Connect with us
Advertisement
Advertisement

News

Welsh Labour whips MSs to oppose Welsh Government policy

Published

on

WELSH politics is a looking-glass world. There is a Labour Government in Cardiff Bay held in such contempt by Welsh constituency Labour MPs that its policies are dismissed as “for the birds”. Even bearing that in mind, Wednesday, March 12, was a day in the Senedd that went from the bizarre to the surreal.

GETTING WALES A FAIR SHARE

Plaid called a debate on transport funding. Their motion called on the Welsh Government to confirm its position that Wales should receive the resultant consequentials in line with figures quoted by current UK Government Ministers when in opposition. It also asked for the Welsh Government to write to the UK Secretary of State for Transport to ask for the full consequentials to be made available to Wales.

The “consequentials” referred to are the £4.2bn that the Labour Government in Wales and Labour MPs and ministers in Westminster called for from the Conservative government. The Conservative government under David Cameron designated HS2 an England and Wales project despite the fact that not one centimetre of track or one cubic metre of concrete would be in Wales. Scotland received funding as a result of the project’s cost. Wales did not.

The pursuit of funding for Wales as a result of HS2 is uncontroversial in the Welsh Parliament. EVERY party, including the Conservatives, have consistently called for the funding to come to Wales for years. It is Welsh Government policy.

In those circumstances, Plaid’s motion calling for the Welsh Government to stand by its policy and write to the Secretary of State for Transport should have been uncontroversial. All those Labour MSs who spent years talking about how the Tories had robbed Wales of funding on a transparent ruse would surely line up to demand that their Labour comrades do likewise.

THE WORLD OF UNREASON

Alas, on Wednesday, March 12, things took a turn so surreal that a visitor from a country taking the first steps towards democracy might well have turned around after watching what unfolded and begged for the return of a repressive dictatorship in their nation.

Instead, Labour Minister Jane Hutt filed an amendment to Plaid Cymru’s motion that deleted any reference to HS2 funding and instead thanked Westminster for not nuking Cardiff. That last might be an exaggeration, but not much of one.

As the debate unfolded, our fictional visitor from a foreign land would’ve been forgiven if they’d spent a long time looking for the hidden camera and the gotcha reveal.

Labour MS after Labour MS stood up and pilloried the last Conservative government for failing to fund transport infrastructure in Wales adequately. Labour after Labour MS stood up and praised their Labour counterparts in Westminster for notionally increasing funding for transport infrastructure in Wales. All those Labour MSs conspicuously failed to support the Welsh government’s policy that Wales should get full consequential funding from HS2. Of course, they’d all like to have it, but now there is a Labour government at the other end of the M4, it doesn’t matter to them. Or, if it does, those speaking from the Labour benches in the debate are hypocrites whose previous call for funding was grandstanding duplicity.

We had the bizarre experience of watching Welsh Labour MSs barracking Welsh Conservative MSs during the latter’s speeches, calling for nothing more than the Welsh Labour government to follow its policy. And also to write a formal letter to the Labour Westminster government repeating its previous calls for equitable treatment.

As virtually all Labour MSs represent constituencies within the South Wales Metro area, a project already well underway and scheduled for completion relatively soon, it came as no surprise that they mentioned that project. Somehow, none of them mentioned that Westminster’s funding for it via funding to Cardiff Bay long predated July 4, 2024.

Outside South Wales, they were not much interested.

There wasn’t as much as lip service to rural Wales’s transport needs. Instead, Labour MSs mentioned “a pipeline of projects”, most of which are not advanced beyond the blue-sky-thinking stage.

DODDS’ DOWNBEAT CONTRIBUTION SHINES

Jane Dodds: Highlighting shortfall in rail enhancement investment in Wales

Plaid’s contributions were not much better. Instead of a laser focus on HS2 funding, their motion gave Labour members a chance to chip away at comparatively small beer in financial terms. “Who needs £4.2bn when we’ve been told we’ll get £34m for Labour constituencies?”

Two factors hamstrung the Conservatives’ contributions. First, none of their best performers spoke in the debate. Second, the last Conservative government not only ignored their calls over HS2 funding but also made unfunded pledges for rail infrastructure in Wales.

It took the Welsh Parliament’s sole Liberal Democrat to point out the fatuousness of Labour MSs’ posturing conduct and the Welsh government’s abuse of the amendment system.

