News
Charitable funds – Pembrokeshire NHS – where does your donation go?


A SPECIAL REPORT
by Lyn Neville
Many people give donations to the local hospital for different reasons. My concern is for Cancer Services at Withybush Hospital in Haverfordwest and what is done with this money. I have suffered personal grief when members of my family have passed away on Ward 10. The first feeling is sorrow but you also feel the need to help the people who helped you and your loved one. The staff on Ward 10 and in the Chemotherapy Day Unit (CDU) have been caring, helpful, compassionate and professional. Many people make donations in lieu of flowers and in legacies to Ward 10 and the CDU. But, when you make a donation now the Ward 10 and CDU funds have disappeared and become part of Pembrokeshire Cancer Services. So can you give your money specifically (only) to Ward 10 or CDU? It certainly seems not. The Hywel Dda General Fund Charity (the Charity) was established on 29 March 2012 and is registered with the Charity Commission (1147863). The Charity has a single corporate trustee – Hywel Dda [University] Local Health Board. (The name has recently changed again to Hywel Dda Health Charities). The object of the Charity is that: “… The Trustees shall hold the trust fund upon trust to apply the income, and at their direction so far as permissible, the capital, for any charitable purpose or purposes relating to the National Health Service…” The Charity’s Strategic Direction (recently agreed at a Public Board meeting) sets out what the Charity aims to support from the donations received: “The Hywel Dda Charity’s objective is to support any NHS charitable purpose. This is primarily within the Hywel Dda area. The Trustees ensure that this purpose is carried out for the public benefit by working to the following aim: To raise more than £2 million per year to help keep Hywel Dda’s Services at the highest standards”. So, it seems the Hywel Dda Health Board NEEDS the generous support of the public to keep Hywel Dda’s Services at the highest standards. If you also take into account that on the 22nd May, 2014 the Audit Committee Report to the Board informed the Health Board that, “The Audit Committee was informed that Hywel Dda University Health Board’s year-end financial position of £19.225m deficit reflects the on-going requirement for major service redesign in order to deliver the statutory breakeven duty. (The major service redesign is another story!!) At that Health Board meeting on the 29th March, 2012 the Board said – “Board Members will be well aware of the local sensitivities to restructuring of charitable Funds. These funds having in the main been raised over many years by voluntary donations and legacies to local services. Board members can be assured that the restructuring has been focussed on improving the Health Board’s ability to spend the monies on these very local services. “By retaining 110 local designations and significant restricted funds we are bound to apply the monies for the purposes intended. The Charity Commission has repeatedly stated that monies are to be applied for the charitable purposes not hoarded. This proposal is aimed at achieving this end. The creation of local a Charitable Funds Subcommittee in each county has further strengthened this local accountability.” So: the Charity Commission says the money mustn’t be “Hoarded” it must be spent. BBC Wales reported recently that £550,000 had been “Ring-fenced” for the CDU and Ward 10 at Withybush Hospital. This is made up of £250,000 for Ward 10 and £300,000 for CDU and was decided at a Hywel Dda Charitable Funds Committee Meeting in September 2013. But the term “Ring-fence” doesn’t really mean anything. On the 1st December, 2011 the Charitable Funds Committee ringfenced £200,000 for Ward 10. On the 3rd April 2012 – Chris Martin (Chair) in a letter to Angela Burns A.M. informed her that £290.000 had been ring-fenced for Ward 10. So between April 2012 and September 2013 the ring-fenced amount for Ward 10 went DOWN by £40,000! So why did that happen? The Charitable Funds Committee agreed to ring-fence the funds which means they can also agree Not to ring fence the funds and use them for something else. The money needs to be “Restricted” which in the eyes of the Charity Commissions means that is all it can be used for!! But the Health Board say it is too difficult to do this (and would be very inconvenient). At a meeting with Chris Martin (former Chair of Hywel Dda) on the 12th March, 2014 he said I could “trust him that the money was ring-fenced and that is all it would be used for”. Well he’s gone. Let’s see what his successor says. In the Pembrokeshire Charitable Funds Committee Meeting on Thursday 24th January, 2013 it was minuted that, “discussions took place regarding the Cancer Services Fund as the balances do not look like Ward 10 funds are being ring-fenced. “Redacted” therefore agreed to discuss with “Redacted” to provide reassurance.” At the Charitable Funds Committee 4th March 2014 – (minutes 12th Dec, 2013). Finance CF(14)05 Directors Report – Mr Forster began by advising that this contained both good and bad news. The bad news was that donations were down by 30% comparing year on year figures. Donations are down because no one knows where the money goes or what it is being spent on. In a recent Charitable Funds Committee meeting, a Board Member suggested the use of a general “get out” clause. But what does that mean? I am informed that this was a “reference