News
Stephen Crabb: ‘I will vote to deliver Brexit tonight’
STEPHEN CRABB MP, member of parliament for Preseli Pembrokeshire, has written an open letter to his constituents explaining his position over Brexit and explaining his intentions in supporting Theresa May in the Brexit vote tonight (Jan 15).
On his Facebook page, the MP posted: “I have received thousands of emails and letters from constituents in recent weeks outlining their views on Brexit. I am taking the time to read through every piece of correspondence because I believe it is important to hear all views from the constituency at this serious moment.
“It will not be possible to reply to all emails ahead of the vote tomorrow but I will respond as soon as I can.
“Attached is an open letter to all my constituents about the Brexit vote tonight.
“It is highly likely that the deal will be defeated later, but I believe that this deal or something very much like it will eventually have to be passed in order for us to move forward. Please take the time to read over the letter to hear my views on the process so far and what is yet to come.”
The full letter below:
Dear Constituents,
Firstly, many thanks to everyone who has contacted me about Brexit over the last few weeks and months.
I have received more than two thousand emails and letters from constituents. No other issue, including the proposed downgrading of Withybush Hospital, has generated anything like as much correspondence – and opinion has been split right down the middle. Many constituents are now arguing for a second referendum and for Brexit to be stopped, whilst on the other side many are arguing for the Brexit vote to be respected and implemented.
Tonight the House of Commons will vote on the draft EU Withdrawal Agreement. It will be the most significant vote for over forty years.
In 2016 the country voted 52% to leave the EU and 48% to remain. In Preseli Pembrokeshire, that majority was even clearer with 55% of voters wanting to leave. On the night of the referendum result I promised to give my all to ensuring that the outcome of that vote is delivered.
It would be an enormous breach of trust with voters for the referendum result to be ignored or overturned. So at every stage of the process since June 2016 I have voted consistently to implement Brexit and to allow the UK Government flexibility in the way it conducts the negotiations. I have voted against every attempt to block or water-down the referendum result, or to try and shackle the hands of the Prime Minister.
As we approach the end of the negotiation process, there is now a deal on the table. It is important to be clear about what this deal is and what it is not. This deal does not set out in detail our new long-term relationship with the EU once we leave; this is purely about the terms on which we exit at the end of March this year.
Under this Agreement, the UK ceases to be a member of the EU at the end of March but it provides for a transition period which will give clarity on trade rules for businesses while the details of the new long-term relationship are negotiated and agreed.
I will vote for the deal because I believe it is the surest and most responsible way of delivering Brexit. A lot of the criticism I have heard about the deal is ill-informed and, in some cases, blatantly untrue.
This deal ensures:
- Free movement of people will end
- We are free to sign trade deals with other countries
- A free trade area for goods with the EU
- No more vast contributions to the EU budget
- Flexibility on services and digital
- We leave the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy
- The European Court of Justice won’t have jurisdiction over the UK
- Continued security cooperation
- Direct effect of EU law in the UK will end
- No hard border in Northern Ireland, or a border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK
On the issue of the so-called ‘Irish backstop’, I think that taking a careful approach to the sensitivities around the Irish border and protecting the gains of the peace process is the responsible thing to do. Polls show that a majority of people in Northern Ireland actually support the Irish backstop regardless of what the DUP may say.
If this Brexit deal is blocked tonight, it is very unclear what will happen next. Different groups of MPs have their own ideas on the way forward. There is a growing number of MPs calling for a second referendum to stop Brexit; there is a group of MPs arguing for a Norway style deal which would be an even softer Brexit; some are arguing for the Brexit day to be postponed to allow more time to negotiate the current deal. All of these scenarios make Brexit less likely.
Even though it is not my preferred outcome, I have consistently voted to allow the Government to spend money preparing for a No Deal outcome as I believe we should be prepared for all eventualities. However, as we saw in the votes last week, there is a majority of MPs in Parliament who will do everything in their power to try to prevent No Deal.
How we leave the EU really does matter to the lives of people who work in key sectors in Pembrokeshire, such as the ports, oil refining and agriculture. I have taken the time to discuss the different Brexit scenarios with all of the leading employers in Pembrokeshire and I honestly believe that the deal on the table is the best way forward given the very serious and specific concerns that have been raised with me by the people who create jobs for my constituents.
The deal is not perfect but no one seems to have a serious Plan B that can command a majority in the Commons. Britain needs a way forward from the current divisions and arguments that are poisoning our national politics.
Nobody knows what will happen next but I genuinely believe that the Brexit deal on the table is the only way to deliver on the referendum result with any kind of certainty.
Tonight I will vote to deliver Brexit.
