News
Councillor ‘right’ to question chairmanship

Are you a lawyer? Audit Chair Peter Jones asked Cllr Williams
THE WALES AUDIT OFFICE has determined that Cllr Jacob Williams was right to question whether Cllr Mike James could chair the December meeting of the Audit Committee.
Lay member and Chair, Peter Jones did not attend December’s meeting of the key Council committee and Vice Chair Mike James stood in for him. Legal advice from the Acting Head of Legal Services, Claire Incledon, was that Cllr James could chair the meeting in Mr Jones’ absence, despite being a member of the ruling group. The relevant rules state no member of the ruling group can chair the Audit Committee.
Cllr Williams questioned Ms Incledon’s advice at the time and at Thursday’s (Feb 5) meeting of the Audit Committee the Wales Audit Office said that his assertion that Cllr James’ membership of the IPPG debarred him from chairing the committee was correct.
In the interim period since December, the Council sought advice from Bristol barrister Simon Morgan, of St John’s Chambers. Acting Head of Legal Services, Claire Incledon, declined to go through the report prepared for the committee members and asked for questions straight away.
Cllr Jacob Williams asked that the legal advisor take them through the report. but that was not supported.
Richard Harris from the Wales Audit Office said: “We’ve seen the legal advice that has been given to the council, we haven’t taken legal advice. We have spoken to the Welsh Government; In terms of the letter of the law we think that the process does need to be refined.
“The Welsh Government have spoken to us and they’re looking at the guidance they provided and from what they are saying it is not clear. Their view was that the person who chaired the meeting shouldn’t be part of the ruling group.
“The Welsh Government are going to look at it again, there are three other counties across Wales who are in the same position and they will try and clarify the guidance they put forward”.
Chairman Peter Jones said: “It’s not as good as it should be, it needs improvement and that is in hand”.
Claire Incledon said: “I welcome the challenge from Cllr Williams. It has brought this to our attention, I have given my interpretation on the law and that’s also been supported by this advice from the council and as the WAO has explained has enabled us to see that there are matters lacking in regards to the implementation and the wording used with regards to the 2011 measure. It needs addressing and leaves us in a position with regards to the recommendations in the report whether we want to seek steps as suggested or waiting for the outcome of the update”.
Cllr Jacob Williams said: “I am disappointed with what’s happened here. The Local Government Measure is clearly designed to prevent a member of a ruling group from chairing a committee.
“We would all agree that this is the committee but under this lawyer’s external opinion that is not the case, he says this is not a committee, it’s a meeting of the committee. You or I wouldn’t make that distinction. It’s a wacko distinction, in my view, because when Cllr James sat in the chair at the start of the December meeting, I was aware of the measure which intended committees not to be chaired by members of the ruling group. I raised an objection and Ms Incledon’s view was that the rule requiring the meeting to be chaired by a non-ruling group member only applied to you chair, Mr Jones, as the appointed chair and that it didn’t apply to anybody else.
“I find it interesting that Mrs Incledon would come today and say that her view was supported, because that isn’t what the external barrister says. The external barrister says that rule didn’t apply to Councillor James because he was not chairing the committee, he was only chairing a meeting of it. That, to me, is bizarre: I don’t accept that this is a loophole because the measure also says that if, for instance, myself or Cllr Woodham had not been there, a member of the ruling group could chair the meeting if there were no other alternatives, but a member of the executive group could not under any circumstance. The reason for this is that the Welsh Government, when they made this legislation, wanted to drive a wedge between the executive and this important committee.
“I also find it a bit of a concern that Mr Harding said that the rule doesn’t apply to Cllr James. I find it concerning that Mr Harding couldn’t understand the intention of the measure and I don’t think that’s good enough.
