Local Government
Council under fire over Long Course Weekend deal
PEMBROKESHIRE County Council is facing mounting questions over governance after councillors claimed officers signed a five-year agreement for the Long Course Weekend without Cabinet approval — echoing a previous £1 million error involving electric vehicles.

Tiers Cross overspend
The Governance & Audit Committee on Tuesday (Sept 30) heard figures which showed the Tiers Cross housing scheme had run significantly over budget. WRW’s original tender was for £1.9 million, but after the company went into administration the replacement contractor, Tycroes, was paid £2.9 million — a 60 per cent increase.
At Johnston, WRW’s original contract stood at £5.1 million, with £3.5 million already paid when the firm collapsed. Although the council later claimed the project finished £1.1 million “under budget,” the final £4.5 million bill was around three times the £1.5 million that had been left outstanding when WRW folded.
Long Course Weekend governance
Speaking to The Herald, Councillor Huw Murphy said his main concern was the handling of the Long Course Weekend.
“Cabinet made a clear decision in January and that was not complied with,” he said.
Cabinet recommended officers put together a one-year agreement for 2025, to be produced following consultation before LCW 2025 commenced. Instead, on the Thursday (26th June) before the 2025 LCW event Councillors were presented with a five-year agreement, which was legally sealed, effectively a fait-accompli, where no scrutiny occurred prior to its publication, which begs the question of who agreed to this course of action and who accepts responsibility for it?
It was made clear at January Cabinet that any LCW host agreement from 2026-2029 would be subject of an ICM (individual Cabinet member) decision which never occurred, why not?
Cllr Murphy explained that he requested a copy of the LCW Host Agreement on Monday June 30th from both the Leader (Jon Harvey) and Cabinet holder responsible for events (Rhys Sinnett) and was not given any response. As a result, Cllr Murphy submitted a question for July Full Council utilising the Constitution to compel a response. The consequence of this request led to Cabinet Member for Residents’ Services, Cllr Rhys Sinnett, issuing a retrospective ICM decision to cover the agreement. This was called in at the end of July and upheld, prompting an extraordinary meeting of Cabinet in early August. At the Scrutiny Call-In held on August 8th where you had the very rare event where every Councillor present supported Councillor Murphy’s decision to call-in the LCW Host Agreement retrospective agreement
This can only be viewed as a sorry state of affairs where a decision of Cabinet was seemingly not complied with and when this was identified by opposition Councillors a request for information was ignored and only through use of the Constitution was a response provided which clearly identified a serious process failure.
“In my opinion the whole process has been shambolic,” Cllr Murphy said.
Echoes of EV contract mistake
Cllr Murphy pointed to a wider pattern of governance failings. In July 2024, the council believed it was submitting an expression of interest for an electric vehicle scheme. In reality, the paperwork constituted a binding contract to buy approximately 45 electric vehicles at a cost of more than £1 million, which resulted in the Investigation & Disciplinary Committee being convened to examine how that sorry state of affairs occurred. The question that now is being asked by many Councillors and constituents 12 months on is have lessons been learnt?
That PCC EV Contract failures along with the Long Course Weekend agreement, took place under the watch of Cllr Sinnett.
Political reaction
Cllr Murphy said: “When you add the LCW agreement to the EV contract fiasco, it points to a possible wider problem of governance within PCC. Cabinet decisions are not being followed, and retrospective fixes are no substitute for doing things properly in the first place.” Councillor Murphy adds, that doing things right first time gives confidence to the public of Pembrokeshire that even when unpopular decisions are made, they have faith the correct process has occurred. Furthermore, Governance failures give rise to concern and suspicion and often result in officer time being spent investigating failures to unravel what has occurred.
There is clear disquiet over the handling of the Long Course Weekend, within the Chamber and across it. The G&A Meeting appears to have exonerated Officers in respect of producing the LCW Host Agreement, which has resulted in the Committee requesting another report to look at the “other actors” which can only mean elected Councillors role. What is clear at present is that no one has been held to account for what has been a clear process failure, and this cannot be allowed to go unchallenged as without challenge the risk of repetition will remain.
Council response
The Herald has asked Pembrokeshire County Council for comment on both the Tiers Cross figures and the concerns raised about Long Course Weekend governance.

