THE SENIOR Coroner for Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire has said he will write to the South Wales Trunk Road Agency and Carmarthenshire Council to request further road markings on the A48, following the inquest into the tragic death of Swansea solicitor Emily Thornton-Sandy.

His action follows the devastating collision in which Emily died after another driver travelled the wrong way down the dual carriageway. The coroner recorded a conclusion of Road Traffic Collision.

Emily, from Pontarddulais, had been travelling home from a veterinary appointment at around midday on 5 November 2024 when the collision occurred between Pont Abraham and Cross Hands.

Her dog, Scout, sadly died shortly afterwards. Emily was taken to the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff but died six days later from catastrophic injuries. The collision involved two other vehicles.

At the inquest on 3 December 2025 at Llanelli Town Hall, Senior Coroner Paul Bennett said a 90-year-old driver had pulled out of a junction on the eastbound side of the A48 near Cross Hands, leaving Emily no time to react. Two other vehicles were also struck in the tragic sequence of events.

Evidence from Dyfed-Powys Police confirmed that the road was in good condition, the weather was dry and overcast, visibility was clear, and the junction already had a sign instructing drivers to turn left. No emergency braking marks were found, and both drivers were wearing seatbelts.

The inquest also heard that the driver who caused the collision had been seen by a medic at his home two days earlier after experiencing a sudden loss of consciousness. He was assessed following the episode but, the court heard, there had been no medical instruction or clear indication at that time that he should not continue driving.

In light of the evidence, the coroner confirmed he will raise concerns with the South Wales Trunk Road Agency and Carmarthenshire Council about the junction from which the other driver exited moments before the fatal crash.

Emily’s family have welcomed the decision, hoping it will draw attention to long-standing safety concerns on a stretch of road where Dyfed-Powys Police recorded 169 crashes in just 12 months. However, they remain gravely concerned that further markings alone will not prevent future incidents, given that clear signage is already in place.*

Emily’s family have described her as intelligent, kind and compassionate, devoted to her work supporting people affected by asbestos exposure, and passionate about literature and houseplants. Three people benefited from organ donation following her heartbreaking death.

During the inquest, where the family were represented by Thompsons Solicitors, statements from Emily’s husband and parents were read out.

Her husband, Stuart, said he would do all he could to prevent other families suffering similar loss. He said: “Nobody should have to see their wife as I saw Emily in hospital. Emily lost her life and I lost my future. I never envisaged living my life without her. I felt like I lost purpose when I lost Emily and Scout.”

Emily’s parents described her death as an avoidable tragedy and urged people to speak up if they have concerns about the driving ability of an elderly relative, in the hope that it may prevent another family enduring such unbearable grief.

Helen Shakespeare, Partner at Thompsons Solicitors and the family’s legal representative, said: “Emily’s death was devastating to all who knew and loved her. The inquest has shown that what happened was entirely avoidable.

“The family therefore welcome the coroner’s decision to raise concerns with the highways authorities, but they remain deeply worried that more meaningful action is needed to address the wider safety issues on a road where so many serious incidents have occurred.”

Brother says 51-year-old Robert is “wasting away in agony” while their 80-year-old mother struggles to cope

SAMUEL KURTZ MS has intervened in the case of a Pembroke family who say they have been left “abandoned” by the Welsh NHS, after a severely disabled man waited two years for essential dental treatment.

Mr Kurtz confirmed that his office has been in contact with the family since the end of last week, and that he will raise their concerns with the Welsh Government and Hywel Dda University Health Board at the earliest possible opportunity.

The case centres on 51-year-old Robert, who is disabled, non-verbal and relies entirely on his mother for his day-to-day care. According to the family, Robert has suffered severe dental pain for two years, during which time he has been unable to eat properly and has experienced rapid weight loss.

His brother, Alfie Probert, highlighted the situation in an emotional Facebook post that has been widely shared in Pembrokeshire. Alfie said Robert had once been a healthy sixteen stone but is now “wasting away” while the family waits for specialist treatment.

He also described the strain on their mother, who is eighty, unwell herself and caring for Robert around the clock. “We feel completely abandoned,” he wrote. “This isn’t just a backlog. This is cruelty. This is negligence. This is destroying people’s lives.”

The post has prompted a strong local reaction, with many residents tagging Samuel Kurtz and calling for urgent action.

Mr Kurtz said he shared the public’s concerns and would be seeking answers from ministers and Hywel Dda UHB as to how such a long delay could be allowed to develop for a vulnerable adult.

Hywel Dda University Health Board has been approached for comment.

THE PEMBROKESHIRE HERALD has today confirmed that its Editor, Tom Sinclair, has served a £50,000 defamation claim on Neyland Town Council following a series of false and damaging statements issued by the Council and its Clerk.

The legal action centres on an official post published by Neyland Town Council on its Facebook page in October, in which the Herald’s reporting was described as “targeted”, “bullying”, and “relentless”. These accusations were presented as fact, published without evidence, and issued without giving the newspaper any right of reply.

In the weeks that followed, serious defamatory abuse was allowed to remain visible beneath the Council’s post, including a comment labelling the editor a “nonce”. That comment remained public for around eight weeks before being removed. The Town Clerk later escalated matters further by posting an abusive public message directed at Mr Sinclair personally, using obscene language.

Mr Sinclair said: “Our reporting has been fair, accurate and entirely justified. When a public authority uses its official platform to publish untrue personal attacks about a journalist, it crosses a line. This is not about disagreement with a story – it is about a council making baseless allegations that undermine press freedom and damage trust in local democracy.”

He added: “No journalist should be publicly slurred by a public body for doing their job. Allowing defamatory abuse to remain online for weeks, and then adding further hostile comments, has caused serious harm to my reputation and encouraged harassment.”

The claim seeks damages, the removal of the offending material, a public apology, and written undertakings to prevent a repeat of the allegations.

Mr Sinclair said the purpose of the action is to “draw a clear line under this behaviour” and ensure that no other journalist is subjected to similar treatment by those in public office.

“The Herald will always hold public bodies to account,” he said. “But accountability runs both ways.”