Politics
Senedd criticises ‘nowhere near acceptable’ pace of cladding repairs
DEVELOPERS have fully fixed only four out of 163 at-risk buildings in Wales more than eight years on from the Grenfell disaster, which claimed the lives of 72 people.
The warning came as the Senedd debated a building safety bill which excludes powers to enforce legally binding deadlines on developers to finish the work.
Labour’s John Griffiths chairs the Senedd’s housing committee which warned progress on remediation “has been far too slow and this should not be allowed to continue”.
Urging ministers to accelerate progress as the bill cleared the first hurdle in the Senedd, Mr Griffiths called for changes to include legally enforceable deadlines and penalties.
He told Senedd Members: “It cannot be right that residents are left to continue the difficult battle to resolve safety issues through no fault of their own.”

Jane Dodds, the Liberal Democrats’ leader in Wales, warned innocent leaseholders remain trapped in homes they cannot sell and faced with costs they cannot bear.
She said: “We’ve got 163 buildings that developers are responsible for remediating. And then we hear that only four of those buildings have been completed. Four out of 163.
“The Welsh Government has stated remediation won’t cost leaseholders but it already is. It’s costing them their mental health. It’s costing them their emotional wellbeing.”
She added: “The commitment by developers to at least start works by the end of 2026 is not legally binding. It’s dependent on developer goodwill. And where has that goodwill gotten us? Well, four completed buildings out of 163.”
Ms Dodds stressed it is “absolutely vital” that leaseholders and tenants are not made to carry the costs of the new building safety system for Wales proposed under the bill.
She pleaded with ministers: “Give this legislation the teeth it needs to protect people right now and hold developers accountable. Because if we don’t, we could be back here in another eight years or, perish the thought, thinking that there could be another Grenfell.”
Plaid Cymru’s Mabon ap Gwynfor echoed her concerns, saying: “This pace is nowhere near acceptable. Residents have already waited too long.”
Rhys ab Owen, an independent, pointed to the plight of constituents living only a stone’s throw away from the Senedd who have lived in fear for nearly nine years.

He criticised an overreliance on future regulations and warned a lack of clear costings meant politicians were effectively being asked to vote for a “blank cheque”.
Mr ab Owen called for a cap on costs for leaseholders similar to that in the 2022 Act across the border, arguing: “English victims should not be enjoying better protection.”
Joel James, the Conservatives’ shadow housing secretary, warned the new building safety regime risks failing before it starts due to a lack of trained inspectors.
He told the Senedd: “The bill can look good on paper but it won’t amount to much if we don’t have trained, capable people to carry out the inspections and the enforcement.”
Mr James also expressed concerns that piling “complexity” onto thousands of lower-risk, category three buildings – those under 11 metres – could stifle housing supply.

Meanwhile, Mike Hedges, who chairs the Senedd’s legislation committee, criticised the “sheer extent” of powers being handed to ministers rather than set out in the bill.
He warned these ‘Henry VIII powers’ allow the Welsh Government to rewrite laws without full scrutiny, placing the “balance of power inappropriately in favour of the executive”.
Jayne Bryant, Wales’ housing secretary, acknowledged leaseholders’ frustrations about the pace of remediation but she insisted the bill was not the right place to fix historic defects.

She said: “I must be clear: amending this bill would not deliver the programme more quickly.” However, the minister pledged to “continue to identify ways of unblocking barriers and speeding up the pace of remediation”.
Ms Bryant rejected calls to exempt category three buildings from the rules, arguing evidence shows they have higher rates of fire casualties than purpose-built blocks. “Watering down or dropping the requirement for these buildings would be perverse,” she said.
She told the Senedd: “The Grenfell Tower tragedy is a poignant and devastating reminder of the necessity of getting building safety right. Sadly, recent events in Hong Kong have served to underline the potential terrible results of external fire spread.”
Following Tuesday’s (December 9) stage-one debate, Senedd Members supported the general principles of the bill which now moves onto the amending stages.
Community
Campaign to ‘save’ River Cleddau hits over 2,200 signatures
A PETITION call for a public commitment to save Pembrokeshire’s River Cleddau which has attracted more than 2,200 signatures, and is due to be heard by full council, ends in a few days.
The e-petition on Pembrokeshire County Council’s own website, started by James Harrison-Allen, says: “We call on Pembrokeshire County Council to create and enact a Clean Rivers Policy to restore the Cleddau to good health after decades of neglect and degradation.
