News
Britain returns to the nuclear frontline with purchase of nuclear-capable jets
RAF Marham and Lakenheath to house new planes as protests grow
THE UK is facing the most significant expansion of its nuclear weapons capability in a generation, with anti-arms groups warning of mass protests and a new wave of peace activism. The move brings Britain back onto the nuclear frontline — and has sparked concern among Welsh campaigners and military watchers.
The UK Government has confirmed the purchase of 12 F-35A fighter jets from the United States. These aircraft are nuclear-capable and can be equipped with the US B61-12 gravity bomb — a weapon with over three times the explosive power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
The jets will be based at RAF Marham in Norfolk, while RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk — already a US-operated base — is undergoing multimillion-pound upgrades. Nuclear storage vaults at Lakenheath, unused since the withdrawal of US bombs in 2008, are expected to be reactivated.
Cost and controversy
The cost of the aircraft is expected to exceed £700 million, with similar sums anticipated for long-term maintenance and support. Campaigners from the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) say the spending contradicts government claims of budgetary restraint in public services.
“This is nuclear proliferation by any other name,” said Kirsten Bayes of CAAT. “At a time when funding is being cut for disabled people and essential services, ministers have found hundreds of millions for US jets designed to carry nuclear bombs.”
The UK has not had its own air-launched nuclear weapons since 1998, when the WE177 free-fall bomb was decommissioned by the then Labour government. Since then, Britain’s nuclear deterrent has relied solely on submarine-launched Trident missiles.
Wales watches with concern
While no nuclear weapons are planned for deployment in Wales, the expansion has raised questions about the role of Welsh airspace and training facilities in future operations.
RAF Valley on Anglesey is a key training hub for the RAF’s fast jet pilots and regularly hosts low-flying exercises involving Typhoon and F-35 aircraft. Flights over rural areas such as the Mach Loop are likely to increase.
“We may not be housing the bombs,” said one local peace campaigner from Ceredigion, “but our airspace is being used in preparation for a nuclear scenario. That should concern everyone in Wales.”
In previous years, RAF Valley has seen protests over jet noise and military flights. Campaigners now say the presence of nuclear-capable jets in Britain could escalate local opposition.
Protest movement revives
CND is organising a large-scale protest this Saturday (June 28) at RAF Lakenheath. The site was previously the focus of anti-nuclear activism in the 1980s, when peace protesters targeted US cruise missile deployment. Organisers say demonstrations will also be held at RAF Marham.
Sophie Bolt, general secretary of CND, said: “This puts Britain on the nuclear frontline. We have not had US nuclear weapons on our soil since 2008, and this decision has been made without any parliamentary debate. That undermines both British sovereignty and democratic accountability.”
The government has denied claims that the move signals a return to Cold War-era posturing. Defence Secretary John Healey said the decision to acquire the jets is “entirely consistent” with the UK’s obligations under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
Britain remains part of NATO’s Dual Capable Aircraft programme, which requires nuclear-capable aircraft to be available for deployment under US control. Any use of such weapons would require joint authorisation by the US president, UK prime minister, and NATO nuclear planning group.

Local unease and national implications
In Pembrokeshire, where residents are no strangers to military activity, news of the expansion has drawn criticism. Campaigners have highlighted the potential for escalation and the region’s role in NATO exercises over the Irish Sea.
“With our history of peace activism and our rural vulnerability, people in West Wales have reason to be concerned,” said a former member of CND Pembrokeshire. “This isn’t just about RAF Lakenheath. If tensions escalate, no part of the UK is safe.”
Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended the move, stating: “In an era of radical uncertainty, we can no longer take peace for granted. That is why my government is investing in our national security.”
But campaigners remain unconvinced.
“This is not about defence,” said Bolt. “This is about preparing for nuclear war — and people across the UK, including in Wales, are right to oppose it.”
Crime
Man accused of Milford Haven burglary and GBH remanded to Crown Court
A MILFORD HAVEN man has appeared in court charged with burglary and inflicting grievous bodily harm, following an incident at a flat in the town earlier this week.
Charged after alleged attack inside Victoria Road flat
Stephen Collier, aged thirty-eight, of Vaynor Road, Milford Haven, appeared before Llanelli Magistrates’ Court today (Friday, Dec 5). Collier is accused of entering a property known as Nos Da Flat, 2 Victoria Road, on December 3 and, while inside, inflicting grievous bodily harm on a man named John Hilton.
The court was told the alleged burglary and assault was carried out jointly with another man, Denis Chmelevski.
The charge is brought under section 9(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968, which covers burglary where violence is inflicted on a person inside the property.