Local Government
Dog beach restrictions return across Pembrokeshire from Friday
DOG owners are being reminded that seasonal restrictions on some of Pembrokeshire’s most popular beaches come back into force from Friday (May 1).
The restrictions run each year from May 1 until September 30 and apply to a number of beaches across the county during the busiest months of the visitor season.
Pembrokeshire County Council’s current guidance states that some beaches are subject to either full or partial dog bans during the summer period. Maps showing where dogs can and cannot be walked are available online and are also displayed at the affected beaches.
The council says the restrictions are in place primarily to protect the interests of bathers and other beach users during the summer season, when beaches are at their busiest.
There are only two beaches in Pembrokeshire where a total summer dog ban applies.
From Friday (May 1), dogs are not allowed on Tenby North Beach or Whitesands, St Davids, until the restrictions are lifted again on October 1.
Partial bans are in place at Lydstep, Newgale beach and promenade, Saundersfoot beach and promenade, Tenby Castle and South Beach, Amroth beach and promenade, Poppit Sands, Broad Haven North, and Dale.
Visit Pembrokeshire also lists dog restriction maps for Coppet Hall, which has previously been described by the council as a voluntary restriction area.

Check signs before walking
THE restrictions do not mean dogs are banned from the whole of every beach listed under the partial ban.
In many cases, parts of the beach remain available for dog walking, but owners are urged to check the signs and maps before heading onto the sand.
The signs at each location show the areas where dogs are banned, areas where dogs are allowed, and areas where dogs must be kept on leads.
At Tenby, the rules affect several beach areas. Tenby North Beach is subject to a full seasonal ban, while Tenby South Beach and Castle Beach are covered by partial restrictions.
At Newgale, the restriction also includes the promenade and pebble bank. At Saundersfoot and Amroth, the restrictions include the promenade areas.
Poppit Sands, Broad Haven North, Dale and Lydstep are also covered by partial seasonal restrictions, with mapped areas showing where dogs are allowed.
Majority of beaches still dog-friendly
DOG owners are also being reminded that the majority of Pembrokeshire’s beaches remain dog-friendly throughout the year.
Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority says dogs are welcome on more than 50 beaches in the county, although some have seasonal restrictions or restricted areas between May and the end of September.
Guide dogs are exempt from the restrictions.
The current council list of affected beaches is:
Total dog bans from May 1 to September 30
Tenby North Beach
Whitesands, St Davids
Partial dog bans from May 1 to September 30
Lydstep
Newgale beach and promenade
Saundersfoot beach and promenade
Tenby Castle and South Beach
Amroth beach and promenade
Poppit Sands
Broad Haven North
Dale
Additional mapped restriction
Coppet Hall — listed by Visit Pembrokeshire among the dog restriction beach maps and previously described by the council as voluntary.
Enforcement over summer
Pembrokeshire County Council says leisure staff enforce the bans throughout the summer months.
Breaches of the byelaws can lead to enforcement action, and the council has previously said the maximum penalty is £500.
The council has also reminded dog owners that they must clean up after their pets on all Pembrokeshire beaches, whether or not a seasonal restriction applies.
In recent years, the council has said officers would focus on education in the first instance, with warnings issued for first offences before fixed penalty notices were considered for repeat breaches or failure to leave a restricted area when asked.
Owners are being urged to check the beach signs, follow the marked zones, keep dogs under control, and clean up after them.
The restrictions will remain in place until Wednesday, September 30. Dogs will be welcome back on the restricted beaches from Thursday, October 1.
Local Government
Fishguard children’s home application is a ‘legal test’, not planning merits decision
Town council objected over highway safety and parking, but PCC says policy issues are not part of the certificate process
CONCERNS raised by Fishguard and Goodwick Town Council over a proposed children’s home at Bryn Delyn, Y Fraich, may not be considered in the same way as objections to a normal planning application, Pembrokeshire County Council has confirmed.
The town council’s planning committee discussed application 25/0948/CL on Monday (Apr 20), relating to the proposed use of Bryn Delyn as a children’s home.
Members are understood to have objected on highway safety and parking grounds, amid concerns about the suitability of the site and surrounding roads.
