “new evidence” to justify rejecting compensation.

They argue the material had already been available for years and therefore provides “no lawful basis” to overturn the Ombudsman’s conclusions.

In a statement, a spokesperson said: “To accept maladministration while denying financial loss is internally inconsistent.

“The Department’s failure deprived women of the opportunity to make informed decisions about retirement. Many incurred real, quantifiable losses – from depleted savings to forced early retirement and reliance on benefits.”

Campaigners also claim key testimony from former DWP ministers was omitted from the Ombudsman investigation, and that evidence of discrimination was not fully considered.

They say relying on what they call an “incomplete and selective report” leaves the Government open to legal challenge.

Political pressure in Wales

The issue has also been raised in the Senedd.

Plaid Cymru Deputy Leader Delyth Jewell MS recently pressed Welsh ministers to back affected women and push for engagement with campaigners.

Organiser Jackie Gilderdale said many Welsh women feel excluded from discussions.

“This campaign is not a brand or a limited company – it is real women whose lives were turned upside down,” she said.

“We don’t want another court battle. We want dialogue and a political solution. But if the door remains closed, Judicial Review remains an option.”

A petition calling for structured mediation between government and representative groups has already gathered more than 34,000 signatures.

Government position

The UK Government has previously said that most women were aware of the changes and that modelling showed limited evidence of widespread direct financial loss caused solely by communication failures.

Ministers have also pointed to the overall cost of compensation, which could run into billions of pounds.

Public law experts note that while maladministration findings are serious, compensation is not automatic and governments retain discretion over how – or whether – to implement financial redress.

Long-running dispute

The dispute has been ongoing for more than a decade and has become one of the most persistent pension justice campaigns in the UK.

Women’s groups argue many lost up to six years of expected pension income, with some estimating personal losses of tens of thousands of pounds.

Successive governments, however, have resisted calls for mass compensation, saying equalising the pension age was necessary for fairness and sustainability of the system.

For many campaigners, the fight is far from over.

“We are not going away,” the groups said.