News
Councillor reveals the shocking cost of Parry-Jones’ departure

Bryn Parry-Jones: Still creating a stir
A COUNTY COUNCILLOR has revealed that the shocking cost of getting rid of controversial chief executive Bryn Parry Jones.
Cllr Jacob Williams told The Herald: “On my website (www.jacobwilliams.com) I reveal that in excess of a staggering £150k of your money was spent by the council on fees in connection with Bryn Parry-Jones’ pension debacle and the eventual golden handshake, which itself cost £280k.”
In his detailed report, the East Williamston representative reveals that in addition to the bumper £280K plus pay-off, the Council spent over £150K on first defending the former Chief Executive and then getting rid of him.
Cllr Williams reveals that:
- Pembrokeshire County Council paid £5,800 +VAT for Tim Kerr QC’s help in drafting a letter to the Wales Audit Office (WAO), which was sent by the council’s now retired head of legal services, begging him to reconsider issuing a public interest report about the Council’s pension payments, ruled unlawful by the WAO;
- The Council also paid a further £10,289.22 for Mr Kerr’s attendance at the notorious Council debate of February 14 last year, which descended into chaos when reference was made to an envelope of newspaper cuttings provided to him by Monitoring Office Laurence Harding, who appeared to have been tipped the wink by then Deputy Leader Rob Lewis;
- Stuart Watson, a director at London-based pension consultants and financial planners Chartermarque, was there solely for the debate on Mr. Barrett’s report. His report and attendance set the Council back a heady £12,450.
- Solicitors Eversheds have billed the Council a staggering £106,354 for “employment advice” relating to the process which led to the end of Mr Parry-Jones’ employment;

