PLANS for works at Tenby’s historic sailing club building, part of the ‘iconic view’ of the town’s harbour have been given the go-ahead by the national park.

In an application to Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, Tenby Sailing Club, through agent David J P Morgan RIBA Architect sought permission for the two openings in second floor gable wall along with two new windows at Tenby Sailing Club, Penniless Cove Hill, along with a related listed building consent.

The application was supported by Tenby Town Council and Tenby Civic Society, the latter saying it will “add value to the use of the building and maintain the character and value of the listed building and the conservation area”.

Supporting documents for the application said: “The proposal is to form two new openings in the stonework and install two windows. These will replicate the existing windows at first floor level below. The openings will have red brick head as on existing original openings on the building. The proposal will have very little adverse impact on the listed building.”

They added: “The proposed new windows will improve observation of the harbour and bay from the second-floor level. This is where yacht racing is monitored and observed by officials and safety personnel.”

An officer report, recommending approval said: “The sailing club was built as a warehouse c. 1825, abutting the C17 sluice. Originally wine stores, it was later used by the local fishermen for stores and is now the home to Tenby Sailing Club, established in 1936. The rubble-built building is of three storeys and four bays, the glazing all later C20 with a slated roof and a modernised interior. There is a large steel stair to north (seaward) elevation.”

It added: “The building forms part of a group picturesquely clustered around the sluice, in turn forming part of the iconic view of Tenby Harbour. The proposal is to insert two windows at second floor level to the north (seaward) elevation, flanking the existing door,” adding: “The area retains its mercantile character not just in appearance, but also through its character due to ongoing use as fishing boat stores and winter moorings.

“The sailing club has occupied the building for many years and remains very active. The proposal is intended to improve the amenity of the building to provide better viewing at elevation and seeks to copy the detail and proportions of the windows at first floor stage.”

The application, and the related listed building consent, was conditionally approved by park planners.

OPPOSITION calls on Labour Government to restore 30mph default, revive frozen projects, and advance long-stalled infrastructure schemes amid ongoing controversy over speed limits and road investment.

In a session that began around 4:30pm and was broadcast live via the Senedd’s online proceedings, the Welsh Conservatives presented a detailed motion urging the Welsh Labour Government—supported by Plaid Cymru under their co-operation agreement—to reverse several high-profile transport decisions. At the heart of the debate was a call to restore the default speed limit on restricted roads from 20mph back to 30mph, a policy introduced in September 2023 that continues to divide opinion sharply.

The Conservatives framed their proposals as a comprehensive plan to “fix Wales’ transport system,” emphasizing that robust road networks are fundamental to supporting businesses, generating employment, and stimulating economic growth. They argued that current policies—including the 20mph default, the long-standing cancellation of the M4 relief road around Newport, and the effective moratorium on new major road projects—amount to an “attack on Welsh motorists” that is exacerbating economic stagnation, lengthening journey times, increasing costs for commuters and hauliers, and contributing to Wales trailing other UK nations in wages and overall prosperity.

The specific demands outlined in the motion included:

• Restoring the default speed limit to 30mph (with the party noting that 20mph zones would remain appropriate in sensitive locations such as near schools, hospitals, and residential areas with high pedestrian activity);
• Proceeding with construction of an M4 relief road to alleviate severe congestion in and around Newport, a bottleneck that has persisted for decades despite repeated promises and planning;
• Upgrading the A55, the key North Wales corridor linking Holyhead port to the English border and vital for tourism, freight, and daily commuting;
• Dualing sections of the A40 in West Wales to address chronic bottlenecks that hinder access to regions like Pembrokeshire and Carmarthenshire;
• Delivering a third Menai crossing to enhance connectivity between mainland Gwynedd and Anglesey, reducing reliance on the existing bridges which face capacity and maintenance challenges;
• Unfreezing all paused road projects to resume investment in infrastructure that supporters say has been neglected for too long.

Leading the debate, Sam Rowlands MS—Welsh Conservative Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Transport and Infrastructure—described Labour and Plaid Cymru’s approach as one that is “slowing Wales down and holding our economy back.” He positioned the Conservative agenda as pragmatic and economy-focused, arguing that good transport links are indispensable for prosperity, job creation, and reversing underinvestment in Wales’ crumbling infrastructure.