“The external barrister makes five points, only one of which is now relevant, and that’s whether there is a distinction between chairing the committee and chairing the meeting. He finds that there is a distinction to be made. I don’t think there is a distinction to be made. ‘It is my view that the chairing of the meeting is very different from the chairing of a committee’, that’s what he says, I cannot believe that. Basically the council has gone to this barrister and he’s provided a report to back up the internal lawyers who said that I was wrong to raise this. I am pleased that the Wales Audit Office recognises I was exactly right.
“This is an easy way out in my view and the external barrister provided a wacko report”.
Chairman Peter Jones then questioned whether Cllr Williams was a qualified lawyer.
Cllr Williams said he wasn’t but went on to say: “On this occasion I have been vindicated and I was entirely right”.
Cllr John Allen-Mirehouse leapt to the officers’ defence, claiming: “The guidelines are ambiguous and the interpretation we received from our legal adviser at the time was in fact legally accurate. It was on this advice that the committee voted.”
Using his own extensive legal experience, Cllr Mirehouse continued: “If the guidelines change in the future that will not affect the legality of that decision we took that day. The committee was properly constituted, under the law with legal advice.
Graciously acknowledging Cllr Williams’ contribution to highlighting the issue, the Hundleton representative concluded: “He raises a good point that the measure is ambiguous. The Welsh Government have said they are going to re-draft it. I can see what he is saying that the legislation is ambiguous but that was not the law”.
Chairman Peter Jones added: “We are where we are; the committee took advice and acted on that in good faith.”
Ignoring the findings of the Wales Audit Office, he concluded: “The advice was supported and my advice to this committee is that we should await the outcome of the ongoing deliberations and then we will revisit the issue”.
It was not clear whether Mr Jones’ advice was intended as legal advice to the Committee members.
Mr Jones’ proposal was supported by his former client Cllr John Allen-Mirehouse and by Council Chair Tom Richards; Cllrs Guy Woodham and Jacob Williams voted against it.
Business
Tata Steel says Port Talbot mill restart planned after major fire
TATA STEEL has confirmed that work is underway to assess the damage caused by Wednesday night’s fire at its Port Talbot steelworks.
The company said the incident happened at the Pickle Line on Wednesday evening, prompting the temporary shutdown of the Hot Strip Mill.
In an operational update issued at 2:30pm on Friday (Jun 5), Tata Steel said teams were now working towards a planned restart of the Hot Strip Mill in the middle of next week.
The fire led to a major emergency response at the Port Talbot site, with emergency services called to the steelworks at around 8:00pm on Wednesday.
Earlier statements from the company confirmed that all personnel were accounted for and evacuated safely.
Tata Steel has also said the fire was not connected to the planned demolition of a redundant gas holder carried out at the site earlier the same evening.
The company said supply chain teams were now putting mitigation plans in place, including alternative processing at the Llanwern Cold Mill and Pickle Line.
Those measures are aimed at maintaining continuity of supply and supporting customers while the affected area is assessed.

In its latest update, Tata Steel said: “Following the incident at the Pickle Line on Wednesday evening, work is now underway to carry out a full assessment of the area affected.
“During the incident, the Hot Strip Mill was temporarily taken offline. Teams are working towards a planned restart in the middle of next week.
“Our Supply Chain teams are actively implementing mitigation plans, including alternative processing at the Llanwern Cold Mill and Pickle Line.
“These actions are focused on maintaining continuity of supply and supporting our customers during this period.
“Our priority remains the safety of our people and the safe, stable operation of our assets. We will continue to provide updates as further information becomes available.
“We would like to thank our employees and the emergency services for their swift and professional response.”
Sharon Graham, from the union Unite, said the blaze has caused “substantial damage to a vital production line”.
“Measures must now be put in place to protect jobs both at Tata and down the supply chain during any period of disruption,” she explained.
“Meanwhile we are asking Tata and the government to ensure that operations are rebuilt as swiftly as possible.”
She thanked the emergency services for bringing the fire under control so quickly and confirmed that no-one was injured.
The cause of the fire has not yet been confirmed.
