Local Government
Another leak from Neyland: Clerk’s own job description contradicts email claims
Official document shows project management and event delivery are part of the Clerk’s role
ANOTHER internal document has been leaked from Neyland Town Council, this time appearing to contradict claims made by the Clerk in her now-infamous email to councillors about being overworked and expected to lead community projects.

The Herald has obtained the official job description and employee specification for the role of Town Clerk and Responsible Finance Officer, dated July 2023. The document, approved by the council last year, clearly states that the Clerk is required “to oversee the implementation of all events (including civic events, town twinning and community-engagement initiatives) approved by the Town Council” and “to manage projects ensuring adherence to project plans, budgets and deliverables.”
These clauses appear to contradict the Clerk’s statement to councillors on 30 September that it was “an impossible standard” for her to be expected to lead projects and that councillors should instead take responsibility for delivering them.
Hours increased to run more projects
A source with direct knowledge of the council’s employment arrangements told The Herald that the Clerk’s contracted hours were increased from 20 to 30 per week in 2023, “specifically to give more time for organising events and managing council projects.”
The same source said the email circulated to councillors last week, in which the Clerk accused members of failing to contribute ideas, “appears inconsistent with the duties she is paid to perform.”
The Herald has verified that the clauses appear in the official job description, which also makes the Clerk accountable for ensuring all council decisions are effectively implemented.

Further controversy after public outburst
The latest leak comes just days after Town Clerk Libby Matthews publicly attacked The Pembrokeshire Herald on social media, accusing the newspaper of having a “personal agenda” and mocking the editor with laughing emojis.
In a comment posted under the Herald’s Facebook report about her leaked email, Ms Matthews wrote: “Tom, guess I hurt your feelings by calling you out. The public and residents know you, and they know me… nice try at causing further tensions and trying to shift blame over to me now for everything. It won’t work… Bore off and find another victim to try and cause trouble for.”
The Herald replied publicly, stating that the article was based entirely on Ms Matthews’ own correspondence to councillors and that “publicly attacking journalists for accurate reporting does not reflect the standards expected of a Town Clerk.”
The exchange drew widespread reaction, with several residents criticising the Clerk’s tone and questioning whether such behaviour was appropriate for a senior local-government officer.
Under the Local Government Act 1972, a town-council clerk acts as the Proper Officer and is expected to remain professional, impartial and politically neutral at all times.
Pattern of dysfunction
This is the latest in a string of damaging disclosures from within Neyland Town Council. Earlier this year The Herald reported that a councillor under investigation for alleged bullying and harassment of the Clerk resigned before the Ombudsman could complete its inquiry.
Two further councillors, Brian Rothero and David Devauden, are currently facing hearings before the Adjudication Panel for Wales over alleged breaches of the members’ Code of Conduct.
Residents have expressed frustration that the authority appears more preoccupied with internal disputes than with improving the town.
Questions over governance
The newly leaked job document adds another layer of confusion to the council’s internal dispute. In her email, the Clerk wrote that councillors “must agree on a member or working group” to lead projects and warned that she could not manage them all herself.
However, the council’s own approved job description assigns the Clerk specific responsibility for implementing and managing those same projects. The contradiction raises questions about how roles are being interpreted and whether the council has clear internal oversight of its officer’s performance.
Community reaction
Several Neyland residents have commented online following the latest revelations. One wrote: “It’s becoming embarrassing for the town. Every week there’s another leak. Maybe time they all started focusing on the community instead of arguing.”
Another said: “This is proof the Herald was right to report on what’s really going on — people deserve to know the truth.”
What happens next
The council is due to meet later today (Monday, Oct 6), where the 12-month plan and member responsibilities will again be discussed. It remains unclear whether the leaked job description will be addressed or whether disciplinary or procedural action will be taken in response to the Clerk’s public comments.
The Herald has contacted Neyland Town Council regarding the latest claims and awaits a response.
Climate
Fishguard ‘battery box’ scheme near school refused
PLANNERS have refused a Pembrokeshire ‘battery box’ electricity storage unit near a Pembrokeshire town school, which has seen local objections including fears of a potential risk to nearby school children.
In an application recommended for approval at the December meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council’s planning committee, AMP Clean Energy sought permission for a micro energy storage project on land at Fishguard Leisure Centre Car Park, near Ysgol Bro Gwaun.
The application had previously been recommended for approval at the November meeting, but a decision was deferred pending a site visit.
The scheme is one of a number of similar applications by AMP, either registered or approved under delegated planning powers by officers.
The battery boxes import electricity from the local electricity network when demand for electricity is low or when there are high levels of renewable energy available, exporting it back during periods of high demand to help address grid reliability issues; each giving the potential to power 200 homes for four hours.
The Fishguard scheme, which has seen objections from the town council and members of the public, was before committee at the request of the local member, Cllr Pat Davies.
Fishguard and Goodwick Town Council objected to the proposal on grounds including visual impact, and the location being near the school.
An officer report said the scheme would be well screened by a Paladin Fence, with a need to be sited close to an existing substation.
Speaking at the December meeting, Ben Wallace of AMP Clean Energy conceded the boxes were “not things of beauty” before addressing previously raised concerns of any potential fire risk, saying that “in the incredibly unlikely” event of a fire, the system would contain it for up to two hours, giving “plenty of time” for it to be extinguished, an alarm immediately sounding, with the fire service raising no concerns.