Rt Hon Stephen Crabb MP
Crime
Milford Haven drug dealing pub boss who boasted of ‘best coke around’ jailed
Dealer who claimed £160,000 profits was later calling police for protection as threats escalated over money he owed to his suppliers
A MILFORD HAVEN drug dealer who bragged he had “the best coke out there” and claimed to have made up to £160,000 in just four months has been jailed for six years.
But behind the image of a confident, high-earning operator, the reality was starkly different — a man in debt, under threat, and repeatedly calling police for protection as his world closed in.

The 35-year-old defendant admitted multiple offences relating to the supply of cocaine and cannabis when he appeared before Swansea Crown Court.
The court heard he played a significant role in the supply of Class A and Class B drugs, purchasing large quantities — including claims he was buying cocaine by the kilogram — and maintaining contact with upstream suppliers.
In messages shown to the court, he boasted about his profits, claiming to have made £38,000 and suggesting that far larger sums were within reach. He also claimed to have earned £160,000 in just four months and said he had bought two houses.
He told customers he had “the best coke out there” and responded aggressively to complaints, stating: “Out of £30,000 worth, you’re the only one to complain,” before adding: “Bad mouthing me is a bad idea you little slag.”

Violence and intimidation
The court was also shown chilling footage of a confrontation at a property on the Mount Estate, where the defendant was heard directing violence over a debt.
In the video, he shouted: “I got boys, yeah, I got boys,” before telling others to “kick his head in” as the attack unfolded inside the victim’s home.
Witnesses described him as having become a “kingpin” in Milford Haven’s drug scene, operating from The Vibe public house, which they claimed was used as both a legitimate business front and a base linked to drug dealing.
Fear behind the façade
Yet the court heard that behind the bravado, the defendant was living in fear.
He had accumulated drug debts estimated at between £18,000 and £26,000 and was being threatened by those higher up the supply chain. His partner reported people turning up at their home, with threats including claims it would be bombed or burned down.
The Herald attended his home address on multiple occasions to report on police activity after he called officers for protection.
In a direct call to this newspaper during the period, he said: “There are threats to my life — people want me dead, dead. I don’t want this in the paper. It’s over money… hundreds of thousands of pounds.”
Documents reveal further pressure
The Herald can also reveal that the defendant was served with a statutory demand in late 2025 over an alleged unpaid debt relating to stock, fixtures and fittings following his takeover of The Vibe public house in March 2024.
Documents seen by this newspaper indicate the financial pressures he was under extended beyond drug debts.
National attention
The case has already drawn national interest, with Channel 4 making a documentary featuring the defendant after interviewing local people in Milford Haven over recent months.
‘Significant role’ in drug trade
Police arrested the defendant on January 5 last year on suspicion of being concerned in the supply of Class A drugs. A search of an address on Priory Road uncovered 18 grams of cannabis, while a separate incident involving a vehicle led to the discovery of 73 grams of cocaine and cannabis.
Prosecutors said he was actively involved in the supply of drugs and purchasing large quantities, describing him as a key player in the local trade.
He has 57 previous convictions, mostly for theft-related offences.
‘Only a custodial sentence’
Defending, Mr Ibrihim described his client’s background as a “tale of woe,” telling the court his father was addicted to heroin and his mother struggled with alcohol. His younger sister died in 2022.
The court heard he had gone “off the rails” in his late teens and that his drug dealing was linked to debts, including those connected to his father. It was also said that many of his claims about wealth were exaggerated and amounted to “bravado”.
Sentencing, the judge said: “The seriousness of this offending means that only an immediate custodial sentence is appropriate.
“You played a significant role in drug dealing. What is clear is that you were dealing with a lot of cocaine.
“I have no doubt that some of what you did was due to pressure, but some of it was for your own gain.”
The judge added that despite the defendant’s claims of wealth, “you haven’t got hardly anything left”.
For the supply of cocaine, he was sentenced to six years in prison, with a concurrent sentence of 30 months for supplying cannabis.
He will serve at least half the sentence in custody before being eligible for release.
A victim surcharge of £228 was also imposed.
Community
Loose horse sparks police response in Pembroke
Animal seen galloping through residential streets and towards main road
POLICE are reportedly tracking a loose horse which strayed into a residential area of Pembroke.
The animal was first spotted in Gatehouse View before making its way onto a nearby main road.
A post on the Pembroke and Pembroke Dock Citizens’ Forum said the horse had left Gatehouse View and was seen heading towards the road by Pembroke Leisure Centre.
The resident wrote: “Anyone recognise it? Police following it.”
The horse was later reported to be galloping down Buttermilk Lane in the direction of Martha’s.
Stray horses are not uncommon in the area. In January, several animals were reported loose around Pembroke and along the A477, particularly near Buttermilk Close and the Cleddau Bridge.