News
Council tax shake-up in doubt as Welsh Government reviews reform plans
Questions over 2028 revaluation as ministers reconsider next steps
THE FUTURE of council tax reform in Wales has been thrown into uncertainty after the Welsh Government confirmed it is reviewing whether to proceed with a planned revaluation of homes due in 2028.
The move has sparked criticism from opposition parties, who say ministers are sending mixed messages to households already struggling with rising bills.
Council tax is one of the largest expenses for many families in Wales and helps fund local services including rubbish collections, social care, libraries and road maintenance. Yet critics have long argued the current system is unfair because charges are based on historic property values rather than people’s ability to pay.
Welsh homes have not been revalued for more than two decades, despite major changes in house prices since the early 2000s.
Speaking to BBC Wales, Local Government Minister Siân Gwenllian confirmed ministers were “actively looking” at whether to proceed with the planned reforms, but stopped short of guaranteeing that a revaluation would take place.
She said the issue sat within the remit of Finance Minister Elin Jones and discussions were ongoing about what the government’s “next steps” would be.
Plaid Cymru entered government after promising to make council tax fairer, describing the existing system in its Senedd election manifesto as “long overdue for reform”. Reform was also part of Plaid’s previous co-operation agreement with Welsh Labour.
However, ministers have now signalled that the timetable could change.
A Welsh Government spokesperson did not directly confirm whether the planned 2028 revaluation would still go ahead, instead saying ministers remained committed to creating a “fairer” system and would set out their approach in due course.
The spokesperson said: “Getting reform right matters more than getting it done quickly.”
Potential winners and losers
Any overhaul of council tax has the potential to create political controversy.
One local government source described reform as a “classic zero-sum game” in which households that benefit tend to remain quiet, while those facing higher bills react strongly.
Under earlier proposals, council tax bands would have been updated to reflect modern property values, with the possibility of lower-band homes paying less and higher-value properties paying more.
Figures produced during Wales’ last revaluation in 2003 suggested around one in three homes moved up at least one band, while most stayed the same and a small number moved down.
Opposition parties attack ‘uncertainty’
Labour MS and former Cardiff council leader Huw Thomas accused the new Plaid-led government of lacking clarity, saying it was “extraordinary” that ministers could not confirm whether they would continue with a policy Plaid had previously championed.
He said many households were still struggling with the cost of living crisis and needed certainty about future bills.
Reform Wales also criticised what it called a lack of clear decision-making, saying uncertainty would do little to reassure families facing increasing household costs.
Meanwhile, Welsh Conservative finance spokesperson Peter Fox urged ministers to abandon revaluation plans altogether, warning that many homeowners could face higher council tax bills.
He said: “The last thing that people need right now is to be spending even more on their council tax bills than before.”
Second homes and holiday lets under review
The Welsh Government also confirmed it is reviewing rules affecting self-catering accommodation and second homes.
Under current rules, self-catering holiday properties must be available to let for at least 252 days and actually let for an average of 182 days over several years in order to qualify for business rates instead of often higher council tax charges.
The measures were introduced as part of efforts to tackle the impact of second homes and holiday lets on local housing markets in parts of Wales, including communities in Pembrokeshire, Gwynedd and Ceredigion.
Gwenllian said ministers would now look “forensically” at whether those policies were working and whether further action may be needed.
The uncertainty over council tax reform comes at a time when many Welsh councils are continuing to raise bills, with some local authorities approving increases of close to ten per cent in recent years as they struggle to balance budgets.
For households already feeling the pressure of rising living costs, ministers now face difficult decisions over whether changing the system risks creating more winners – or more losers.
Crime
Paddleboard company owner loses bid to cut sentence over Haverfordwest tragedy
A FORMER paddleboard company owner jailed over the deaths of four people on the Western Cleddau has failed in a Court of Appeal bid to challenge her sentence.
Nerys Bethan Lloyd, 39, of Port Talbot, was jailed for ten years and six months in April 2025 after admitting four counts of gross negligence manslaughter.