“The Cleddau flows through the heart of Pembrokeshire, including our county town, and is the foundation for Pembrokeshire’s prosperity. The river is failing, and we need to act now to save it from irreversible decline.
“What’s the problem? The Cleddau rivers and estuary are the worst (and worsening) polluted SAC (Special Area of Conservation) designated rivers in Wales; worse even than the Wye and the Usk (NRW Water Assessment Report 2024), and considerably worse than the neighbouring Towy and Teifi.
“Damaging impacts on Pembrokeshire’s economy, public health and the natural environment. Ineffective regulation; monitoring, responding, policing, enforcement and prosecutions. What should PCC be doing to address this? Make a formal, public commitment to cleaning up the Cleddau. Make the health of the Cleddau central.”
Earlier this year, Henry Tufnell, MP for Mid and South Pembrokeshire, called for “urgent” action to tackle the poor state of the River Cleddau when he chaired a discussion bringing together key stakeholders, environmental experts, and community voices to address the issues surrounding water quality and pollution.
The panel event, organised by local river action group The Cleddau Project, covered topics including pollution sources, enforcement failures, and potential solutions to improve the river’s health.
The e-petition runs up to February 1, and had attracted 2,207 signatures by January 27.
If a petition gets 500 signatures, the creator will have an opportunity to debate it at a future full council meeting.
Community
Tenby sailing club works approved by national park
PLANS for works at Tenby’s historic sailing club building, part of the ‘iconic view’ of the town’s harbour have been given the go-ahead by the national park.
In an application to Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, Tenby Sailing Club, through agent David J P Morgan RIBA Architect sought permission for the two openings in second floor gable wall along with two new windows at Tenby Sailing Club, Penniless Cove Hill, along with a related listed building consent.
The application was supported by Tenby Town Council and Tenby Civic Society, the latter saying it will “add value to the use of the building and maintain the character and value of the listed building and the conservation area”.
Supporting documents for the application said: “The proposal is to form two new openings in the stonework and install two windows. These will replicate the existing windows at first floor level below. The openings will have red brick head as on existing original openings on the building. The proposal will have very little adverse impact on the listed building.”
They added: “The proposed new windows will improve observation of the harbour and bay from the second-floor level. This is where yacht racing is monitored and observed by officials and safety personnel.”
An officer report, recommending approval said: “The sailing club was built as a warehouse c. 1825, abutting the C17 sluice. Originally wine stores, it was later used by the local fishermen for stores and is now the home to Tenby Sailing Club, established in 1936. The rubble-built building is of three storeys and four bays, the glazing all later C20 with a slated roof and a modernised interior. There is a large steel stair to north (seaward) elevation.”
It added: “The building forms part of a group picturesquely clustered around the sluice, in turn forming part of the iconic view of Tenby Harbour. The proposal is to insert two windows at second floor level to the north (seaward) elevation, flanking the existing door,” adding: “The area retains its mercantile character not just in appearance, but also through its character due to ongoing use as fishing boat stores and winter moorings.
“The sailing club has occupied the building for many years and remains very active. The proposal is intended to improve the amenity of the building to provide better viewing at elevation and seeks to copy the detail and proportions of the windows at first floor stage.”
The application, and the related listed building consent, was conditionally approved by park planners.
News
Welsh Conservatives push for reversal of 20mph limit and major road spending
OPPOSITION calls on Labour Government to restore 30mph default, revive frozen projects, and advance long-stalled infrastructure schemes amid ongoing controversy over speed limits and road investment.
In a session that began around 4:30pm and was broadcast live via the Senedd’s online proceedings, the Welsh Conservatives presented a detailed motion urging the Welsh Labour Government—supported by Plaid Cymru under their co-operation agreement—to reverse several high-profile transport decisions. At the heart of the debate was a call to restore the default speed limit on restricted roads from 20mph back to 30mph, a policy introduced in September 2023 that continues to divide opinion sharply.
The Conservatives framed their proposals as a comprehensive plan to “fix Wales’ transport system,” emphasizing that robust road networks are fundamental to supporting businesses, generating employment, and stimulating economic growth. They argued that current policies—including the 20mph default, the long-standing cancellation of the M4 relief road around Newport, and the effective moratorium on new major road projects—amount to an “attack on Welsh motorists” that is exacerbating economic stagnation, lengthening journey times, increasing costs for commuters and hauliers, and contributing to Wales trailing other UK nations in wages and overall prosperity.