Jane Dodds said: “This is really quite depressing for two reasons. One is that those two parties just want to tear chunks out of each other for not doing what the other one thinks they should be doing. And the second reason—and I am very frustrated with the Welsh Government—is the ‘delete all’ that you’ve put on the motion.

“I challenge every single one of you here just to reread what the motion calls for. With the greatest of respect to my Labour colleagues, let’s remind ourselves. Do tell me what you disagree with here.

“It ‘calls on the Welsh Government to provide updated figures on the shortfall in rail enhancement investment in Wales’. What’s wrong with that? 

“Secondly [it asks the Welsh Government to] ‘confirm its position that HS2 should be redesignated as an England-only project and that Wales should receive the resultant consequentials in line with figures quoted by current UK Government Ministers when in opposition’.

“What’s wrong with that? 

“And thirdly: ‘write to the UK Secretary of State for Transport to ask for the full consequentials to be made available to Wales and reversal of low levels of enhancement spending.’

“That is the focus and the ask of this debate. We all accept that services could be better elsewhere, in ‘where I live’ or whatever, but it’s not about that. I feel these Wednesday afternoon debates are really the opposition parties putting down a motion and the Welsh Government saying ‘delete all’, and it feels like on this occasion just for the point of doing it.”

Her reward for a thoughtful intervention was another interruption from Alun Davies MS. This time, Mr Davies pointed out Ms Dodds’s Liberal Democrat colleague was transport minister in the coalition when HS2 was designated for England and Wales.

As whataboutery goes, it’s hard to beat. It is for Mr Davies to explain how what a Liberal Democrat MP did a dozen or more years ago was relevant to the terms of Wednesday’s debate and why the promises made by Labour in Westminster while it was in opposition no longer bind it. Perhaps Labour MPs in Westminster are as hypocritical and as guilty of grandstanding as their Cardiff Bay counterparts.

SKATES SPEECH BEYOND PARODY

One thing neither Alun Davies nor any other Labour MS addressed was the substance of what Jane Dodds said. They couldn’t explain what they opposed in the motion or elucidate any points of disagreement. Labour filed their “delete all” amendment and opposed the motion not because they opposed it or disagreed with it but because they’d been told to oppose it and disagree with it.

Transport Minister Ken Skates’s response to the debate was so risible that he ended up talking about Plaid’s policy on Welsh independence instead of the motion before the Chamber. Mr Skates fatuously stated that it was a good job Wales wasn’t independent because then there’d be no question of funding from Westminster, let alone HS2 funding.

At that point, our foreign visitor was on the plane back to their homeland, plotting to burn down polling stations before the disease spread.

Heledd Fychan, for Plaid, tried in vain to get the Transport Minister to stick to the motion’s point. It proved beyond Mr Skates. She may as well have tried nailing jelly to a wall.

As Labour members unanimously voted against doing something that reflects Welsh government policy, all that was missing was a Terry Gilliam animation and the closing credits to Eluned Morgan’s Flying Circus.

This is how devolution ends, not with a bang but to the strains of The Liberty Bell March.

Business

Welsh Govt shifts stance on business rates after pressure from S4C and Herald

Published

on

Ministers release unexpected statement 48 hours after widespread concern highlighted in Welsh media

THE WELSH GOVERNMENT has announced a new package of tapered business rates relief for 2026-27, in a move that follows sustained pressure from Welsh media — including S4C Newyddion and The Pembrokeshire Herald — over the impact of revaluation on small businesses.

In Milford Haven, the hard-pressed pub sector is already feeling the impact: the annual bill for The Lord Kitchener is rising from £5,000 to £15,000, while rates at the Kimberley Public House have nearly doubled from £10,500 to £19,500. The Imperial Hall’s rates are increasing from £5,800 to £9,200, prompting director Lee Bridges to question why businesses “are being asked to pay more when we use less services”. In Haverfordwest, the annual rates bill for Eddie’s Nightclub is increasing from £57,000 to £61,500.

A written statement, issued suddenly on Wednesday afternoon, confirms that ministers will introduce a transitional “tapering mechanism” to soften steep increases for tourism, hospitality and small independent operators. Full details will be published with the draft Budget later this month.

The announcement comes less than two days after The Herald’s in-depth reporting brought forward direct concerns from Pembrokeshire business owners and councillors, highlighting the uncertainty facing one of Wales’ most important local industries.