to the trustees’ general power to apply designated unrestricted funds for “any” purpose.” I was also informed that “as a Charity, they rarely exercise this power.” But it is a power they can use if they want to!! The Health Board has a Fundraising Team and an Army of Media and P.R. people so why can they not explain to the generous people of Pembrokeshire why the funding structure was changed, where the money goes and what it is spent on. I was told at a recent meeting with the Chair of the Pembrokeshire Charitable Funds Committee that donations in Pembrokeshire have, “gone through the floor”. If there is no “Trust” then people will not give. Many people now give money to organisations that hold funds outside the reach of the Health Board like the League of Friends and the Withybush Hospital Cancer Day Unit Appeal Shop who are happy to explain to donors how the funds are distributed. As I said, my main concern is for Cancer Services at Withybush Hospital. I took a look at the Hywel Dda Health Board’s “Cancer Delivery Plan 2013- 16” and there is NO “Planned Action” to establish a new CDU at Withybush Hospital or to Refurbish Ward 10. It is very strange that this is not shown as we have been told for many years now that the plan to do this is ongoing. The “buzz words” these days are Honesty and Transparency so can we please have some from the Hywel Dda Health Board on Charitable Funds……… Please? A Board spokesperson told the Herald: “The University Health Board has repeatedly stated both to Mrs Evans- Thomas and other interested parties that, other than the ‘Bucket Full of Hope’ Appeal Fund monies, the University Health Board did not receive donations and legacies from the public to the Cancer Services Pembrokeshire Fund with any specific wish that they were for the ‘Bucket Full of Hope’ or any expressed restriction (most likely in the form of a legacy) that it be used in this way “The Charity Commission have confirmed that under charity legislation the Trustees have a duty to expend the funds under the objects of the charity to which they were donated and these are specifically NHS. It was further confirmed by them that the University Health Board’s Charity has no power to hand these monies wholesale to a non NHS charity. Therefore it is the hospital charity that is responsible for the public discharge of those funds under Charity Commission rules and charity legislation. “NHS bodies can work with other charities on matters of joint interest. However, this would usually be in the form of expenditure grants directly to shared projects and not what ‘Bucket Full of Hope’ are requesting. It is for the Trustees of the NHS charity to make decisions insofar as they lie within their power.”
News
Anger at plans to turn Little Haven shed into holiday let

PLANS to convert a garden shed to a holiday let at a Pembrokeshire seaside village with the highest rates of second homes and holiday lets in the county have been turned down.
In an application before Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, Shabnam Banihashem of 19a Wesley Road, Little Haven sought permission to convert a rear garden shed, already replace with a summerhouse, to holiday let accommodation.
Local community council The Havens had objected to the scheme, saying it has concerns over parking and highway access arrangements, and concerns about impact on Highway traffic safety-related matters.
The park’s building conservation officer had recommended the plans be refused despite it being a “relatively hidden and constricted site” with a likely low impact on the conservation area, saying there “is likely to be an impact on character due to extra traffic – and the potential for setting a worrying development”.
An officer report recommending refusal said: “The Authority has concerns in connection with the proposal due to the impact upon the residential amenity of the host dwelling, and its immediate neighbours, the impact upon the character of the Little Haven Conservation Area due to the potential for additional traffic, and due to the proposed summerhouse being unsuitable in terms of size for the use of holiday letting.
“Ordinarily, when a proposal would result in the creation of a single residential unit, a financial contribution towards the provision of off-site affordable housing would be required [in accordance with policy].
“However, in this particular case, the unit being proposed would not be suitable for long term residential use due to the limited size of the unit. As such, had the proposal been deemed acceptable, the Authority would have imposed a condition restricting the use of the unit to C6 – short term holiday let.
“Given that it would not have then been possible for the unit to benefit from current permitted development rights between C3, C5 and C6 uses, a commuted sum would not have been sought.
“Overall, it is considered that the proposed development would have an unacceptable impact upon residential amenity, and upon the character of the Little Haven Conservation Area.”
The application was refused on grounds including “introducing a significantly greater level of noise and disturbance than the current situation, to the detriment of the residential amenity of neighbouring properties,” and impact on the conservation area.
A previous national park report, based on the second homes council tax premium payable to Pembrokeshire County Council, has said nearly two-thirds of properties in Little Haven are either second homes or holiday lets.
