Politics

Welsh ministers row back on promise to ban lying politicians

Published

3 months ago

November 5, 2025

THE WELSH Government has rowed back on a promise to bring in a ban on lying politicians – a commitment previously made to avoid defeat in a key Senedd vote.

Welsh ministers promised to introduce a law before the next election to disqualify Senedd Members and candidates found guilty of deliberate deception.

But the Welsh Government has now brought forward proposed legislation which falls short of a commitment made to the Welsh Parliament.

Mick Antoniw, then-counsel general, the Welsh Government’s chief legal adviser, struck a deal with Adam Price just before a vote on creating an offence of deception in July 2024.

He said at the time: “The Welsh Government will bring forward legislation before 2026 for the disqualification of members and candidates found guilty of deception through an independent judicial process.”

In return for that commitment, Plaid Cymru and independent Rhys ab Owen abstained in a crunch vote – enabling ministers to remove plans for a ban from a previous elections bill.

But the accountability bill introduced this week does not create an independent judicial process for sitting members, with deception to instead be handled internally initially.

Under the bill, the Senedd’s standards committee could recommend a “recall poll” after an investigation – giving the public a vote on whether to remove a member between elections. A vacant seat would automatically be filled by the next candidate on the political party’s list.

However, the process would remain political – with a recall poll triggered by a simple majority vote in the Senedd – giving rise to concerns about members marking their own homework.

The committee, which is made up of politicians from the main parties, must first issue recall guidance that will need to be approved by a two-thirds supermajority.

Neither does the bill implement the promised ban for candidates in time for May’s election, which the Welsh Government described as “not feasible”.

Instead, it creates a duty for ministers to introduce rules prohibiting false statements in elections – which could include a new criminal offence – at an unspecified later date.

In the Senedd on Tuesday November 4, Mr Price – who has spearheaded calls for a ban – warned of a “collapse in trust” in democracies worldwide.

The former Plaid Cymru leader welcomed plans to make the Senedd the first parliament to introduce a general prohibition on deliberate deception in the context of elections.

But he questioned why the change could not be introduced for the next election “when we’re going to face a flotilla of bot farms etc and political actors with nefarious aims”. The former MP added: “The bill, currently, is completely silent on [sitting] members.”

Jane Dodds, leader of the Liberal Democrats in Wales, said: “For me, introducing the deliberate deception element in 2030 is doing something after the horse has bolted.”

Jane Dodds, leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats

Sam Rowlands, for the Conservatives, backed plans to give voters greater power to hold politicians to account – warning a Senedd recall mechanism has been lacking for too long.

Elin Jones, the Senedd’s speaker or Llywydd, cautioned of potential legislative obstacles. She noted clauses imposing duties on the courts – to notify the Senedd if a member is convicted of a crime, an automatic recall poll trigger if a politician receives a custodial or suspended sentence – have not yet received consent from the UK Government.

Under the bill, the standards committee will become a legal requirement for every Senedd term and non-politicians could be appointed to sit on the committee for the first time.

Douglas Bain, the standards commissioner who investigates Senedd politicians, would be given “own-initiative” powers to launch investigations without first needing a complaint.

In this afternoon’s statement, Julie James said the duty on ministers will lay the foundations for the creation of an offence to tackle deliberate deception by candidates.

Julie James MS, counsel general and minister for delivery

The counsel general cautioned: “This is incredibly complex. It isn’t something we can rush,” before stressing: “By including this duty in the bill, we are ensuring that the work to create the offence of deliberate deception will continue to be taken forward.”

Ms James, a former solicitor, raised the need for further consultation as well as a fuller assessment of the impact on the justice system and human rights.

She said: “This bill represents a landmark moment in this Senedd’s history. It will strengthen Welsh democracy and ensure that representatives… are held to the highest standards.”

Business

Bid to convert office space into chocolate factory, salon and laundrette

Published

5 hours ago

February 4, 2026

Bruce Sinclair - Local Democracy Reporter

A CALL for the retrospective conversion of office space previously connected to a Pembrokeshire car hire business to a chocolate factory, a beauty salon and a laundrette has been submitted to county planners

In an application to Pembrokeshire County Council, Mr M Williams, through agent Preseli Planning Ltd, sought retrospective permission for the subdivision of an office on land off Scotchwell Cottage, Cartlett, Haverfordwest into three units forming a chocolate manufacturing, a beauty salon, and a launderette, along with associated works.

A supporting statement said planning history at the site saw a 2018 application for the refurbishment of an existing office building and a change of use from oil depot offices to a hire car office and car/van storage yard, approved back in 2019.

For the chocolate manufacturing by ‘Pembrokeshire Chocolate company,’ as part of the latest scheme it said: “The operation comprises of manufacturing of handmade bespoke flavoured chocolate bars. Historically there was an element of counter sales but this has now ceased. The business sales comprise of online orders and the delivery of produce to local stockist. There are no counter sales from the premises.”

It said the beauty salon “offers treatments, nail services and hairdressing,” operating “on an appointment only basis, with the hairdresser element also offering a mobile service”. It said the third unit of the building functions as a commercial laundrette and ironing services known as ‘West Coast Laundry,’ which “predominantly provides services to holiday cottages, hotels and care homes”.

