News
Votes of no confidence in senior officers
The Pembrokeshire Herald has learned that a number of councillors were individually submitting MOTIONS OF NO CONFIDENCE in embattled CHIEF EXECUTIVE BRYN PARRY-JONES for the next full council meeting early next month.
Cllr Paul Miller, leader of the party’s Labour group and councillor for Neyland, along with many others including Cllr David Bryan of Haverfordwest, Cllrs Mike and Viv Stoddart of Milford Haven and Cllr Jacob Williams all submitted their motions before Wednesday’s (19th) deadline.
The Herald can also EXCLUSIVELY reveal that separate VOTES OF NO CONFIDENCE have also been tabled over the MONITORING OFFICER, LAURENCE HARDING. Among numerous others, the Herald understands Cllrs Tony Brinsden (Amroth) Jacob Williams (East Williamston) Mike Stoddart (Milford Haven) all unaffiliated, have tabled individual notices of motions of no confidence for the March 6 meeting of full council.
More in The Pembrokehire Herald tomorrow.
Crime
Swansea man dies weeks after release from troubled HMP Parc: Investigation launched
A SWANSEA man has died just weeks after being released from HMP Parc, the Bridgend prison now at the centre of a national crisis over inmate deaths and post-release failures.
Darren Thomas, aged 52, died on 13 November 2025 — less than a month after leaving custody. The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman (PPO) has confirmed an independent investigation into his death, which is currently listed as “in progress”.
Born on 9 April 1973, Mr Thomas had been under post-release supervision following a period at HMP/YOI Parc, the G4S-run prison that recorded seventeen deaths in custody in 2024 — the highest in the UK.
His last known legal appearance was at Swansea Crown Court in October 2024, where he stood trial accused of making a threatening phone call and two counts of criminal damage. During the hearing, reported by The Pembrokeshire Herald at the time, the court heard he made threats during a heated call on 5 October 2023.
Mr Thomas denied the allegations but was found guilty on all counts. He was sentenced to a custodial term, which led to his imprisonment at HMP Parc.
Parc: A prison in breakdown
HMP Parc has faced sustained criticism throughout 2024 and 2025. A damning unannounced inspection in January found:
- Severe self-harm incidents up 190%
- Violence against staff up 109%
- Synthetic drugs “easily accessible” across wings
- Overcrowding at 108% capacity
In the first three months of 2024 alone, ten men died at Parc — part of a wider cluster of twenty PPO-investigated deaths since 2022. Six occurred within three weeks, all linked to synthetic drug use.
Leaked staff messages in 2025 exposed a culture of indifference, including one officer writing: “Let’s push him to go tomorrow so we can drop him.”
Six G4S employees have been arrested since 2023 in connection with alleged assaults and misconduct.
The danger after release
Deaths shortly after release from custody are a growing national concern. Ministry of Justice data shows 620 people died while under community supervision in 2024–2025, with 62 deaths occurring within 14 days of release.
Short sentences — common at Parc — leave little time for effective rehabilitation or release planning. Homelessness, loss of drug tolerance and untreated mental-health conditions create a high-risk environment for those newly released.
The PPO investigates all such deaths to determine whether prisons or probation failed in their duties. Reports often take 6–12 months and can lead to recommendations.
A system at breaking point
The crisis at Parc reflects wider failures across UK prisons and probation. A July 2025 House of Lords report described the service as “not fit for purpose”. More than 500 people die in custody annually, with campaigners warning that private prisons such as Parc prioritise cost-cutting over care.
The PPO investigation into the death of Darren Thomas continues.
Crime
Woman stabbed partner in Haverfordwest before handing herself in
A WOMAN who stabbed her partner during a drug-fuelled episode walked straight into Haverfordwest Police Station and told officers what she had done, Swansea Crown Court has heard.
Amy Woolston, 22, of Dartmouth Street in Milford Haven, arrived at the station at around 8:00pm on June 13 and said: “I stabbed my ex-partner earlier… he’s alright and he let me walk off,” prosecutor Tom Scapens told the court.
The pair had taken acid together earlier in the day, and Woolston claimed she believed she could feel “stab marks in her back” before the incident.
Police find victim with four wounds
Officers went to the victim’s home to check on him. He was not there at first, but returned shortly afterwards. He appeared sober and told police: “Just a couple of things,” before pointing to injuries on his back.
He had three stab or puncture wounds to his back and another to his bicep.
The victim said that when he arrived home from the shop, Woolston was acting “a bit shifty”. After asking if she was alright, she grabbed something from the windowsill — described as either a knife or a shard of glass — and stabbed him.
He told officers he had “had worse from her before”, did not support a prosecution, and refused to go to hospital.
Defendant has long history of violence
Woolston pleaded guilty to unlawful wounding. The court heard she had amassed 20 previous convictions from 10 court appearances, including assaults, battery, and offences against emergency workers.