For the main centres of settlements within the national park, second home rates, at the time of the 2023 report, were: Tenby 28.07 per cent, Saundersfoot 29.35 per cent, St Davids 20.86 per cent and Newport 30.6 per cent.
For smaller communities within the national park, some of the figures were even higher: Amroth 47.37 per cent, Broad Haven 36.58 per cent, Dale 39.47 per cent, Lawrenny 28.57 per cent, Marloes 29.66 per cent, Moylegrove 22.64 per cent, and Wisemans Bridge 35.71 per cent.
Topping the list, by a large margin, were: Nolton Haven 60 per cent, and 62.96 per cent Little Haven.
Community
Stena Nordica sailings remain disrupted due to technical fault

Passengers diverted as Fishguard-Rosslare service still affected
FISHGUARD ferry services have faced another day of disruption, with early hopes of a return to normal sailings dashed again this morning (Tuesday, April 8).
The 1:30am sailing of the Stena Nordica was once again cancelled, marking several consecutive days without service on the Fishguard-Rosslare route. The vessel has not sailed since the early hours of Saturday (April 5).
Stena Line has blamed a combination of adverse weather and an ongoing technical issue for the disruption, which began when Saturday’s 2:00pm sailing was delayed and subsequently cancelled. This also resulted in the evening return crossing from Rosslare being called off.
Passengers affected by the cancellations were either transferred to the Holyhead-Dublin route or remained on board in the hope of a later departure.
Among those onboard on Saturday was George Holland, a regular ferry passenger, who had planned a day trip. He reported that the ferry was busy, with 96 vehicles and many families travelling at the start of the Easter holidays.
Despite expectations that Sunday services might resume, sailings remained suspended, and affected passengers were rerouted via Irish Ferries’ Pembroke Dock to Rosslare service.
Hopes were again raised for a resumption of service on Monday (April 7), but that afternoon’s 2:00pm sailing and the corresponding evening return crossing were also cancelled.
A spokesperson for Stena Line said: “Due to a technical issue with Stena Nordica, sailings on the Rosslare-Fishguard route were cancelled over the weekend and on Monday, April 7. Engineers are working onboard to resolve the issue, and it is currently anticipated that sailings will resume at 1:30am on Tuesday, April 8.”
However, the scheduled early morning crossing did not take place, with Stena’s website again citing a technical issue. Passengers were again transferred to Irish Ferries.
At the time of writing, today’s 2:00pm departure from Fishguard and the 7:30pm return from Rosslare remain on the schedule.
Crime
Driver claims he took legal CBD after testing positive for THC

A HEMP user has appeared in court after claiming a legally purchased CBD product caused him to test positive for an illegal drug.
Daren Bradbury, 54, from Seven Steps Road in Sageston, told police he had taken cannabidiol (CBD), a substance derived from the hemp plant and sold legally in the UK. However, blood tests revealed that he had 2.3 micrograms of Delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in his system — just over the legal limit of 2mcg.
THC is the psychoactive compound in cannabis that causes intoxication and remains a controlled substance under UK law.
“He received the CBD from the internet, believing it didn’t contain THC,” said Bradbury’s solicitor, Michael Kelleher, when the case was heard at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court this week.
“He handed the packet to the police and was surprised that the test came back positive — albeit only 0.3mcg over the limit.”
Bradbury was stopped by officers on December 4 while driving on the A477 at Milton. A roadside test proved positive, and subsequent analysis confirmed the presence of THC.
He pleaded guilty to the drug driving offence, but Mr Kelleher requested an adjournment to gather further evidence from the CBD supplier.
“We would like to raise a ‘special reasons’ argument as to why the defendant should not be disqualified from driving,” he said. “We hope to obtain proof from the vendor that the CBD should not have contained THC, as the defendant believed it was perfectly legal.”
Mr Kelleher added that CBD products can be legally purchased both online and in pharmacies.
Magistrates adjourned sentencing until May 1.
-
Crime3 days ago
Hakin drug dealer caught twice in two counties
-
Entertainment7 days ago
Mad Hatter magic planned for Milford Haven this Easter at the Vibe
-
News6 days ago
Wales faces deepening housing crisis as new figures show drop in home building
-
Business7 days ago
Pembrokeshire Council rules out ‘toxic tourism tax’ – for now
-
Business6 days ago
Valero refinery escapes Trump’s new tariffs
-
Crime6 days ago
Man avoids jail despite possessing child abuse images
-
Charity6 days ago
Royal visit celebrates Pembrokeshire charity’s community impact
-
Crime5 days ago
Fined for dropping cigarette at Milford Haven Tesco