A SENIOR officer has been accused of misleading Pembrokeshire Cabinet member Rhys Sinnett about a contract to purchase electric vehicles for the County Council’s fleet.

An investigation led by Council CEO Will Bramble is underway, and a disciplinary panel has been called to consider the incident.
The issue concerns the process used to okay the vehicles’ purchase.
On June 24, Cllr Sinnett approved the purchase of 32 electric vehicles, 21 small vans and 11 large vans at a price of £1.04m.
Shortly after the meeting with officers that okayed the purchase, the IPG called in the decision to be reconsidered by the Cabinet.
On July 4, the Head of Infrastructure and the Environment, Darren Thomas, told the Chief Executive and Cabinet Member about the cock up and that the vehicles had already arrived.
Will Bramble rapidly decided the report given to Rhys Sinnett was incorrect and, on July 9, asked Cllr Sinnett to rescind it.
Cllr Sinnett rescinded his decision on the same day.
The report, into which some of the Council’s most senior officers had input, did not tell Cllr Sinnett that – far from approving the future purchase of vehicles – officers had made an elementary blunder during the procurement process.
Officers failed to understand that instead of negotiating an option to purchase the vehicles, they had – in fact – committed the Council to their purchase. In addition, at least some of the vehicles concerned had already been delivered to the local authority and modified for its use.
In other words, by the time Cllr Sinnett was asked to approve the purchase, the vehicles had already been bought.
A contributor, possibly more than one, to the report given to him on June 24 withheld that information.
The Council’s purchase of the vehicles is neither here nor there. The Welsh Government has set aside funding to transition Welsh local authorities from fossil fuels to electric vehicles. The funding for the vehicles’ purchase came from a pot earmarked for that purpose.

Faced with Hobson’s choice, the Cabinet retrospectively approved buying 32 electric vehicles it already owned.

That is not the key issue.
Council Deputy Leader Paul Miller spelt out the more significant issue: Either deliberately or by omission, a senior officer materially misled a Cabinet member about the background and facts relating to significant capital investment.
The report handed to Cllr Sinnett on June 24 gave him no clue that the vehicles’ purchase had been completed.
Cllr Sinnett was only asked to give authority “to enter a contract with FleetEV for the purchases of 31 EV small vans and 11 EV large vans.”
Cllr Miller, like Cllr Sinnett, was clearly livid at the extent of the deceit.
The former said the issue involved “trust and confidence” in the person or persons who decided to withhold key information from an elected member of the Council’s Cabinet.
Purchasing the vehicles, which was the focus of the IPG’s latest complaint about the steps being taken by the Council to meet its statutory obligation, is not the issue.
As Cllr Miller put it, replacing vehicles at the end of their life is a no-brainer. As anyone with any commercial sense knows, trying to stretch an asset’s life is throwing good money after bad in terms of maintenance and opportunity costs.
The key point is that one or more of the Council’s most senior officers has materially misled a Cabinet member about a seven-figure purchase.
The questions that arise are obvious.
If a senior officer has deliberately withheld information or misled a Cabinet member, have they done so previously, and can they be trusted in the future?
That is very much more important than ridiculous attempts at point-scoring about buying electric vehicles in the first place.
So, in a backhanded way, the IPG has actually drawn a crucial issue to light, albeit entirely by accident.