Defending, Dyfed Thomas said Woolston had longstanding mental health problems and had been off medication prescribed for paranoid schizophrenia at the time.
“She’s had a difficult upbringing,” he added, saying she was remorseful and now compliant with treatment.
Woolston was jailed for 12 months, but the court heard she has already served the equivalent time on remand and will be released imminently on a 12-month licence.
News
BBC apologises to Herald’s editor for inaccurate story
THE BBC has issued a formal apology and amended a six-year-old article written by BBC Wales Business Correspondent Huw Thomas after its Executive Complaints Unit ruled that the original headline and wording gave an “incorrect impression” that Herald editor Tom Sinclair was personally liable for tens of thousands of pounds in debt.

The 2019 report, originally headlined “Herald newspaper editor Tom Sinclair has £70,000 debts”, has now been changed.
The ECU found: “The wording of the article and its headline could have led readers to form the incorrect impression that the debt was Mr Sinclair’s personal responsibility… In that respect the article failed to meet the BBC’s standards of due accuracy.”
Mr Sinclair said: “I’m grateful to the ECU for the apology and for correcting the personal-liability impression that caused real harm for six years. However, the article still links the debts to ‘the group which publishes The Herald’ when in fact they related to printing companies that were dissolved two years before the Herald was founded in 2013. I have asked the BBC to add that final clarification so the record is completely accurate.”
A formal apology and correction of this kind from the BBC is extremely rare, especially for a story more than six years old.
-
Crime2 days agoDefendant denies using Sudocrem-covered finger to assault two-month-old baby
-
Crime1 day agoPembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation
-
Crime6 days agoMan denies causing baby’s injuries as police interviews read to jury
-
News1 day agoBaby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box
-
Crime2 days agoLifeboat crew member forced to stand down after being assaulted at Milford pub
-
Crime3 days agoDefendant denies causing injuries to two-month-old baby
-
Crime3 days agoPembrokeshire haven master admits endangering life after speedboat collision
-
Crime14 hours agoMother admits “terrible idea” to let new partner change her baby’s nappies alone








Welshman23
February 21, 2014 at 8:05 am
Fantastic news but we Ned a few more councillors to join up including some IPPG members perhaps the vote of confidence should include Jamie Adams his conduct is appalling.
Ian
February 21, 2014 at 9:27 pm
So all the things that Jamie adams and BRyn Jones have been defending over the last few years are suddendly nuffink to do with them and they are against it – what flipping lying hypocrites :((
Robin Howells (Chair, Preseli Pembs. Labour Party)
February 21, 2014 at 10:38 pm
Well done Cllr. Paul Miller and fellow Councillors for submitting motions of no-confidence in the Chief Executive, Bryn Parry-Jones and Monitoring Officer Laurence Harding. After last Friday\’s \”democratic process\” where elected Councillors were prevented from representing their voters by Paul Kerr QC it does prove that there is something to hide in County Hall when it comes to examining and debating publicly what money is going where or more to the point in who\’s bank account. Councillors such as Jamie Adams and the Chief Executive Bryn Parry-Jones should remember they are public servants and there to represent the public and the interests of the community and not there to pervert the course of democratic debate and to help themselves to the public purse as they see fit. Interesting how the role of the Monitoring Officer was taken over by Paul Kerr QC – I thought he was there to provide so called \”independent advice\” but ended up excluding those Councillors who expressed their opinions to the press but not excluding those Councillors who spoke to the press in favour of the Chief Executive. Both sides have expressed opposing opinions for and against retaining Bryn Parry-Jones pending a police investigation and therefore both opinions being predetermination but only those calling for his suspension being asked or advised to leave the chamber. Between expenses, grants and pensions being investigated it\’s about time things were cleaned up in County Hall and time for the Welsh Assembley Government to look at this situation and step in and run Pembrokeshire County Council in the interests of the people of Pembrokeshire.
J Hudson
February 22, 2014 at 1:02 pm
The most alarming thing is that the QC was asked to comment on the pre-determinations issue based on out-of date press cuttings, which may have not fully reported the comments of councillors.
Legislations now allows councillors to enter in pre-debate and take part in meetings and decisions, providing that at the time of the meeting they have an open mind and consider all relevant considerations.
I do not understand how anyone other than the individual can assess their state of mind at the time of the meeting.
Still it goes to demonstrate what a rotten council this is.
Will councillors now need to declare that they have open minds when taking part in debates and decisions to avoid being reported to the Ombudsman?
Teifion
February 22, 2014 at 1:07 pm
All we want now is a vote of no confidence in Adams – I’m sure a lot of decent ppl in the IPPG MUST be ashamed of the shenanigins that have been going on in their name (indeed they must be worrying of the ramifications to their own cheque books and freedom for having voted for certain things – all I’d say is don’t take my word or Jamies but look up shirley porter, London councillor ) they + all other councillors should unite against him.