Crime
Too young to vote, old enough for the dock: Calls to raise age of criminal responsibility grow
A TEN-YEAR-old is too young to leave the school gates without a parent’s permission, let alone cast a ballot. They can’t work a paper round, open a bank account or see a 12A film without an adult. They are, in almost every sense, dependent on the grown-ups around them.
Yet, the moment they cross a certain line – that protective bubble vanishes. Under current law, a child still in primary school is considered mature enough to stand in a dock, be questioned under caution and carry a criminal record that could follow them for decades.
This paradox was at the heart of a Senedd debate on Wednesday (January 14) as Plaid Cymru’s Adam Price called for the age of criminal responsibility to be raised from ten to 14.
He told the Welsh Parliament: “A child still in primary school can be arrested, questioned under caution, prosecuted, convicted, and marked, sometimes for years, by an encounter with the criminal courts. I believe we should raise the age of criminal responsibility to 14.
“That’s not to be soft on crime, as some would see it – it’s to be smart on crime, clear-eyed, with a hard-headed focus on what the evidence tells us.”
He warned: “The evidence is all in one direction: criminalising ten, 11, 12 and 13-year-olds is to create a conveyor belt of future crime, pulling children deeper into the system, widening the net, turning one incident into the beginning of a longer offending career.”
The former Plaid Cymru leader criticised the “crude” current threshold, saying: “The age of criminal responsibility is not just a number, it’s a line that determines whether we treat a child primarily as a child who needs help or an offender to be processed.
Mr Price pointed out that the doctrine of “doli incapax” – which presumed children aged ten to 13 were incapable of criminal intent unless proven otherwise – was abolished in 1998.
Warning of an incoherent and unfair system, he said: “Nothing better replaced it. So, now we have the worst of both worlds – a very low threshold with none of the old protections.”
He added: “As long as the legal age for criminal responsibility stays at ten, that… creates a constant pull towards court when what a child actually needs is something else: protection, support, supervision, help with mental health and, where necessary, secure care.”
Mr Price stressed early intervention does not require early criminalisation. “This is not an argument for doing nothing,” he said. “It’s an argument for doing the right thing.”
A 2023 inquiry by the Senedd’s equality committee highlighted a hidden crisis: at least 60% of young people in the justice system have a speech, language or communication need.
“Think about what that means,” said Mr Price. “It affects whether a child understands the police caution, whether they can tell their story clearly, whether they can follow what’s happening in court, take instructions, understand consequences or engage with anything designed to change their behavior.”
The MP-turned-Senedd Member added: “Sometimes, the most serious harm by children is tangled up with exploitation. Children can be groomed into offending, coerced, threatened, controlled by older criminals. When that happens, a purely punitive response misses the point. It treats the exploited child as the problem rather than as a child in danger.”
Rhian Croke, a human rights expert at the Children’s Legal Centre Wales, has warned of a “glaring contradiction” within the Wales and England legal system.
She wrote: “This legal mismatch is not just technical – it reflects a deeper inconsistency…. On the one hand, we delay rights like voting, full medical consent or signing contracts until 16 or 18. On the other, we impose adult-like punishments on children still in primary school.”
Dr Croke pointed out that the age of criminal responsibility in Wales is the lowest in Europe. This means children can be interviewed, detained, subject to strip searches, prosecuted, sentenced and given a criminal record that follows them into adulthood.
Warning Wales and England is an international outlier, she said: “Further afield, it may be interesting to learn the minimum age of criminal responsibility is higher in China and Russia.”
Dr Croke cautioned that criminalising children as young as ten can cause significant and lasting harm as well as make reoffending more likely – not less.

Jane Hutt, Wales’ social justice secretary, stressed that while the Senedd can debate the issue – the power to change the law remains locked in Westminster.
Reiterating calls for powers over youth justice, she committed to raising the issue during a forthcoming meeting with Jake Richards, the UK youth justice minister.
Ms Hutt told the Welsh Parliament: “I’m very conscious of the extensive evidence in favour of raising the age of criminal responsibility.”
In 2019, John Thomas – the ex-head of the judiciary – led a commission on justice in Wales, which recommended raising the age of criminal responsibility to at least 12.
Scotland raised the age to 12 in 2021. The United Nations has urged the UK Government to raise the age to 14 in Wales and England but Westminster has resisted the calls.
Crime
Man due in court over alleged false refund claims at Pembrokeshire businesses
A 32-YEAR-OLD man is due to appear before magistrates next month accused of attempting to obtain hundreds of pounds by allegedly making false claims that money had been incorrectly taken from his bank card.
Craig James, of Fryer Court, Whitworth Close, Gosport, is listed for a plea hearing at 2:00pm in relation to three allegations of fraud by false representation, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.
The court register states that the offences are alleged to have taken place on December 8, 2025, at three separate locations in west Wales.
In the first allegation, James is accused of dishonestly making a false representation at an address on Bridge Street, Haverfordwest, by allegedly claiming £153.80 had been incorrectly debited from his bank card and asking for it to be returned, intending to make a gain for himself.
A second charge relates to Penfro Garage in Ceredigion, where he is alleged to have made a similar claim involving £180.18.
The third allegation concerns Melrose House on Market Street, Newport, Pembrokeshire, where he is accused of falsely claiming £297 had been incorrectly debited and asking for the money back.
Each charge carries a maximum penalty in the magistrates’ court of up to six months’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.
The case was previously listed on December 22, 2025, but was adjourned at the request of the prosecution to allow further enquiries. The court register notes that there were concerns over whether the offences as laid were the correct charges.
James is expected to enter pleas when the matter returns to court.