Those incidents created a hazard for motorists, prompting Pembrokeshire County Council to step in and return the animals. Drivers were advised to take extra care and avoid startling them.
international news
Britain exposed: UK has no real shield against long-range Iranian missile threat
Reliance on US interceptors leaves gaps as Iran’s reach grows
BRITAIN would struggle to defend itself against a long-range ballistic missile attack and would instead rely heavily on American systems based in Eastern Europe and at sea — with no guarantee of success.
That is the stark reality emerging after Iran’s attempted strike on a UK–US base at Diego Garcia on Saturday (March 21), a move that caught many world leaders off guard and marked a significant escalation in capability.

Concerns are further heightened by Iran’s development of larger space launch vehicles, including the Simorgh, Zuljanah, Ghaem-100 and Qased systems, which on paper demonstrate ranges of between 2,200 km and up to 6,000 km, with payload capacities of up to 1,000 kg. While these rockets are officially designed to place satellites into orbit rather than deliver warheads, they use the same multi-stage technology and propulsion systems found in long-range ballistic missiles. Defence analysts have long warned that such programmes provide a clear pathway to intercontinental strike capability, raising the prospect that parts of Europe — and potentially even the UK — could fall within reach if these technologies are adapted for military use.
No UK shield over Britain
The UK has no dedicated system to shoot down long-range ballistic missiles over its own territory.
While RAF Fylingdales provides early warning and tracking, it cannot intercept incoming threats. Britain’s air defence network — including RAF jets and ground systems — is designed for aircraft, drones and cruise missiles, not high-speed ballistic weapons.
In simple terms, if a missile were heading toward a target such as Milford Haven’s energy facilities, there is no British-operated system that could reliably stop it at the last moment.
America would have to act
Instead, any interception attempt would fall to the United States.
Key assets include:
- Aegis Ashore missile defence bases in Romania and Poland
- US Navy warships equipped with SM-3 interceptors
- Wider NATO tracking and coordination systems
These systems are capable of striking a missile in space during its midcourse phase, long before it reaches the UK.
But there is a crucial limitation: they can only engage if the missile passes within range of those systems.
If the trajectory falls outside that envelope — or if no US ship is positioned correctly — there may be no interception at all.
A probability, not protection
Even when an intercept is attempted, success is far from certain.
Testing data for the SM-3 system suggests success rates of roughly 50 to 80 per cent per engagement, depending on conditions. In practice, multiple interceptors are often fired at a single target to improve the odds.
That still leaves a significant margin for failure.
In a real-world scenario involving countermeasures, technical faults or multiple missiles, the chances of at least one getting through rise sharply.
Gaps in coverage
The NATO missile defence network is not a continuous shield.
It is a patchwork of coverage zones tied to specific systems:
- Romania and Poland provide fixed land-based interception capability
- US warships offer flexible but limited coverage depending on deployment
There is no permanent protective umbrella over the UK itself.
If a missile does not pass through one of those defended zones, Britain would effectively be relying on luck and geometry.
Deterrence, not defence
Ultimately, the UK’s primary protection is not interception — it is deterrence.
Any successful strike on British soil would almost certainly trigger a major NATO response, making such an attack extraordinarily risky for any adversary.
But deterrence does not equal defence.
A growing concern
Iran’s attempted long-range strike on Diego Garcia has shifted the debate sharply.
The use of a missile capable of travelling thousands of kilometres surprised many Western leaders, who had not expected Tehran to demonstrate that level of reach in the current crisis. Although one missile failed and another was intercepted, the incident has raised fresh questions about how far Iran’s capabilities have advanced.
For years, the idea of a missile threat to Europe — let alone Britain — was largely theoretical. Now, defence analysts are treating it as a credible future risk, even if capability remains limited today.
The bottom line
The UK can detect a missile, track it, and coordinate a response — but when it comes to actually stopping it, the country would be dependent on American systems operating at distance, with no certainty of success.
If a missile ever did get through, there would be little standing between it and its target.
And that is the uncomfortable truth behind the headlines.
-
News7 days agoFishguard linked to allegations in Many Tears Animal Rescue investigation
-
News5 days agoEmergency services flood Haverfordwest after reports of person in river
-
Crime3 days agoMother given community order after admitting child cruelty offence
-
Health3 days agoNHS waiting list falls — but cancer delays and diagnostic backlog worsen
-
News4 days agoSenedd vote to ban greyhound racing hailed as ‘landmark moment’ by charities
-
international news7 days agoUK considers military options as pressure grows to secure Strait of Hormuz
-
News4 days agoSenedd votes to ban Greyhound racing in Wales to protect animal welfare
-
Crime6 days agoMan cleared of sexual assault allegation after magistrates rule no case to answer











