News
Stepaside residents win High Court permission for council planning challenge
LAST WEEK (June 22), Stepaside and Pleasant Valley Residents Group (SPVRG) won High Court approval to challenge a PCC planning permission at the Heritage Park, Pleasant Valley, Stepaside.
On 3 March 1987 a planning permission was granted at the Heritage Park site in Pleasant Valley. In order to overcome local residents’ opposition to over-development of the site, it restricted caravans to the south of the site. It changed the use of the north to car parking only, extinguishing all rights for tents and caravans. A separate legal agreement was also signed, confirming this change and binding all future owners of the site to comply.
Unfortunately, PCC mislaid all these records from 1987 and so in 2016 they wrongly granted permission for 29 caravans in the north of the site.
Since January this year SPVRG has made repeated requests to PCC regarding the planning permissions relating to the Stepaside Industrial Heritage Project from the 1980s. Finally, PCC found the mislaid 1987 details on 11 May 2021.
However, two weeks later, on 27 May 2021, PCC proceeded to grant permission for even larger caravans in the north of the site without considering either of the rediscovered 1987 planning permission or legal agreement.
On 22 June 2021 the High Court in Cardiff, overruling PCC’s objections, granted permission for SPVRG to challenge the 2021 permission for failing to take account of the 1987 events and for six other reasons.

SPVRG had also asked the Court to consider quashing the 2016 decision at last week’s hearing, but the judge refused because it was 5 years since the decision was made.
Alec Cormack, Secretary of SPVRG said: “We are delighted that after hearing our evidence, the Court reversed its earlier decision and allowed our case to proceed to a full hearing”
He continued: “SPVRG confidently expects the final hearing, probably in October, will quash the 2021 permission and also establish that the 1987 agreement forbids all caravans in the north, including those wrongly granted permission in 2016”.
SPVRG is a residents group representing the interests of some 300 supporters, acting solely to protect our rural community from over-expansion of the caravan site, and further desecration of an area of natural beauty and historical interest.
News
Davies and Morgan clash over policing powers and terror response in Senedd exchange
CONSERVATIVE MS says breaking up UK would ‘benefit criminals’ as First Minister insists Wales would still rely on cross-border co-operation
A ROW over whether policing powers should be devolved to Wales spilled onto the Senedd floor as a senior Conservative warned that separating from UK-wide structures could leave the country exposed to terrorism and serious crime.

During questions to the First Minister in Senedd Cymru, Andrew RT Davies pressed ministers on whether law and order is better delivered from Westminster rather than Cardiff Bay.
Opening the exchange, Mr Davies said that although he and the Welsh Government disagreed on where policing powers should sit, they should both accept that dismantling the United Kingdom would weaken security.
He told the chamber that if “separatists had their way and they broke up the United Kingdom, policing would be fundamentally weakened in these islands and the criminals will benefit from it”.
He asked the First Minister to agree that the UK provides the strongest framework for keeping communities safe through joint working between England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
“The co-operative working and that strong union, working together… protects the citizens of this great country of ours,” he said, urging ministers to reject what he called a “narrow, separatist, independent argument”.

‘Strong devolution in a strong UK’
Responding, Eluned Morgan said her government was not pursuing devolution as a stepping stone to independence.
“We want to see strong devolution in a strong UK,” she said, adding that Labour remained committed to improving services rather than chasing constitutional change for its own sake.
She argued that reforming how policing is governed in Wales could improve accountability and outcomes for the public, particularly as discussions continue over replacing the current police and crime commissioner model.
“We want to see change when it comes to policing… because we want to see better provision for the people in Wales,” she told MSs.
Terrorism expertise ‘not something you could replicate’
However, the First Minister acknowledged that certain specialist capabilities, particularly counter-terrorism, would still require close links with the rest of the UK.
“It of course makes sense for us to co-operate across the border when it comes to policing, when it makes sense,” she said.
“Just think about terrorism; we’ll never have the kind of absolute expertise in terrorism that you may get in a place like London. We would have to work with them and depend on them—not something you could do in an independent Wales.”
Her comments prompted Mr Davies to argue that this reliance showed why policing should remain reserved to Westminster.
He later said the admission demonstrated “the dangers of putting the Senedd in charge of policing”, claiming Wales could end up dependent on external support during major incidents.
Long-running debate

Policing and criminal justice are among the few major public services not currently devolved to Wales, with responsibility resting with the UK Government.
Supporters of devolution, including Plaid Cymru, argue that Welsh control would allow policies better tailored to local needs.
Opponents say fragmenting the system could weaken intelligence sharing and increase costs, particularly for specialist units tackling organised crime and terrorism.
The exchange underlines how the issue remains a political dividing line in Cardiff Bay, with both sides framing the argument around public safety rather than constitutional theory.
For now, any change would require agreement from Westminster, meaning the debate is likely to continue long before any powers formally shift.
Crime
Pembroke Dock woman admits breaching community order
Magistrates revoke sentence after missed appointments
A PEMBROKE DOCK woman has admitted breaching the terms of a community order.
Shannon Charge, aged 30, of Pater Court, appeared before Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Monday (Feb 2).
She admitted failing to attend a scheduled probation appointment and a drug dependency appointment.
Magistrates revoked the existing community order and ordered her to pay £60 in court costs.
The court heard the order related to earlier offences, for which she had been made subject to rehabilitation and drug treatment requirements. A further review hearing is listed for March 2.
Crime
Milford Haven man given extra unpaid work after breaching court order
Magistrates add hours after missed appointments
A MILFORD HAVEN man has been ordered to complete extra unpaid work after breaching the terms of a community order.
Peter Jones, aged 33, of Precelly Place, appeared before Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Monday (Feb 2).
He admitted failing to attend scheduled unpaid work and a probation appointment earlier this month.
Magistrates varied the order, imposing an additional 10 hours of unpaid work. Jones was also ordered to pay £60 in court costs.
The court heard the original community order followed an earlier conviction.
-
Health5 days agoConsultation reveals lack of public trust in health board
-
News6 days agoCaldey still unsafe, survivors warn — despite Abbey’s reform claims
-
Community6 days agoPembrokeshire students speak at national Holocaust Memorial Day event
-
News2 hours agoPrincess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
-
News6 days agoKurtz raises Gumfreston flooding in the Senedd as petition deadline nears
-
Crime4 days agoPembroke man accused of child sex offences sent to Swansea Crown Court
-
Education6 days ago‘Vulnerable teen’ questioned by police at Milford Haven School
-
Education6 days agoAttendance concerns at Milford School reflect wider issue raised at the Senedd