Crime
Former Gwent detective would have been sacked after off duty assault conviction
Ex officer found guilty of gross misconduct following Devon incident and magistrates court conviction
A FORMER Gwent Police detective sergeant has been found guilty of gross misconduct after being convicted of assaulting a man while off duty in Devon.
Joanne Marston resigned from the force shortly before an accelerated misconduct hearing was due to begin at Cwmbran on Monday. The panel went ahead in her absence.
The hearing was told the incident happened in February 2024 while Marston was off duty in Devon. She was later arrested and charged with common assault, and was convicted at Exeter Magistrates’ Court in March last year.
A professional standards investigation concluded she had breached the police standards of professional behaviour relating to discreditable conduct. The panel upheld the allegation and found it amounted to gross misconduct.
Had she remained a serving officer, the panel ruled she would have been dismissed without notice.
Assistant Chief Constable Vicki Townsend, who chaired the hearing, said the former officer’s actions were “shocking and unacceptable” and warned that such behaviour damages public confidence in policing.
Marston will now be placed on the College of Policing barred list, preventing her from serving with any police force in the UK.
Crime
Milford Haven man tells jury he feared being run over outside pub
Ben Jenkins, 26, denies GBH after woman suffered facial fractures during Guy Fawkes Night incident outside Nos Da in 2023
A MILFORD HAVEN man accused of inflicting grievous bodily harm on a woman outside a town centre bar has told a Crown Court jury he acted in self-defence because he feared he was about to be run over.

Ben Jenkins, 26, of St Lawrence Avenue, Hakin, is on trial at Swansea Crown Court charged with causing grievous bodily harm to a female motorist outside the Nos Da Bar, Victoria Road, Milford Haven, on Guy Fawkes Night, November 5, 2023.
The jury retired to consider its verdict on Wednesday (Jan 14) after hearing evidence from Jenkins and other witnesses. A verdict is expected later this week.
On the stand
Giving evidence, Jenkins told the court he had been standing in the road outside Nos Da at about 3:00am, talking to his fiancée, Bronwyn Jenkins.
He said a silver car pulled up behind his fiancée’s vehicle and someone shouted words to the effect of: “Get out of the fxxxing way or I’ll fxxxing run you over.”
“I was terrified,” Jenkins told the jury. “I thought my life was in danger.”
He said he went straight home after the incident. The court heard Jenkins provided a prepared statement to police but answered “no comment” in interview.
Under cross-examination, the jury was told Jenkins had consumed six or seven pints of cider and three or four rum and cokes. Jenkins maintained he was not intoxicated.
Prosecutors also questioned why the alleged threat to run him over was not included in his prepared statement.
CCTV footage was shown to the jury which the prosecution said appeared to show Jenkins being held back by a friend to prevent him approaching the car. Jenkins told the court his friend was not holding him back.
Further CCTV was said to show Jenkins being dragged away during the incident. Jenkins told the court this did not reflect what happened and that he was moving away in any event.
Jenkins said he did not know the driver was a woman at the time. He told the jury: “I swung four times but only one punch connected.”
“Shaken and tearful”
Bronwyn Jenkins told the court that when she picked her partner up later, he was “extremely shaken and tearful,” and said he had been in fear for his life.
She told the court she felt threatened after a car pulled up behind her and there was aggressive shouting. Bronwyn Jenkins said she drove down to a roundabout to get out of the way and did not see the incident itself.
Victim’s account
The complainant told the court she and her husband had been driving home after a night out at the Manchester Club when they had to stop abruptly behind Bronwyn Jenkins’ car, which she said was parked in the middle of the road.
She told the court she asked for the car to be moved and did not want to overtake because of the position of the vehicle. She said two men near the car made inappropriate gestures towards her, prompting her husband to tell her to pull over.
Her husband told the court he had been in the Manchester Club earlier and was already upset because his own car had been written off while it was stationary. He said he had called police but no officer attended, leaving him irate.
He told the jury he saw the men making gestures and heard shouting, and told his wife: “What’s their fxxxing problem? Pull the fxxxing car over.”
He also alleged he saw Jenkins punch his wife four times and heard him say: “You fxxxing deserved that, bxxxxh.”
Prosecution and defence
Prosecuting barrister Georgia Donahue told the court Mrs Bernard suffered two facial fractures and a perforated sinus, along with bruising and bleeding.
She said the victim was not aiming to run Jenkins over, and told the jury the Crown’s case was that the violence was “completely disproportionate” and amounted to retaliation rather than self-defence. The prosecution suggested it was Mr Bernard who was the aggressor.
The defence barrister told the jury that he accepted the vehicle moved in the direction of Jenkins, but said it was for the prosecution to prove Jenkins was not acting in self-defence.
He also referred to Jenkins’ character references, and told the jury Jenkins did not realise a woman was in the driver’s seat.
Jenkins remains on unconditional bail while the jury deliberates.
-
Crime2 days agoMan jailed after samurai sword brandished in Pembroke Dock street brawl
-
Crime23 hours agoMilford Haven man tells jury he feared being run over outside pub
-
Crime3 days agoFather jailed for 35 years after baby hurled at television
-
Crime6 days agoMan pleads guilty after £150k drugs haul found in Pembroke traffic stop
-
Crime1 day agoDock woman sentenced after assault on neighbour during ‘psychotic episode’
-
Education3 days agoPembrokeshire Learning Centre placed in special measures following Estyn inspection
-
Crime3 days agoMilford Haven man, 65, convicted of sexual assault on teenage girl
-
Crime1 day agoOn-duty paramedic racially abused at Withybush General Hospital