No plea entered
Collier, represented by defence solicitor Chris White, did not enter a plea during the hearing. Prosecutor Simone Walsh applied for the defendant to be remanded in custody, citing the serious nature of the offence, the risk of further offending, and concerns that he could interfere with witnesses.
Magistrates Mr I Howells, Mr V Brickley and Mrs H Meade agreed, refusing bail and ordering that Collier be kept in custody before trial.
Case sent to Swansea Crown Court
The case was sent to Swansea Crown Court under Section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Collier will next appear on January 5, 2026 at 9:00am for a Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing.
A custody time limit has been set for June 5, 2026.
Chmelevski is expected to face proceedings separately.
News
Woman dies after collision in Tumble as police renew appeal for witnesses
POLICE are appealing for information after a woman died following a collision in Tumble on Tuesday (Dec 2).
Officers were called to Heol y Neuadd at around 5:35pm after a collision involving a maroon Skoda and a pedestrian. The female pedestrian was taken to hospital but sadly died from her injuries.
Dyfed-Powys Police has launched a renewed appeal for witnesses, including anyone who may have dash-cam, CCTV footage, or any information that could help the investigation.
Investigators are urging anyone who was in the area at the time or who may have captured the vehicle or the pedestrian on camera shortly before the collision to get in touch. (Phone: 101 Quote reference: DP-20251202-259.)
News
Greyhound Bill faces fresh scrutiny as second committee raises “serious concerns”
THE PROHIBITION of Greyhound Racing (Wales) Bill has been heavily criticised for a second time in 24 hours after the Senedd’s Legislation, Justice and Constitution (LJC) Committee published a highly critical Stage 1 report yesterday.
The cross-party committee said the Welsh Government’s handling of the legislation had “in several respects, fallen short of the standard of good legislative practice that we would normally expect”.
Key concerns highlighted by the LJC Committee include:
- Introducing the Bill before all relevant impact assessments (including a full Regulatory Impact Assessment and Children’s Rights Impact Assessment) had been completed – a step it described as “poor legislative practice, particularly … where the Bill may impact on human rights”.
- Failure to publish a statement confirming the Bill’s compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The committee has recommended that Rural Affairs Minister Huw Irranca-Davies issue such a statement before the Stage 1 vote on 16 December.
- Inadequate public consultation, with the 2023 animal-licensing consultation deemed “not an appropriate substitute” for targeted engagement on the specific proposal to ban the sport.
The report follows Tuesday’s equally critical findings from the Culture, Communications, Welsh Language, Sport and International Relations Committee, which questioned the robustness of the evidence base and the accelerated legislative timetable.
Industry reaction Mark Bird, chief executive of the Greyhound Board of Great Britain (GBGB), described the two reports as leaving the Bill “in tatters”.
“Two consecutive cross-party Senedd committees have now condemned the Welsh Government’s failures in due diligence, consultation and human rights considerations and evidence gathering,” he said. “The case for a ban has been comprehensively undermined. The responsible path forward is stronger regulation of the single remaining track at Ystrad Mynach, not prohibition.”
Response from supporters of the Bill Luke Fletcher MS (Labour, South Wales West), who introduced the Member-proposed Bill, said he welcomed thorough scrutiny and remained confident the legislation could be improved at later stages.
“I have always said this Bill is about ending an outdated practice that causes unnecessary suffering to thousands of greyhounds every year,” Mr Fletcher said. “The committees have raised legitimate procedural points, and I look forward to working with the Welsh Government and colleagues across the Senedd to address those concerns while keeping the core aim of the Bill intact.”
A Welsh Government spokesperson said: “The Minister has noted the committees’ reports and will respond formally in due course. The government supports the principle of the Bill and believes a ban on greyhound racing is justified on animal welfare grounds. Work is ongoing to finalise the outstanding impact assessments and to ensure full compatibility with the ECHR.”
The Bill is scheduled for a Stage 1 debate and vote in plenary on Tuesday 16 December. Even if it passes that hurdle, it would still require significant amendment at Stages 2 and 3 to satisfy the committees’ recommendations.
-
Crime3 days agoDefendant denies using Sudocrem-covered finger to assault two-month-old baby
-
Crime2 days agoPembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation
-
News2 days agoBaby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box
-
Crime15 hours agoProsecution delivers powerful closing speech in Christopher Phillips trial
-
Crime3 days agoLifeboat crew member forced to stand down after being assaulted at Milford pub
-
Crime4 days agoDefendant denies causing injuries to two-month-old baby
-
Crime2 days agoMother admits “terrible idea” to let new partner change her baby’s nappies alone
-
Crime4 days agoPembrokeshire haven master admits endangering life after speedboat collision







