Politics
Call for legal action over rail and NI funding
ADAM PRICE urged ministers to consider legal action over £432m “owed” to Wales by the UK Government for rail spending and increased national insurance costs.
The former Plaid Cymru leader warned that a decision to reclassify an Oxford-to-Cambridge railway line as a “England-and-Wales” project cost Wales £360m in consequential funding.
Mr Price asked Welsh ministers: “If the change was made – as it ostensibly was – without consultation or adequate reasoning, what legal hurdles would the Welsh Government face in bringing a case and what remedies might be available?”
Julie James, who is counsel general, the Welsh Government’s chief legal adviser, replied: “I don’t think that’s something we want to particularly take to court.”
Ms James pointed to an extra £445m for rail in Wales in last week’s UK Government spending review, welcoming a “step change” in the level of investment in the past year.
But Mr Price suggested the decision to reclassify East West Rail after four years as an England-only project created a legitimate expectation in legal terms for budget planning.
During counsel general questions in the Senedd on June 17, he criticised the “completely unexplained reversal” on the project which has “no direct nor indirect benefit to Wales”.
The shadow justice secretary said: “That seems to me to amount to a breach of procedural fairness, or potentially even cross the Wednesbury threshold of irrationality because it’s a perverse decision – and that’s why no real explanation has been proffered.”
He urged Welsh ministers to issue a pre-legal action letter compelling the UK Government to disclose the reasoning behind the reclassification.
Ms James, who could not explain the four-year delay, replied: “I don’t think that that would be a good use of the government’s resources at all.”

The Labour politician told the Senedd national planning on heavy rail is done on a England-and-Wales basis, so any scheme in England would proceed as such.
“And, actually, so would any scheme in Wales be on an England-and-Wales basis,” she said. “So, a line with nothing touching England would also be on an England-and-Wales basis.
“The real issue for us is that there aren’t any of those second ones. We’ve been seriously underinvested in and what we now need to see are those investments coming into Wales.
“We need to make sure that the pipeline is an England-and-Wales pipeline and not just an England pipeline, as it was under the previous [UK] Government.”
Ms James said she would like to see heavy rail devolved because the current system has “muddied the waters for sure”.
Mr Price also suggested legal action over a £72m shortfall in funding from UK ministers to cover the increased cost of national insurance contributions in the Welsh public sector.
He told Senedd members the UK Government’s statement of funding policy states devolved administrations should suffer no detriment from UK policy decisions.
Questioning whether there is a credible legal route through judicial review or other means to secure full reimbursement, he asked: “What factors would determine whether that policy wording is legally enforceable?”
Ms James replied: “I think it is a clear breach of the funding policy and the finance minister has been more than plain that he also regards it as a clear breach….
“The question you’re asking me, though, is is it worth trying to take some sort of judicial approach to putting that right and I think that our view is that it isn’t because that will involve an enormous amount of expenditure, it’s quite a sledgehammer.”

She was further pressed by Plaid Cymru’s shadow finance secretary Peredur Owen Griffiths, who warned the UK Treasury acts as “judge, jury and executioner” on such decisions.
Reiterating that heavy rail is not devolved, Ms James replied that the rail example “perfectly illustrates” what’s wrong with the Barnett formula – the mechanism used to allocate additional funding to Wales.
But she said: “I don’t think that it would best serve the Welsh public to spend resources on arguing with HM Treasury about whether that’s a mistake or the classification—.
“I don’t think that would get us anywhere. I don’t think that we would have a decent legal argument to put up that it wasn’t a mistake, and I think that we would ultimately fail.”
Ms James said ministers are concentrating on making sure the England-and-Wales pipeline “has a Wales bit in it”, arguing a legal case would cost a lot and not get very far.
News
Kurtz calls on Labour MPs to back release of Mandelson papers
Opposition motion follows Epstein-linked document disclosures
A SENEDD Member has called on Labour MPs to support a Conservative Opposition Day Motion demanding the release of papers linked to Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK Ambassador to the United States.
Samuel Kurtz said the motion follows the publication of new files and photographs involving Lord Mandelson, which were released as part of a United States investigation into the disgraced and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaking out, Mr Kurtz said that during Prime Minister’s Questions, the Prime Minister admitted he was aware of Peter Mandelson’s ongoing relationship with Epstein at the time of his appointment.
“That means the Prime Minister knowingly appointed Peter Mandelson to one of the most important diplomatic roles in government despite his links to Epstein,” he said. “This raises serious questions about the Prime Minister’s judgement.”
Mr Kurtz went on to accuse the Prime Minister of attempting to prevent transparency over the appointment process.
“Now, instead of being open and transparent, the Prime Minister is attempting to block the release of documents relating to Mandelson’s appointment in order to protect his own position,” he said.
He warned that Labour MPs who oppose the motion would share responsibility for withholding information, adding: “If Labour MPs support blocking the release of these papers, they will be complicit in covering up the process and judgement that led the Prime Minister to appoint Peter Mandelson as Ambassador, despite his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.”
News
Welsh peace campaigner removed from court during Palestine protest case
Concerns raised over use of terrorism laws against silent sign-holders as Welsh activist among those ejected from London hearings
A WELSH peace campaigner was among several protesters removed from court by security staff this week as plea hearings continued for people charged under terrorism legislation for holding pro-Palestine signs.
Angie Zelter, aged 74, from Knucklas, appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London on Monday as part of mass proceedings linked to the Government’s ban on Palestine Action.
Campaigners say hundreds of people across the UK – including some in Wales – have been charged under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 after quietly holding handwritten signs reading: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”