Digging for the truth: Cllr Williams
Councillor Williams said: “You have to remember that all of the above is ON TOP of that the Council spent £25,000 on paying the additional fees of the WAO relating to the pensions debacle brought upon it by the members of the Senior Staff Committee.”
He concluded: “Had it not been for the WAO’s second intervention, the biggest sum – the £280k golden handshake – would have been £332k. So keen were councillors from the ruling party to soften Bryn’s fall from grace they stuffed his safety mat with unlawful sums. In time, the public can hold them to account in its own way.
“The costs lavished on Tim Kerr QC, Chartermarque and Eversheds are a different case. They weren’t sanctioned by councillors but by officers.
“Your money is often being spent – and as can be seen, wasted – in the interests of a select few who have a lot at stake, and often by those who are not even accountable to you directly.”
Crime
Man accused of Milford Haven burglary and GBH remanded to Crown Court
A MILFORD HAVEN man has appeared in court charged with burglary and inflicting grievous bodily harm, following an incident at a flat in the town earlier this week.
Charged after alleged attack inside Victoria Road flat
Stephen Collier, aged thirty-eight, of Vaynor Road, Milford Haven, appeared before Llanelli Magistrates’ Court today (Friday, Dec 5). Collier is accused of entering a property known as Nos Da Flat, 2 Victoria Road, on December 3 and, while inside, inflicting grievous bodily harm on a man named John Hilton.
The court was told the alleged burglary and assault was carried out jointly with another man, Denis Chmelevski.
The charge is brought under section 9(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968, which covers burglary where violence is inflicted on a person inside the property.
No plea entered
Collier, represented by defence solicitor Chris White, did not enter a plea during the hearing. Prosecutor Simone Walsh applied for the defendant to be remanded in custody, citing the serious nature of the offence, the risk of further offending, and concerns that he could interfere with witnesses.
Magistrates Mr I Howells, Mr V Brickley and Mrs H Meade agreed, refusing bail and ordering that Collier be kept in custody before trial.
Case sent to Swansea Crown Court
The case was sent to Swansea Crown Court under Section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Collier will next appear on January 5, 2026 at 9:00am for a Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing.
A custody time limit has been set for June 5, 2026.
Chmelevski is expected to face proceedings separately.
News
Woman dies after collision in Tumble as police renew appeal for witnesses
POLICE are appealing for information after a woman died following a collision in Tumble on Tuesday (Dec 2).
Officers were called to Heol y Neuadd at around 5:35pm after a collision involving a maroon Skoda and a pedestrian. The female pedestrian was taken to hospital but sadly died from her injuries.
Dyfed-Powys Police has launched a renewed appeal for witnesses, including anyone who may have dash-cam, CCTV footage, or any information that could help the investigation.
Investigators are urging anyone who was in the area at the time or who may have captured the vehicle or the pedestrian on camera shortly before the collision to get in touch. (Phone: 101 Quote reference: DP-20251202-259.)
News
Greyhound Bill faces fresh scrutiny as second committee raises “serious concerns”
THE PROHIBITION of Greyhound Racing (Wales) Bill has been heavily criticised for a second time in 24 hours after the Senedd’s Legislation, Justice and Constitution (LJC) Committee published a highly critical Stage 1 report yesterday.
The cross-party committee said the Welsh Government’s handling of the legislation had “in several respects, fallen short of the standard of good legislative practice that we would normally expect”.
Key concerns highlighted by the LJC Committee include:
- Introducing the Bill before all relevant impact assessments (including a full Regulatory Impact Assessment and Children’s Rights Impact Assessment) had been completed – a step it described as “poor legislative practice, particularly … where the Bill may impact on human rights”.
- Failure to publish a statement confirming the Bill’s compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The committee has recommended that Rural Affairs Minister Huw Irranca-Davies issue such a statement before the Stage 1 vote on 16 December.
- Inadequate public consultation, with the 2023 animal-licensing consultation deemed “not an appropriate substitute” for targeted engagement on the specific proposal to ban the sport.
The report follows Tuesday’s equally critical findings from the Culture, Communications, Welsh Language, Sport and International Relations Committee, which questioned the robustness of the evidence base and the accelerated legislative timetable.
Industry reaction Mark Bird, chief executive of the Greyhound Board of Great Britain (GBGB), described the two reports as leaving the Bill “in tatters”.
“Two consecutive cross-party Senedd committees have now condemned the Welsh Government’s failures in due diligence, consultation and human rights considerations and evidence gathering,” he said. “The case for a ban has been comprehensively undermined. The responsible path forward is stronger regulation of the single remaining track at Ystrad Mynach, not prohibition.”
Response from supporters of the Bill Luke Fletcher MS (Labour, South Wales West), who introduced the Member-proposed Bill, said he welcomed thorough scrutiny and remained confident the legislation could be improved at later stages.
“I have always said this Bill is about ending an outdated practice that causes unnecessary suffering to thousands of greyhounds every year,” Mr Fletcher said. “The committees have raised legitimate procedural points, and I look forward to working with the Welsh Government and colleagues across the Senedd to address those concerns while keeping the core aim of the Bill intact.”
A Welsh Government spokesperson said: “The Minister has noted the committees’ reports and will respond formally in due course. The government supports the principle of the Bill and believes a ban on greyhound racing is justified on animal welfare grounds. Work is ongoing to finalise the outstanding impact assessments and to ensure full compatibility with the ECHR.”
The Bill is scheduled for a Stage 1 debate and vote in plenary on Tuesday 16 December. Even if it passes that hurdle, it would still require significant amendment at Stages 2 and 3 to satisfy the committees’ recommendations.
-
Crime3 days agoDefendant denies using Sudocrem-covered finger to assault two-month-old baby
-
Crime2 days agoPembroke rape investigation dropped – one suspect now facing deportation
-
News3 days agoBaby C trial: Mother breaks down in tears in the witness box
-
Crime16 hours agoProsecution delivers powerful closing speech in Christopher Phillips trial
-
Crime3 days agoLifeboat crew member forced to stand down after being assaulted at Milford pub
-
Crime4 days agoDefendant denies causing injuries to two-month-old baby
-
Crime2 days agoMother admits “terrible idea” to let new partner change her baby’s nappies alone
-
Crime4 days agoPembrokeshire haven master admits endangering life after speedboat collision






ieuan
January 29, 2015 at 8:22 am
What a disgrace!! would the last rat from the sinking ship that is the ruling council please turn off the light when they are all gone, oh sorry you don\’t have the brains to do it without guidance from the Yogurt Maker Jamie Adams!THAT WAS OUR MONEY THEY WASTED! WHAT CREDIBILITY DO THE IPPG HAVE NOW?
Tom Pritchard
January 29, 2015 at 7:55 pm
why is there no one taken to task over this , at least mismanagement , probably misappropriated funds ? It is all quite incredible , no heads are rolling ! These people would not find employment in the private sector , at any level .
If it wasn’t for the hard working people who’s taxes are being misappropriated it would be laughable .
Wendy
February 13, 2015 at 12:08 pm
I think Bryn Parry Jones should have been jailed as the rumours over the last twenty years have said that he has taken many backhanders,been dishonest in many other ways,staff were not allowed to speak to him,had his own lift he is not a member of the royal family why did he have all these proviligies,the council are short f money yet he had a nearly three thousand pond a month car.What about the many other people which is common knowledge among the public who have helped and enjoyed some of his spoils,they are still getting away with it at the tax payers money.What about the councillors who get in time after time and the public are not allowed in when the votes are counted,one in particular have the consituancy say they do not vote for him yet he gets in each time and does very little for the community does not reply to e,mails,letters or phone calls it is a joke.