“These are fundamentally safe, the technology is not new,” he said, comparing them to such batteries in phones and laptops.
One of the three objectors at the meeting raised concerns of the proximity to homes and the school, describing it as “an unsafe, unsustainable and unnecessary location,” with Cllr Jim Morgan of Fishguard Town Council, who had previously raised concerns of the “nightmare scenario” of a fire as children were leaving the school, also voicing similar issues.
Local county councillor Pat Davies, who had spoken at the previous meeting stressing she was not against the technology, just the location and the potential risk to pupils, said the siting would be “a visual intrusion,” with the school having many concerns about the scheme, adding it had been “brought forward without any dialogue of consultation with the school”.
Cllr Davies added: “It is unacceptable that a micro-storage unit should be proposed in this area; someone somewhere has got it wrong.”
Following a lengthy debate, committee chair Cllr Mark Carter proposed going against officers in refusing the scheme; members unanimously refusing the application.
Climate
Fears Sageston wind turbine scheme could affect bats
AN APPLICATION for a wind turbine nearly 250 foot high on the road to Tenby, recommended to be turned down due to a lack of information on how it could affect bats, has been put on hold.
In an application recommended for refusal at the December meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council’s planning committee, Constantine Wind Energy Ltd sought permission for a 76-metre-high wind turbine at Summerton Farm, Sageston.
Back in 2024, an application to replace a current 60.5m high turbine on the site with one up to 90 metres, or just under 300 foot, at the site was refused on the grounds its height and scale would have a detrimental impact on the visual amenity of the locality, with the additional clause of failing to comply with supplementary guidance.
A report for committee members on the latest application says the smaller turbine than previously proposed, representing a 16-metre increase in height from a previously granted turbine “would not be sufficient for it to become an overbearing feature in the landscape,” with no objections from either the Council Landscape Officer or Natural Resources Wales.
However, concerns were raised by the council ecologist that the applicant’s Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Report was incomplete.
“The Council Ecologist questions why the response received in relation to myotis bat records were not included within the initial PEA. As such, he considers that the PEA does not present enough information on the possible presence of bats within the application site area.
“Whilst there may be negligible foraging and commuting potential, there are records of foraging on grassland within two kilometres which have positive identification of myotis bat foraging, along with greater and lesser horseshoe bat foraging. He also notes that the application site is in close proximity to a wooded area.”
It was recommended for refusal on the grounds that appraisal report, and technical note, “do not adequately address the impact of the proposed wind turbine on bat activity in the area”.
At the committee meeting, members heard the scheme had been temporarily withdrawn to deal with issues raised, the application expected to return to a future meeting.
Local Government
More than £3.5m of Pembrokeshire council housing purchased
OFFICER success in attracting grant funding which has helped Pembrokeshire buy nearly £.5m in council housing in the last six months, has been praised by senior councillors.
A report presented by deputy leader Cllr Paul Miller at the December 1 meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council’s Cabinet gave members details of acquisitions and disposals in the first six months of the current financial year.
It included the purchase of 16 properties for council housing stock, to the tune of £3,470,000 and the disposal of two industrial estate plots at Waterloo, Pembroke Dock, at some £278,400.
Properties purchased are: 32 Southdown Close, Pembroke, at £115,000; 8 Hyfrydle, Letterston at £115,000; 6 Precelly Place, Milford Haven at £120,000; 50 Heywood Court, Tenby at £125,000; 33 Croft Avenue, Hakin at £130,000; 7 Hyfrydle, Letterston at £135,000; 18 St Clements Park, Freystrop at £140,000; 55 College Park, Neyland at £140,000; 26 Baring Gould Way, Haverfordwest at £146,000; 25 Station Road, Letterston at £170,000; 16 Woodlands Crescent, Milford Haven at £283,000; 26 & 27 Harcourt Close, Hook at £744,000; and 23, 24 And 25 Harcourt Close, Hook at £1,107,000.
Of the purchases, £1,851,000 is made up of five properties in Hook.
Members noted the report, Cabinet Member for Housing Cllr Michelle Bateman saying the grants-supported acquisitions programme was “increasing the supply of tenancies across the county”.
Leader Cllr Jon Harvey praised “wizards in attracting grant aid” officer success in accessing funding, adding the purchases would not stop the council continuing to build new properties across the county.
Back in September, Cabinet members backed a recommendation to enter into an agreement for the acquisition of up to 16 new build housing units as an off the shelf deal at Harcourt Close, Hook.
The proposal was the second social housing scheme recommended for approval by members at that meeting; councillors having earlier backed a scheme for the purchase of 21 affordable homes, along with an option for four intermediate units on land at Sandyhill, Saundersfoot.
-
Crime5 days agoMan denies causing baby’s injuries as police interviews read to jury
-
Crime1 day agoDefendant denies using Sudocrem-covered finger to assault two-month-old baby
-
Crime6 days agoMan denies injuring baby as jury hears police interview in ongoing abuse trial
-
Crime13 hours agoPembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation
-
News14 hours agoBaby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box
-
Crime7 days agoMilford Haven man jailed after online paedophile sting
-
Crime2 days agoDefendant denies causing injuries to two-month-old baby
-
Crime1 day agoLifeboat crew member forced to stand down after being assaulted at Milford pub