Zelter, a long-time anti-war activist and founder of Trident Ploughshares, attempted to read a prepared statement criticising the prosecutions before being escorted from the courtroom, according to supporters.
She told the court she did not accept being labelled a terrorist for what she described as peaceful protest and opposition to the war in Gaza.
Outside the building, fellow campaigners said she had sought to argue that international law and freedom of expression should protect non-violent dissent.
Also removed from the hearing was Tim Crosland, co-founder of Defend Our Juries, who said he had tried to raise legal objections to the charges before being asked to leave.
Arrests nationwide
Organisers of the “Lift The Ban” campaign claim nearly 3,000 people have been arrested across Britain since late 2025 for taking part in silent vigils, with several hundred now facing prosecution. The offences carry a maximum sentence of six months in prison.
The group argues the legislation is being used to criminalise peaceful protest. It is calling on the Government to lift the ban on Palestine Action and to change its stance on military cooperation with Israel.
However, ministers have defended the proscription, saying the organisation has been linked to criminal damage and disruption at sites connected to defence manufacturing.
Welsh perspective
While most hearings are taking place in London, campaigners say demonstrators in Wales have also taken part in sign-holding protests.
Civil liberties advocates have warned that applying terrorism laws to non-violent protest risks setting a troubling precedent.
For many in mid Wales, the sight of a pensioner from rural Powys being removed from a courtroom has sharpened debate over where the line lies between legitimate protest and criminality.
Further hearings are scheduled in the coming weeks, with more defendants from across the UK expected to appear.
Business
Bid to convert office space into chocolate factory, salon and laundrette
A CALL for the retrospective conversion of office space previously connected to a Pembrokeshire car hire business to a chocolate factory, a beauty salon and a laundrette has been submitted to county planners
In an application to Pembrokeshire County Council, Mr M Williams, through agent Preseli Planning Ltd, sought retrospective permission for the subdivision of an office on land off Scotchwell Cottage, Cartlett, Haverfordwest into three units forming a chocolate manufacturing, a beauty salon, and a launderette, along with associated works.
A supporting statement said planning history at the site saw a 2018 application for the refurbishment of an existing office building and a change of use from oil depot offices to a hire car office and car/van storage yard, approved back in 2019.
For the chocolate manufacturing by ‘Pembrokeshire Chocolate company,’ as part of the latest scheme it said: “The operation comprises of manufacturing of handmade bespoke flavoured chocolate bars. Historically there was an element of counter sales but this has now ceased. The business sales comprise of online orders and the delivery of produce to local stockist. There are no counter sales from the premises.”
It said the beauty salon “offers treatments, nail services and hairdressing,” operating “on an appointment only basis, with the hairdresser element also offering a mobile service”. It said the third unit of the building functions as a commercial laundrette and ironing services known as ‘West Coast Laundry,’ which “predominantly provides services to holiday cottages, hotels and care homes”.
The statement added: “Beyond the unchanged access the site has parking provision for at least 12 vehicles and a turning area. The building now forms three units which employ two persons per unit. The 12 parking spaces, therefore, provide sufficient provision for staff.
“In terms of visiting members of the public the beauty salon operates on an appointment only basis and based on its small scale can only accommodate two customers at any one time. Therefore, ample parking provision exists to visitors.
“With regard to the chocolate manufacturing and commercial laundrette service these enterprises do not attract visitors but do attract the dropping off laundry and delivery of associated inputs. Drop off and collections associated with the laundry services tend to fall in line with holiday accommodation changeover days, for example Tuesday drop off and collections on the Thursday.
“With regard to the chocolate manufacturing ingredients are delivered by couriers and movements associated with this is also estimated at 10 vehicular movements per week.”
The application will be considered by county planners at a later date.
-
Health6 days agoConsultation reveals lack of public trust in health board
-
Community7 days agoPembrokeshire students speak at national Holocaust Memorial Day event
-
News1 day agoPrincess of Wales visits historic Pembrokeshire woollen mill
-
Crime5 days agoPembroke man accused of child sex offences sent to Swansea Crown Court
-
Education7 days agoAttendance concerns at Milford School reflect wider issue raised at the Senedd
-
Community6 days agoCampaign to ‘save’ River Cleddau hits over 2,200 signatures
-
Education7 days ago‘Vulnerable teen’ questioned by police at Milford Haven School
-
Health3 days agoDoctor struck off after sexual misconduct findings at Withybush Hospital