Paul O’Dwyer, Andrea Powell, Morgan Rogers and Nicola Wheatley died following a paddleboarding trip on the River Cleddau in Haverfordwest on October 30, 2021.
The group had entered the water in dangerous flood conditions before being swept over the weir near County Hall.
Sentence not excessive
Three judges at the Court of Appeal rejected arguments that Lloyd’s sentence was “manifestly excessive”.
Lady Justice May said the original sentencing judge had clearly taken Lloyd’s mitigation into account and ruled there was no arguable basis for reducing the term.
Lloyd, a former South Wales Police officer, had been running the paddleboarding trip through her company, Salty Dog Co Ltd.
At sentencing, the court heard neither Lloyd nor fellow instructor Paul O’Dwyer was qualified to lead the tour in such conditions.
‘Abysmal’ safety failures
Mrs Justice Stacey, who sentenced Lloyd, described the approach to health and safety as “abysmal”.
The court heard there had been heavy rain in the days before the trip, leaving the river in flood with a visibly strong current.
Participants were taken towards the weir, where they were swept into turbulent water described as a hydraulic jump. Several were wearing ankle leashes, which were unsuitable for fast-flowing water and made escape more difficult.
The court was told there had been no proper safety briefing, no suitable risk assessment, and no next-of-kin details taken.
Lloyd’s police and RNLI background was also raised in court, with the judge saying she “knew better”.

Victims remembered
Paul O’Dwyer, from Port Talbot, Morgan Rogers, from Merthyr Tydfil, and Nicola Wheatley, from Pontarddulais, died at the scene.
Andrea Powell, from Bridgend, died in hospital on November 5, 2021.
During the sentencing hearing, families of the victims described the devastating impact of the tragedy.
Mr O’Dwyer had initially managed to get out of the water but went back in to try to help others.
Dyfed-Powys Police previously described the incident as “completely avoidable”, while the Health and Safety Executive said Lloyd had failed to plan for obvious risks or take basic safety precautions.
-
Crime2 days agoMilford Haven man bit neighbour’s neck near cashpoint
-
Crime4 days agoMilford Haven man jailed for illegal Premier League streaming service
-
Crime4 days agoHaverfordwest man admits cocaine offence as Crown disputes basis of plea
-
Crime2 days agoPembroke Dock driver avoided jail after drug-drive crash
-
Local Government4 days agoNational Express use of new Haverfordwest interchange still subject to risk checks
-
Crime2 days agoDinas Cross man jailed over shop thefts
-
Community6 days agoCharles Street to come alive for Milford Haven Founders Day
-
Local Government7 days agoMilford Haven school redevelopment moves a major step closer









Flashbang
February 24, 2015 at 10:33 pm
The audacity and arrogance of the IPPG in trampling all over any principles of honesty and democracy is mind boggling. The fact that they have promoted a totally incompetent officer to head of Legal Services speaks volumes about their integrity. This is the same legal officer who keeps spending vast amounts of taxpayers money on external legal advice which doesn’t hold water because the wrong questions are asked. Well done Jacob for putting the microscope on this councils dishonest dealings.
Ian
February 25, 2015 at 4:08 pm
Have to say Jacob only ever allows praise for Jacob or someone agreeing 100% with him on his web site, If he’s that picky about comments appearing he should do what oldgrumpy does and just not bother
Flashbang
February 26, 2015 at 7:01 am
Ian, at least Jacob isn’t screwing the county out of hundreds of thousands of with dodgy dealings and and paying off scoundrels. You may well be one of his targets on the council. If so what are you doing for the benefit of the people of the county?
Ian
February 26, 2015 at 7:16 pm
I pay my taxes, my “rates” on a Pembroke house, I have no kids in education in Pembs. indeed I only spend 3/4 months approx here, I claim nothing and I’m allowed an opinion surely?
Jacob gets paid for being a councillor, claims his expenses I’m sure gets a LOT of publicity for himself and as such is a public figure