Herald reporting credited by senior councillor

Cllr Huw Murphy

Pembrokeshire County Council Independent Group Leader Cllr Huw Carnhuan Murphy publicly thanked The Herald for pushing the issue into the spotlight.

In a statement shared on Wednesday, Cllr Murphy said: “Welcome news from Welsh Government. Thanks to Tom Sinclair for running this important item in the Herald in relation to the revaluation of businesses and the consequences it will have for many.

He added: “Newyddion S4C hefyd am redeg y stori pwysig yma ynghylch trethi busnes.,” which in English is “and thanks to S4C Newyddion as well for running this important story about business taxes.”

He added that the Independent Group “will always campaign to support our tourism and agriculture industry, on which so many residents rely within Pembrokeshire”.

Media spotlight increased pressure on Cardiff Bay

On Monday, ministers said business rates plans would be outlined “within the next two weeks”.
By Wednesday afternoon — following prominent coverage on S4C and continued pressure from The Herald — Welsh Government released an early written statement outlining new support.

Industry sources told The Herald they believed the level of public concern, amplified by the media, “forced the issue up the agenda much faster than expected”.

A cautious welcome for ‘better than nothing’

Cllr Murphy welcomed the partial support, though he stressed it fell short of what many businesses had hoped for.

“This isn’t the level of support many were hoping for,” he said, “but it is certainly much better than nothing.”

Draft Budget expected soon

The full tapered support scheme will be detailed in the Welsh Government draft Budget, expected within a fortnight.

Tourism and hospitality representatives have reserved final judgment until the figures are published, but many have expressed relief that some support will continue, following weeks of uncertainty.

Continue Reading

Crime

Pembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation

Published

on

DYFED-POWYS POLICE have closed an investigation into an alleged rape and false imprisonment in Pembroke after deciding to take no further action. One of the two men originally arrested is now in immigration detention and faces deportation.

The incident took place on Main Street over the weekend of 8–9 November 2025. Police were called at 9:45am on Sunday 9 November after reports of a woman in distress. She was taken to hospital for treatment.

Two men – aged 36 and 27 – were arrested at the scene on suspicion of rape and false imprisonment. They were subsequently released on bail while enquiries continued.

On Tuesday (2 December 2025), the force announced the criminal investigation has concluded and no charges will be brought. A police spokesperson said the decision took full account of the victim’s wishes.

Outcome for the two suspects:

  • The 36-year-old man has been transferred to the custody of the Home Office Immigration Enforcement team and is now detained pending deportation.
  • The 27-year-old man has been released with no further police action.

A Dyfed-Powys Police statement read: “This investigation was not terrorism-related, and we have no knowledge of any linked incident in Monkton. All rumours suggesting otherwise are incorrect.”

The force has also dismissed separate community speculation that the men entered the UK illegally on fraudulent passports or were due in court this week on terrorism charges.

Detectives stressed that every report of rape or serious sexual assault is treated seriously and victims are supported throughout. Anyone affected has been directed to specialist services, details of which are available on the force website.

No further police updates are expected.

Continue Reading

News

Baby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box

Published

on

She tells jury Christopher Phillips repeatedly offered to babysit her seven-week-old son alone in weeks before life-changing injuries were discovered

THE MOTHER of Baby C – the seven-week-old boy allegedly raped and seriously injured by Christopher Phillips – has begun giving evidence at Swansea Crown Court.

Speaking in a barely audible voice from the witness box and frequently breaking down in tears, the woman (who cannot be named for legal reasons) described the rapid deterioration of her infant son’s health in the weeks after she began a relationship with Phillips, whom she met on Tinder.

The couple started messaging shortly after Baby C’s birth in November 2020. The mother’s Tinder profile featured a photograph of herself cradling her newborn son.

She told the jury that all of their meetings took place at her flat in Pembrokeshire. Initially, Phillips paid no attention to the baby, but after about three weeks he began showing interest in the child.

“He sent me a message saying that if I ever needed time to myself – for shopping or anything – he would stay in the flat with the baby,” she said. She declined the offer, explaining to the court: “I didn’t know him well enough to leave my baby alone with him. You don’t leave your baby with someone you barely know.”

Days after Baby C received his first vaccinations, the child began screaming in his sleep. The mother described the cries as sounding “as if someone was snapping his bones” – a family expression she said she had grown up hearing.

