Farming
Global plant pest standards agreed

THE BODY charged with keeping global trade in plants and plant products safe has adopted several new phytosanitary standards aimed at preventing destructive agricultural and environmental pests from jumping borders and spreading internationally.
The standardized norms developed by the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) cover a range of strategies and techniques used to prevent the introduction and spread of plant diseases and pests to new environments, thereby avoiding their often-devastating impacts on biodiversity, food security and trade.
“This is challenging work with high stakes: each year an estimated 10-16 percent of our global harvest is lost to plant pests. A loss estimated at $220 billion,” FAO Deputy Director-General Maria Helena Semedo said at the opening of this year’s IPPC annual meeting in Rome.
Some $1.1 trillion worth of agricultural products are traded internationally each year, with food accounting for over 80 percent of that total, according to FAO data.
New measures adopted this week by the IPPC’s governing body, the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures(CPM), include:
Standard on the use of various temperature treatments against agricultural pests. The standard aims at ensuring that such treatments are consistently and effectively used in different operational contexts.
The norm covers cold treatment techniques that freeze and kill pests as well as those that raise temperatures past their survival threshold. This can be achieved by submerging them in extremely hot water or exposing them to super-heated steam (for commodities vulnerable to drying out, such as fruits, vegetables or flower bulbs) or dry heat (ideal for low moisture-content items such as seeds or grain).
Revised standard for sanitation of wood packing materials. An existing standard, known as ISPM-15, was updated to include the use of sulphuryl fluoride — a gas insecticide — and new-generation heating technologies that employ microwave and radio frequency waves to generate pest-killing temperatures deep inside wood products.
An expanded standard on the use of heat vapour to kill Oriental Fruit Flies. The highly destructive, fruit-attacking Bactrocera dorsalis originated in Asia but has now spread to at least 65 countries. Its presence in Africa, where it first appeared in 2003, costs the continent an estimated $2 billion in annual losses due to fruit export bans. The control technique outlined under the new measure kills 99.98% of the bug’s eggs and larvae when used correctly.
The IPPC Commission also approved revisions that streamline existing standards targeting fruit flies to make it easier for countries to comply with them and improve their effectiveness, as well as revisions to a standard that establishes best-practice benchmarks for the operation of national pest surveillance programs.
And it endorsed new diagnostic protocols for sudden oak death, a fungi-like organism of unknown origin that attacks a wide range of trees and shrubs in nurseries, introduced into western North America and western Europe through the ornamental plants trade. And it approved new diagnostic protocol for tospoviruses, which affect 1,000 plant species and are causing devastating losses, especially to tomato, potato and squash and cucumber yields.
BENEFITS AND RISKS OF GLOBAL TRADE
The dangerous hitchhikers carried by global trade — plant pests and diseases — once introduced into new environments can quickly take root and spread, impacting food production and causing billions in economic damages and control cost. One recent study in East Africa, for instance, found that just five invasive alien species could be causing as much as $1.1 billion in economic losses annually to smallholder farmers in the region.
Not only can fruits, crops and seeds become infected, but the containers and boxes they travel in, as well. Packaging for overseas shipments is commonly constructed from wood, which is relatively inexpensive, and easily manufactured — but also easily infested with a variety of bark and wood pests, and so act as a vector. Timber and wood-made products like furniture can harbour stowaways, also.
This means that not only are food crops at risk, but forests and trees as well. Recent studies shared during this week’s meeting have shown that the loss of tree cover due to invasive pests may result in an increase in stress related-diseases and possibly elevated human mortality rates.
In another example, the Republic of Korea was recently forced to cut down some 3.5 million trees as a result of the pinewood nematode, and over the past three decades has spent nearly a half a billion dollars on control programs to fight this deadly pest. Additional sums have been spent in Canada and the United States in attempts to stop the thus far unstoppable Emerald Ash Borer.
The need to contain threats such as these are why the IPPC was established in 1952. Since then, it has promulgated some 100 standards covering a broad range of phytosanitary issues. It also runs a number of programs that work to share information on best-practices and build the capacity of developing countries to manage plant diseases and pests, both at home and in trade flows.
Farming
Plaid Cymru demands pause to ‘destructive’ farm tax