The specific demands outlined in the motion included:
- Restoring the default speed limit to 30mph (with the party noting that 20mph zones would remain appropriate in sensitive locations such as near schools, hospitals, and residential areas with high pedestrian activity);
- Proceeding with construction of an M4 relief road to alleviate severe congestion in and around Newport, a bottleneck that has persisted for decades despite repeated promises and planning;
- Upgrading the A55, the key North Wales corridor linking Holyhead port to the English border and vital for tourism, freight, and daily commuting;
- Dualing sections of the A40 in West Wales to address chronic bottlenecks that hinder access to regions like Pembrokeshire and Carmarthenshire;
- Delivering a third Menai crossing to enhance connectivity between mainland Gwynedd and Anglesey, reducing reliance on the existing bridges which face capacity and maintenance challenges;
- Unfreezing all paused road projects to resume investment in infrastructure that supporters say has been neglected for too long.
Leading the debate, Sam Rowlands MS—Welsh Conservative Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Transport and Infrastructure—described Labour and Plaid Cymru’s approach as one that is “slowing Wales down and holding our economy back.” He positioned the Conservative agenda as pragmatic and economy-focused, arguing that good transport links are indispensable for prosperity, job creation, and reversing underinvestment in Wales’ crumbling infrastructure.
This latest intervention comes against a backdrop of sustained political contention over transport policy in Wales. The 20mph default speed limit, championed by the Welsh Government as a road safety measure expected to reduce collisions, injuries, and NHS costs (with some early data showing positive trends in casualty reductions on affected roads), has faced widespread public backlash. A record-breaking Senedd petition opposing the change amassed nearly half a million signatures, and opinion polling has consistently shown strong opposition—often around 70%—particularly among drivers who report increased journey times, frustration in rural and suburban areas, and occasional non-compliance.
The Welsh Conservatives have capitalized on this discontent, repeatedly branding the policy “anti-motorist” and positioning themselves as defenders of drivers, rural communities, businesses dependent on road freight, and those in less well-served regions where public transport alternatives are limited. Critics of the current approach, including the opposition, point to economic modeling (including some Welsh Government estimates) suggesting potential costs from slower average speeds running into billions over time, alongside enforcement expenses and perceived over-application in areas where higher speeds were historically considered safe.
For their part, the Welsh Government and its supporters defend the 20mph limit as evidence-based, life-saving, and aligned with broader goals of sustainable transport, reduced emissions, and safer communities—especially in built-up areas. They have highlighted data indicating collision and injury reductions in the first year of implementation, while acknowledging implementation challenges and engaging in reviews and “listening” exercises in response to criticism. Previous Senedd debates on the issue (including those prompted by petitions and opposition motions) have seen the government largely hold firm, though with signals of potential adjustments toward more targeted application rather than blanket coverage.
The debate also occurs in the early stages of the run-up to the May 2026 Senedd election, where transport—alongside health, the economy, and devolved powers—remains a key battleground. Polling suggests a competitive landscape, with Labour facing pressure to retain its historic dominance, Plaid Cymru gaining ground, and emerging challengers like Reform UK adding volatility. The Welsh Conservatives hope to frame themselves as offering a clear, motorist-friendly alternative that prioritizes economic connectivity and infrastructure delivery.
No immediate outcome from the January 28 debate was detailed in public releases, but such opposition-led motions typically serve to highlight divisions, rally supporters, and keep issues prominent in the media and public discourse ahead of the election. Sam Rowlands MS was made available for media interviews following the session, underscoring the party’s intent to sustain momentum on these themes.
The session underscores the ongoing tension in Welsh politics between competing visions of transport: one emphasizing road-user convenience, economic efficiency, and major infrastructure projects; the other prioritizing safety gains, environmental sustainability, active travel alternatives, and long-term decarbonization. As Wales approaches a pivotal election year, debates like this one are likely to shape voter perceptions of how best to balance these priorities.
-
Health7 days agoHywel Dda board to consider refreshed health strategy to 2040
-
Health5 days agoHealth Board to decide on future model for nine clinical services
-
Health7 days agoWithybush staff fear crèche fee rise will price parents out
-
News1 day agoCaldey still unsafe, survivors warn — despite Abbey’s reform claims
-
Business6 days agoNew planning rules could block Welsh pubs from running pop up campsites
-
Crime6 days agoCounty lines gang operating from Chessington to west Wales jailed
-
Health6 days agoPembroke Corn Store footpath overlooking castle closed after landslip
-
Climate5 days agoPetition opposing climate emergency reaffirmation and ‘tax hikes’ to be heard