However, Pembrokeshire County Council has clarified that the application has been submitted under section 192 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
This means the applicant is seeking a Certificate of Lawfulness to determine whether the proposed use of the property would be lawful and would not require planning permission.
A council spokesperson said the purpose of the submission was to determine whether the proposed use of Bryn Delyn, as described in the documents, would be lawful.
They said: “The onus lies with the applicant to provide sufficient evidence for the Local Planning Authority to determine the application on the balance of probabilities.
“Adopted planning policy and the planning merits of the proposed use/development are not for consideration by the LPA.”

The council also confirmed that, unlike ordinary planning applications, there is no statutory duty for the Local Planning Authority to publicise or consult on submissions made under section 192.
No formal consultation has been carried out with the council’s Highways Department.
However, the council said it had used its discretion to advertise the certificate of lawful development submission by displaying a site notice.
The spokesperson added that this was done in case members of the public had their own evidence to present which could be of value when determining the submission.
The clarification means the council’s decision will focus on the legal position and the facts of the proposed use, rather than wider planning policy, parking concerns or highway safety issues in the usual planning sense.
The application remains under consideration.
Cover image is a rough artists impression created by The Pembrokeshire Herald
Community
Tenby Brynhir estate will not home ‘illegal immigrants’
CLAIMS Tenby’s Brynhir housing development will house “illegal immigrants” through purchases by an English council have been refuted by Pembrokeshire County Council.
Back in 2024, the scheme, with nearly 100 “local houses for local people” was approved by national park planners.
In 2018, Pembrokeshire County Council, which already owned the 15-acre Brynhir site on the edge of Tenby, ‘bought’ the land for £4million using its Housing Revenue Account.
Campaigners fought a two-year battle against the use of the land for housing, calling for protection for ‘Tenby’s last green space’ and fearing it would become a ‘concrete jungle’.
The county council was granted outline planning permission by the Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority for the development of 144 properties – including up to 102 affordable units – in 2020.
The later 2024 scheme proposed that only 125 houses be built, 93 of them affordable, and, of the 32 open market dwellings, 16 are shared ownership properties.
Tenby Civic Society has raised numerous concerns to the scheme and 20 objections were also received from members of the public, raising concerns including loss of green space, traffic issues, privacy, design, visual impacts and the scale of the development, sewage capacity, the site being no longer allocated for housing, potential antisocial behaviour within the play area, and a limitation on second homes/holiday lets being required.
At the September meeting, concerns about the proposal were raised by Jane Merrony of 1,100-member Tenby Green Space Preservation Society, who said it was inappropriate in its proposed location and “a visual intrusion which will be seen from Caldey Island”.
Since that approval, initial construction for the site started late last year.
The full development is set to be finished by 2029.
However, fears have been raised that some of the site will house “illegal immigrants” via an English council.
A member of the public raised their concerns saying: “Unconfirmed rumours have it that Liverpool City Council has bought houses in the development as their waiting list is so long due to illegal immigrants being housed in their stock, making it a 10-year waiting list to get local housing in Liverpool.
“Does this mean that Liverpool City Council will be offloading illegals onto the Tenby social housing?”
They added: “When the planning permission was going through, we were informed that all the housing would be mixed council, open-market and association houses with a covenant saying that you had to live, work or have links to the area to be considered for any of the units.”
Responding, a Pembrokeshire County Council spokesperson said: “These rumours are untrue. This site is owned and managed by the local authority. Allocations will be made to those from our Choice Homes register in accordance with a local connection lettings policy that will be developed in conjunction with the local town and community councils, and local community, in due course.”
-
Local Government6 days agoUnresolved building control record leaves buyer’s cottage unregistered
-
Crime6 days agoMan on trial over historic sex offence allegations
-
News6 days agoWaiting lists fall for ninth month — but cancer, A&E and ambulance pressures grow
-
Crime7 days agoKeeston driver to face trial over A40 driving allegation
-
News4 days agoBarley Saturday brings bumper crowds to Cardigan
-
News6 days agoKemi Badenoch warns over loss of industry during Valero visit
-
News7 days agoMcDonald’s customers abused by drunk in Milford
-
News7 days agoSafety fears over Resolute wreck off Pembrokeshire coast