PLAID CYMRU urged the UK Government to pause and review planned changes to inheritance tax for farmers, warning the impact could be destructive in rural Wales.
Llŷr Gruffydd said the problem with the policy is it does not distinguish between millionaires buying land to avoid tax and family farms scraping a living from the land.
Raising concerns about far-reaching consequences, he told the Senedd: “Wales isn’t a nation of lavish-living millionaire farmers. Our family farms operate on tight margins and they’re cash poor; many live a hand-to-mouth existence and too many are in debt.”
Mr Gruffydd warned the changes, which will see 100% agricultural property relief to inheritance tax restricted to the first £1m from April, will force family farms to sell land.
The shadow rural affairs secretary said: “The policy is utterly counter-productive at a time, of course, when we need to be strengthening our food security – not undermining it.”
Recognising a need to crack down with multi-millionaires who buy up land for tax avoidance purposes, Mr Gruffydd warned working family farms are being caught in the cross-fire.
“This isn’t just bad news for farms,” he said. “It’s bad news for the wider food sector, for the wider rural economy and for jobs in the supply chain. It will reduce local economic activity … and, of course, it’ll further weaken the social fabric of our rural areas.”

Leading a debate on March 5, he pointed to proposals for an alternative “clawback” system which would levy inheritance tax if assets are sold by the beneficiary within seven years.
He explained clawback is used by other European countries to discourage buying farmland to minimise tax bills, adding that such a policy could raise 7% more for the UK Treasury.
“It feels very often like a sector under siege these days,” Mr Gruffydd said. “But this proposal on inheritance tax goes deeper … the one thing you cling onto is your ability to pass your farm on to the next generation, to give your children a livelihood.”
Peter Fox, the Conservatives’ shadow rural affairs secretary who is a retired farmer, backed calls to pause the “draconian” decision to remove agricultural property relief.

He said: “Let’s also be clear: average farm incomes are low, certainly nowhere near even half of what any of us get paid in this place.
“There’s no way the average farm can generate enough money to pay inheritance tax, even if spread over 10 years. The fact is farms would have to be broken up.”
His colleague Samuel Kurtz criticised the Welsh Government’s “delete-all” amendment to the motion which “rides roughshod over this Senedd in trying to gain a unified voice”.
Mr Kurtz, the son of a farmer, pointed out that Steve Reed, the UK rural affairs secretary, told farmers Labour had no plans to change inheritance tax rules before the election.
Welsh Lib Dem leader Jane Dodds said farmers and their families are frozen in fear as she accused the Labour UK Government of repeatedly picking on the little people.

“Families are genuinely worried about their futures,” she said. “Young people are concerned about whether they can carry on. This policy discriminates against the widowed, the widower, the terminally ill and older farmers.”
Pointing out that 43% of the sector speaks Welsh, Plaid Cymru’s Siân Gwenllian warned the change could have a disproportionate impact on the language.
Party leader Rhun ap Iorwerth, whose son is an agriculture student, warned the change will be a heavy blow to an industry already under so much pressure.
He said: “Welsh family farms need a Welsh Government that stands up for them and genuinely makes the case that this inheritance tax change should be delayed until its impact is honestly and carefully assessed.”
Huw Irranca-Davies, the deputy first minister, said the UK Government inherited a catastrophic financial situation, with a £20bn “blackhole”.
Mr Irranca-Davies, who is responsible for rural affairs in Wales, acknowledged significant concerns about the proposed changes to agricultural property relief which is not devolved.

He said: “Many farmers have met with me and shared their worries about passing on their farms to their children, reflecting a widespread anxiety amongst our rural areas.
“I have made and will continue to make strong representations to the UK Government about the need to understand and respond to the specific concerns of our Welsh farmers.”
Plaid Cymru’s motion was narrowly voted down, 26-25, before the Welsh Government’s amended version was agreed, 26-14 with 11 abstentions.
Farming
Farmers and Plaid take inheritance tax fight to the Senedd