A few days later she discovered extensive bruising to the baby’s bottom, a swollen testicle and blood in his nappy. Alarmed, she confided in her sister and parents. Her mother (the baby’s grandmother) immediately suspected deliberate harm, referring to “some paedo” and urging her daughter to seek urgent medical help.

The following day the mother contacted her health visitor and GP. When she told Phillips about the appointments, he became angry.

“He wasn’t shouting, but his tone was different,” she said. “He was worried it would get out in the community and that he would be seen as a suspect. He told me to ‘nip it in the bud’. He said that once it had blown over he would put his offer back on the table – the offer to look after the baby. But I still wasn’t going to accept it.”

On another occasion she walked in while Phillips was changing the baby’s nappy and noticed Sudocrem around his finger “as if it had come from a pot”. She told the jury she did not own a pot of Sudocrem.

On 19 January 2021, following further concerns, Baby C was examined at West Wales General Hospital. Doctors examined his testicle and anus. The mother said she felt “horrible” taking him in but “relieved and reassured” when they were allowed home with advice.

Back at the flat, however, Phillips complained that her refusal to let him have alone time with the baby was “annoying” him and accused her of “micro-managing”. “I was just looking after my baby,” she said.

The mother then described the events of 24 January 2021, the night she dialled 999.

Baby C began screaming in a way she had never heard before. “It wasn’t a cry of pain exactly, but I knew something was terribly wrong,” she said.

At the time the screaming started, Phillips was in the baby’s room, supposedly changing his nappy. When she tried to go in, Phillips told her to stay in the living room. Ignoring him, she entered and saw Phillips fastening the nappy. He then left the room without putting the baby’s babygro back on – something she said immediately struck her as wrong.

Baby C was taken to hospital in a critical condition with catastrophic injuries. He survived but suffered life-changing harm.

The mother denies two charges of causing or allowing a child to suffer serious physical harm and two charges of child cruelty by neglect.

Christopher Phillips (37), of Warrior Reach, Burton, Pembrokeshire, denies eleven counts of sexual penetration of a child under 13, four counts of causing grievous bodily harm with intent and one count of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, all between 20 December 2020 and 25 January 2021.

Cross-examination of the mother by the prosecution is due to begin tomorrow (Thursday, Dec 4). Closing speeches and the judge’s summing-up are expected next week, with the jury likely to retire to consider verdicts on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Business13 hours ago

Welsh Govt shifts stance on business rates after pressure from S4C and Herald

Ministers release unexpected statement 48 hours after widespread concern highlighted in Welsh media THE WELSH GOVERNMENT has announced a new...

Crime16 hours ago

Pembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation

DYFED-POWYS POLICE have closed an investigation into an alleged rape and false imprisonment in Pembroke after deciding to take no...

News16 hours ago

Baby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box

She tells jury Christopher Phillips repeatedly offered to babysit her seven-week-old son alone in weeks before life-changing injuries were discovered...

Crime1 day ago

Defendant denies using Sudocrem-covered finger to assault two-month-old baby

In dramatic day-long cross-examination, Christopher Phillips repeatedly denies sexual penetration, as prosecution alleges escalating anal attacks ended in catastrophic injury...

Business2 days ago

New Milford Haven pilot vessel successfully launched in the Netherlands

THE PORT OF MILFORD HAVEN’S new pilot vessel has reached a major milestone after being launched in the Netherlands, where...

Crime2 days ago

Plaques unveiled in Haverfordwest to honour HIV charity pioneer Terry Higgins

Two blue plaques mark the birthplace of the man whose death led to creation of Terrence Higgins Trust THE LIFE...

Crime2 days ago

Defendant denies causing injuries to two-month-old baby

Christopher Phillips explains “rattle” incident during questioning CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS, the 28-year-old man accused of sexually assaulting and causing serious physical...

Crime2 days ago

Pembrokeshire haven master admits endangering life after speedboat collision

He drove motor boat at excessive speed into a teenage kayaker A PEMBROKESHIRE haven master has admitted endangering life after...

Business3 days ago

RWE confirms £200m battery storage investment for Pembroke

RWE has signed off a £200 million investment to build one of the UK’s largest battery storage facilities in Pembrokeshire,...

Ministry of Defence3 days ago

Castlemartin uncertainty as Government refuses to confirm or deny asylum plans

A RESPONSE from the UK Government has failed to provide any clarity over whether Castlemartin Training Camp – or the...

Popular This Week