The statement added: “Beyond the unchanged access the site has parking provision for at least 12 vehicles and a turning area. The building now forms three units which employ two persons per unit. The 12 parking spaces, therefore, provide sufficient provision for staff.

“In terms of visiting members of the public the beauty salon operates on an appointment only basis and based on its small scale can only accommodate two customers at any one time. Therefore, ample parking provision exists to visitors.

“With regard to the chocolate manufacturing and commercial laundrette service these enterprises do not attract visitors but do attract the dropping off laundry and delivery of associated inputs. Drop off and collections associated with the laundry services tend to fall in line with holiday accommodation changeover days, for example Tuesday drop off and collections on the Thursday.

“With regard to the chocolate manufacturing ingredients are delivered by couriers and movements associated with this is also estimated at 10 vehicular movements per week.”

The application will be considered by county planners at a later date.

Politics

Ceredigion council tax expected to rise by 4.7 per cent

Published

12 hours ago

February 3, 2026

Bruce Sinclair - Local Democracy Reporter

A BETTER financial settlement for Ceredigion from the Welsh Government along with a fresh grant is expected to see council tax bills in the county rising by less than five per cent this year, far below previous fears of a rise as high as nearly nine.

Last year, for the 2025-’26 budget, Ceredigion saw a council tax rise of 9.3 per cent.

While council tax makes up a proportion of the council’s annual revenue, a crucial area of funding is the Aggregate External Finance (AEF) rate from Welsh Government.

Ceredigion was to receive a 2.3 per cent increase on its settlement, some £3,388,000 for a total of £150,670,000, placing it at joint 13th of the 22 local authorities in Wales.

Following a later Welsh Government and Plaid Cymru agreement additional funding for local government was secured, giving Ceredigion additional funding.

Back in November, before the increased settlement was announced, Ceredigion Leader Cllr Bryan Davies said that early estimates indicated that an 8.9 per cent increase in council tax would be necessary, but an improved position of 6.9 per cent had been indicated as a result of a further modelling of service cost pressures and operational savings.

Following the improved settlement, members at the January meeting of Cabinet heard from Cabinet Member for Finance and Procurement Services Cllr Gareth Davies a recommendation for a 4.75 per cent council tax increase as part of a draft budget requirement of £221.493m was being mooted.

That position has improved again, following financial support towards the Mid and West Wales Fire Service Levy, members of the February 3 meeting of the council’s corporate resources overview and scrutiny committee heard, the funding now dropping the expected council tax increase to 4.7 per cent, equivalent to an extra £7.39 per month for the average Band D property for the next financial year.

Members of the committee agreed to note the 4.7 per cent figure, with the final council tax recommendation being considered by Cabinet on February 10; the final decision on the budget being made by full council on March 2.

international news

Mandelson quits Lords amid police probe over Epstein links

Published

20 hours ago

February 3, 2026

Tom Sinclair

Peter Mandelson has announced he will retire from the House of Lords with immediate effect, as mounting political and legal pressure grows over claims he shared sensitive government information with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Parliamentary officials confirmed that Peter Mandelson formally notified the Clerk of the Parliaments of his decision, ending his membership of the upper chamber from Tuesday (Feb 4).

The move follows reports that the Metropolitan Police Service is reviewing allegations of possible misconduct in public office connected to emails said to have been forwarded to Epstein while Mandelson was business secretary during the 2008–09 financial crisis.

Downing Street has confirmed that material has been passed to police after an initial Cabinet Office review.

Government fury

LONDON, ENGLAND – JANUARY 19: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer delivers a statement in the media briefing room of 9 Downing Street in central London, after US president Donald Trump’s threats to ramp up tariffs until a deal is reached for the US to buy Greenland, at Downing Street on January 19, 2026 in London, England. (Photo by Jordan Pettitt – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Prime Minister Keir Starmer told cabinet colleagues Mandelson had “let his country down”, according to No 10, and officials are now drafting legislation that could strip him of his peerage entirely.

Removing a life peer is rare and would require an Act of Parliament.

If passed, Mandelson would lose the title “Lord” altogether — an extraordinary step that has only been considered in the most serious cases.

Senior ministers have described the alleged passing-on of market-sensitive government discussions as “disgraceful” and a “betrayal of trust”.

What police are examining

Misconduct in public office is a centuries-old common law offence that applies where someone in a position of public trust wilfully abuses that role. It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

Investigators will assess whether confidential information — particularly relating to government financial policy during the crash — was shared without justification and whether safeguards were breached.

At this stage, no charges have been brought.

Mandelson has previously apologised for maintaining contact with Epstein after the financier’s conviction, saying he regrets “ever having known him”, but he has disputed some of the latest claims and has not commented directly on the police review.

Political shockwaves

Opposition parties are pushing for further disclosure of documents relating to Mandelson’s vetting and his past roles.

Conservatives are expected to force a Commons vote demanding more information, while Liberal Democrats have called for a public inquiry.

Several MPs have also suggested Mandelson should be removed from the Privy Council.

The developments mark a dramatic fall for one of Labour’s most influential political figures of the past three decades, who only months ago was serving as the UK’s ambassador to Washington.

Now, with police examining evidence and legislation being prepared to remove his title, his public career appears effectively over.

More updates are expected as the investigation continues.