This latest intervention comes against a backdrop of sustained political contention over transport policy in Wales. The 20mph default speed limit, championed by the Welsh Government as a road safety measure expected to reduce collisions, injuries, and NHS costs (with some early data showing positive trends in casualty reductions on affected roads), has faced widespread public backlash. A record-breaking Senedd petition opposing the change amassed nearly half a million signatures, and opinion polling has consistently shown strong opposition—often around 70%—particularly among drivers who report increased journey times, frustration in rural and suburban areas, and occasional non-compliance.

The Welsh Conservatives have capitalized on this discontent, repeatedly branding the policy “anti-motorist” and positioning themselves as defenders of drivers, rural communities, businesses dependent on road freight, and those in less well-served regions where public transport alternatives are limited. Critics of the current approach, including the opposition, point to economic modeling (including some Welsh Government estimates) suggesting potential costs from slower average speeds running into billions over time, alongside enforcement expenses and perceived over-application in areas where higher speeds were historically considered safe.

For their part, the Welsh Government and its supporters defend the 20mph limit as evidence-based, life-saving, and aligned with broader goals of sustainable transport, reduced emissions, and safer communities—especially in built-up areas. They have highlighted data indicating collision and injury reductions in the first year of implementation, while acknowledging implementation challenges and engaging in reviews and “listening” exercises in response to criticism. Previous Senedd debates on the issue (including those prompted by petitions and opposition motions) have seen the government largely hold firm, though with signals of potential adjustments toward more targeted application rather than blanket coverage.

The debate also occurs in the early stages of the run-up to the May 2026 Senedd election, where transport—alongside health, the economy, and devolved powers—remains a key battleground. Polling suggests a competitive landscape, with Labour facing pressure to retain its historic dominance, Plaid Cymru gaining ground, and emerging challengers like Reform UK adding volatility. The Welsh Conservatives hope to frame themselves as offering a clear, motorist-friendly alternative that prioritizes economic connectivity and infrastructure delivery.

No immediate outcome from the January 28 debate was detailed in public releases, but such opposition-led motions typically serve to highlight divisions, rally supporters, and keep issues prominent in the media and public discourse ahead of the election. Sam Rowlands MS was made available for media interviews following the session, underscoring the party’s intent to sustain momentum on these themes.

The session underscores the ongoing tension in Welsh politics between competing visions of transport: one emphasizing road-user convenience, economic efficiency, and major infrastructure projects; the other prioritizing safety gains, environmental sustainability, active travel alternatives, and long-term decarbonization. As Wales approaches a pivotal election year, debates like this one are likely to shape voter perceptions of how best to balance these priorities.

Concerns raised over cultural funding priorities amid NHS pressures and closure of Welsh institutions

The Welsh Government has come under criticism after it emerged that more than £40,000 of public money was spent supporting an African film festival held in Cardiff.

Figures show that £41,600.90 was paid in February 2025 to Watch Africa CIC, the organisation behind the annual Watch Africa Film Festival, which showcases African cinema through film screenings, workshops, filmmaker question-and-answer sessions and cultural events. According to the festival’s organisers, the event was launched in 2013 and aims to celebrate the richness and diversity of African storytelling through film.

The spending has been challenged by Gareth Davies, the Welsh Conservatives’ Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Culture, Tourism, Sport and North Wales, who questioned the decision at a time when public finances in Wales remain under significant pressure.

Mr Davies said the allocation of funding was difficult to justify while Wales continues to experience the longest NHS waiting times in the UK, alongside growing financial pressures on households and mounting challenges for public services.

He also pointed to the situation facing Welsh cultural and artistic organisations, several of which have faced severe funding difficulties in recent years. In particular, he highlighted the closure of National Theatre Wales in 2024 after it lost core financial support.

Mr Davies stressed that his criticism was not aimed at the Watch Africa Film Festival itself, which he said had a place within Wales’ cultural landscape. Instead, he said his concerns related to the use of taxpayer money and how limited culture and arts budgets are being prioritised.

Commenting on the spending, Mr Davies said it was concerning that the Welsh Government had chosen to allocate more than £41,000 to the project at a time when many families were struggling with the cost of living and public services were under intense strain.

He argued that when funding is scarce, it is hard to justify public money being used to support events that, in his view, should be capable of operating without government backing, particularly when long-established Welsh cultural institutions were allowed to collapse due to a lack of financial support.

Mr Davies called on ministers to reassess their priorities and ensure that future culture and arts funding is focused on supporting Welsh culture and organisations that preserve and promote Wales’ national identity.

The Welsh Government has been approached for comment.