FARMING families affected by proposed inheritance tax changes will gather at the Senedd tomorrow (Wednesday, March 5) to urge Members of the Senedd (MSs) to support a Plaid Cymru motion calling for the policy to be reconsidered.
The debate and subsequent vote are seen as a final effort to persuade the Welsh Government to send a clear message to their Labour colleagues in Westminster. The timing is crucial, coming just weeks before the UK Spring Budget, which presents an opportunity for Chancellor Rachel Reeves to announce a policy shift.
NFU Cymru will coordinate meetings between farming families and their elected representatives on the day of the debate, encouraging cross-party support for the motion.
‘Devastating consequences for Welsh farmers’
Plaid Cymru’s Shadow Minister for Rural Affairs, Llyr Gruffydd MS, who will lead the Senedd debate, said: “This UK Government decision will have devastating consequences for farming families across Wales.
“Wales is not a nation of millionaire farmers. Our family farms operate on tight margins and are often cash-poor, with many already burdened by debt. These changes will force families to sell land, threatening their livelihoods and making farms less viable for future generations.
“The policy is unforgivable and utterly counterproductive at a time when we should be strengthening our food security, not undermining it.
“That’s why Plaid Cymru is calling on the Welsh Government to make the strongest possible case to their Labour colleagues in London to reverse course.”
‘A threat to rural communities’
NFU Cymru President Aled Jones echoed these concerns, warning of the broader impact on the agricultural sector:
“If the UK Government’s planned inheritance tax changes go ahead, they will have an incredibly detrimental impact on Wales’s family farms and the many businesses that rely on them.
“By imposing unsustainable tax liabilities on the backbone of our food system, the UK Government risks dismantling a vital sector and hollowing out our rural communities.
“I therefore very much welcome Plaid Cymru’s efforts in securing this debate. It is vital that the impacts of these proposals on Wales are heard and properly considered in the Senedd.”
The debate is expected to be closely watched by the farming community, with campaigners hoping to influence policymakers before the Spring Budget announcement.
Farming
Henry Tufnell MP calls for review of IHT at visit to local farm

FOLLOWING months of engagement with representatives from the farming sector, Henry Tufnell MP has called for the Chancellor’s proposed changes to IHT to be reviewed, and for the relationship between government and the farming community to be restored.
Appearing at local Hayscastle farm on Friday morning, Tufnell said: “We need the opportunity to look again at the threshold that has been proposed, and the possibility of introducing a transition period. I believe that a transition period will protect those elderly farmers who believed in good faith that they could continue to farm for as long as they wanted to.”
He continued, “I was disappointed to hear that the recent meeting between representatives from the farming sector and government didn’t go well. The relationship between our farmers and our government is crucial – and today, it is broken. We cannot achieve the growth our country so desperately needs without the trust, the support, or the confidence of our farmers. We cannot deliver our ambitious net-zero targets without that solid working relationship. We need to listen to our rural communities; I know that the reforms to IHT are the biggest anxiety for farmers right now; and so, we should listen to them.
After over a decade of Tory decline, and neglect from successive conservative government’s I know that Labour can deliver for the people of Pembrokeshire and for the people of Great Britain, and we must do that with a strong working relationship with our farmers.”
Aled Davies, from NFU Cymru said, “Henry has done the right thing by listening to his farming constituents and their representatives. He has always agreed to meet whenever we ask for a meeting – It is most unfortunate that every meeting we have had with him since the budget is to discuss the inheritance tax issue when we could have been discussing other opportunities for the industry to succeed rather than this policy which will almost certainly see the demise of many family farms. As NFU Cymru always does, we backed what we said by giving him facts and figures in our argument against this policy. I am hopeful that MPs like Henry will be able to get the government to relook at this policy that has already created huge uncertainty and reduced investment in agriculture. Pembrokeshire really does rely on Agriculture for growth in the economy, so it is imperative that the government consults over this policy before any decision is made.”
Lottie Wilson, from Wilson Family Farm where Henry made the announcement from said, “We warmly welcomed Henry to the farm last week and were both impressed and greatly relieved to hear his stance on the IHT agricultural relief. Knowing that he’s met with Pembrokeshire NFU several times, as well as with several farmers both in London, and here in Pembrokeshire; it’s encouraging to know that he has taken our concerns on board, and we are extremely grateful that he has been willing to stand up against this purposeful damaging change to IHT, and we can only hope that other MPs are able to see sense and are brave enough to do the same.”
-
Crime3 days ago
Father and daughter in court accused of causing suffering to dogs, pigs and sheep
-
Crime3 days ago
Drug-dealing teenager assaulted woman and offering her cash to drop charges
-
Crime3 days ago
Pembroke Dock man to appear in court over indecent child images
-
Crime3 days ago
Man charged and remanded following e-bike crash in Milford Haven
-
Crime2 days ago
Woman accused of £85,000 fraud while acting as power of attorney
-
Crime2 days ago
Milford Haven teenager accused of Valentine’s Day sex offences
-
Crime3 days ago
Milford Haven man fined for littering in Haverfordwest
-
Crime2 days ago
Notorious paedophile cult leader Colin Batley may be freed this week